User:Reversedragon/FirstNineThousand/100 - Revision history

Reversedragon: Truth corresponds to reality

2026-04-26T08:41:16Z

Truth corresponds to reality

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:41, 26 April 2026
Line 323:		Line 323:

	</li><li class="field_nations" value="280" data-dimension="S0">[[Ontology:Q280\|statement with no possible backing claims]]		</li><li class="field_nations" value="280" data-dimension="S0">[[Ontology:Q280\|statement with no possible backing claims]]
	</li>~~<li class=~~"~~number_empty~~" value~~="281">??~~
			{{li\|I=S2/EC\|Q=281}}Falsity diverges from reality / correspondence theory of truth (proposition; generic) / diverges from reality (truth value) -> this proposition basically exists so "Truth corresponds to reality" can be used unambiguously as a truth value, as well as it
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="282">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="282">??
	~~</li><~~li ~~class~~=~~"number_empty" value~~="283~~">??~~		{{li\|I=S2/EC\|Q=283}}Truth corresponds to reality / A true statement accurately describes some state of affairs in an objective inanimate reality independent of individual minds; this is to imply but not state that a population of animate people is inanimate rather than animate / The truth is what the facts are (Aron Ra) / correspondence theory of truth (proposition) / corresponds to reality (truth value)
	</li><li class="~~number_empty~~" value="284">??
			</li><li class="field_ML" value="284" data-dimension="S2">Seek truth from facts [https://research.moraleconomy.au/index.php?title=Term:實事求是] / Practice is the only criterion for testing the truth / Theory cannot decide what is accurate to reality (what is true; objectively true) -> I feel like this proposition is already recorded either in the numbering or <cite>MDem</cite> drafts. I don't think it's a unique proposition.

	</li><li class="number_empty" value="285">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="285">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="286">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="286">??

Reversedragon: sublation

2026-04-17T08:04:53Z

sublation

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:04, 17 April 2026
Line 817:		Line 817:
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="696">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="696">??

	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_ML" value~~="697~~" data-dimension~~=~~"S">~~sublation / "The conditions of this movement result from the premises now in existence" (Marx) -> takes a bit to properly explain, but very important. I've even been using it in a whole lot of propositions here without thinking about the exact word. sublation is something like a description of how material objects are transformed into new material objects. kingdoms are transformed into republics, and the kingdom or empire shape is partially preserved because the republic had to be made from something, it doesn't sprout from nowhere, but removing the feudal order allows the kingdom shape to be preserved in a new very different form as the republic for better or for worse.<br />		{{li\|I=S1/ML\|Q=697\|Q2=697}}sublation / "The conditions of this movement result from the premises now in existence" (Marx) / ([[EC:9k/RD/Q697]])
	from time to time, I keep trying to explain sublation in terms of superhero shows. like Agumon turns into MetalGreymon and it's still Agumon but it's better even though it had to leave behind the characteristics of Agumon. Ultraman, which is a blatant failed Communism metaphor anyway, has all the people turning into big aliens with powers to represent that the society has been transformed, and with their new form they have become something greater by leaving behind what they were previously but they also can't totally get rid of it. you can also connect sublation to real-world evolution, and how it often takes a while for any particular ancestral characteristic to be lost and you always have some of them. but I like to point to superhero shows because they portray things happening without having to wait for them, this idea that something part of a bigger thing can simply change itself when change is needed.

	</li><li class="number_empty" value="698">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="698">??

Reversedragon: exclusively-existing republic

2026-04-07T23:20:19Z

exclusively-existing republic

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:20, 7 April 2026
Line 310:		Line 310:
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="269">source reprinted online -> this is for texts that are free online, in any format		</li><li class="field_geo" value="269">source reprinted online -> this is for texts that are free online, in any format

