User:Reversedragon/FirstNineThousand/3000 - Revision history

Reversedragon: The Matrix / gender ideology (Toryism)

2026-06-25T05:36:21Z

The Matrix / gender ideology (Toryism)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:36, 25 June 2026
Line 1,289:		Line 1,289:
	</li><li class="field_nations" value="3899" data-dimension="S2">??		</li><li class="field_nations" value="3899" data-dimension="S2">??
	</li><li class="field_nations" value="3900" data-dimension="S2">??		</li><li class="field_nations" value="3900" data-dimension="S2">??

	</li><li class="field_nations" value="3901" data-dimension="S2">??		</li><li class="field_nations" value="3901" data-dimension="S2">??

			{{li\|I=S1/PT\|tradition=\|Q=39,01\|Q2=3901}}gender identity (ideology) / gender ideology (Toryism) -> despite how vile this motif can get sometimes it's a little funny to think you could read it exactly the opposite way as Tories pushing antiquated 'gender ideology' on trans people. I will add that as a sense later

	</li><li class="field_nations" data-qid="39,02" value="3902" data-dimension="F2">The only two ideologies are small government and big government / There are two ideologies: small government and big government / There are only two genders: small government and big government -> this is so far beyond untrue. it's... provably untrue with just a few historical events. let's say Stalin is in favor of Big Government. well, Trotsky is also in favor of Big Government! he wants all the world's countries to spontaneously form into a world government. by some metrics you'd think a civilization with the area of the world is the biggest government. how many people are even in the parliament or council of soviets?? but the two of them are fighting each other even though they both believe in Big Government. there are more than two ideologies. they're all separate and they all begin from different local sets of interests and goals. how do you even square the notion of small vs big government with the United States fighting over Catholicism? Protestantism and Catholicism also show there are more than two ideologies, once you get to Islam and Buddhism and all the other religions there have ever been.		</li><li class="field_nations" data-qid="39,02" value="3902" data-dimension="F2">The only two ideologies are small government and big government / There are two ideologies: small government and big government / There are only two genders: small government and big government -> this is so far beyond untrue. it's... provably untrue with just a few historical events. let's say Stalin is in favor of Big Government. well, Trotsky is also in favor of Big Government! he wants all the world's countries to spontaneously form into a world government. by some metrics you'd think a civilization with the area of the world is the biggest government. how many people are even in the parliament or council of soviets?? but the two of them are fighting each other even though they both believe in Big Government. there are more than two ideologies. they're all separate and they all begin from different local sets of interests and goals. how do you even square the notion of small vs big government with the United States fighting over Catholicism? Protestantism and Catholicism also show there are more than two ideologies, once you get to Islam and Buddhism and all the other religions there have ever been.

	</~~li><li class~~=~~"field_nations" value~~="3903~~" data-dimension="S2">??~~		{{li\|I=S1/LGBT\|tradition=\|Q=39,03\|Q2=3903}}The Matrix (motif)

	</li><li class="field_nations" data-qid="39,04" value="3904" data-dimension="F2">{{TTS\|tts=Dungeons & Dragons\|D&D}} is not gay whatsoever / Dungeons and Dragons is absolutely not gay {{YouTube\|cUyvUjBc-Eg}} -> arguably, it's been a wave of minorities that were previously excluded from it that even brought it back. it's been this special case of not even nostalgia but genuinely people discovering it for the first time and catapulting it out to "normal" people or vice versa in a certain back-and-forth.<br />		</li><li class="field_nations" data-qid="39,04" value="3904" data-dimension="F2">{{TTS\|tts=Dungeons & Dragons\|D&D}} is not gay whatsoever / Dungeons and Dragons is absolutely not gay {{YouTube\|cUyvUjBc-Eg}} -> arguably, it's been a wave of minorities that were previously excluded from it that even brought it back. it's been this special case of not even nostalgia but genuinely people discovering it for the first time and catapulting it out to "normal" people or vice versa in a certain back-and-forth.<br />

Reversedragon: metanarrative

2026-06-22T23:47:40Z

metanarrative

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:47, 22 June 2026
Line 565:		Line 565:

	</li><li class="number_empty" value="3365" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="3365" data-dimension="S">??
	</~~li><li class~~=~~"number_empty" value~~="3366~~" data-dimension="S">??~~
			{{li\|I=S1/ES\|tradition=\|Q=33,66\|Q2=3366}}metanarrative (philosophy)

	</li><li class="number_empty" value="3367" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="3367" data-dimension="S">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="3368" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="3368" data-dimension="S">??

