User:Reversedragon/FirstNineThousand/100 - Revision history

Reversedragon: approximating quintic functions with Fourier series

2026-09-08T00:24:38Z

approximating quintic functions with Fourier series

Reversedragon: Most science is not done in reality

2026-08-13T05:56:05Z

Most science is not done in reality

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:56, 13 August 2026
Line 460:		Line 460:
	</li><li value="391" class="number_empty">??		</li><li value="391" class="number_empty">??

	</li><li class="field_geo" value="392" data-dimension="S2">Most science is not ~~done in reality / Most science is not done in the material world~~ / Most science is not done in the field or in laboratories / criterion for ~~identifying~~ scientific revisionism, defining the failure to recognize correct models as revisionism -> sounds shocking at first but logically has to be true. textbooks and teachers present science to children like every scientific claim is always substantiated by testing it in the material world. but that leaves people with a really bad understanding of science by the time they have to actually go interpret complicated discusssions in string theory and quantum field theory which will take a long time to go to some kind of particle accelerator or highly indirect apparatus that was unusual in the early days of science and finally get tested. these days most claims in science actually get tested against highly accurate models of experiments instead of in actual experiments. that's what you actually do when you cross-check a new hypothesis against older equations and existing experiment teams — those equations and memories of experiments are models of experiments. and this is why I find non-Materialist interpretations of literature frustrating. the people saying that fiction is not internally consistent in a way where some claims (~~although not every claim~~) ~~can be tested against coherent models of a fictional world's internal physics <em>may not actually understand real-world science<~~/em>, because at the end of the day, taking your best coherent model of <cite>Dragon Ball</cite> and testing something against it and taking your best coherent model of current experiments to understand the universe and testing something against it are not actually all that different. unpopular opinion, building theories about fiction and trying to solve if everything is actually consistent shows you are building a good understanding of the real world. also, most science of historical processes and ideologies would not be done in the real world. if you understand how science truly works, then you'll understand how Marxism truly works and how meta-Marxism truly works. it's very possible I had to invent the category of meta-Marxism purely because people around the world don't understand that most Marxist "experiments" amount to thought experiments or peer review through the means of models of old experiments. I've always been confused why Marxism wasn't already meta-Marxism. why wouldn't Marxists test their models against each other for accuracy, and why would Marxists end up dividing into different competing versions of Marxism that become unfalsifiable?		</li><li class="field_geo" value="392" data-dimension="S2">Most science is not empirical / Most science is not done in the field or in laboratories / criterion for scientific revisionism (generic) / ({{9k\|RD/Q392}})

	</li><li class="field_geo" value="392" data-dimension="S2">The abstraction of matter, of a law of nature ... all scientific (correct, serious, not absurd) abstractions reflect nature more deeply, truly and completely (Lenin) ~~[https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/volume-1/mswv1_16.htm]~~

	</li><li value="393" class="number_empty">??		</li><li value="393" class="number_empty">??

Reversedragon: up-reductionism

2026-08-13T05:02:52Z

up-reductionism

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:02, 13 August 2026
Line 196:		Line 196:
	</li><li value="173" data-remark="SCP" class="field_geo">unit for constructing works / unit for constructing texts / unit of work or series construction / serialization unit or unit of work construction -> note that this one is so general that "text" can be a unit for constructing texts, although "volume" or "episode" could also be.		</li><li value="173" data-remark="SCP" class="field_geo">unit for constructing works / unit for constructing texts / unit of work or series construction / serialization unit or unit of work construction -> note that this one is so general that "text" can be a unit for constructing texts, although "volume" or "episode" could also be.