	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_mdem" data-tradition="ML,~~ MX~~" value~~="270~~" data-dimension~~=~~"S">~~exclusively-existing republic / ~~republic that exists to the exclusion of other kinds of republics~~		{{li\|I=S1/MX\|Q=270\|Q2=270}}exclusively-existing republic / ([[EC:9k/RD/Q270\|9k]])
	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_gramsci" value~~="271~~" data-dimension~~=~~"S0">~~dictatorship of the whatever / ~~republic that exists to maintain its national borders to the exclusion of foreign control but does not exclude the existence of the bourgeoisie~~ (~~at the very least, smaller ones), and tends to neatly put workers and petty producers together in~~ [[E:~~Yaroshenkoism~~\|~~'strawberry' production relations or social structures~~]]		{{li\|I=S0/DX\|Q=271\|Q2=271}}exclusively strawberry republic / dictatorship of the whatever / ([[EC:9k/RD/Q270\|9k]])
	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_ML" value~~="272~~" data-dimension~~=~~"S">~~dictatorship of the Stalinists (~~under interpretation that Stalin's government excluding Trotskyists is not equivalent to excluding bourgeoisie~~)		{{li\|I=S1/ML\|Q=272\|Q2=272}}exclusively Stalinist republic / dictatorship of the Stalinists / ([[EC:9k/RD/Q270\|9k]])
	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_ML" value~~="273~~" data-dimension~~=~~"S">~~dictatorship of the proletariat ~~/ proletarian civilization (state of proletarian republic existing exclusively or somewhat exclusively while specifically not allowing a bourgeois republic to exist)~~ / workers' state (existing exclusively) / ~~proletarian republic~~ (~~existing exclusively)~~ / ~~crimson republic (existing exclusively)~~ / dictatorship of the Stalinists (under hypothesis that excluding Trotskyists is almost exactly the same as excluding bourgeoisie and defending the exclusive emergence of proletarian civilization; good connotation)		{{li\|I=S0/ML\|Q=273\|Q2=273}}exclusively proletarian civilization / dictatorship of the proletariat / workers' state (existing exclusively) / ([[EC:9k/RD/Q270\|9k]])
	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_trotsky" value~~="274~~" data-dimension~~=~~"S">dictatorship of the Trotskyists -> this sounds like I'm joking but I'm quite serious. there really seems to be a dynamic where when Trotskyists think they can create a uniquely~~ Trotskyist republic (supranational federation, huge wad of 100 countries, or whatever it practically looks like) they want to create it to the exclusion of mainstream Marxist-Leninist republics. in functionality, this aspect of Trotskyism is almost exactly like the dictatorship of the ~~bourgeoisie trying to prevent the dictatorship of the proletariat, or vice versa~~ (although Trotskyists allow so much anticommunism I do think the former is fair). this is very strange, because it's hard to tell class-wise what exactly Trotskyists want to create the dictatorship {{em\|of}}. they'll try to claim the proletariat and take credit for it but when Stalin does something they don't like — and thus during the bulk of everything they wrote or said in the 1930s — they aren't focused on the proletariat then. defeating Stalin's government is a weirdly huge part of Trotskyism. arguably more than actually caring about workers. so what exactly is it that they are trying to exclude and what exactly is it that they are trying to make mandatory?<br/>		{{li\|I=S1/IV\|Q=274\|Q2=274}}exclusively Trotskyist republic / dictatorship of the Trotskyists / ([[EC:9k/RD/Q270\|9k]])<br/>
	one possible answer which is like, the most charitable interpretation of everything they say, is that they are trying to create a dictatorship of internationalism so they can exclude the existence of today's nation-states. that is one of the most weirdly anarchist things for a statist ideology to try to do, but ultimately, at least it makes logical sense. "Stalin is keeping us from our freedom by keeping Russia from merging with China, but we could fix it if we made Bolshevism bigger" is actually a way more coherent statement than Bellegarrigue trying to say that any person who fits an abstract template of somebody giving orders 'somehow' leads to countries being divided. in one way Trotskyism is the most respectable 'anarchism' because it's the only 'anarchism' that makes sense, I mean, even taking Liberalism as an anarchism it doesn't incorporate Lenin while Trotskyism does try to and says you can't get to anarchy without Lenin. which is true.<br/>
	another much less charitable interpretation is that Trotskyism is a dictatorship of intermediate classes which are not proletarian but are not 'factory-level' bourgeoisie. this is the impression you'd get if you associated with some Trotskyist parties, that they think they're better than Stalin's government because Stalin was ultimately a proletarian ally but the few Trotskyist theorists of that time were solidly non-proletarian, allies of non-proletarians, and believed they were better than the proletariat. there are historical incidents that would definitely imply this, like Trotsky trying to order around the council of trade unions.<br/>
	town full of Trotskyists + ?? = dictatorship of the Trotskyists.		town full of Trotskyists + ?? = dictatorship of the Trotskyists.
	</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="275" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="275" data-dimension="S">??
	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_exstruct" value~~="276~~" data-dimension~~=~~"Z0">~~dictatorship of the bourgeoisie / Liberal-republicanism (~~state of Liberal-republicanism~~ existing exclusively ~~while not allowing any other form of republic to exist~~) / ~~bourgeois republic~~ (~~existing exclusively)~~ / ~~blue republic (existing exclusively~~) -> this thing is so ubiquitous and possible to point to physically that not only am I giving it a low number to be easier to remember but it gets a Z dimension. dictatorship of the bourgeoisie physically exists, it's time to stop denying it.		{{li\|I=Z0/LR\|Q=276\|Q2=276}}exclusively bourgeois republic / dictatorship of the bourgeoisie / Liberal-republicanism (existing exclusively) / ([[EC:9k/RD/Q270\|9k]])
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="277">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="277">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="278">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="278">??

