User:Reversedragon/FirstNineThousand/3000 - Revision history

Reversedragon: The only bad business

2026-09-06T22:11:58Z

The only bad business

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:11, 6 September 2026
Line 95:		Line 95:
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="3046" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="3046" data-dimension="S">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="3047" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="3047" data-dimension="S">??
	</~~li><li class~~=~~"number_empty" value~~="3048~~" data-dimension="S">??~~
			{{li\|I=S2/LR\|Q=30,48\|Q2=3048}}The only bad business / Society needs all the businesses that aren't The One Bad One {{9k\|RD\|Q3048}}

	{{li\|I=S1/STM/LR\|Q=30,49\|Q2=3049}}the scientific community / ({{9k\|RD/Q42,34}})		{{li\|I=S1/STM/LR\|Q=30,49\|Q2=3049}}the scientific community / ({{9k\|RD/Q42,34}})

Reversedragon: dragons as intelligent life

2026-09-06T11:32:31Z

dragons as intelligent life

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:32, 6 September 2026
Line 370:		Line 370:
	</li><li class="field_fantasy" value="3211" data-dimension="S">unrealistic animal / imaginary organism in nature / unrealistic organism in nature / flatlanders in nature / kaiju in nature / unicorns in nature		</li><li class="field_fantasy" value="3211" data-dimension="S">unrealistic animal / imaginary organism in nature / unrealistic organism in nature / flatlanders in nature / kaiju in nature / unicorns in nature
	</li><li class="field_fantasy" value="3212" data-dimension="S">an animal, not a beast -> the motif of distinguishing between humans and nonhuman Animals but only by their capabilities.		</li><li class="field_fantasy" value="3212" data-dimension="S">an animal, not a beast -> the motif of distinguishing between humans and nonhuman Animals but only by their capabilities.

			</li><li class="number_empty" value="3213" data-dimension="S">??
			</li><li class="number_empty" value="3214" data-dimension="S">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="3215" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="3215" data-dimension="S">??

			{{li\|I=S1/Fy\|Q=32,16\|Q2=3216}}dragons as intelligent life / dragons as earth aliens

			</li><li class="number_empty" value="3217" data-dimension="S">??
			</li><li class="number_empty" value="3218" data-dimension="S">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="3219" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="3219" data-dimension="S">??

Reversedragon: Warriors is creating reactionaries (Russia)

2026-09-05T03:08:18Z

Warriors is creating reactionaries (Russia)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:08, 5 September 2026
Line 892:		Line 892:
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="3598" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="3598" data-dimension="S">??

	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_gramsci" data-qid~~="35,99~~" value~~="3599~~" data-dimension="S2">~~{{book\|Warriors}} is ~~programming Russians to be reactionaries / <cite>Warriors</cite> is programming Russian children to be~~ reactionaries ~~-> derived Gramscian proposition. everybody says "well the books have to be censored to sell to~~ Russia~~", but nobody thinks about the implications of what effect "selling books to Russia" has on Russia.<br />~~		{{li\|I=S2/W\|Q=35,99\|Q2=3599}}{{book\|Warriors}} is creating reactionaries (Russia) {{9k\|RD\|Q3599}}
	I think this is way funnier if you leave off "children" and just let it weirdly imply that adults believe whatever they read in a kids' book. the point of it isn't that children must be protected from bad literature anyway, it's that the upper crust of two countries getting together to determine what <em>both countries</em> will be reading is gross. although disappointing, it'd be far less disgusting to know that reactionary-sounding literature was being written by Russians than to know it came from the United States and people are making excuses for it because supposedly the retailers of Russia are the whole Free Will of Russia. if the bourgeoisie currently have so much power to determine what books the United States sells to Russia then why don't they get together to make Russia buy good books rather than censoring them? why doesn't anyone ever ask that?

	</li><li class="field_geo" value="3600" data-dimension="Z"><cite>The God Delusion</cite> (Dawkins 2006) -> contains the infamous claim that religion is a delusion.		</li><li class="field_geo" value="3600" data-dimension="Z"><cite>The God Delusion</cite> (Dawkins 2006) -> contains the infamous claim that religion is a delusion.