	</li><li class="field_mdem" value="174" data-dimension="S">[[Ontology:Q174\|atom-like entity]] -> an atom-like entity is a mostly-indivisible unit which contains the capacity for particular patterns when combined with particular other atom-like entities. a chemical element is the prototypical example: two hydrogens and one oxygen form water. but one hypothesis I am trying to investigate is the possibility that individuals of particular ideologies are atom-like entities, and when put together in various "compounds" they form specific ideologies. I feel like there is some remote possibility that one day there could just be a periodic table of ideologies that is as prosaic and numerical as the study of chemical elements and chemical compounds.<br /~~> an atom-like entity is <em>not<~~/em> an entity that can be considered in total isolation from all others akin to a helium atom. I really don't like models like [[E:Q1980\|Rothenberg's]] that imply that, because not even chemistry works that way. chemistry may be reductionist, but the predictable emergences from the elements are the whole study of chemistry.		</li><li class="field_mdem" value="174" data-dimension="S">[[Ontology:Q174\|atom-like entity]] / ({{9k\|RD/Q174}})
	</li><li class="field_mdem" value="175" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="field_mdem" value="175" data-dimension="S">??
	{{li\|I=S1/ES\|Q=176}}abstract Ideal / abstract ideal (standard English capitalization outside philosophy)		{{li\|I=S1/ES\|Q=176}}abstract Ideal / abstract ideal (standard English capitalization outside philosophy)
Line 473:		Line 473:

	</li><li class="field_geo" value="400" data-dimension="S">reductionism		</li><li class="field_geo" value="400" data-dimension="S">reductionism
	</li><li class="field_mdem" value="401" data-dimension="S">{{TTS\|tts=up-reductionism\|upreductionism}} ~~or <i>ana<~~/~~i>-reductionism / retermination~~ (~~[[Term:reterminism~~\|~~relativistic determination or determinism]]; framed as a new kind of reductionism)~~ / ~~emergence (the subset of emergence which is relatively predictable and involves one scale of things producing a larger scale of things~~) -> science communicators and anti-science people need to understand the distinction between splitting atoms to find the quarks and attempting to predict atoms from quarks, and realize that the latter is still sometimes possible even if it's a lot harder. let's think about weather models: a lot of big objects like cold fronts and warm fronts interact to produce a weather outcome. when the weather report is correct you've managed to do up-reductionism.<br />		</li><li class="field_mdem" value="401" data-dimension="S">{{TTS\|tts=up-reductionism\|upreductionism}} / ({{9k\|RD/Q174}})
	it's taking all of me to not flip the swatch color to <code>STM</code> from <code>MX</code> and say this is already science. no, I need a science article. a credible science hypothesis in an article will do as far as marking this a motif; you'd need more to mark it Z0 but that would prove it's being discussed in science and not just in philosophy.

	</li><li class="field_geo" value="402" data-dimension="S">constructor theory -> a weird and interesting scientific hypothesis that, the more I think about it, the more I doubt could possibly be true. I think humanity has more chance of cracking a model of up-reductionism / [[Term:reterminism\|retermination]] than this being a theory that makes sense.		</li><li class="field_geo" value="402" data-dimension="S">constructor theory -> a weird and interesting scientific hypothesis that, the more I think about it, the more I doubt could possibly be true. I think humanity has more chance of cracking a model of up-reductionism / [[Term:reterminism\|retermination]] than this being a theory that makes sense.

Reversedragon: re-sort mediums so console game is next to anime

2026-08-13T04:50:31Z

re-sort mediums so console game is next to anime

Reversedragon: named Marxism

2026-08-13T04:41:05Z

named Marxism

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:41, 13 August 2026
Line 106:		Line 106:
	</li><li value="88" class="field_nations" data-dimension="S0">[[Ontology:Q88\|named nationalism]] / named fascism / named Identitarianism / nationalism distinguished into cultural category / uniquely Spanish nationalism / uniquely Japanese nationalism / uniquely United-States nationalism		</li><li value="88" class="field_nations" data-dimension="S0">[[Ontology:Q88\|named nationalism]] / named fascism / named Identitarianism / nationalism distinguished into cultural category / uniquely Spanish nationalism / uniquely Japanese nationalism / uniquely United-States nationalism
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="89" data-dimension="S0">spacetime-unique ideology / named ideology -> an "S2" style ideology with a definite Particle Theory / Bauplan, or at least a specific series of axioms; an instance of an ideology as opposed to a pure set category having no particular beliefs; in religion, a denominational religion as opposed to an umbrella religious category		</li><li class="field_geo" value="89" data-dimension="S0">spacetime-unique ideology / named ideology -> an "S2" style ideology with a definite Particle Theory / Bauplan, or at least a specific series of axioms; an instance of an ideology as opposed to a pure set category having no particular beliefs; in religion, a denominational religion as opposed to an umbrella religious category
	</li><li class="field_ML" value="90" data-dimension="S0">named Marxism / Marxism ~~differentiated for country conditions~~ / ~~Marxist sect -> save the concept of named Trotskyisms for the 4000s range~~		</li><li class="field_ML" value="90" data-dimension="S0">named Marxism / Marxist tendency (meta-Marxism) / ({{9k\|RD/Q90}})
	</li><li value="91" data-dimension="S0">named republicanism which is not Marxism / named Liberalism -> Alexander Hamilton & Thomas Jefferson are examples		</li><li value="91" data-dimension="S0">named republicanism which is not Marxism / named Liberalism -> Alexander Hamilton & Thomas Jefferson are examples
	</li><li value="92" data-dimension="Z" class="field_mdem">[[Ontology:Q92\|meta-Marxism]]		</li><li value="92" data-dimension="Z" class="field_mdem">[[Ontology:Q92\|meta-Marxism]]