Reversedragon: archive early formatting in a more intuitive way; based on revision 413

2026-04-06T00:58:29Z

archive early formatting in a more intuitive way; based on revision 413

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:58, 6 April 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<h2 id="section-100"><span class="mw-headline">Items 1 - ~~225~~</span> <span class="mw-editsection plainlinks"><span class="mw-editsection-bracket">[</span>[https://research.moraleconomy.au/index.php?title=User:Reversedragon/FirstNineThousand/100&action=edit edit]<span class="mw-editsection-bracket">]</span></span></h2>		<h2 id="section-100"><span class="mw-headline">Items 1 - 900</span> <span class="mw-editsection plainlinks"><span class="mw-editsection-bracket">[</span>[https://research.moraleconomy.au/index.php?title=User:Reversedragon/FirstNineThousand/100&action=edit edit]<span class="mw-editsection-bracket">]</span></span></h2>

	Critical concepts and best-known countable philosophies<noinclude><br /> Final live version of this section: [[Philosophical Research:Items 1 to 1,000]]</noinclude>		Critical concepts and best-known countable philosophies<noinclude><br /> Final live version of this section: [[Philosophical Research:Items 1 to 1,000]]</noinclude>

	~~<noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude>~~<ol ~~class~~="~~hue clean reset~~">		=== 1 - 225 ===
	<li ~~value~~="1" data-dimension="Z~~" class="field_geo~~">[[Ontology:Q1\|process of Being]]
	</li><li class="field_geo" ~~value~~="2" data-dimension="Z">[[Ontology:Q2\|sea of free-floating entities]]		<ol start="1" data-inception="2024-12-26T03:32:15Z" data-created="2025-01-14T02:00:41">
	</li><li class="field_geo" ~~value~~="3" data-dimension="Z0">[[Ontology:Q3\|countable entity]]		<li class="field_geo entry_1" data-qid="1" data-dimension="Z">[Z] [[Ontology:Q1\|process of Being]] -> (note: this is the early formatting from January 2025 — before Hue lists were created, and before the list eventually got so long these per-Item prototype notes had to be removed.)
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="4" data-dimension="Z0">[[Ontology:Q4\|countable concept]]		</li><li class="field_geo entry_2" data-qid="2" data-dimension="Z">[Z] [[Ontology:Q2\|sea of free-floating entities]]
			</li><li class="field_geo" data-qid="3" data-dimension="Z0">[Z0] [[Ontology:Q3\|countable entity]]
			</li></ol>

			<noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol start="4" class="hue clean reset">
			<li class="field_geo" value="4" data-dimension="Z0">[[Ontology:Q4\|countable concept]]
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="5" data-dimension="Z0">[[Ontology:Q5\|countable object]]		</li><li class="field_geo" value="5" data-dimension="Z0">[[Ontology:Q5\|countable object]]
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="6" data-dimension="Z">spatially-unique object / unique object		</li><li class="field_geo" value="6" data-dimension="Z">spatially-unique object / unique object
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="7" data-dimension="Z">spacetime-unique event / unique event		</li><li class="field_geo" value="7" data-dimension="Z">spacetime-unique event / unique event
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="8" data-dimension="Z">series of unique events / timeline of unique events		</li><li class="field_geo" value="8" data-dimension="Z">series of unique events / timeline of unique events
	</li><li class="field_ML" value="9" data-dimension-2="S0">~~[S0]~~ [[Ontology:Q9\|series of non-unique events]] / repeatable historical pattern		</li><li class="field_ML" value="9" data-dimension="S0">[[Ontology:Q9\|series of non-unique events]] / repeatable historical pattern
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="10" data-dimension="Z">repeating process		</li><li class="field_geo" value="10" data-dimension="Z">repeating process
	</li><li class="field_ML" value="11" data-dimension="Z">material-history -> the series of physical events that defines what any particular object or population is; the topic historical materialism studies		</li><li class="field_ML" value="11" data-dimension="Z">material-history -> the series of physical events that defines what any particular object or population is; the topic historical materialism studies