Reversedragon: Manning Johnson orchestrated a Communist plot to divide Black churches

2026-09-05T02:33:31Z

Manning Johnson orchestrated a Communist plot to divide Black churches

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:33, 5 September 2026
Line 721:		Line 721:
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="3469" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="3469" data-dimension="S">??

	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_exstruct" data-qid~~="34,70~~" value~~="3470~~" data-dimension="F2">~~If Black people are the first ones to start a Marxist movement, there will be a race war; there has not been a race war prior to attempting Leninism ~~-> false because there already is a race war. it's already been happening, to such an extent that Marxism couldn't newly start it.<br/>~~		{{li\|I=F2/ES\|Q=34,70\|Q2=3470}}If Black people are the first ones to start a Marxist movement, there will be a race war; there has not been a race war prior to attempting Leninism {{9k\|RD\|Q4167}}
	what people really, really don't understand is that every time an anarchist hides out and "lives life by anarchism", at least one Tory does it along with them. and if it goes on long enough, Tories become cops and shoot Black people just as part of "living their lives by anarcho-Toryism", exactly [[E:Every ideology invents direct action\|~~the same way]] people do post-structuralist anarchism, just [[E:Post-structuralist anarchy is indistinguishable from Toryism~~\|~~in khaki brown]]. anarchists are really really bad at [[E:duplexing (meta-Marxism)\|duplexing]] things and realizing what their ideologies lead to.~~		{{li\|I=Z1/ML\|Q=34,71\|Q2=3471}}{{book\|Color, Communism, and Common Sense}} (Johnson) {{9k\|RD\|Q4167}}
			{{li\|I=S2/ES\|Q=34,72\|Q2=3472}}Manning Johnson orchestrated a Communist plot to divide Black churches {{9k\|RD\|Q4167}}
	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_ML" data-qid~~="34,71~~" value~~="3471~~" data-dimension="Z"><cite>~~Color, Communism, and Common Sense~~</cite>~~ (Johnson ??)		{{li\|I=S1/ES\|Q=34,73\|Q2=3473}}Highlander school of Communist troublemaking {{9k\|RD\|Q4167}}
	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_exstruct" data-qid~~="34,72~~" value~~="3472~~" data-dimension="S2">~~Manning Johnson orchestrated a Communist plot to divide Black churches [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JzP-UurjYEE] [https://www.lighthousetrailsresearch.com/blog/manning-johnson-1958-the-communist-plot-to-exploit-blacks/] / Stalin planned to use Black people as expendables (sic; referring to a proposed vanguard) -> it appears the main error here is taking the phrase "general conflagration" and not realizing the key word is "general". looks like the substance of the plan is that <em>if</em> there is a rebellion in the United States <em>then</em> it will occur when Black people and all the other workers join together. but in reality, the Soviet Union has made an error because since about the US Civil War its subpopulations don't really spontaneously join together like that. it's always been movements for really specific identities only that on top of that take a really really long time or sometimes go backward. so yeah, "Stalin's" theory was wrong. look at people today and weirdly, the most effective and popular issues for joining people together are negative issues against things, especially a million people against a specific individual. people are very "anarchy-brained" and seem really incapable of comprehending actually creating policies versus exactly and precisely {{~~TTS\|html=em~~\|~~not having something bad~~\|~~E=Capitalism ends through many rounds of Absolutely Not~~}} ~~that's annoying or frightening them.~~
	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_exstruct" data-qid~~="34,73~~" value~~="3473~~" data-dimension="S">~~Highlander school of Communist troublemaking {{~~YouTube~~\|~~JzP-UurjYEE~~}} ~~-> this phrase makes me laugh. it's really the cherry on top that it has the same cadence as "Hogwarts school of wizardry". it sounds so <em>official</em>.~~

	{{li\|I=S2/ES\|tradition=MX onto LR, MX onto PT\|Q=34,75\|Q2=3475}}The United States is a nation of immigrants, but the only people who belong in the United States are its emigrants -> if that's "true" of China, North Korea, Cuba, and Vietnam it should logically be true of the United States.<br/>		{{li\|I=S2/ES\|tradition=MX onto LR, MX onto PT\|Q=34,75\|Q2=3475}}The United States is a nation of immigrants, but the only people who belong in the United States are its emigrants -> if that's "true" of China, North Korea, Cuba, and Vietnam it should logically be true of the United States.<br/>

