User:Reversedragon/FirstNineThousand/100 - Revision history

Reversedragon: The 1930s Trotskyite conspiracy never happened

2026-06-10T00:15:53Z

The 1930s Trotskyite conspiracy never happened

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:15, 10 June 2026
Line 526:		Line 526:
	</li><li value="434" class="field_nations" data-dimension="S">[[E:TimeCube\|time cube theory]]		</li><li value="434" class="field_nations" data-dimension="S">[[E:TimeCube\|time cube theory]]
	</li><li value="435" class="number_empty">??		</li><li value="435" class="number_empty">??
	</~~li><li value~~="436~~" class~~=~~"number_empty">??~~
			{{li\|I=S2/IV\|Q=436\|Q2=436}}The 1930s Trotskyite conspiracy never happened / ({{9k\|RD/Q41,91}})

	</li><li value="437" class="number_empty">??		</li><li value="437" class="number_empty">??
	</li><li value="438" class="number_empty">??		</li><li value="438" class="number_empty">??

Reversedragon: The source of theory lies not in thought but in the objective world (David North)

2026-05-12T03:17:28Z

The source of theory lies not in thought but in the objective world (David North)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:17, 12 May 2026
Line 327:		Line 327:
	{{li\|I=S2/EC\|Q=281}}Falsity diverges from reality / correspondence theory of truth (proposition; generic) / diverges from reality (truth value) -> this proposition basically exists so "Truth corresponds to reality" can be used unambiguously as a truth value, as well as it		{{li\|I=S2/EC\|Q=281}}Falsity diverges from reality / correspondence theory of truth (proposition; generic) / diverges from reality (truth value) -> this proposition basically exists so "Truth corresponds to reality" can be used unambiguously as a truth value, as well as it
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="282">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="282">??
	{{li\|I=S2/EC\|Q=283}}Truth corresponds to reality / A true statement accurately describes some state of affairs in an objective inanimate reality independent of individual minds; this is to imply but not state that a population of animate people is inanimate rather than animate / The truth is what the facts are (Aron Ra) / correspondence theory of truth (proposition) / corresponds to reality (truth value)		{{li\|I=S2/EC\|Q=283}}Truth corresponds to reality / A true statement accurately describes some state of affairs in an objective inanimate reality independent of individual minds; this is to imply but not state that a population of animate people is inanimate rather than animate / The truth is what the facts are (Aron Ra) / The source of theory lies not in thought but in the objective world (David North 2012) [https://www.wsws.org/en/special/library/frankfurt-school-postmodernism-politics-pseudoleft/05.html] / correspondence theory of truth (proposition) / corresponds to reality (truth value)

	</li><li class="field_ML" value="284" data-dimension="S2">Seek truth from facts [https://research.moraleconomy.au/index.php?title=Term:實事求是] / Practice is the only criterion for testing the truth / Theory cannot decide what is accurate to reality (what is true; objectively true) -> I feel like this proposition is already recorded either in the numbering or <cite>MDem</cite> drafts. I don't think it's a unique proposition.		</li><li class="field_ML" value="284" data-dimension="S2">Seek truth from facts [https://research.moraleconomy.au/index.php?title=Term:實事求是] / Practice is the only criterion for testing the truth / Theory cannot decide what is accurate to reality (what is true; objectively true) -> I feel like this proposition is already recorded either in the numbering or <cite>MDem</cite> drafts. I don't think it's a unique proposition.

Reversedragon: mode of production (Marx) / dialectic (Hegel)

2026-05-11T10:30:43Z

mode of production (Marx) / dialectic (Hegel)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:30, 11 May 2026
Line 798:		Line 798:
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="677">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="677">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="678">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="678">??
	~~</li><li class="number_empty" value="679">??~~
	~~</li><li class="number_empty" value="680">??~~
	~~</li><li class="number_empty" value="681">??~~

	</li><li ~~class~~=~~"field_trotsky" value~~="682~~" data-dimension~~=~~"S">~~indestructible entity / entity which is nearly impossible to destroy because its existence is not limited to one physical object / entity which has permanently left an effect on history (applied sense) / You can kill [[E:Leon Trotsky\|a man]] but you can't kill his ideas (Alan Woods)		{{li\|I=S1/AS \|Q=679\|Q2=679}}dialectic (Hegel)
			{{li\|I=S1/HAS\|Q=680\|Q2=680}}general-sense dialectic -> I think this gets the Liberal-republicanism/humanities swatch for the '[[EC:9k/RD/Q64,30\|phoenix wright]] appeal'.
			{{li\|I=S1/A \|Q=681\|Q2=681}}general-sense Idealist dialectic -> a general-sense Idealist dialectic is a process or operator by which two things in conceptual contradiction interact.<br/>
			Rhizome and 'molecular Idealism' vaguely fall into either the category of this or the vicinity of this.

