User:RD/9k/Q51,29 - Revision history

Reversedragon: fruit flies like a banana - move to own entry

2026-05-09T19:31:17Z

fruit flies like a banana - move to own entry

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:31, 9 May 2026
Line 33:		Line 33:
	<ol class="hue clean field_exstruct">		<ol class="hue clean field_exstruct">

	{{li\|start=y\|I=S1/HAS\|tradition=\|Q=31,72\|Q2=~~3172\|h4 = fruit flies like a banana~~ }} / ~~part of speech changed by rest of sentence~~ / ~~expected sense of word changed by rest of sentence~~		{{li\|start=y\|I=S1/HAS/Fy\|tradition=\|Q=51,30\|Q2=5130}}root-word mirage / root word mirage (searchable) / name-element mirage / ({{9k\|RD/Q51,30}})

	{{li\|I=S1/HAS\|tradition=~~ES, Aa~~\|Q=31,72\|Q2=3172~~}}expected sense of word changed by rest of sentence / stroked his lover with the edge of~~ a ~~knife (???, Rothenberg; Lacanianism) / cellar filled with wine and spirits, but not a bottle to be seen ({{book\|Dr. Faustroll\|~~}})		{{li\|I=S1/HAS\|tradition=\|Q=31,72\|Q2=3172\|h4 = fruit flies like a banana }} / part of speech changed by rest of sentence / expected sense of word changed by rest of sentence / ({{9k\|RD/Q31,72}})

	~~{{li\|I=S1~~/~~HAS\|tradition=\|Q=31,72\|Q2=3172}}~~part of speech changed by rest of sentence / ~~fruit flies like a banana~~

	~~{{li\|I=S1/Fy\|tradition=\|Q=31,72\|Q2=3172}}part~~ of ~~speech~~ changed by rest of sentence / ~~"I can't express how much I hate~~ {{~~censor~~\|~~fucking}} bees" "then stop {{censor\|\|fuck\|ing~~}} ~~bees??" [https://funnyjunk.com/channel/Tumblr-Content/Bees/zldrLmy/] / I can't express how much I hate ..... bees (censored title~~)

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>

Reversedragon: I can't express how much I hate ..... bees

2026-05-09T19:15:36Z

I can't express how much I hate ..... bees

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:15, 9 May 2026
Line 31:		Line 31:

	== Related ==		== Related ==
	~~<!--~~
	<ol class="hue clean field_exstruct">		<ol class="hue clean field_exstruct">
	</li></ol~~> --~~>
			{{li\|start=y\|I=S1/HAS\|tradition=\|Q=31,72\|Q2=3172\|h4 = fruit flies like a banana }} / part of speech changed by rest of sentence / expected sense of word changed by rest of sentence

			{{li\|I=S1/HAS\|tradition=ES, Aa\|Q=31,72\|Q2=3172}}expected sense of word changed by rest of sentence / stroked his lover with the edge of a knife (???, Rothenberg; Lacanianism) / cellar filled with wine and spirits, but not a bottle to be seen ({{book\|Dr. Faustroll\|}})

			{{li\|I=S1/HAS\|tradition=\|Q=31,72\|Q2=3172}}part of speech changed by rest of sentence / fruit flies like a banana

			{{li\|I=S1/Fy\|tradition=\|Q=31,72\|Q2=3172}}part of speech changed by rest of sentence / "I can't express how much I hate {{censor\|fucking}} bees" "then stop {{censor\|\|fuck\|ing}} bees??" [https://funnyjunk.com/channel/Tumblr-Content/Bees/zldrLmy/] / I can't express how much I hate ..... bees (censored title)

			</li></ol>

	== Ideologies or fields ==		== Ideologies or fields ==

Reversedragon: re-sort

2026-05-09T19:05:39Z

re-sort

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:05, 9 May 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{NextNineThousand\|PPPA=let's eat grandpa\|User=RD\|E=Q51,29\|Contents=y}}		{{NextNineThousand\|PPPA=let's eat grandpa\|User=RD\|E=Q51,29\|Contents=y}}
	~~<!-- == Ontology entry ==~~		{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean field_exstruct">
	{{~~HueNumberPreview\|E=Q51,29~~}}