Reversedragon: lived experience

2026-09-02T02:08:02Z

lived experience

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:08, 2 September 2026
Line 1,171:		Line 1,171:
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="3798" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="3798" data-dimension="S">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="3799" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="3799" data-dimension="S">??
	</~~li><li class~~=~~"number_empty" value~~="3800~~" data-dimension="S">??~~
			{{li\|I=S1/ES\|Q=38,00\|Q2=3800}}lived experience / ({{9k\|RD/Q3800}})
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="3801" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="3801" data-dimension="S">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="3802" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="3802" data-dimension="S">??

Reversedragon: Bolshevism in the Soviet Union lasted 39 years

2026-08-26T05:44:39Z

Bolshevism in the Soviet Union lasted 39 years

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:44, 26 August 2026
Line 263:		Line 263:
	{{li\|I=M3/MX\|Q=31,60\|Q2=3160}}At what moment does Communism "stop working"? {{9k\|RD\|Q3160}}		{{li\|I=M3/MX\|Q=31,60\|Q2=3160}}At what moment does Communism "stop working"? {{9k\|RD\|Q3160}}

	</~~li><li class~~=~~"number_empty" value~~="3161~~" data~~-~~dimension~~=~~"S">??~~		{{li\|I=S2/MX/ML\|Q=31,61\|Q2=3161}}Bolshevism in the Soviet Union lasted 39 years (1917-1956) {{9k\|RD\|Q3160}}
	</~~li><li class~~=~~"number_empty" value~~="3162~~" data~~-~~dimension="S">??~~		{{li\|I=S2/MX/ML\|Q=31,62\|Q2=3162}}Dengism in the Soviet Union lasted 38 years (1953-1991) {{9k\|RD\|Q3160}}

	{{li\|I=S2/MX\|tradition=MX onto LLM, MX onto ML\|Q=31,63\|Q2=3163}}Communism is more effective than {{TTS\|AGI\|artificial general intelligence}} {{9k\|RD\|Q3160}}		{{li\|I=S2/MX\|tradition=MX onto LLM, MX onto ML\|Q=31,63\|Q2=3163}}Communism is more effective than {{TTS\|AGI\|artificial general intelligence}} {{9k\|RD\|Q3160}}

Reversedragon: Pokémon is two-thirds as effective as Communism

2026-08-26T05:38:32Z

Pokémon is two-thirds as effective as Communism

Reversedragon: Dinosaurs don't work

2026-08-26T02:43:05Z

Dinosaurs don't work

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:43, 26 August 2026
Line 239:		Line 239:
	{{li\|I=S2/MX\|Q=31,46\|Q2=31,46}}Whether something is capable of surviving is not a binary statement, because survival is not merely something that happens at all or doesn't happen at all but something that happens over a quantifiable period of time -> this one seems confusing when you stand on exactly one year, but it becomes easier to conceive of if you look at a large span of time without having any idea what date someone is evaluating everything on.		{{li\|I=S2/MX\|Q=31,46\|Q2=31,46}}Whether something is capable of surviving is not a binary statement, because survival is not merely something that happens at all or doesn't happen at all but something that happens over a quantifiable period of time -> this one seems confusing when you stand on exactly one year, but it becomes easier to conceive of if you look at a large span of time without having any idea what date someone is evaluating everything on.