			{{li\|I=S1/IV\|Q=682\|Q2=682}}indestructible entity / entity which is nearly impossible to destroy because its existence is not limited to one physical object / entity which has permanently left an effect on history (applied sense) / You can kill [[E:Leon Trotsky\|a man]] but you can't kill his ideas (Alan Woods)

			{{li\|I=S1/ML\|Q=683\|Q2=683}}general-sense materialist dialectic / naïve dialectical materialism (generic) -> a general-sense materialist dialectic is a process or operator by which two things in material contradiction interact.

			{{li\|I=S1/ML\|Q=684\|Q2=684}}mode of production (Marx) -> I understand this to be a molecularized process where relations of production (production structures in motion) assemble into a population that could be a whole country or part of a country. if I say anything about Q684 that conflicts with Marx, assume Marx/Engels is more likely to be correct

	~~</li><li class="number_empty" value="683">??~~
	~~</li><li class="number_empty" value="684">??~~
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="685">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="685">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="686">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="686">??
Line 813:		Line 817:
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="690">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="690">??

	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_mdem" value~~="691~~" data-dimension~~=~~"S">~~"I wish comrades existed" / wishing comrades or solidarity existed in real life (motif) / "the love of humanity" is usually not reciprocated (motif) / ([[User:RD/9k/Q691\|9k]])		{{li\|I=S1/MX\|Q=691\|Q2=691}}"I wish comrades existed" / wishing comrades or solidarity existed in real life (motif) / "the love of humanity" is usually not reciprocated (motif) / ([[User:RD/9k/Q691\|9k]])
	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_mdem" value~~="692~~" data-dimension~~=~~"S">~~comrade (mathematics) / mathematical description of which individuals or localized graphs remain part of a Lattice model / ([[User:RD/9k/Q691\|9k]])		{{li\|I=S1/MX\|Q=692\|Q2=692}}comrade (mathematics) / mathematical description of which individuals or localized graphs remain part of a Lattice model / ([[User:RD/9k/Q691\|9k]])

	</li><li class="number_empty" value="693">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="693">??

Reversedragon: freedom

2026-05-08T12:24:05Z

freedom

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:24, 8 May 2026
Line 930:		Line 930:
	</li><li class="field_mdem" value="776" data-dimension="S">[[Ontology:Q776\|social event horizon]] / Vegeta effect / Entei effect -> the non-fictional motif of people having a horizon around themselves which other people cannot pierce through to control, with only a few exceptions for such things as people forming a social structure that makes a decision of how to use all its people. this motif doesn't directly include those exceptions. this motif combines with other propositions to form particular historical or contemporary conceptions of "free will", but it doesn't really have to be used that way if you instead wish to study people through existential materialism.		</li><li class="field_mdem" value="776" data-dimension="S">[[Ontology:Q776\|social event horizon]] / Vegeta effect / Entei effect -> the non-fictional motif of people having a horizon around themselves which other people cannot pierce through to control, with only a few exceptions for such things as people forming a social structure that makes a decision of how to use all its people. this motif doesn't directly include those exceptions. this motif combines with other propositions to form particular historical or contemporary conceptions of "free will", but it doesn't really have to be used that way if you instead wish to study people through existential materialism.
	</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="777" data-dimension="S">[[Ontology:Q777\|Free Will]] -> a motif I have never liked because of the fact nobody can actually define it. whenever you try to discuss Free Will the discussion becomes confusing, because what process are we even debating the existence <em>of</em>? worse yet, people who think they can disprove it typically try to counter it with concepts that are difficult to substantiate or falsify. even Sabine Hossenfelder, who is convinced she knows exactly what hypotheses are so up-in-the-air they aren't science, tossed out an unfalsifiable hypothesis to counter Free Will. this entry.... will be a messy one. there will be about 10+ different models associated with what is supposedly the same thing.		</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="777" data-dimension="S">[[Ontology:Q777\|Free Will]] -> a motif I have never liked because of the fact nobody can actually define it. whenever you try to discuss Free Will the discussion becomes confusing, because what process are we even debating the existence <em>of</em>? worse yet, people who think they can disprove it typically try to counter it with concepts that are difficult to substantiate or falsify. even Sabine Hossenfelder, who is convinced she knows exactly what hypotheses are so up-in-the-air they aren't science, tossed out an unfalsifiable hypothesis to counter Free Will. this entry.... will be a messy one. there will be about 10+ different models associated with what is supposedly the same thing.
	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_exstruct" value~~="778~~" data-dimension~~=~~"S">~~freedom (top-level category) ~~-> one of the only terms worse than free will in terms of how many definitions it has. genuinely don't use this except to list the category on category pages~~
			{{li\|I=S1/ES\|Q=778\|Q2=778}}freedom (top-level category) / ({{9k\|RD/Q778}})