Reversedragon: revolutionary event

2026-08-05T00:05:31Z

revolutionary event

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:05, 5 August 2026
Line 25:		Line 25:
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="15" data-dimension="S0">[[Ontology:countable philosophical framework\|countable philosophical framework]] / philosophy not considered an ideology		</li><li class="field_geo" value="15" data-dimension="S0">[[Ontology:countable philosophical framework\|countable philosophical framework]] / philosophy not considered an ideology
	</li><li class="field_mdem" value="16" data-dimension="S0">[[Ontology:Q16\|countable ideology]] -> the major difference between a countable philosophical framework and a countable ideology is that a countable ideology can be realized into a new Social-Philosophical-Material System distinguishable from other kinds of societies in a countable way; some kind of "countable Culture" or countable political system with its own individual identity and name (USSR, Spain) as well as perhaps its own repeatable but fully distinguishable category (Marxism, Liberalism) is produced		</li><li class="field_mdem" value="16" data-dimension="S0">[[Ontology:Q16\|countable ideology]] -> the major difference between a countable philosophical framework and a countable ideology is that a countable ideology can be realized into a new Social-Philosophical-Material System distinguishable from other kinds of societies in a countable way; some kind of "countable Culture" or countable political system with its own individual identity and name (USSR, Spain) as well as perhaps its own repeatable but fully distinguishable category (Marxism, Liberalism) is produced
	</li><li value="17" class="~~field_exstruct~~" data-dimension="Z">revolutionary event / event which creates new regime with new population structure		</li><li value="17" class="field_ML" data-dimension="Z">revolutionary event / event which creates new regime with new population structure / regime change (installing distinct new sociophilosophy) / ({{9k\|RD/Q17}})

	</li><li class="field_exstruct" data-remark="Lacanians going on and on about Christianity and eschatology" value="18" data-dimension="S0">countable religion or spirituality		</li><li class="field_exstruct" data-remark="Lacanians going on and on about Christianity and eschatology" value="18" data-dimension="S0">countable religion or spirituality
	</li><li value="19" class="field_exstruct" data-dimension="Z">historical account -> subset of: non-fictional work		</li><li value="19" class="field_exstruct" data-dimension="Z">historical account -> subset of: non-fictional work

Reversedragon: agora (meta-Marxism)

2026-07-26T22:04:11Z

agora (meta-Marxism)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:04, 26 July 2026
Line 954:		Line 954:
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="788">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="788">??

	</li><li class="~~number_empty~~" value="789" data-dimension="Z">??		</li><li class="field_geo" value="789" data-dimension="S">NOT (logical operator) / NOT (logic gate)
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="790" data-dimension="S0">formal logic operator / logical operator / logic gate		</li><li class="field_geo" value="790" data-dimension="S0">formal logic operator / logical operator / logic gate
	</li><li class="~~field_geo~~" value="791" data-dimension="S">~~NOT~~ (~~logical operator~~) / ~~NOT (logic gate)~~
			</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="791" data-dimension="S">agora (meta-Marxism) / non-economic market or "marketplace"

	</li><li class="field_geo" value="792" data-dimension="S">IMPLY (logical operator) / material conditional / → / P → Q -> silly question: do these arrows go the text direction in RTL and vertical scripts? I'd think they would but I have no idea		</li><li class="field_geo" value="792" data-dimension="S">IMPLY (logical operator) / material conditional / → / P → Q -> silly question: do these arrows go the text direction in RTL and vertical scripts? I'd think they would but I have no idea
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="793" data-dimension="S">converse (logical operator) / ← / P ← Q -> not always equal to IMPLY operation		</li><li class="field_geo" value="793" data-dimension="S">converse (logical operator) / ← / P ← Q -> not always equal to IMPLY operation