	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_mdem" data-qid~~="31,47~~" value~~="3147~~" data-dimension="S2">~~The effectiveness of Communism can be measured in how many years it lives / law of fractions (meta-Marxist conjecture)		{{li\|I=S2/MX\|Q=31,47\|Q2=3147}}The effectiveness of Communism can be measured in how many years it lives / law of fractions (meta-Marxist conjecture) {{9k\|RD\|Q3160}}
	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_exstruct" data-qid~~="31,48~~" value~~="3148~~" data-dimension="F2">~~Light bulbs don't work ~~-> somewhat literally what was said at the time, and now we all have them.~~		{{li\|I=F2/ES\|Q=31,48\|Q2=3148}}Light bulbs don't work {{9k\|RD\|Q3160}}
	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_mdem" data-qid~~="31,49~~" value~~="3149~~" data-dimension="S2">~~Bolshevism is effective in the same sense as dinosaurs ~~-> dinosaurs are still very effective, they just look different.~~		{{li\|I=S2/MX\|Q=31,49\|Q2=3149}}Bolshevism is effective in the same sense as dinosaurs {{9k\|RD\|Q3160}}
	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_exstruct" data-qid~~="31,50~~" value~~="3150~~" data-dimension="F2">~~Dinosaurs became obsolete / Dinosaurs don't work / Dinosaurs are over [sic] / Dinosaurs were effective for millions of years but then they failed to be effective and disappeared (worked millions of years ago; failed to work; went extinct) [sic] -> at face value, funny joke. most non-avian dinosaurs went extinct. but what I really like about this statement is how backhandedly true it is. if you think dinosaurs don't work you've failed to realize that birds are dinosaurs. and if you think Communism doesn't work you may have failed to realize that Deng Xiaoping Thought is still a fringe form of Marxism.		{{li\|I=F2/ES\|Q=31,50\|Q2=3150}}Dinosaurs became obsolete / Dinosaurs don't work {{9k\|RD\|Q3160}}

	</li><li class="field_mdem" data-qid="31,51" value="3151" data-dimension="S2">Pokémon is two-thirds as effective as Communism / Pokémon is half as effective as Communism -> follows from "Google was half as effective as Communism". Pokémon has been around 29 years. which is pretty impressive, really. but strictly speaking you can't yet say it works as well as Communism.		</li><li class="field_mdem" data-qid="31,51" value="3151" data-dimension="S2">Pokémon is two-thirds as effective as Communism / Pokémon is half as effective as Communism -> follows from "Google was half as effective as Communism". Pokémon has been around 29 years. which is pretty impressive, really. but strictly speaking you can't yet say it works as well as Communism.
Line 266:		Line 266:
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="3162" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="3162" data-dimension="S">??

	{{li\|I=S2/MX\|tradition=MX onto LLM, MX onto ML\|Q=31,63\|Q2=3163}}Communism is more effective than AGI ~~/ Bolshevism is more effective than~~ artificial general intelligence ~~in that the [[E:socialism~~ (~~Stalin's Marxism~~)~~\|Material System of Bolshevism]] has been realized at least once, but machine learning has never physically realized a computer implementing artificial general intelligence~~		{{li\|I=S2/MX\|tradition=MX onto LLM, MX onto ML\|Q=31,63\|Q2=3163}}Communism is more effective than {{TTS\|AGI\|artificial general intelligence}} / ({{9k\|RD\|Q3160}})
	{{li\|I=S2/MX\|tradition=MX onto LLM, MX onto IV\|Q=31,64\|Q2=3164}}AGI is as effective as Trotskyism / Machine learning is just as effective as Trotskyism in that machine learning never produces artificial general intelligence and Trotskyism never produces a durable "orange" uniquely-Trotskyist dictatorship-of-the-proletariat		{{li\|I=S2/MX\|tradition=MX onto LLM, MX onto IV\|Q=31,64\|Q2=3164}}{{TTS\|AGI\|artificial general intelligence}} is as effective as Trotskyism / ({{9k\|RD\|Q3160}})

	{{li\|I=S2/A\|Q=31,65\|Q2=3165}}Anarchism is often met with ridicule (Rodgers) / ({{9k\|RD/Q31,65}})		{{li\|I=S2/A\|Q=31,65\|Q2=3165}}Anarchism is often met with ridicule (Rodgers) / ({{9k\|RD/Q31,65}})

Reversedragon: At what moment does Communism "stop working"?

2026-08-23T23:47:29Z

At what moment does Communism "stop working"?

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:47, 23 August 2026
Line 260:		Line 260:
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="3158" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="3158" data-dimension="S">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="3159" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="3159" data-dimension="S">??
	</~~li><li class~~=~~"number_empty" value~~="3160" ~~data-dimension="S~~">??
			{{li\|I=M3/MX\|Q=31,60\|Q2=3160}}At what moment does Communism "stop working"? / ({{9k\|RD/Q3160}})

	</li><li class="number_empty" value="3161" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="3161" data-dimension="S">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="3162" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="3162" data-dimension="S">??