	</li><li class="number_empty" value="779">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="779">??

Reversedragon: special relativity, general relativity

2026-05-06T03:58:01Z

special relativity, general relativity

Reversedragon: Idealism

2026-05-01T06:40:26Z

Idealism

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:40, 1 May 2026
Line 100:		Line 100:
	</li><li class="field_ML" value="85" data-dimension="S">Marxism believing itself to be uncountable / generic Marxism / ([[User:RD/9k/Q81\|9k]])		</li><li class="field_ML" value="85" data-dimension="S">Marxism believing itself to be uncountable / generic Marxism / ([[User:RD/9k/Q81\|9k]])
	</li><li class="field_mdem" value="86" data-dimension="Z">existential materialism / exmat / ([[User:RD/9k/Q81\|9k]])		</li><li class="field_mdem" value="86" data-dimension="Z">existential materialism / exmat / ([[User:RD/9k/Q81\|9k]])
	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_anarchy" value~~="87~~" data-dimension~~=~~"Z">~~[[E:Idealism\|Idealism]]		{{li\|I=Z1/HAS/A\|Q=87\|Q2=87}}[[E:Idealism\|Idealism]] / ([[EC:9k/RD/Q87\|9k]])

	</li><li value="88" class="field_nations" data-dimension="S0">[[Ontology:Q88\|named nationalism]] / named fascism / named Identitarianism / nationalism distinguished into cultural category / uniquely Spanish nationalism / uniquely Japanese nationalism / uniquely United-States nationalism		</li><li value="88" class="field_nations" data-dimension="S0">[[Ontology:Q88\|named nationalism]] / named fascism / named Identitarianism / nationalism distinguished into cultural category / uniquely Spanish nationalism / uniquely Japanese nationalism / uniquely United-States nationalism

Reversedragon: Truth corresponds to reality

2026-04-26T08:41:16Z

Truth corresponds to reality

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:41, 26 April 2026
Line 323:		Line 323:

	</li><li class="field_nations" value="280" data-dimension="S0">[[Ontology:Q280\|statement with no possible backing claims]]		</li><li class="field_nations" value="280" data-dimension="S0">[[Ontology:Q280\|statement with no possible backing claims]]
	</li>~~<li class=~~"~~number_empty~~" value~~="281">??~~
			{{li\|I=S2/EC\|Q=281}}Falsity diverges from reality / correspondence theory of truth (proposition; generic) / diverges from reality (truth value) -> this proposition basically exists so "Truth corresponds to reality" can be used unambiguously as a truth value, as well as it
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="282">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="282">??
	~~</li><~~li ~~class~~=~~"number_empty" value~~="283~~">??~~		{{li\|I=S2/EC\|Q=283}}Truth corresponds to reality / A true statement accurately describes some state of affairs in an objective inanimate reality independent of individual minds; this is to imply but not state that a population of animate people is inanimate rather than animate / The truth is what the facts are (Aron Ra) / correspondence theory of truth (proposition) / corresponds to reality (truth value)
	</li><li class="~~number_empty~~" value="284">??
			</li><li class="field_ML" value="284" data-dimension="S2">Seek truth from facts [https://research.moraleconomy.au/index.php?title=Term:實事求是] / Practice is the only criterion for testing the truth / Theory cannot decide what is accurate to reality (what is true; objectively true) -> I feel like this proposition is already recorded either in the numbering or <cite>MDem</cite> drafts. I don't think it's a unique proposition.