Reversedragon: the meaning of lives

2026-07-20T10:10:05Z

the meaning of lives

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:10, 20 July 2026
Line 280:		Line 280:
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="241" data-dimension="Z">[[Ontology:Q241\|audience as relative to fictional world]]		</li><li class="field_geo" value="241" data-dimension="Z">[[Ontology:Q241\|audience as relative to fictional world]]

	</li><li class="~~number_empty~~" value="242">??		<!-- {{li\|I=S1/MX\|tradition=\|Q=618\|Q2=618}} -->
			</li><li class="field_mdem" data-qid="242" value="242" data-dimension="S">the meaning of lives / describing "the meaning of life" as a concept that strictly applies to multiple people interacting instead of individual people

	</li><li class="number_empty" value="243">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="243">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="244">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="244">??

Reversedragon: pinning False to anecdotes

2026-06-21T11:12:10Z

pinning False to anecdotes

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:12, 21 June 2026
Line 760:		Line 760:
	</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="640" data-dimension="S">[[Ontology:Q640\|Pascal's wager]] / god grid (Christian philosophy)		</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="640" data-dimension="S">[[Ontology:Q640\|Pascal's wager]] / god grid (Christian philosophy)
	</li><li class="field_trotsky" value="641" data-dimension="S0">[[Ontology:Q641\|ethics problem involving Trotsky]] / ethics thought experiment involving Trotsky / Trotskyite variant of existing thought experiment / Trotsky problem (philosophical dilemma which centers around Trotskyite conspirators or early Trotskyism; meta-Marxism) -> there are bound to be some new ones that come up but the variants of old ones can also go on this entry		</li><li class="field_trotsky" value="641" data-dimension="S0">[[Ontology:Q641\|ethics problem involving Trotsky]] / ethics thought experiment involving Trotsky / Trotskyite variant of existing thought experiment / Trotsky problem (philosophical dilemma which centers around Trotskyite conspirators or early Trotskyism; meta-Marxism) -> there are bound to be some new ones that come up but the variants of old ones can also go on this entry
	</~~li><li class~~=~~"number_empty" value~~="642~~">??~~
			{{li\|I=S1/HAS\|Q=642\|Q2=642}}pinning False to anecdotes / pinning True to specific incident / pinning True to oddly-specific outcome / pegging truth values to oddly specific outcomes / ({{9k\|RD/Q642}})

	</li><li class="field_ML" value="643" data-dimension="S0">[[Ontology:Q643\|ethics problem involving workers' states]]		</li><li class="field_ML" value="643" data-dimension="S0">[[Ontology:Q643\|ethics problem involving workers' states]]
	</li><li class="field_trotsky" value="644" data-dimension="S">[[Ontology:Q644\|Trotsky's wager]] / Trotskyist god grid -> Pascal's wager except with early Trotskyism.		</li><li class="field_trotsky" value="644" data-dimension="S">[[Ontology:Q644\|Trotsky's wager]] / Trotskyist god grid -> Pascal's wager except with early Trotskyism.

Reversedragon: The 1930s Trotskyite conspiracy never happened

2026-06-10T00:15:53Z

The 1930s Trotskyite conspiracy never happened

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:15, 10 June 2026
Line 526:		Line 526:
	</li><li value="434" class="field_nations" data-dimension="S">[[E:TimeCube\|time cube theory]]		</li><li value="434" class="field_nations" data-dimension="S">[[E:TimeCube\|time cube theory]]
	</li><li value="435" class="number_empty">??		</li><li value="435" class="number_empty">??
	</~~li><li value~~="436~~" class~~=~~"number_empty">??~~
			{{li\|I=S2/IV\|Q=436\|Q2=436}}The 1930s Trotskyite conspiracy never happened / ({{9k\|RD/Q41,91}})

	</li><li value="437" class="number_empty">??		</li><li value="437" class="number_empty">??
	</li><li value="438" class="number_empty">??		</li><li value="438" class="number_empty">??