Reversedragon: ideologies of petty-bourgeois defeat

2026-08-22T08:29:48Z

ideologies of petty-bourgeois defeat

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:29, 22 August 2026
Line 559:		Line 559:
	</li><li class="field_ML" data-qid="33,64" value="3364" data-tradition="MX" data-dimension="S2">Writing about Communists driving out the First World is edgier than Game of Thrones (braver than; bolder than; meta-transitional socialist realism) -> think about it. which one would get you more actual controversy? an edgy medieval setting people already perceive as "reality", or writing something that fundamentally questions whether anybody reading your work should have any loyalty to their country or abandon everything they do every day to actually think about the perspective of people in another country?		</li><li class="field_ML" data-qid="33,64" value="3364" data-tradition="MX" data-dimension="S2">Writing about Communists driving out the First World is edgier than Game of Thrones (braver than; bolder than; meta-transitional socialist realism) -> think about it. which one would get you more actual controversy? an edgy medieval setting people already perceive as "reality", or writing something that fundamentally questions whether anybody reading your work should have any loyalty to their country or abandon everything they do every day to actually think about the perspective of people in another country?

	</~~li><li class~~=~~"number_empty" value~~="3365~~" data~~-~~dimension="S">??~~		{{li\|I=S1/ES\|tradition=\|Q=33,65\|Q2=3365}}ideologies of petty-bourgeois defeat / ideology of the defeated petty bourgeoisie

	{{li\|I=S1/ES\|tradition=\|Q=33,66\|Q2=3366}}metanarrative (philosophy)		{{li\|I=S1/ES\|tradition=\|Q=33,66\|Q2=3366}}metanarrative (philosophy)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:33, 5 September 2026
Line 721:		Line 721:
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="3469" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="3469" data-dimension="S">??

	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_exstruct" data-qid~~="34,70~~" value~~="3470~~" data-dimension="F2">~~If Black people are the first ones to start a Marxist movement, there will be a race war; there has not been a race war prior to attempting Leninism ~~-> false because there already is a race war. it's already been happening, to such an extent that Marxism couldn't newly start it.<br/>~~		{{li\|I=F2/ES\|Q=34,70\|Q2=3470}}If Black people are the first ones to start a Marxist movement, there will be a race war; there has not been a race war prior to attempting Leninism {{9k\|RD\|Q4167}}
	what people really, really don't understand is that every time an anarchist hides out and "lives life by anarchism", at least one Tory does it along with them. and if it goes on long enough, Tories become cops and shoot Black people just as part of "living their lives by anarcho-Toryism", exactly [[E:Every ideology invents direct action\|~~the same way]] people do post-structuralist anarchism, just [[E:Post-structuralist anarchy is indistinguishable from Toryism~~\|~~in khaki brown]]. anarchists are really really bad at [[E:duplexing (meta-Marxism)\|duplexing]] things and realizing what their ideologies lead to.~~		{{li\|I=Z1/ML\|Q=34,71\|Q2=3471}}{{book\|Color, Communism, and Common Sense}} (Johnson) {{9k\|RD\|Q4167}}
			{{li\|I=S2/ES\|Q=34,72\|Q2=3472}}Manning Johnson orchestrated a Communist plot to divide Black churches {{9k\|RD\|Q4167}}
	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_ML" data-qid~~="34,71~~" value~~="3471~~" data-dimension="Z"><cite>~~Color, Communism, and Common Sense~~</cite>~~ (Johnson ??)		{{li\|I=S1/ES\|Q=34,73\|Q2=3473}}Highlander school of Communist troublemaking {{9k\|RD\|Q4167}}
	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_exstruct" data-qid~~="34,72~~" value~~="3472~~" data-dimension="S2">~~Manning Johnson orchestrated a Communist plot to divide Black churches [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JzP-UurjYEE] [https://www.lighthousetrailsresearch.com/blog/manning-johnson-1958-the-communist-plot-to-exploit-blacks/] / Stalin planned to use Black people as expendables (sic; referring to a proposed vanguard) -> it appears the main error here is taking the phrase "general conflagration" and not realizing the key word is "general". looks like the substance of the plan is that <em>if</em> there is a rebellion in the United States <em>then</em> it will occur when Black people and all the other workers join together. but in reality, the Soviet Union has made an error because since about the US Civil War its subpopulations don't really spontaneously join together like that. it's always been movements for really specific identities only that on top of that take a really really long time or sometimes go backward. so yeah, "Stalin's" theory was wrong. look at people today and weirdly, the most effective and popular issues for joining people together are negative issues against things, especially a million people against a specific individual. people are very "anarchy-brained" and seem really incapable of comprehending actually creating policies versus exactly and precisely {{~~TTS\|html=em~~\|~~not having something bad~~\|~~E=Capitalism ends through many rounds of Absolutely Not~~}} ~~that's annoying or frightening them.~~
	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_exstruct" data-qid~~="34,73~~" value~~="3473~~" data-dimension="S">~~Highlander school of Communist troublemaking {{~~YouTube~~\|~~JzP-UurjYEE~~}} ~~-> this phrase makes me laugh. it's really the cherry on top that it has the same cadence as "Hogwarts school of wizardry". it sounds so <em>official</em>.~~