	</li><li class="number_empty" value="285">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="285">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="286">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="286">??

Reversedragon: sublation

2026-04-17T08:04:53Z

sublation

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:04, 17 April 2026
Line 817:		Line 817:
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="696">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="696">??

	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_ML" value~~="697~~" data-dimension~~=~~"S">~~sublation / "The conditions of this movement result from the premises now in existence" (Marx) -> takes a bit to properly explain, but very important. I've even been using it in a whole lot of propositions here without thinking about the exact word. sublation is something like a description of how material objects are transformed into new material objects. kingdoms are transformed into republics, and the kingdom or empire shape is partially preserved because the republic had to be made from something, it doesn't sprout from nowhere, but removing the feudal order allows the kingdom shape to be preserved in a new very different form as the republic for better or for worse.<br />		{{li\|I=S1/ML\|Q=697\|Q2=697}}sublation / "The conditions of this movement result from the premises now in existence" (Marx) / ([[EC:9k/RD/Q697]])
	from time to time, I keep trying to explain sublation in terms of superhero shows. like Agumon turns into MetalGreymon and it's still Agumon but it's better even though it had to leave behind the characteristics of Agumon. Ultraman, which is a blatant failed Communism metaphor anyway, has all the people turning into big aliens with powers to represent that the society has been transformed, and with their new form they have become something greater by leaving behind what they were previously but they also can't totally get rid of it. you can also connect sublation to real-world evolution, and how it often takes a while for any particular ancestral characteristic to be lost and you always have some of them. but I like to point to superhero shows because they portray things happening without having to wait for them, this idea that something part of a bigger thing can simply change itself when change is needed.

	</li><li class="number_empty" value="698">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="698">??

Reversedragon: exclusively-existing republic

2026-04-07T23:20:19Z

exclusively-existing republic

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:20, 7 April 2026
Line 310:		Line 310:
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="269">source reprinted online -> this is for texts that are free online, in any format		</li><li class="field_geo" value="269">source reprinted online -> this is for texts that are free online, in any format