	~~-->~~== ~~Main entry~~ ==		{{li\|I=S1/ES/HAS\|Q=51,29\|Q2=5129\|h4= let's eat grandpa }} / the first Undertale ever received / please workers only -> the motif of an utterance which has different meanings depending on how the same set of words is associated together into clauses. (let's eat) (grandpa) vs (let's) (eat grandpa). (the first received) (Undertale ever) vs (the first ever) (Undertale received).
	~~<noinclude>{{HueCSS~~}}</~~noinclude><ol class="hue clean"~~>

	<li ~~class~~=~~"field_exstruct" data-remark="linguistics" data-qid~~="51,29~~" value~~="5129~~" data-dimension="S">~~let's eat grandpa ~~/ the first Undertale ever received~~ / please workers only (sign installed in public place which appears to be an instruction to only obey workers) -> the motif of an utterance which has different meanings depending on how the same set of words graphs together into clauses. (let's eat) (grandpa) vs (let's) (eat grandpa). (the first received) (Undertale ever) vs (the first ever) (Undertale received).<br />		{{li\|I=S1/ML\|Q=51,29\|Q2=5129}}let's eat grandpa / please workers only (sign installed in public place which appears to be an instruction to only obey workers)
	I have no idea why but I looked at "the first Undertale ever received" and it was immensely funny to me for no good reason. there's nothing inherently funny about there being a first person that downloaded Undertale. statistically there has to be one. it's a very mundane thing, really. but there's really something about wording it as "the first Undertale ever received". I guess, about putting it in passive voice and making it almost overly formal. like narrator-Gaster said it. "{{caps\|We approach its realization. The first Delta Rune ever received.}}" it sounds like this very distanced statement of observation in the process of aiming for something else. it's a wonder how much the phrasing of something can affect its connotations.

	{{li\|I=S2/A\|Q=~~618~~}}wait until the movie starts to eat your popcorn {{YouTube\|S-hA_os0F5A}} -> wait (until the movie starts) (to eat your popcorn) / wait until (the movie starts to eat) (your popcorn).		{{li\|I=S1/Fy\|Q=51,29\|Q2=5129}}wait until the movie starts to eat your popcorn {{YouTube\|S-hA_os0F5A}} -> wait (until the movie starts) (to eat your popcorn) / wait until (the movie starts to eat) (your popcorn).

	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_trotsky" data-qid~~="51,29~~" value~~="5129~~" data~~-~~dimension=~~"S"~~>Trotsky helped lay the foundations of the Third International galvanizing revolutionary parties around the world [https://workersvoiceus~~.~~org/2020/08/18/trotskys-unfinished-article-on-trade-unions-still-speaks-~~to~~-workers-struggles/] -> found~~ one ~~of these in~~ a ~~Trotskyist article~~. it's ~~apparently possible to do them with propositions~~ and ~~not just language~~.~~<br />~~		{{li\|I=S1/Fy\|Q=51,29\|Q2=5129}}the first Undertale ever received -> I have no idea why but I looked at "the first Undertale ever received" and it was immensely funny to me for no good reason. there's nothing inherently funny about there being a first person that downloaded Undertale. statistically there has to be one. it's a very mundane thing, really. but there's really something about wording it as "the first Undertale ever received". I guess, about putting it in passive voice and making it almost overly formal. like narrator-Gaster said it. "{{caps\|We approach its realization. The first Delta Rune ever received.}}" it sounds like this very distanced statement of observation in the process of aiming for something else. it's a wonder how much the phrasing of something can affect its connotations.
	~~I took~~ the ~~initiative to create internet + early Trotskyism / Leon Trotsky = Trotsky helped found the Third International galvanizing the world~~'s ~~parties~~.

	<li class="~~field_trotsky~~" ~~data~~-~~qid~~="40,16~~" value~~="4016~~" data-dimension="S">~~Lenin and Trotsky who founded the {{TTS\|tts=Communist Party of the Soviet Union\|CPSU}}		</li></ol>

			== In Trotskyism ==
			<ol class="hue clean">

			{{li\|start=y\|I=S1/IV\|Q=51,29\|Q2=51,29}}Trotsky helped lay the foundations of the Third International galvanizing revolutionary parties around the world [https://workersvoiceus.org/2020/08/18/trotskys-unfinished-article-on-trade-unions-still-speaks-to-workers-struggles/] -> found one of these in a Trotskyist article. it's apparently possible to do them with propositions and not just language.<br />
			I took the initiative to create internet + early Trotskyism / Leon Trotsky = Trotsky helped found the Third International, galvanizing the world's parties.