	{{li\|I=S2/ES\|tradition=MX onto LR, MX onto PT\|Q=34,75\|Q2=3475}}The United States is a nation of immigrants, but the only people who belong in the United States are its emigrants -> if that's "true" of China, North Korea, Cuba, and Vietnam it should logically be true of the United States.<br/>		{{li\|I=S2/ES\|tradition=MX onto LR, MX onto PT\|Q=34,75\|Q2=3475}}The United States is a nation of immigrants, but the only people who belong in the United States are its emigrants -> if that's "true" of China, North Korea, Cuba, and Vietnam it should logically be true of the United States.<br/>

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:38, 26 August 2026
Line 234:		Line 234:
	{{li\|I=S2/PT\|Q=31,43\|Q2=31,43}}Whether something functions for the externally assigned purpose of surviving can only be judged by comparing it with other things that are exclusively intending to survive instead of it -> I swear this proposition is buried inside the Christian bible behind several obscuring layers of morality talk.		{{li\|I=S2/PT\|Q=31,43\|Q2=31,43}}Whether something functions for the externally assigned purpose of surviving can only be judged by comparing it with other things that are exclusively intending to survive instead of it -> I swear this proposition is buried inside the Christian bible behind several obscuring layers of morality talk.

	{{li\|I=S2/~~MX\|tradition=MX onto IV~~\|Q=31,44\|Q2=31,44}}Whether Trotskyism is effective and functions as described can be judged by how many years Trotskyists maintain a real-world workers' state or stateless orange civilization; this is to imply that as of 1991 the effectiveness of Trotskyism was zero, and as of 2026 the effectiveness of Trotskyism is zero		{{li\|I=S2/ML\|Q=31,44\|Q2=31,44}}Trotskyism boasts zero success / Whether Trotskyism is effective and functions as described can be judged by how many years Trotskyists maintain a real-world workers' state or stateless orange civilization; this is to imply that as of 1991 the effectiveness of Trotskyism was zero, and as of 2026 the effectiveness of Trotskyism is zero {{9k\|RD\|Q3160}}

	{{li\|I=S2/MX\|Q=31,45\|Q2=31,45}}Whether something functions for its intended or assigned purpose is not a binary statement, because the only way to actually know if something is fit for its purpose is to compare it with something else which performs the same purpose -> backing for numerical theory of whether things work.		{{li\|I=S2/MX\|Q=31,45\|Q2=31,45}}Whether something functions for its intended or assigned purpose is not a binary statement, because the only way to actually know if something is fit for its purpose is to compare it with something else which performs the same purpose -> backing for numerical theory of whether things work.
Line 244:		Line 244:
	{{li\|I=F2/ES\|Q=31,50\|Q2=3150}}Dinosaurs became obsolete / Dinosaurs don't work {{9k\|RD\|Q3160}}		{{li\|I=F2/ES\|Q=31,50\|Q2=3150}}Dinosaurs became obsolete / Dinosaurs don't work {{9k\|RD\|Q3160}}