	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_mdem" data-tradition="ML,~~ MX~~" value~~="270~~" data-dimension~~=~~"S">~~exclusively-existing republic / ~~republic that exists to the exclusion of other kinds of republics~~		{{li\|I=S1/MX\|Q=270\|Q2=270}}exclusively-existing republic / ([[EC:9k/RD/Q270\|9k]])
	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_gramsci" value~~="271~~" data-dimension~~=~~"S0">~~dictatorship of the whatever / ~~republic that exists to maintain its national borders to the exclusion of foreign control but does not exclude the existence of the bourgeoisie~~ (~~at the very least, smaller ones), and tends to neatly put workers and petty producers together in~~ [[E:~~Yaroshenkoism~~\|~~'strawberry' production relations or social structures~~]]		{{li\|I=S0/DX\|Q=271\|Q2=271}}exclusively strawberry republic / dictatorship of the whatever / ([[EC:9k/RD/Q270\|9k]])
	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_ML" value~~="272~~" data-dimension~~=~~"S">~~dictatorship of the Stalinists (~~under interpretation that Stalin's government excluding Trotskyists is not equivalent to excluding bourgeoisie~~)		{{li\|I=S1/ML\|Q=272\|Q2=272}}exclusively Stalinist republic / dictatorship of the Stalinists / ([[EC:9k/RD/Q270\|9k]])
	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_ML" value~~="273~~" data-dimension~~=~~"S">~~dictatorship of the proletariat ~~/ proletarian civilization (state of proletarian republic existing exclusively or somewhat exclusively while specifically not allowing a bourgeois republic to exist)~~ / workers' state (existing exclusively) / ~~proletarian republic~~ (~~existing exclusively)~~ / ~~crimson republic (existing exclusively)~~ / dictatorship of the Stalinists (under hypothesis that excluding Trotskyists is almost exactly the same as excluding bourgeoisie and defending the exclusive emergence of proletarian civilization; good connotation)		{{li\|I=S0/ML\|Q=273\|Q2=273}}exclusively proletarian civilization / dictatorship of the proletariat / workers' state (existing exclusively) / ([[EC:9k/RD/Q270\|9k]])
	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_trotsky" value~~="274~~" data-dimension~~=~~"S">dictatorship of the Trotskyists -> this sounds like I'm joking but I'm quite serious. there really seems to be a dynamic where when Trotskyists think they can create a uniquely~~ Trotskyist republic (supranational federation, huge wad of 100 countries, or whatever it practically looks like) they want to create it to the exclusion of mainstream Marxist-Leninist republics. in functionality, this aspect of Trotskyism is almost exactly like the dictatorship of the ~~bourgeoisie trying to prevent the dictatorship of the proletariat, or vice versa~~ (although Trotskyists allow so much anticommunism I do think the former is fair). this is very strange, because it's hard to tell class-wise what exactly Trotskyists want to create the dictatorship {{em\|of}}. they'll try to claim the proletariat and take credit for it but when Stalin does something they don't like — and thus during the bulk of everything they wrote or said in the 1930s — they aren't focused on the proletariat then. defeating Stalin's government is a weirdly huge part of Trotskyism. arguably more than actually caring about workers. so what exactly is it that they are trying to exclude and what exactly is it that they are trying to make mandatory?<br/>		{{li\|I=S1/IV\|Q=274\|Q2=274}}exclusively Trotskyist republic / dictatorship of the Trotskyists / ([[EC:9k/RD/Q270\|9k]])<br/>
	one possible answer which is like, the most charitable interpretation of everything they say, is that they are trying to create a dictatorship of internationalism so they can exclude the existence of today's nation-states. that is one of the most weirdly anarchist things for a statist ideology to try to do, but ultimately, at least it makes logical sense. "Stalin is keeping us from our freedom by keeping Russia from merging with China, but we could fix it if we made Bolshevism bigger" is actually a way more coherent statement than Bellegarrigue trying to say that any person who fits an abstract template of somebody giving orders 'somehow' leads to countries being divided. in one way Trotskyism is the most respectable 'anarchism' because it's the only 'anarchism' that makes sense, I mean, even taking Liberalism as an anarchism it doesn't incorporate Lenin while Trotskyism does try to and says you can't get to anarchy without Lenin. which is true.<br/>
	another much less charitable interpretation is that Trotskyism is a dictatorship of intermediate classes which are not proletarian but are not 'factory-level' bourgeoisie. this is the impression you'd get if you associated with some Trotskyist parties, that they think they're better than Stalin's government because Stalin was ultimately a proletarian ally but the few Trotskyist theorists of that time were solidly non-proletarian, allies of non-proletarians, and believed they were better than the proletariat. there are historical incidents that would definitely imply this, like Trotsky trying to order around the council of trade unions.<br/>
	town full of Trotskyists + ?? = dictatorship of the Trotskyists.		town full of Trotskyists + ?? = dictatorship of the Trotskyists.
	</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="275" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="275" data-dimension="S">??
	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_exstruct" value~~="276~~" data-dimension~~=~~"Z0">~~dictatorship of the bourgeoisie / Liberal-republicanism (~~state of Liberal-republicanism~~ existing exclusively ~~while not allowing any other form of republic to exist~~) / ~~bourgeois republic~~ (~~existing exclusively)~~ / ~~blue republic (existing exclusively~~) -> this thing is so ubiquitous and possible to point to physically that not only am I giving it a low number to be easier to remember but it gets a Z dimension. dictatorship of the bourgeoisie physically exists, it's time to stop denying it.		{{li\|I=Z0/LR\|Q=276\|Q2=276}}exclusively bourgeois republic / dictatorship of the bourgeoisie / Liberal-republicanism (existing exclusively) / ([[EC:9k/RD/Q270\|9k]])
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="277">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="277">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="278">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="278">??