			{{li\|I=S1/IV\|Q=40,16\|Q2=4016}}Lenin and Trotsky who founded the {{TTS\|tts=Communist Party of the Soviet Union\|CPSU}} -> (Lenin who founded the CPSU) (and Trotsky) vs (Lenin and) (Trotsky who founded the CPSU). if "let's eat grandpa" wasn't bad enough, a badly arranged sentence can very much be used to falsely attribute accomplishments to the wrong people.

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>

	== ~~Related~~ ==		== In Liberal-republicanism ==
			<ol class="hue clean field_exstruct">

	~~<ol class="hue clean">~~		{{li\|I=S1/LR\|Q=51,28\|Q2=5128\|h4= I took the initiative to create internet }} / I took the initiative in creating the internet [https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/internet-of-lies/] -> remark made by Al Gore about coordinating universities and later telecommunications owners to work together to actually create the internet, which became infamous as an apparent statement he "invented the internet".<br/>

	<li ~~class~~=~~"field_exstruct" data-qid~~="51,28~~" value~~="5128~~" data-dimension~~=~~"S">~~I took the initiative to create internet / I took the initiative in creating the internet [https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/internet-of-lies/] -> remark made by Al Gore about coordinating universities and later telecommunications owners to work together to actually create the internet, which became infamous as an apparent statement he "invented the internet".<br/>
	looking back at this sentence... I think the notable grammatical feature is a confusion between an uncountable concept (The Internet) and a semi-countable instantiation of an uncountable concept (internet networks, internet access). a grammatically-similar statement might go, "in about 1906 Trotsky formulated Marxism" — where the statement is super wrong if it refers to the general uncountable concept of Marxism, but technically correct if you think Marxism can be a countable thing and it's a meaningful statement to say that particular factions can create [[E:named Marxism (meta-Marxism)\|their own version]] that may be better or may be worse. that's simpler than the internet example though, because both "The Internet" and "internet" are a bit more {{em\|truly}} uncountable. maybe they're strictly distinguished by definiteness?		looking back at this sentence... I think the notable grammatical feature is a confusion between an uncountable concept (The Internet) and a semi-countable instantiation of an uncountable concept (internet networks, internet access). a grammatically-similar statement might go, "in about 1906 Trotsky formulated Marxism" — where the statement is super wrong if it refers to the general uncountable concept of Marxism, but technically correct if you think Marxism can be a countable thing and it's a meaningful statement to say that particular factions can create [[E:named Marxism (meta-Marxism)\|their own version]] that may be better or may be worse. that's simpler than the internet example though, because both "The Internet" and "internet" are a bit more {{em\|truly}} uncountable. maybe they're strictly distinguished by definiteness?

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>

	== ~~Ideology codes~~ ==		== Related ==
			<!--
			<ol class="hue clean field_exstruct">
			</li></ol> -->

	* (none)		== Ideologies or fields ==
			<ol class="hue clean terse field_exstruct">
			{{li\|start=y
			\|I=Z1/HAS\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}{{TTS\|ES\|E.S.}} / linguistics
			{{li\|I=S1/Fy \|Q=618\|Q2=618}}{{TTS\|Fy\|Arts}} / tumblr posts
			{{li\|I=Z1/IV \|Q=41,04\|Q2=4104}}{{TTS\|IV\|Fourth}} / Trotskyism
			</li></ol>

YouTubeCommenters: (note: this is from a tumblr post, but was compiled in a YouTube video. it's being counted as a YouTube "comment" based on its level of effort)