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:12, 21 June 2026
Line 760:		Line 760:
	</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="640" data-dimension="S">[[Ontology:Q640\|Pascal's wager]] / god grid (Christian philosophy)		</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="640" data-dimension="S">[[Ontology:Q640\|Pascal's wager]] / god grid (Christian philosophy)
	</li><li class="field_trotsky" value="641" data-dimension="S0">[[Ontology:Q641\|ethics problem involving Trotsky]] / ethics thought experiment involving Trotsky / Trotskyite variant of existing thought experiment / Trotsky problem (philosophical dilemma which centers around Trotskyite conspirators or early Trotskyism; meta-Marxism) -> there are bound to be some new ones that come up but the variants of old ones can also go on this entry		</li><li class="field_trotsky" value="641" data-dimension="S0">[[Ontology:Q641\|ethics problem involving Trotsky]] / ethics thought experiment involving Trotsky / Trotskyite variant of existing thought experiment / Trotsky problem (philosophical dilemma which centers around Trotskyite conspirators or early Trotskyism; meta-Marxism) -> there are bound to be some new ones that come up but the variants of old ones can also go on this entry
	</~~li><li class~~=~~"number_empty" value~~="642~~">??~~
			{{li\|I=S1/HAS\|Q=642\|Q2=642}}pinning False to anecdotes / pinning True to specific incident / pinning True to oddly-specific outcome / pegging truth values to oddly specific outcomes / ({{9k\|RD/Q642}})

	</li><li class="field_ML" value="643" data-dimension="S0">[[Ontology:Q643\|ethics problem involving workers' states]]		</li><li class="field_ML" value="643" data-dimension="S0">[[Ontology:Q643\|ethics problem involving workers' states]]
	</li><li class="field_trotsky" value="644" data-dimension="S">[[Ontology:Q644\|Trotsky's wager]] / Trotskyist god grid -> Pascal's wager except with early Trotskyism.		</li><li class="field_trotsky" value="644" data-dimension="S">[[Ontology:Q644\|Trotsky's wager]] / Trotskyist god grid -> Pascal's wager except with early Trotskyism.

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:24, 8 September 2026
Line 25:		Line 25:
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="15" data-dimension="S0">[[Ontology:countable philosophical framework\|countable philosophical framework]] / philosophy not considered an ideology		</li><li class="field_geo" value="15" data-dimension="S0">[[Ontology:countable philosophical framework\|countable philosophical framework]] / philosophy not considered an ideology
	</li><li class="field_mdem" value="16" data-dimension="S0">[[Ontology:Q16\|countable ideology]] -> the major difference between a countable philosophical framework and a countable ideology is that a countable ideology can be realized into a new Social-Philosophical-Material System distinguishable from other kinds of societies in a countable way; some kind of "countable Culture" or countable political system with its own individual identity and name (USSR, Spain) as well as perhaps its own repeatable but fully distinguishable category (Marxism, Liberalism) is produced		</li><li class="field_mdem" value="16" data-dimension="S0">[[Ontology:Q16\|countable ideology]] -> the major difference between a countable philosophical framework and a countable ideology is that a countable ideology can be realized into a new Social-Philosophical-Material System distinguishable from other kinds of societies in a countable way; some kind of "countable Culture" or countable political system with its own individual identity and name (USSR, Spain) as well as perhaps its own repeatable but fully distinguishable category (Marxism, Liberalism) is produced
	</li><li value="17" class="field_ML" data-dimension="Z">revolutionary event / event which creates new regime with new population structure / regime change (installing distinct new sociophilosophy) / ({{9k\|RD/Q17}})		</li><li value="17" class="field_ML" data-dimension="Z">revolutionary event / event which creates new regime with new population structure / regime change (installing distinct new sociophilosophy) / ([[EC:9k/RD/Q17\|9k]])