Reversedragon: clarify that "poststructuralism" is "poststructuralist philosophy"; move it to Q76 given that it is more instrumental in definitions of Freedom than psychoanalysis

2026-04-06T00:31:23Z

clarify that "poststructuralism" is "poststructuralist philosophy"; move it to Q76 given that it is more instrumental in definitions of Freedom than psychoanalysis

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:31, 6 April 2026
Line 79:		Line 79:
	</li><li class="field_exstruct" data-remark="one basic precursor to E-S trad" value="70" data-dimension="Z">analytic philosophy		</li><li class="field_exstruct" data-remark="one basic precursor to E-S trad" value="70" data-dimension="Z">analytic philosophy
	</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="71" data-dimension="S0">field of study diagramming signs and signifiers / semiotics (generic) / structuralist linguistics (generic) / meta-ontology (generic)		</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="71" data-dimension="S0">field of study diagramming signs and signifiers / semiotics (generic) / structuralist linguistics (generic) / meta-ontology (generic)
	</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="72" data-dimension="Z">phenomenology / Husserl's phenomenology (Existentialism)		</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="72" data-dimension="Z">phenomenology / Husserl's phenomenology ([[E:Q73\|Existentialism]])
	</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="73" data-dimension="Z">[[Ontology:Q73\|Existentialist-Structuralist tradition]] / Existentialism (abbreviation) -> note, early-existentialism is already Q42		</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="73" data-dimension="Z">[[Ontology:Q73\|Existentialist-Structuralist tradition]] / Existentialism (abbreviation) -> note, early-existentialism is already Q42
	</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="74" data-dimension="Z">structuralist linguistics / structuralism (linguistics)		</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="74" data-dimension="Z">structuralist linguistics / structuralism (linguistics)
	</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="75" data-dimension="Z">~~poststructuralism~~		</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="75" data-dimension="Z">psychoanalysis / Freudian psychoanalysis (generic) / Lacanian psychoanalysis (generic)
	</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="76" data-dimension="Z">~~psychoanalysis~~ / ~~Freudian psychoanalysis (generic)~~ / ~~Lacanian psychoanalysis~~ (generic)		</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="76" data-dimension="Z">post-structuralist philosophy / poststructuralism / poststructuralist linguistics (generic)
	</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="77" data-dimension="Z">schizoanalysis		</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="77" data-dimension="Z">schizoanalysis
	</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="78" data-dimension="Z">alterity theories / postcolonial theories (theories about how colonialism is a prejudice about a group of people in someone's mind)		</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="78" data-dimension="Z">alterity theories / postcolonial theories (theories about how colonialism is a prejudice about a group of people in someone's mind)

Reversedragon: historically accurate (truth value)

2026-04-05T21:38:27Z

historically accurate (truth value)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:38, 5 April 2026
Line 710:		Line 710:
	</li><li value="601" data-remark="DCI" class="field_horror" data-tradition="Fy" data-dimension="S">fictional incident, tragedy, or crime / un-true crime		</li><li value="601" data-remark="DCI" class="field_horror" data-tradition="Fy" data-dimension="S">fictional incident, tragedy, or crime / un-true crime
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="602">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="602">??
	</li><li class="~~number_empty~~" value="603">??		</li><li class="field_ML" value="603" data-dimension="S">historically accurate (truth value) / historically accurate statement within the bounds of specified population or populations
	</li><li class="~~number_empty~~" value="604">??		</li><li class="field_ML" value="604" data-dimension="S">historically inaccurate (truth value) / historically inaccurate statement within the bounds of specified population or populations / ([[EC:9k/RD/Q530\|9k]])
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="605">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="605">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="606">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="606">??