Reversedragon: archive early formatting in a more intuitive way; based on revision 413

2026-04-06T00:58:29Z

archive early formatting in a more intuitive way; based on revision 413

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:58, 6 April 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<h2 id="section-100"><span class="mw-headline">Items 1 - ~~225~~</span> <span class="mw-editsection plainlinks"><span class="mw-editsection-bracket">[</span>[https://research.moraleconomy.au/index.php?title=User:Reversedragon/FirstNineThousand/100&action=edit edit]<span class="mw-editsection-bracket">]</span></span></h2>		<h2 id="section-100"><span class="mw-headline">Items 1 - 900</span> <span class="mw-editsection plainlinks"><span class="mw-editsection-bracket">[</span>[https://research.moraleconomy.au/index.php?title=User:Reversedragon/FirstNineThousand/100&action=edit edit]<span class="mw-editsection-bracket">]</span></span></h2>

	Critical concepts and best-known countable philosophies<noinclude><br /> Final live version of this section: [[Philosophical Research:Items 1 to 1,000]]</noinclude>		Critical concepts and best-known countable philosophies<noinclude><br /> Final live version of this section: [[Philosophical Research:Items 1 to 1,000]]</noinclude>

	~~<noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude>~~<ol ~~class~~="~~hue clean reset~~">		=== 1 - 225 ===
	<li ~~value~~="1" data-dimension="Z~~" class="field_geo~~">[[Ontology:Q1\|process of Being]]
	</li><li class="field_geo" ~~value~~="2" data-dimension="Z">[[Ontology:Q2\|sea of free-floating entities]]		<ol start="1" data-inception="2024-12-26T03:32:15Z" data-created="2025-01-14T02:00:41">
	</li><li class="field_geo" ~~value~~="3" data-dimension="Z0">[[Ontology:Q3\|countable entity]]		<li class="field_geo entry_1" data-qid="1" data-dimension="Z">[Z] [[Ontology:Q1\|process of Being]] -> (note: this is the early formatting from January 2025 — before Hue lists were created, and before the list eventually got so long these per-Item prototype notes had to be removed.)
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="4" data-dimension="Z0">[[Ontology:Q4\|countable concept]]		</li><li class="field_geo entry_2" data-qid="2" data-dimension="Z">[Z] [[Ontology:Q2\|sea of free-floating entities]]
			</li><li class="field_geo" data-qid="3" data-dimension="Z0">[Z0] [[Ontology:Q3\|countable entity]]
			</li></ol>

			<noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol start="4" class="hue clean reset">
			<li class="field_geo" value="4" data-dimension="Z0">[[Ontology:Q4\|countable concept]]
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="5" data-dimension="Z0">[[Ontology:Q5\|countable object]]		</li><li class="field_geo" value="5" data-dimension="Z0">[[Ontology:Q5\|countable object]]
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="6" data-dimension="Z">spatially-unique object / unique object		</li><li class="field_geo" value="6" data-dimension="Z">spatially-unique object / unique object
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="7" data-dimension="Z">spacetime-unique event / unique event		</li><li class="field_geo" value="7" data-dimension="Z">spacetime-unique event / unique event
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="8" data-dimension="Z">series of unique events / timeline of unique events		</li><li class="field_geo" value="8" data-dimension="Z">series of unique events / timeline of unique events
	</li><li class="field_ML" value="9" data-dimension-2="S0">~~[S0]~~ [[Ontology:Q9\|series of non-unique events]] / repeatable historical pattern		</li><li class="field_ML" value="9" data-dimension="S0">[[Ontology:Q9\|series of non-unique events]] / repeatable historical pattern
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="10" data-dimension="Z">repeating process		</li><li class="field_geo" value="10" data-dimension="Z">repeating process
	</li><li class="field_ML" value="11" data-dimension="Z">material-history -> the series of physical events that defines what any particular object or population is; the topic historical materialism studies		</li><li class="field_ML" value="11" data-dimension="Z">material-history -> the series of physical events that defines what any particular object or population is; the topic historical materialism studies

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:40, 1 May 2026
Line 100:		Line 100:
	</li><li class="field_ML" value="85" data-dimension="S">Marxism believing itself to be uncountable / generic Marxism / ([[User:RD/9k/Q81\|9k]])		</li><li class="field_ML" value="85" data-dimension="S">Marxism believing itself to be uncountable / generic Marxism / ([[User:RD/9k/Q81\|9k]])
	</li><li class="field_mdem" value="86" data-dimension="Z">existential materialism / exmat / ([[User:RD/9k/Q81\|9k]])		</li><li class="field_mdem" value="86" data-dimension="Z">existential materialism / exmat / ([[User:RD/9k/Q81\|9k]])
	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_anarchy" value~~="87~~" data-dimension~~=~~"Z">~~[[E:Idealism\|Idealism]]		{{li\|I=Z1/HAS/A\|Q=87\|Q2=87}}[[E:Idealism\|Idealism]] / ([[EC:9k/RD/Q87\|9k]])