2026-05-02T10:40:11Z

(note: this is from a tumblr post, but was compiled in a YouTube video. it's being counted as a YouTube "comment" based on its level of effort)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:40, 2 May 2026
Line 8:		Line 8:
	<li class="field_exstruct" data-remark="linguistics" data-qid="51,29" value="5129" data-dimension="S">let's eat grandpa / the first Undertale ever received / please workers only (sign installed in public place which appears to be an instruction to only obey workers) -> the motif of an utterance which has different meanings depending on how the same set of words graphs together into clauses. (let's eat) (grandpa) vs (let's) (eat grandpa). (the first received) (Undertale ever) vs (the first ever) (Undertale received).<br />		<li class="field_exstruct" data-remark="linguistics" data-qid="51,29" value="5129" data-dimension="S">let's eat grandpa / the first Undertale ever received / please workers only (sign installed in public place which appears to be an instruction to only obey workers) -> the motif of an utterance which has different meanings depending on how the same set of words graphs together into clauses. (let's eat) (grandpa) vs (let's) (eat grandpa). (the first received) (Undertale ever) vs (the first ever) (Undertale received).<br />
	I have no idea why but I looked at "the first Undertale ever received" and it was immensely funny to me for no good reason. there's nothing inherently funny about there being a first person that downloaded Undertale. statistically there has to be one. it's a very mundane thing, really. but there's really something about wording it as "the first Undertale ever received". I guess, about putting it in passive voice and making it almost overly formal. like narrator-Gaster said it. "{{caps\|We approach its realization. The first Delta Rune ever received.}}" it sounds like this very distanced statement of observation in the process of aiming for something else. it's a wonder how much the phrasing of something can affect its connotations.		I have no idea why but I looked at "the first Undertale ever received" and it was immensely funny to me for no good reason. there's nothing inherently funny about there being a first person that downloaded Undertale. statistically there has to be one. it's a very mundane thing, really. but there's really something about wording it as "the first Undertale ever received". I guess, about putting it in passive voice and making it almost overly formal. like narrator-Gaster said it. "{{caps\|We approach its realization. The first Delta Rune ever received.}}" it sounds like this very distanced statement of observation in the process of aiming for something else. it's a wonder how much the phrasing of something can affect its connotations.

			{{li\|I=S2/A\|Q=618}}wait until the movie starts to eat your popcorn {{YouTube\|S-hA_os0F5A}} -> wait (until the movie starts) (to eat your popcorn) / wait until (the movie starts to eat) (your popcorn).

	</li><li class="field_trotsky" data-qid="51,29" value="5129" data-dimension="S">Trotsky helped lay the foundations of the Third International galvanizing revolutionary parties around the world [https://workersvoiceus.org/2020/08/18/trotskys-unfinished-article-on-trade-unions-still-speaks-to-workers-struggles/] -> found one of these in a Trotskyist article. it's apparently possible to do them with propositions and not just language.<br />		</li><li class="field_trotsky" data-qid="51,29" value="5129" data-dimension="S">Trotsky helped lay the foundations of the Third International galvanizing revolutionary parties around the world [https://workersvoiceus.org/2020/08/18/trotskys-unfinished-article-on-trade-unions-still-speaks-to-workers-struggles/] -> found one of these in a Trotskyist article. it's apparently possible to do them with propositions and not just language.<br />

Reversedragon: Reversedragon moved page User:RD/9k/Q5129 to User:RD/9k/Q51,29: Moving numbered Item to TTS-pronounceable title

2026-01-24T13:34:48Z

Reversedragon moved page User:RD/9k/Q5129 to User:RD/9k/Q51,29: Moving numbered Item to TTS-pronounceable title

← Older revision	Revision as of 13:34, 24 January 2026
(No difference)