Reversedragon: the scientific community

2026-06-12T03:36:13Z

the scientific community

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:36, 12 June 2026
Line 99:		Line 99:
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="3047" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="3047" data-dimension="S">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="3048" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="3048" data-dimension="S">??
	</~~li><li class~~=~~"number_empty" value~~="3049~~" data-dimension="S">??~~
			{{li\|I=S1/STM/LR\|Q=30,49\|Q2=3049}}the scientific community / ({{9k\|RD/Q42,34}})

	{{li\|I=S1/HM/W\|Q=30,50\|Q2=3050}}right-wing semantic hegemony / ({{9k\|RD/Q30,52}})		{{li\|I=S1/HM/W\|Q=30,50\|Q2=3050}}right-wing semantic hegemony / ({{9k\|RD/Q30,52}})

Reversedragon: You are already free (anarchism)

2026-06-09T13:47:04Z

You are already free (anarchism)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:47, 9 June 2026
Line 429:		Line 429:
	</li><li class="field_exstruct" data-qid="32,69" value="3269" data-dimension="S">Populationism (meta-Marxism) / nameless prejudice against all other populations		</li><li class="field_exstruct" data-qid="32,69" value="3269" data-dimension="S">Populationism (meta-Marxism) / nameless prejudice against all other populations

	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_anarchy" data-qid~~="32,70~~" value~~="3270~~" data-tradition="A" data-dimension="F2">~~Anarchism is acting as if you are already free / Freedom is using individual will to realize ~~Anarchism -> well, here it is. a claim said by anarchists which says the thing I call Existentialism is one specific form of Anarchism.~~ (found in the context of an interview with David Graeber, who was claimed to be an anarchist at some point in time.) I think this claim is inherently contradictory such that it could not possibly be true. if anarchism is acting as if you are free, some people are already anti-vaccine, anti-immigrant, anti-Islam/~~anti-atheist Tories before they do that~~, and then they can do "anarchism" on top of being a Tory. so Anarchism would then be a system where half of the population transitions to fascists with a fascist state and half of the population is Anarchists and the fascists kill the Anarchists (potentially). I think most anarchists would not say fascism is part of any anarchism, so this is not a definition which can actually mark off where anarchism starts and ends. on the other hand, the claim that anarchism generates Liberalism is more plausible, because nothing rules out Liberalism being what anarchism looks like in reality, and it doesn't rule out the possibility that anarchism generates Liberalism and Liberalism then generates fascism.		{{li\|I=F2/A\|tradition=A, ES\|Q=32,70\|Q2=3270}}You are already free (anarchism) / Anarchism is acting as if you are already free / Freedom is using individual will to realize anarchism / ({{9k\|RD/Q32,70}})

	</li><li class="field_exstruct" data-qid="32,71" value="3271" data-dimension="S2">Freedom is the discovery of escape routes / Freedom is the rearrangement of social connections -> schizoanalysis		</li><li class="field_exstruct" data-qid="32,71" value="3271" data-dimension="S2">Freedom is the discovery of escape routes / Freedom is the rearrangement of social connections -> schizoanalysis

Reversedragon: Propositions are 40 characters

2026-06-07T04:00:55Z

Propositions are 40 characters

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:00, 7 June 2026
Line 821:		Line 821:
	</li><li class="field_mdem" value="3539" data-dimension="M3">What is the truth value of creepypastas?		</li><li class="field_mdem" value="3539" data-dimension="M3">What is the truth value of creepypastas?

	</li><li class="number_empty" value="~~3540~~" data-dimension="S">??		{{li\|I=S2/MW\|Q=35,40\|Q2=3540}}Propositions are 40 characters / Propositions should be summarized in about 40 characters or less assuming they are being summarized in the English language; this by itself does not imply any specific length for other languages, although it is possible the recommended character lengths for languages such as German and Spanish (languages based on Latin letters) will be similar / Propositions are allowed but not required to be 4 characters long in Mandarin Chinese (sense) -> this is more important than the rule that propositions are four words long, especially when it is easier to apply across different languages

			</li><li class="number_empty" value="3541" data-dimension="S">??
			</li><li class="number_empty" value="3542" data-dimension="S">??
			</li><li class="number_empty" value="3543" data-dimension="S">??
			</li><li class="number_empty" value="3544" data-dimension="S">??
			</li><li class="number_empty" value="3545" data-dimension="S">??
			</li><li class="number_empty" value="3546" data-dimension="S">??
			</li><li class="number_empty" value="3547" data-dimension="S">??
			</li><li class="number_empty" value="3548" data-dimension="S">??
			</li><li class="number_empty" value="3549" data-dimension="S">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="3550" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="3550" data-dimension="S">??
			</li><li class="number_empty" value="3551" data-dimension="S">??
			</li><li class="number_empty" value="3552" data-dimension="S">??
			</li><li class="number_empty" value="3553" data-dimension="S">??
			</li><li class="number_empty" value="3554" data-dimension="S">??