Reversedragon: abstract Ideal / page (non-serialized part)

2026-04-05T07:49:33Z

abstract Ideal / page (non-serialized part)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:49, 5 April 2026
Line 175:		Line 175:

	</li><li class="field_geo" value="160" data-dimension="Z0">text / written work (book; story; article; web page) / visual work (comic; animated series) / aural work (audiobook; podcast) -> I think the major thing that this entry excludes is compilations of things. like, a magazine with many articles is not a text, although it is a periodical issue and by other definitions a work.		</li><li class="field_geo" value="160" data-dimension="Z0">text / written work (book; story; article; web page) / visual work (comic; animated series) / aural work (audiobook; podcast) -> I think the major thing that this entry excludes is compilations of things. like, a magazine with many articles is not a text, although it is a periodical issue and by other definitions a work.
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="161" data-dimension="Z0">~~part (book division)~~		</li><li class="field_geo" value="161" data-dimension="Z0">non-serialized part -> discrete part which may be released in an all-at-once or timeless manner
	~~</li><li class="field_geo" value="162">??~~		</li><li class="field_geo" value="162" data-dimension="Z0">serialized part -> numbered part which is syndicated or expected to release periodically
	~~</li><li class="field_geo" value="163" data~~-~~dimension="Z0">~~serialized part -> ~~numbered~~ part which ~~is syndicated~~ or ~~expected to release periodically~~		</li><li class="field_geo" value="163" data-dimension="Z0">volume -> physical printed book, or book-sized division. I'll say this doesn't refer to science periodical volumes unless they're physically collected into a self-contained book you can browse or something vaguely resembling one.
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="~~164~~" data-dimension="Z0">~~non-~~serialized part -> ~~discrete~~ part which ~~may be released in an all-at-once~~ or ~~timeless manner~~		</li><li class="field_geo" value="164" data-dimension="Z0">part (book division)
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="~~165~~" data-dimension="Z0">volume -> physical printed book, or book-sized division. I'll say this doesn't refer to science periodical volumes unless they're physically collected into a self-contained book you can browse or something vaguely resembling one.		</li><li class="field_geo" value="165" data-dimension="Z0">chapter (non-serialized part) -> in reference to novels.
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="~~166~~" data-dimension="Z0">chapter (non-serialized part) -> in reference to novels.		</li><li class="field_geo" value="166" data-dimension="Z0">page (non-serialized part) -> in rare cases, a "page" can be a serialized part, like how Homestuck was calling its updates or pieces of updates pages. this is for non-serialized pages. a page inside a self-contained serialized comic volume is a non-serialized part.
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="167" data-dimension="Z0">episode / chapter (serialized part) -> in reference to works that are entirely planned for serialization, like manga, or some prose stories submitted to magazines which were not treated as standard novels when published later. personally I'd take the bold stance that there's no serious difference between serialized chapters of printed things and episodes of voiced things. but, this Item will have both sense-labels to minimize confusion.		</li><li class="field_fantasy" value="167" data-dimension="S">serialized video game chapter
	~~</li><li class="field_fantasy" value="168" data-dimension="S">serialized video game chapter~~		</li><li class="field_geo" value="168" data-dimension="Z0">episode / chapter (serialized part) -> in reference to works that are entirely planned for serialization, like manga, or some prose stories submitted to magazines which were not treated as standard novels when published later. personally I'd take the bold stance that there's no serious difference between serialized chapters of printed things and episodes of voiced things. but, this Item will have both sense-labels to minimize confusion.
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="169">??		</li><li class="field_geo" value="169">??
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="170">??		</li><li class="field_geo" value="170">??
Line 191:		Line 191:
	</li><li class="field_mdem" value="174" data-dimension="S">[[Ontology:Q174\|atom-like entity]] -> an atom-like entity is a mostly-indivisible unit which contains the capacity for particular patterns when combined with particular other atom-like entities. a chemical element is the prototypical example: two hydrogens and one oxygen form water. but one hypothesis I am trying to investigate is the possibility that individuals of particular ideologies are atom-like entities, and when put together in various "compounds" they form specific ideologies. I feel like there is some remote possibility that one day there could just be a periodic table of ideologies that is as prosaic and numerical as the study of chemical elements and chemical compounds.<br /> an atom-like entity is <em>not</em> an entity that can be considered in total isolation from all others akin to a helium atom. I really don't like models like [[E:Q1980\|Rothenberg's]] that imply that, because not even chemistry works that way. chemistry may be reductionist, but the predictable emergences from the elements are the whole study of chemistry.		</li><li class="field_mdem" value="174" data-dimension="S">[[Ontology:Q174\|atom-like entity]] -> an atom-like entity is a mostly-indivisible unit which contains the capacity for particular patterns when combined with particular other atom-like entities. a chemical element is the prototypical example: two hydrogens and one oxygen form water. but one hypothesis I am trying to investigate is the possibility that individuals of particular ideologies are atom-like entities, and when put together in various "compounds" they form specific ideologies. I feel like there is some remote possibility that one day there could just be a periodic table of ideologies that is as prosaic and numerical as the study of chemical elements and chemical compounds.<br /> an atom-like entity is <em>not</em> an entity that can be considered in total isolation from all others akin to a helium atom. I really don't like models like [[E:Q1980\|Rothenberg's]] that imply that, because not even chemistry works that way. chemistry may be reductionist, but the predictable emergences from the elements are the whole study of chemistry.
	</li><li class="field_mdem" value="175" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="field_mdem" value="175" data-dimension="S">??
	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_mdem" value~~="176~~" data-dimension="S">??~~		{{li\|I=S1/ES\|Q=176}}abstract Ideal / abstract ideal (standard English capitalization outside philosophy)
	</li><li class="field_mdem" value="177" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="field_mdem" value="177" data-dimension="S">??