Reversedragon: re-sort

2026-01-24T13:34:34Z

re-sort

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:34, 24 January 2026
Line 8:		Line 8:
	<li class="field_exstruct" data-remark="linguistics" data-qid="51,29" value="5129" data-dimension="S">let's eat grandpa / the first Undertale ever received / please workers only (sign installed in public place which appears to be an instruction to only obey workers) -> the motif of an utterance which has different meanings depending on how the same set of words graphs together into clauses. (let's eat) (grandpa) vs (let's) (eat grandpa). (the first received) (Undertale ever) vs (the first ever) (Undertale received).<br />		<li class="field_exstruct" data-remark="linguistics" data-qid="51,29" value="5129" data-dimension="S">let's eat grandpa / the first Undertale ever received / please workers only (sign installed in public place which appears to be an instruction to only obey workers) -> the motif of an utterance which has different meanings depending on how the same set of words graphs together into clauses. (let's eat) (grandpa) vs (let's) (eat grandpa). (the first received) (Undertale ever) vs (the first ever) (Undertale received).<br />
	I have no idea why but I looked at "the first Undertale ever received" and it was immensely funny to me for no good reason. there's nothing inherently funny about there being a first person that downloaded Undertale. statistically there has to be one. it's a very mundane thing, really. but there's really something about wording it as "the first Undertale ever received". I guess, about putting it in passive voice and making it almost overly formal. like narrator-Gaster said it. "{{caps\|We approach its realization. The first Delta Rune ever received.}}" it sounds like this very distanced statement of observation in the process of aiming for something else. it's a wonder how much the phrasing of something can affect its connotations.		I have no idea why but I looked at "the first Undertale ever received" and it was immensely funny to me for no good reason. there's nothing inherently funny about there being a first person that downloaded Undertale. statistically there has to be one. it's a very mundane thing, really. but there's really something about wording it as "the first Undertale ever received". I guess, about putting it in passive voice and making it almost overly formal. like narrator-Gaster said it. "{{caps\|We approach its realization. The first Delta Rune ever received.}}" it sounds like this very distanced statement of observation in the process of aiming for something else. it's a wonder how much the phrasing of something can affect its connotations.

			</li><li class="field_trotsky" data-qid="51,29" value="5129" data-dimension="S">Trotsky helped lay the foundations of the Third International galvanizing revolutionary parties around the world [https://workersvoiceus.org/2020/08/18/trotskys-unfinished-article-on-trade-unions-still-speaks-to-workers-struggles/] -> found one of these in a Trotskyist article. it's apparently possible to do them with propositions and not just language.<br />
			I took the initiative to create internet + early Trotskyism / Leon Trotsky = Trotsky helped found the Third International galvanizing the world's parties.

			<li class="field_trotsky" data-qid="40,16" value="4016" data-dimension="S">Lenin and Trotsky who founded the {{TTS\|tts=Communist Party of the Soviet Union\|CPSU}}

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>

	== ~~Cases~~ ==		== Related ==

	<ol class="hue clean">		<ol class="hue clean">
Line 17:		Line 22:
	<li class="field_exstruct" data-qid="51,28" value="5128" data-dimension="S">I took the initiative to create internet / I took the initiative in creating the internet [https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/internet-of-lies/] -> remark made by Al Gore about coordinating universities and later telecommunications owners to work together to actually create the internet, which became infamous as an apparent statement he "invented the internet".<br/>		<li class="field_exstruct" data-qid="51,28" value="5128" data-dimension="S">I took the initiative to create internet / I took the initiative in creating the internet [https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/internet-of-lies/] -> remark made by Al Gore about coordinating universities and later telecommunications owners to work together to actually create the internet, which became infamous as an apparent statement he "invented the internet".<br/>
	looking back at this sentence... I think the notable grammatical feature is a confusion between an uncountable concept (The Internet) and a semi-countable instantiation of an uncountable concept (internet networks, internet access). a grammatically-similar statement might go, "in about 1906 Trotsky formulated Marxism" — where the statement is super wrong if it refers to the general uncountable concept of Marxism, but technically correct if you think Marxism can be a countable thing and it's a meaningful statement to say that particular factions can create [[E:named Marxism (meta-Marxism)\|their own version]] that may be better or may be worse. that's simpler than the internet example though, because both "The Internet" and "internet" are a bit more {{em\|truly}} uncountable. maybe they're strictly distinguished by definiteness?		looking back at this sentence... I think the notable grammatical feature is a confusion between an uncountable concept (The Internet) and a semi-countable instantiation of an uncountable concept (internet networks, internet access). a grammatically-similar statement might go, "in about 1906 Trotsky formulated Marxism" — where the statement is super wrong if it refers to the general uncountable concept of Marxism, but technically correct if you think Marxism can be a countable thing and it's a meaningful statement to say that particular factions can create [[E:named Marxism (meta-Marxism)\|their own version]] that may be better or may be worse. that's simpler than the internet example though, because both "The Internet" and "internet" are a bit more {{em\|truly}} uncountable. maybe they're strictly distinguished by definiteness?