	</li><li class="field_exstruct" data-remark="Lacanians going on and on about Christianity and eschatology" value="18" data-dimension="S0">countable religion or spirituality		</li><li class="field_exstruct" data-remark="Lacanians going on and on about Christianity and eschatology" value="18" data-dimension="S0">countable religion or spirituality
Line 78:		Line 78:
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="64" data-dimension="S0">astrophysics / physical cosmology		</li><li class="field_geo" value="64" data-dimension="S0">astrophysics / physical cosmology
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="65" data-dimension="S0">quantum physics / quantum mechanics research		</li><li class="field_geo" value="65" data-dimension="S0">quantum physics / quantum mechanics research
	{{li\|I=Z2/GR\|Q=66\|Q2=66}}special relativity ~~/ (~~{{9k\|RD/Q66}})		{{li\|I=Z2/GR\|Q=66\|Q2=66}}special relativity {{9k\|RD\|Q66}}
	{{li\|I=S2/GR\|Q=67\|Q2=67}}general relativity ~~/ (~~{{9k\|RD/Q66}})		{{li\|I=S2/GR\|Q=67\|Q2=67}}general relativity {{9k\|RD\|Q66}}
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="68" data-dimension="S0">string theory -> unsubstantiated but awfully neat at the time		</li><li class="field_geo" value="68" data-dimension="S0">string theory -> unsubstantiated but awfully neat at the time
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="69" data-dimension="S0">quantum field theory -> substantiated		</li><li class="field_geo" value="69" data-dimension="S0">quantum field theory -> substantiated
Line 837:		Line 837:
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="701" data-dimension="S">assume a spherical cow -> the motif of mathematics problems, or perhaps general thought experiments, presenting a test case which makes perfect sense yet to any reasonable person looks unlike reality		</li><li class="field_geo" value="701" data-dimension="S">assume a spherical cow -> the motif of mathematics problems, or perhaps general thought experiments, presenting a test case which makes perfect sense yet to any reasonable person looks unlike reality
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="702" data-dimension="S">approximating with sine waves / using Fourier series to approximate functions with sine waves		</li><li class="field_geo" value="702" data-dimension="S">approximating with sine waves / using Fourier series to approximate functions with sine waves
	~~</li><~~li ~~class~~=~~"field_geo" value~~="703~~" data-dimension~~=~~"S">~~three-body problem (physics)
			{{li\|I=S1/STM\|Q=703\|Q2=703}}three-body problem (physics)
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="704">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="704">??
	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_geo" value~~="705~~" data-dimension~~=~~"S">~~approximating quintic functions with Fourier series -> this vaguely reminds me of approximating quantum processes. you look at the black hole image, and it's fuzzy, you look at an atom image and it's fuzzy, but the black hole accretion disk is actually just moving around faster than relativity can successfully transmit information about it. quantum field theory suggests something vaguely similar happens with fundamental particles, at the very least in maddening little antimatter interactions "teleporting" particles around, possibly at smaller scales where quantum fields jump up the threshold into particles. with a quintic function, it's just an everyday math problem, it's not a fancy real-world physical process. but at the same time it's simply becoming so complex it's hard to catch up with. a little like a pseudorandom number generator. and pseudorandom number generators are used to simulate the separation between real-world objects that have trouble predicting each other, like players rolling dice. fuzziness is an artifact of math problems getting too complicated to be worth calculating.		{{li\|I=S1/STM\|Q=705\|Q2=705}}approximating quintic functions with Fourier series / quintic approximation and wave functions (sense) {{9k\|RD\|Q66}}

	</li><li class="number_empty" value="706">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="706">??

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:50, 13 August 2026
Line 6:		Line 6:

	<ol start="1" data-inception="2024-12-26T03:32:15Z" data-created="2025-01-14T02:00:41">		<ol start="1" data-inception="2024-12-26T03:32:15Z" data-created="2025-01-14T02:00:41">
	<li class="field_geo entry_1" data-qid="1" data-dimension="Z">[Z] [[Ontology:Q1\|process of Being]] -> (note: this is the early formatting from January 2025 — before Hue lists were created, and before the list eventually got so long these per-Item prototype notes had to be removed.)		<li class="field_geo entry_1 number_done" data-qid="1" data-dimension="Z">[Z] [[Ontology:Q1\|process of Being]] -> (note: this is the early formatting from January 2025 — before Hue lists were created, and before the list eventually got so long these per-Item prototype notes had to be removed.)
	</li><li class="field_geo entry_2" data-qid="2" data-dimension="Z">[Z] [[Ontology:Q2\|sea of free-floating entities]]		</li><li class="field_geo entry_2" data-qid="2" data-dimension="Z">[Z] [[Ontology:Q2\|sea of free-floating entities]]
	</li><li class="field_geo" data-qid="3" data-dimension="Z0">[Z0] [[Ontology:Q3\|countable entity]]		</li><li class="field_geo" data-qid="3" data-dimension="Z0">[Z0] [[Ontology:Q3\|countable entity]]
Line 160:		Line 160:
	</li><li class="" value="139" data-dimension="Z">multimedia serialized comic		</li><li class="" value="139" data-dimension="Z">multimedia serialized comic
	</li><li class="" value="140" data-dimension="Z">animated series / anime / cartoon		</li><li class="" value="140" data-dimension="Z">animated series / anime / cartoon
	</li><li class="~~number_done~~" value="141" data-dimension="Z">~~song with lyrics~~		</li><li class="" value="141" data-dimension="Z">computer or console game
	</li><li class="" value="142" data-dimension="Z">~~poem~~		</li><li class="" value="142" data-dimension="Z">short story
	</li><li class="" value="143" data-dimension="Z">~~computer or console game~~		</li><li class="" value="143" data-dimension="Z">poem
	</li><li class="" value="144" data-dimension="Z">~~short story~~		</li><li class="" value="144" data-dimension="Z">song with lyrics
	</li><li class="" value="145" data-dimension="Z">novel		</li><li class="" value="145" data-dimension="Z">novel
	</li><li class="" value="146" data-dimension="Z">novel in multi-volume series		</li><li class="" value="146" data-dimension="Z">novel in multi-volume series
	</li><li class="" value="147" data-dimension="Z">novel in multi-volume series adapted into comic / Scholastic graphic novel		</li><li class="" value="147" data-dimension="Z">graphic novel adaptation (from novel) / novel in multi-volume series adapted into comic / Scholastic graphic novel
	</li><li class="" value="148" data-dimension="Z">online video		</li><li class="" value="148" data-dimension="Z">online video
	</li><li class="" value="149" data-dimension="Z">YouTube video		</li><li class="" value="149" data-dimension="Z">YouTube video
	</li><li class="" value="150" data-dimension="Z">PeerTube video		</li><li class="" value="150" data-dimension="Z">PeerTube video
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="151" data-dimension="Z0">thing part of finite numbered series of things / thing part of collectors' index -> collectors' indices have serialized parts, similar to episodes or chapters; technically, a wikibase Item is an instance of this		</li><li class="field_geo" value="151" data-dimension="Z0">thing part of numbered series / thing part of finite numbered series of things / thing part of collectors' index -> collectors' indices have serialized parts, similar to episodes or chapters; technically, a wikibase Item is an instance of this

	</li><li class="" value="152" data-dimension="Z">citation in local Item / work described in Item -> source - conveyed through model having parts - local Item		</li><li class="" value="152" data-dimension="Z">citation in local Item / work described in Item -> source - conveyed through model having parts - local Item
Line 182:		Line 182:

	</li><li class="field_geo" value="160" data-dimension="Z0">text / written work (book; story; article; web page) / visual work (comic; animated series) / aural work (audiobook; podcast) -> I think the major thing that this entry excludes is compilations of things. like, a magazine with many articles is not a text, although it is a periodical issue and by other definitions a work.		</li><li class="field_geo" value="160" data-dimension="Z0">text / written work (book; story; article; web page) / visual work (comic; animated series) / aural work (audiobook; podcast) -> I think the major thing that this entry excludes is compilations of things. like, a magazine with many articles is not a text, although it is a periodical issue and by other definitions a work.
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="161" data-dimension="Z0">non-serialized part -> discrete part which may be released in an all-at-once or timeless manner		</li><li class="field_geo" value="161" data-dimension="Z0">non-serialized part / chapter (generic) -> discrete part which may be released in an all-at-once or timeless manner
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="162" data-dimension="Z0">serialized part -> numbered part which is syndicated or expected to release periodically		</li><li class="field_geo" value="162" data-dimension="Z0">serialized part / episode (generic) -> numbered part which is syndicated or expected to release periodically
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="163" data-dimension="Z0">volume -> physical printed book, or book-sized division. I'll say this doesn't refer to science periodical volumes unless they're physically collected into a self-contained book you can browse or something vaguely resembling one.		</li><li class="field_geo" value="163" data-dimension="Z0">volume -> physical printed book, or book-sized division. I'll say this doesn't refer to science periodical volumes unless they're physically collected into a self-contained book you can browse or something vaguely resembling one.
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="164" data-dimension="Z0">part (book division)		</li><li class="field_geo" value="164" data-dimension="Z0">part (book division)