	~~</li><~~li ~~class~~=~~"field_mdem" data-qid~~="31,51~~" value~~="3151~~" data-dimension="S2">~~Pokémon is two-thirds as effective as Communism / Pokémon is half as effective as Communism -> follows from "Google was half as effective as Communism". Pokémon has been around 29 years. which is pretty impressive, really. but strictly speaking you can't yet say it works as well as Communism.		{{li\|I=S2/MX\|Q=31,51\|Q2=3151}}Pokémon is two-thirds as effective as Communism {{9k\|RD\|Q3160}}

	</li><li class="field_mdem" data-qid="31,52" value="3152" data-dimension="S2">Google is half as effective as Communism / Google search stopped working before Communism did / Google search stopped working before Bolshevism stopped working in the Soviet Union -> Bolshevism: approximately 43 years. Google search: 20 years. to be perfectly fair I think a great fraction of things humans invent are "not as effective as Communism" in this sense. Catholic Christianity would be one of the things that was, because it's been around for hundreds of years; you could say the same for Protestant Christianity, and Islam, as much as that will make some people very mad. Liberalism is as effective as Communism because we've had it over 100 years. but the Democratic Party isn't, because it never gets votes over and over and over to where the Republican Party stops existing and it has to divide. that totally did happen with the original Democratic-republican party. which has been around... 233 years?? that doesn't sound right. but if it's true the Democratic Party is pitifully ineffective in comparison. and definitely not as effective as Communism, because it has never made it for 43 years straight.		</li><li class="field_mdem" data-qid="31,52" value="3152" data-dimension="S2">Google is half as effective as Communism / Google search stopped working before Communism did / Google search stopped working before Bolshevism stopped working in the Soviet Union -> Bolshevism: approximately 43 years. Google search: 20 years. to be perfectly fair I think a great fraction of things humans invent are "not as effective as Communism" in this sense. Catholic Christianity would be one of the things that was, because it's been around for hundreds of years; you could say the same for Protestant Christianity, and Islam, as much as that will make some people very mad. Liberalism is as effective as Communism because we've had it over 100 years. but the Democratic Party isn't, because it never gets votes over and over and over to where the Republican Party stops existing and it has to divide. that totally did happen with the original Democratic-republican party. which has been around... 233 years?? that doesn't sound right. but if it's true the Democratic Party is pitifully ineffective in comparison. and definitely not as effective as Communism, because it has never made it for 43 years straight.
Line 261:		Line 261:
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="3159" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="3159" data-dimension="S">??

	{{li\|I=M3/MX\|Q=31,60\|Q2=3160}}At what moment does Communism "stop working"? ~~/ (~~{{9k\|RD/Q3160}})		{{li\|I=M3/MX\|Q=31,60\|Q2=3160}}At what moment does Communism "stop working"? {{9k\|RD\|Q3160}}

	</li><li class="number_empty" value="3161" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="3161" data-dimension="S">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="3162" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="3162" data-dimension="S">??

	{{li\|I=S2/MX\|tradition=MX onto LLM, MX onto ML\|Q=31,63\|Q2=3163}}Communism is more effective than {{TTS\|AGI\|artificial general intelligence}} ~~/ (~~{{9k\|RD\|Q3160}})		{{li\|I=S2/MX\|tradition=MX onto LLM, MX onto ML\|Q=31,63\|Q2=3163}}Communism is more effective than {{TTS\|AGI\|artificial general intelligence}} {{9k\|RD\|Q3160}}
	{{li\|I=S2/MX\|tradition=MX onto LLM, MX onto IV\|Q=31,64\|Q2=3164}}{{TTS\|AGI\|artificial general intelligence}} is as effective as Trotskyism ~~/ (~~{{9k\|RD\|Q3160}})		{{li\|I=S2/MX\|tradition=MX onto LLM, MX onto IV\|Q=31,64\|Q2=3164}}{{TTS\|AGI\|artificial general intelligence}} is as effective as Trotskyism {{9k\|RD\|Q3160}}

	{{li\|I=S2/A\|Q=31,65\|Q2=3165}}Anarchism is often met with ridicule (Rodgers) / ({{9k\|RD/Q31,65}})		{{li\|I=S2/A\|Q=31,65\|Q2=3165}}Anarchism is often met with ridicule (Rodgers) / ({{9k\|RD/Q31,65}})