	</li><li class="field_geo" value="178">wiki page -> non-serialized part; text not in the form of volume. ~~move these two to later number?~~		</li><li class="field_geo" value="178" data-dimension="Z0">wiki page -> non-serialized part; text not in the form of volume.
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="179">MediaWiki category -> non-serialized part which clusters wiki pages		</li><li class="field_geo" value="179" data-dimension="Z0">wiki category / MediaWiki category -> non-serialized part which clusters wiki pages

	</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="180" data-dimension="S">[[E:Q180\|analyzing a text for motifs]] -> there are different connotations to this. Freudians do this because they think motifs reveal the rules of psychohistory. schizoanalysts do this because they think motifs reveal the rules of finding Freedom. Marxists do this because they think many motifs come from the rules of populations and material-history.		</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="180" data-dimension="S">[[E:Q180\|analyzing a text for motifs]] -> there are different connotations to this. Freudians do this because they think motifs reveal the rules of psychohistory. schizoanalysts do this because they think motifs reveal the rules of finding Freedom. Marxists do this because they think many motifs come from the rules of populations and material-history.

Reversedragon: deontology

2026-04-05T07:33:28Z

deontology

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:33, 5 April 2026
Line 329:		Line 329:
	</li><li class="field_nations" value="288" data-dimension="S0">[[Ontology:Q288\|misinformation or disinformation]]		</li><li class="field_nations" value="288" data-dimension="S0">[[Ontology:Q288\|misinformation or disinformation]]
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="289">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="289">??
	</li><li class="~~number_empty~~" value="290">??
	</li><li class="~~field_mdem~~" value="291">[~~[Ontology~~:~~Q291~~\|'~~pataphysics]]~~		</li><li class="field_mdem" value="290" data-dimension="S">[[Ontology:Q290\|'pataphysics]] / ([[Ontology_talk:9k/RD/Q290\|9k]])
			</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="291" data-dimension="S">deontology / ethical theory where truth values of whether something is good or bad are derived based on the prior existence of particular things which are determined to be "inherently good" — divine decree, natural law, good intentions, etc. / threshold deontology (application) [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deontology] -> I thought deontology sounded bad the first time I heard about it but on closer examination I think I've been using it to create joke thought experiments involving tossing workers' states into traditional ethical problems. looking at that, I think I've always thought it was a little hokey but it takes a long time to actually explain why. I think it's that problem of ethical epicycles where on various things people will go through a chain of reasoning and then suddenly derail it because it didn't fit some external principle that doesn't match the rest of their theory at all. I wish people would be honest and just say the thing they interrupted the first theory with is their real theory. even if it's a theory that's really dumb on the surface like 'things that are prejudiced are inherently bad' (deontology {{i\|a la}} Habermas), like, we get further if you admit that that's your primary theory and then we can get into exactly where it came from.