	</li><li class="field_fantasy" data-tradition="Fy" data-qid="35,55" value="3555" data-dimension="S">If I had a nickel for every time ... I'd have two nickels — which isn't a lot, but it's weird that it happened twice / ([[User:RD/9k/Q225\|9k]])		</li><li class="field_fantasy" data-tradition="Fy" data-qid="35,55" value="3555" data-dimension="S">If I had a nickel for every time ... I'd have two nickels — which isn't a lot, but it's weird that it happened twice / ([[User:RD/9k/Q225\|9k]])

			</li><li class="number_empty" value="3556" data-dimension="S">??
			</li><li class="number_empty" value="3557" data-dimension="S">??
			</li><li class="number_empty" value="3558" data-dimension="S">??
			</li><li class="number_empty" value="3559" data-dimension="S">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="3560" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="3560" data-dimension="S">??
			</li><li class="number_empty" value="3561" data-dimension="S">??
			</li><li class="number_empty" value="3562" data-dimension="S">??
			</li><li class="number_empty" value="3563" data-dimension="S">??
			</li><li class="number_empty" value="3564" data-dimension="S">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="3565" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="3565" data-dimension="S">??

	{{li\|I=S1/ML/IV\|Q=35,66\|Q2=3566}}characters that would be journalists becoming Communist theorists or revolutionaries / characters that would be journalists or educators becoming Communist leaders / ({{9k\|RD/Q12,10}})		{{li\|I=S1/ML/IV\|Q=35,66\|Q2=3566}}characters that would be journalists becoming Communist theorists or revolutionaries / characters that would be journalists or educators becoming Communist leaders / ({{9k\|RD/Q12,10}})

			</li><li class="number_empty" value="3567" data-dimension="S">??
			</li><li class="number_empty" value="3568" data-dimension="S">??
			</li><li class="number_empty" value="3569" data-dimension="S">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="3570" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="3570" data-dimension="S">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="3575" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="3575" data-dimension="S">??

Reversedragon: right-wing semantic hegemony

2026-06-01T01:48:08Z

right-wing semantic hegemony

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:48, 1 June 2026
Line 101:		Line 101:
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="3049" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="3049" data-dimension="S">??

	{{li\|I=S1/HM/W\|Q=30,50\|Q2=3050}}right-wing semantic hegemony {{~~YouTube~~\|~~2BPTuMuYn_I~~}} ~~-> how do I tell you this? there isn't any such thing. language isn't a thing anyone can have hegemony over. not really. not actually. language (ontology~~) is the holding of beliefs and the formation of culture itself. whatever its content is, you can't just tell people not to have it, or to "break free" of having it. they'll never think that being part of it isn't being free if they chose it in order to be free, which is almost always the case. talking about such nonsense as "right-wing semantic hegemony" is basically saying "I don't like the right-wing countable culture, I want to smash all of Tory culture and purge it from the world", and there's no real difference between those two things.<br/>		{{li\|I=S1/HM/W\|Q=30,50\|Q2=3050}}right-wing semantic hegemony / ({{9k\|RD/Q30,52}})
	~~absolute lies. the people who say this are absolute liars about what they're really talking about and what they really mean.~~

	{{li\|I=S1/W\|Q=30,51\|Q2=3051}}hegemonic motif (idea; model; ideology; philosophy) / hegemonic ideology (Western Marxism) / ruling idea (early Marxism) / dominant narrative (postmodernism) / ({{9k\|RD/Q30,52}})		{{li\|I=S1/W\|Q=30,51\|Q2=3051}}hegemonic motif (idea; model; ideology; philosophy) / hegemonic ideology (Western Marxism) / ruling idea (early Marxism) / dominant narrative (postmodernism) / ({{9k\|RD/Q30,52}})