	</li><li class="field_trotsky" data-qid="51,29" value="5129" data-dimension="S">Trotsky helped lay the foundations of the Third International galvanizing revolutionary parties around the world [https://workersvoiceus.org/2020/08/18/trotskys-unfinished-article-on-trade-unions-still-speaks-to-workers-struggles/] -> found one of these in a Trotskyist article. it's apparently possible to do them with propositions and not just language.<br />
	~~I took the initiative to create internet + early Trotskyism / Leon Trotsky = Trotsky helped found the Third International galvanizing the world's parties.~~

	~~<li class="field_trotsky" data-qid="40,16" value="4016" data-dimension="S">Lenin and Trotsky who founded the {{TTS\|tts=Communist Party of the Soviet Union\|CPSU}}~~

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>

Reversedragon: I took the initiative to create internet

2026-01-24T12:36:02Z

I took the initiative to create internet

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:36, 24 January 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{NextNineThousand\|PPPA=~~Russian revolution according to Trotskyists~~\|User=RD\|E=Q51,29\|Contents=y}}		{{NextNineThousand\|PPPA=let's eat grandpa\|User=RD\|E=Q51,29\|Contents=y}}
	<!-- == Ontology entry ==		<!-- == Ontology entry ==
	{{HueNumberPreview\|E=Q51,29}}		{{HueNumberPreview\|E=Q51,29}}
Line 6:		Line 6:
	<noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol class="hue clean">		<noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol class="hue clean">

	~~</li>~~<li class="field_exstruct" data-remark="linguistics" data-qid="51,29" value="5129" data-dimension="S">let's eat grandpa / the first Undertale ever received / please workers only (sign installed in public place which appears to be an instruction to only obey workers) / Trotsky helped lay the foundations of the Third International galvanizing revolutionary parties around the world [https://workersvoiceus.org/2020/08/18/trotskys-unfinished-article-on-trade-unions-still-speaks-to-workers-struggles/] -> the motif of an utterance which has different meanings depending on how the same set of words graphs together into clauses. (let's eat) (grandpa) vs (let's) (eat grandpa). (the first received) (Undertale ever) vs (the first ever) (Undertale received).<br />		<li class="field_exstruct" data-remark="linguistics" data-qid="51,29" value="5129" data-dimension="S">let's eat grandpa / the first Undertale ever received / please workers only (sign installed in public place which appears to be an instruction to only obey workers) -> the motif of an utterance which has different meanings depending on how the same set of words graphs together into clauses. (let's eat) (grandpa) vs (let's) (eat grandpa). (the first received) (Undertale ever) vs (the first ever) (Undertale received).<br />
	I have no idea why but I looked at "the first Undertale ever received" and it was immensely funny to me for no good reason. there's nothing inherently funny about there being a first person that downloaded Undertale. statistically there has to be one. it's a very mundane thing, really. but there's really something about wording it as "the first Undertale ever received". I guess, about putting it in passive voice and making it almost overly formal. like narrator-Gaster said it. "{{caps\|We approach its realization. The first Delta Rune ever received.}}" it sounds like this very distanced statement of observation in the process of aiming for something else. it's a wonder how much the phrasing of something can affect its connotations~~.<br />~~		I have no idea why but I looked at "the first Undertale ever received" and it was immensely funny to me for no good reason. there's nothing inherently funny about there being a first person that downloaded Undertale. statistically there has to be one. it's a very mundane thing, really. but there's really something about wording it as "the first Undertale ever received". I guess, about putting it in passive voice and making it almost overly formal. like narrator-Gaster said it. "{{caps\|We approach its realization. The first Delta Rune ever received.}}" it sounds like this very distanced statement of observation in the process of aiming for something else. it's a wonder how much the phrasing of something can affect its connotations.
	~~edit: found one of these in a Trotskyist article. it's apparently possible to do them with propositions and not just language.<br />~~
	~~I took the initiative to create internet + early Trotskyism / Leon Trotsky = Trotsky helped found the Third International galvanizing the world's parties~~.