	</li><li value="88" class="field_nations" data-dimension="S0">[[Ontology:Q88\|named nationalism]] / named fascism / named Identitarianism / nationalism distinguished into cultural category / uniquely Spanish nationalism / uniquely Japanese nationalism / uniquely United-States nationalism		</li><li value="88" class="field_nations" data-dimension="S0">[[Ontology:Q88\|named nationalism]] / named fascism / named Identitarianism / nationalism distinguished into cultural category / uniquely Spanish nationalism / uniquely Japanese nationalism / uniquely United-States nationalism

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:58, 6 May 2026
Line 62:		Line 62:
	</li><li class="field_exstruct" data-remark="Existentialism treasures the humanities" value="51" data-dimension="S0">literary motif		</li><li class="field_exstruct" data-remark="Existentialism treasures the humanities" value="51" data-dimension="S0">literary motif

	</li><li class="" value="52" data-dimension="S0">historical time period		</li><li class="field_exstruct" data-tradition="HAS" value="52" data-dimension="S0">historical time period
	</li><li class="" value="53" data-dimension="S0">historical civilization / unique feudal order / unique dynasty / unique empire / unique republican period		</li><li class="field_exstruct" data-tradition="HAS, AS" value="53" data-dimension="S0">historical civilization / unique feudal order / unique dynasty / unique empire / unique republican period
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="54" data-dimension="S0">unique named relationship / Group Subject (MDem) / relationship / connection / pairing		</li><li class="field_geo" value="54" data-dimension="S0">unique named relationship / Group Subject (MDem) / relationship / connection / pairing
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="55" data-dimension="Z">[[Ontology:Q55\|graph theory]]		</li><li class="field_geo" value="55" data-dimension="Z">[[Ontology:Q55\|graph theory]]
Line 69:		Line 69:
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="57" data-dimension="S0">social sciences		</li><li class="field_geo" value="57" data-dimension="S0">social sciences
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="58" data-dimension="S0">population science		</li><li class="field_geo" value="58" data-dimension="S0">population science
	</li><li value="59" data-~~dimension~~="Z" class="field_geo ~~number_prime~~">[[Ontology:Q59\|mathematics]]		</li><li value="59" data-rem="prime" class="field_geo" data-dimension="Z">[[Ontology:Q59\|mathematics]]

	</li><li class="field_geo" value="60" data-dimension="S0">field of science		</li><li class="field_geo" value="60" data-dimension="S0">field of science
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="61" data-dimension="S0">life sciences / ecology / biology		</li><li class="field_geo" value="61" data-dimension="S0">life sciences / ecology / biology
Line 76:		Line 77:
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="64" data-dimension="S0">astrophysics / physical cosmology		</li><li class="field_geo" value="64" data-dimension="S0">astrophysics / physical cosmology
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="65" data-dimension="S0">quantum physics / quantum mechanics research		</li><li class="field_geo" value="65" data-dimension="S0">quantum physics / quantum mechanics research
	~~</li><~~li ~~class~~=~~"field_geo" value~~="66~~" data-dimension~~=~~"S0">general~~ relativity		{{li\|I=Z2/GR\|Q=66\|Q2=66}}special relativity / ({{9k\|RD/Q66}})
	~~</li><~~li ~~class~~=~~"field_geo" value~~="67~~" data-dimension~~=~~"S0">special relativity -> subset of:~~ general relativity		{{li\|I=S2/GR\|Q=67\|Q2=67}}general relativity / ({{9k\|RD/Q66}})
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="68" data-dimension="S0">string theory -> unsubstantiated but awfully neat at the time		</li><li class="field_geo" value="68" data-dimension="S0">string theory -> unsubstantiated but awfully neat at the time
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="69" data-dimension="S0">quantum field theory -> substantiated		</li><li class="field_geo" value="69" data-dimension="S0">quantum field theory -> substantiated
	<!-- astronomy chemistry earth sciences life sciences -->		<!-- astronomy chemistry earth sciences life sciences - note to add these at some point -->

	</li><li class="field_exstruct" data-remark="one basic precursor to E-S trad" value="70" data-dimension="Z">analytic philosophy		</li><li class="field_exstruct" data-remark="one basic precursor to E-S trad" value="70" data-dimension="Z">analytic philosophy