Reversedragon: right-wing semantic hegemony

2026-06-01T00:33:51Z

right-wing semantic hegemony

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:33, 1 June 2026
Line 100:		Line 100:
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="3048" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="3048" data-dimension="S">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="3049" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="3049" data-dimension="S">??
	</li>~~<li class=~~"~~number_empty~~" ~~value=~~"~~3050~~" ~~data~~-~~dimension="S~~">??
			{{li\|I=S1/HM/W\|Q=30,50\|Q2=3050}}right-wing semantic hegemony {{YouTube\|2BPTuMuYn_I}} -> how do I tell you this? there isn't any such thing. language isn't a thing anyone can have hegemony over. not really. not actually. language (ontology) is the holding of beliefs and the formation of culture itself. whatever its content is, you can't just tell people not to have it, or to "break free" of having it. they'll never think that being part of it isn't being free if they chose it in order to be free, which is almost always the case. talking about such nonsense as "right-wing semantic hegemony" is basically saying "I don't like the right-wing countable culture, I want to smash all of Tory culture and purge it from the world", and there's no real difference between those two things.<br/>
			absolute lies. the people who say this are absolute liars about what they're really talking about and what they really mean.

	{{li\|I=S1/W\|Q=30,51\|Q2=3051}}hegemonic motif (idea; model; ideology; philosophy) / hegemonic ideology (Western Marxism) / ruling idea (early Marxism) / dominant narrative (postmodernism) / ({{9k\|RD/Q30,52}})		{{li\|I=S1/W\|Q=30,51\|Q2=3051}}hegemonic motif (idea; model; ideology; philosophy) / hegemonic ideology (Western Marxism) / ruling idea (early Marxism) / dominant narrative (postmodernism) / ({{9k\|RD/Q30,52}})

Reversedragon: materialist inversion and math

2026-05-29T22:34:11Z

materialist inversion and math

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:34, 29 May 2026
Line 1,196:		Line 1,196:
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="3856" data-dimension="S2">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="3856" data-dimension="S2">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="3857" data-dimension="S2">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="3857" data-dimension="S2">??
	</li><li class="~~number_empty" value="3858~~" data-~~dimension~~="S2"~~>??~~
	~~</li><li class~~="~~field_mdem~~" data-~~qid~~="~~38,~~59~~" value="3859~~" data-dimension="S">the earth was the experience of a worm / prior to man the earth was the experience of a worm -> this one is violet because this thought experiment would get you all the way to meta-Marxism if you only did it with "the world before mainstream Marxism-Leninism" or "the world before Trotskyism". if Trotsky was only smart enough to be able to see a world where he hadn't been born and realize that for a Marxist theorist people are fungible and the actual world shouldn't be different we wouldn't be in this mess		</li><li class="field_mdem" data-qid="38,58" value="3858" data-rem="previously 59" data-dimension="S">the earth was the experience of a worm / prior to man the earth was the experience of a worm -> this one is violet because this thought experiment would get you all the way to meta-Marxism if you only did it with "the world before mainstream Marxism-Leninism" or "the world before Trotskyism". if Trotsky was only smart enough to be able to see a world where he hadn't been born and realize that for a Marxist theorist people are fungible and the actual world shouldn't be different we wouldn't be in this mess

			{{li\|I=S1/MX\|Q=38,59\|Q2=3859\|rem=Q59 mathematics}}[[E:MaterialistInversionAndMath\|materialist inversion and math]] / ({{9k\|RD/Q38,59}})

	</li><li class="field_exstruct" data-qid="38,60" value="3860" data-dimension="S2">Sensation is a fence / We can only perceive psychical elements, not physical elements -> the positivist core of [[Ontology:Q19,09\|empirio-criticism]]<br /> yeah, it's more of a fuzzy boundary between a lawn and a road if it's anything.		</li><li class="field_exstruct" data-qid="38,60" value="3860" data-dimension="S2">Sensation is a fence / We can only perceive psychical elements, not physical elements -> the positivist core of [[Ontology:Q19,09\|empirio-criticism]]<br /> yeah, it's more of a fuzzy boundary between a lawn and a road if it's anything.