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>
Line 17:		Line 15:
	<ol class="hue clean">		<ol class="hue clean">

	<li class="field_trotsky" data-qid="40,16" value="4016" data-dimension="S">Lenin and Trotsky who founded the CPSU		<li class="field_exstruct" data-qid="51,28" value="5128" data-dimension="S">I took the initiative to create internet / I took the initiative in creating the internet [https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/internet-of-lies/] -> remark made by Al Gore about coordinating universities and later telecommunications owners to work together to actually create the internet, which became infamous as an apparent statement he "invented the internet".<br/>
			looking back at this sentence... I think the notable grammatical feature is a confusion between an uncountable concept (The Internet) and a semi-countable instantiation of an uncountable concept (internet networks, internet access). a grammatically-similar statement might go, "in about 1906 Trotsky formulated Marxism" — where the statement is super wrong if it refers to the general uncountable concept of Marxism, but technically correct if you think Marxism can be a countable thing and it's a meaningful statement to say that particular factions can create [[E:named Marxism (meta-Marxism)\|their own version]] that may be better or may be worse. that's simpler than the internet example though, because both "The Internet" and "internet" are a bit more {{em\|truly}} uncountable. maybe they're strictly distinguished by definiteness?

			</li><li class="field_trotsky" data-qid="51,29" value="5129" data-dimension="S">Trotsky helped lay the foundations of the Third International galvanizing revolutionary parties around the world [https://workersvoiceus.org/2020/08/18/trotskys-unfinished-article-on-trade-unions-still-speaks-to-workers-struggles/] -> found one of these in a Trotskyist article. it's apparently possible to do them with propositions and not just language.<br />
			I took the initiative to create internet + early Trotskyism / Leon Trotsky = Trotsky helped found the Third International galvanizing the world's parties.

			<li class="field_trotsky" data-qid="40,16" value="4016" data-dimension="S">Lenin and Trotsky who founded the {{TTS\|tts=Communist Party of the Soviet Union\|CPSU}}

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>

Reversedragon: copy markup from 9k/Q51,29

2026-01-24T12:01:06Z

copy markup from 9k/Q51,29

New page

{{NextNineThousand|PPPA=Russian revolution according to Trotskyists|User=RD|E=Q51,29|Contents=y}}
== Main entry ==
<noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol class="hue clean">

</li><li class="field_exstruct" data-remark="linguistics" data-qid="51,29" value="5129" data-dimension="S">let's eat grandpa / the first Undertale ever received / please workers only (sign installed in public place which appears to be an instruction to only obey workers) / Trotsky helped lay the foundations of the Third International galvanizing revolutionary parties around the world [https://workersvoiceus.org/2020/08/18/trotskys-unfinished-article-on-trade-unions-still-speaks-to-workers-struggles/] -> the motif of an utterance which has different meanings depending on how the same set of words graphs together into clauses. (let's eat) (grandpa) vs (let's) (eat grandpa). (the first received) (Undertale ever) vs (the first ever) (Undertale received).<br />
I have no idea why but I looked at "the first Undertale ever received" and it was immensely funny to me for no good reason. there's nothing inherently funny about there being a first person that downloaded Undertale. statistically there has to be one. it's a very mundane thing, really. but there's really something about wording it as "the first Undertale ever received". I guess, about putting it in passive voice and making it almost overly formal. like narrator-Gaster said it. "{{caps|We approach its realization. The first Delta Rune ever received.}}" it sounds like this very distanced statement of observation in the process of aiming for something else. it's a wonder how much the phrasing of something can affect its connotations.<br />
edit: found one of these in a Trotskyist article. it's apparently possible to do them with propositions and not just language.<br />
I took the initiative to create internet + early Trotskyism / Leon Trotsky = Trotsky helped found the Third International galvanizing the world's parties.

</li></ol>

== Cases ==

<ol class="hue clean">

<li class="field_trotsky" data-qid="40,16" value="4016" data-dimension="S">Lenin and Trotsky who founded the CPSU

</li></ol>

== Ideology codes ==

* (none)

[[Category:Next nine thousand (RD)]]