	</li><li value="292" class="number_empty" data-dimension="Z0">[[Ontology:Q292\|relativistic gap]] -> gap between physical objects made of something bigger than quarks. when there are no fundamental interactions such as photons crossing the gap between objects, there is no serious causality going on between objects. great separation between objects in terms of how easy it is for them to interact is relativistic separation: two planets several light-years apart have a difficulty in interacting with each other measured by the fact interactions through physical signals take years. in this, there is a certain inherent connection between relativity and quantum physics. relativity talks about gaps that photons travel across. quantum mechanics talks about gaps photons travel across. this means something for gravity, but nobody knows what that statement actually will be.		</li><li value="292" class="number_empty" data-dimension="Z0">[[Ontology:Q292\|relativistic gap]] -> gap between physical objects made of something bigger than quarks. when there are no fundamental interactions such as photons crossing the gap between objects, there is no serious causality going on between objects. great separation between objects in terms of how easy it is for them to interact is relativistic separation: two planets several light-years apart have a difficulty in interacting with each other measured by the fact interactions through physical signals take years. in this, there is a certain inherent connection between relativity and quantum physics. relativity talks about gaps that photons travel across. quantum mechanics talks about gaps photons travel across. this means something for gravity, but nobody knows what that statement actually will be.

Reversedragon: function (mathematics) / indestructible entity

2026-04-05T06:09:31Z

function (mathematics) / indestructible entity

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:09, 5 April 2026
Line 700:		Line 700:
	</li><li class="field_geo" data-tradition="STM" value="595" data-dimension="S">total population		</li><li class="field_geo" data-tradition="STM" value="595" data-dimension="S">total population
	</li><li class="field_geo" data-tradition="STM" value="596" data-dimension="S">population times standard population density / population adjusted by standard population density -> if you use this measurement, you see that New York City is a big population constrained by resources, but Russia is also a big population constrained by logistics.		</li><li class="field_geo" data-tradition="STM" value="596" data-dimension="S">population times standard population density / population adjusted by standard population density -> if you use this measurement, you see that New York City is a big population constrained by resources, but Russia is also a big population constrained by logistics.
	</li><li class="~~number_empty" data-tradition="STM~~" value="597" data-dimension="S">??
	</li><li class="~~number_empty" data-tradition="STM~~" value="598" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="field_geo" value="597" data-dimension="S">data structure (mathematics) / data structure (programming; sense label)
			</li><li class="field_geo" value="598" data-dimension="S">function (mathematics) / one-to-one mapping / one input vector to one output correlation -> so, multivariable functions are still one-to-one mappings. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Function_of_several_real_variables] the surface they generate still has one point per two unique input values, which makes them still computable and decidable in the same sense.

	</li><li class="field_geo" data-tradition="STM" value="599" data-dimension="S">many		</li><li class="field_geo" data-tradition="STM" value="599" data-dimension="S">many
Line 792:		Line 793:
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="680">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="680">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="681">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="681">??
	</li><li class="~~number_empty~~" value="682">??
			</li><li class="field_trotsky" value="682" data-dimension="S">indestructible entity / entity which is nearly impossible to destroy because its existence is not limited to one physical object / entity which has permanently left an effect on history (applied sense) / You can kill [[E:Leon Trotsky\|a man]] but you can't kill his ideas (Alan Woods)

	</li><li class="number_empty" value="683">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="683">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="684">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="684">??
Line 925:		Line 928:
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="780">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="780">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="781">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="781">??
	~~</li><li class="number_empty" value="782">??~~
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="782" data-dimension="Z">formal logic		</li><li class="field_geo" value="782" data-dimension="Z">formal logic
	</li><li class="field_mdem" value="783" data-dimension="S">non-binary logic / ([[9k/RD/Q530\|9k]])		</li><li class="field_mdem" value="783" data-dimension="S">non-binary logic / ([[9k/RD/Q530\|9k]])

Reversedragon: Curvature makes integers into infinities / approximating with sine waves

2026-04-05T05:30:33Z

Curvature makes integers into infinities / approximating with sine waves

Show changes