Reversedragon: The workers must subordinate their interests to the interests of the bourgeois liberals (Menshevism)

2026-05-24T00:55:55Z

The workers must subordinate their interests to the interests of the bourgeois liberals (Menshevism)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:55, 24 May 2026
Line 290:		Line 290:
	</li><li class="field_fantasy" value="3175" data-dimension="S">why didn't they just build bigger towns / town more than big enough for the two of us / ([[User:RD/9k/Q31,76\|9k]])		</li><li class="field_fantasy" value="3175" data-dimension="S">why didn't they just build bigger towns / town more than big enough for the two of us / ([[User:RD/9k/Q31,76\|9k]])
	</li><li class="field_horror" value="3176" data-dimension="S">town ain't big enough for the two of us / ([[User:RD/9k/Q31,76\|9k]])		</li><li class="field_horror" value="3176" data-dimension="S">town ain't big enough for the two of us / ([[User:RD/9k/Q31,76\|9k]])
	</~~li><li class~~=~~"number_empty" value~~="~~3177~~"~~>??~~
			{{li\|I=S2/MX\|Q=31,77\|Q2=3177}}Duginism equals Liberal Zionism / Alexander Dugin failed to create a "new political philosophy distinct from Liberal-republicanism", because it is indistinguishable from Zionism

	</li><li class="field_geo" data-remark="this motif makes me think of anti-religion writings or something." value="3178" data-dimension="S">humorous euphemism for trash / please pick up your campaign promises and put them in the designated bag / what kind of Lacanianism is this? / what kind of Western-Marxism is this?		</li><li class="field_geo" data-remark="this motif makes me think of anti-religion writings or something." value="3178" data-dimension="S">humorous euphemism for trash / please pick up your campaign promises and put them in the designated bag / what kind of Lacanianism is this? / what kind of Western-Marxism is this?
Line 313:		Line 314:
	</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="3196" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="3196" data-dimension="S">??
	</li><li class="field_nations" data-tradition="A, PT" data-qid="31,97" value="3197" data-dimension="S">pre-judging yourself out of the feeling that it's unethical or rude to not be mean to yourself and present yourself to others as bad		</li><li class="field_nations" data-tradition="A, PT" data-qid="31,97" value="3197" data-dimension="S">pre-judging yourself out of the feeling that it's unethical or rude to not be mean to yourself and present yourself to others as bad
	</~~li><li class~~=~~"field_exstruct" value~~="3198~~" data~~-~~dimension="S"~~>??
			{{li\|I=S2/LR\|Q=31,98\|Q2=3198}}The workers must subordinate their interests to the interests of the bourgeois liberals (Menshevism) -> I'll have to find sources on this because man, it looks like in some ways little has changed between the Mensheviks and today

	</li><li class="field_exstruct" data-qid="31,99" value="3199" data-dimension="S">particular name as stupid idiot garbage trash / ([[User:RD/9k/Q3180\|9k]])		</li><li class="field_exstruct" data-qid="31,99" value="3199" data-dimension="S">particular name as stupid idiot garbage trash / ([[User:RD/9k/Q3180\|9k]])

Reversedragon: gostak analysis

2026-05-24T00:49:01Z

gostak analysis

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:49, 24 May 2026
Line 275:		Line 275:
	{{li\|I=F2/ES\|tradition=MX onto ES\|Q=31,67\|Q2=3167}}The Israel-Palestine conflict is more effective than Communism / If the Israel-Palestine conflict lasted longer than the Soviet Union, it must be closer to being a good thing we want to keep going forever -> this should bring the whole idea of quantifying whether things work to the ground. the only real way to dismiss it is to claim that the Israel-Palestine conflict is a destructive process of some sort, and start distinguishing between constructive and destructive processes.		{{li\|I=F2/ES\|tradition=MX onto ES\|Q=31,67\|Q2=3167}}The Israel-Palestine conflict is more effective than Communism / If the Israel-Palestine conflict lasted longer than the Soviet Union, it must be closer to being a good thing we want to keep going forever -> this should bring the whole idea of quantifying whether things work to the ground. the only real way to dismiss it is to claim that the Israel-Palestine conflict is a destructive process of some sort, and start distinguishing between constructive and destructive processes.

	</~~li><li class~~=~~"number_empty" value~~="3168~~" data~~-~~dimension="S"~~>??		{{li\|I=S1/HAS\|Q=31,68\|Q2=3168}}gostak analysis -> the motif of discovering what something is, is made of, or is described as by looking at what things or objects are connected to it. technically the way all LLMs learn what any word means.

	</li><li class="field_fantasy" value="3169" data-dimension="S">artistic abstraction -> the motif of art deliberately separating itself from reality and representation. Magritte's pipe is a decent example. early newspaper-type cartoons are another example. {{YouTube\|mkzHTemRfAk}}<br />		</li><li class="field_fantasy" value="3169" data-dimension="S">artistic abstraction -> the motif of art deliberately separating itself from reality and representation. Magritte's pipe is a decent example. early newspaper-type cartoons are another example. {{YouTube\|mkzHTemRfAk}}<br />