User:Reversedragon/FirstNineThousand/5000 - Revision history

Reversedragon: why would I go to the effort to become good at something over a long period of time when I already have access to a product that was made by someone else?

2026-06-01T01:45:12Z

why would I go to the effort to become good at something over a long period of time when I already have access to a product that was made by someone else?

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:45, 1 June 2026
Line 525:		Line 525:
	</li><li class="field_nations" data-qid="53,70" value="5370" data-dimension="F2">Speedrunning is for cheaters / ([[User:RD/9k/Q53,73\|9k]])		</li><li class="field_nations" data-qid="53,70" value="5370" data-dimension="F2">Speedrunning is for cheaters / ([[User:RD/9k/Q53,73\|9k]])

	{{li\|I=S1/Aa~~\|tradition=~~\|Q=53,71\|Q2=5371}}why would I go to the effort to become good at something over a long period of time when I already have access to a product that was made by someone else? / why would I go to the effort to become good at something over a long period of time when I already have access to a simulation such as ChatGPT or a game or a recorded broadcast? {{YouTube\|DwauNBnF-8A}} -> because if you do the same thing as other people capitalism punishes you and calls you Evil for taking away other people's "right" to section up society and administer every action and behavior that happens in that section. it's not about "simulations" whatsoever. it's about actual security guys with clubs or guns and copyright lawyers and bourgeois republics (~~sometimes including Deng Xiaoping states~~) telling you the government is fine and nobody is allowed to build another republic over the top of them. it's about all the people that called the security forces getting together and saying they have formed the only possible form of modern society.		{{li\|I=S1/Aa\|Q=53,71\|Q2=5371}}why would I go to the effort to become good at something over a long period of time when I already have access to a product that was made by someone else? / why would I go to the effort to become good at something over a long period of time when I already have access to a simulation such as ChatGPT or a game or a recorded broadcast? {{YouTube\|DwauNBnF-8A}} / ({{9k\|RD/Q53,73}})

	</li><li class="field_ML" data-tradition="MX onto ML, MX onto Aa" data-qid="53,72" value="5372" data-dimension="S2">Difficulty is the lack of being able to pay for something to be done by someone else (outsourcing; "farming" people; meta-Marxism) / ([[User:RD/9k/Q53,73\|9k]])		</li><li class="field_ML" data-tradition="MX onto ML, MX onto Aa" data-qid="53,72" value="5372" data-dimension="S2">Difficulty is the lack of being able to pay for something to be done by someone else (outsourcing; "farming" people; meta-Marxism) / ([[User:RD/9k/Q53,73\|9k]])

Reversedragon: why would I go to the effort to become good at something over a long period of time when I already have access to a product that was made by someone else?

2026-05-31T00:09:41Z

why would I go to the effort to become good at something over a long period of time when I already have access to a product that was made by someone else?

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:09, 31 May 2026
Line 524:		Line 524:

	</li><li class="field_nations" data-qid="53,70" value="5370" data-dimension="F2">Speedrunning is for cheaters / ([[User:RD/9k/Q53,73\|9k]])		</li><li class="field_nations" data-qid="53,70" value="5370" data-dimension="F2">Speedrunning is for cheaters / ([[User:RD/9k/Q53,73\|9k]])
	</~~li><li class~~=~~"number_empty" value~~="~~5371~~" ~~data-dimension=~~"S"~~>??~~
			{{li\|I=S1/Aa\|tradition=\|Q=53,71\|Q2=5371}}why would I go to the effort to become good at something over a long period of time when I already have access to a product that was made by someone else? / why would I go to the effort to become good at something over a long period of time when I already have access to a simulation such as ChatGPT or a game or a recorded broadcast? {{YouTube\|DwauNBnF-8A}} -> because if you do the same thing as other people capitalism punishes you and calls you Evil for taking away other people's "right" to section up society and administer every action and behavior that happens in that section. it's not about "simulations" whatsoever. it's about actual security guys with clubs or guns and copyright lawyers and bourgeois republics (sometimes including Deng Xiaoping states) telling you the government is fine and nobody is allowed to build another republic over the top of them. it's about all the people that called the security forces getting together and saying they have formed the only possible form of modern society.

	</li><li class="field_ML" data-tradition="MX onto ML, MX onto Aa" data-qid="53,72" value="5372" data-dimension="S2">Difficulty is the lack of being able to pay for something to be done by someone else (outsourcing; "farming" people; meta-Marxism) / ([[User:RD/9k/Q53,73\|9k]])		</li><li class="field_ML" data-tradition="MX onto ML, MX onto Aa" data-qid="53,72" value="5372" data-dimension="S2">Difficulty is the lack of being able to pay for something to be done by someone else (outsourcing; "farming" people; meta-Marxism) / ([[User:RD/9k/Q53,73\|9k]])

Reversedragon: The Owl House

2026-05-26T04:10:39Z

The Owl House

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:10, 26 May 2026
Line 878:		Line 878:
	Grandpa Ralph who doesn't watch cartoons + ?? = spurious canonicity claim		Grandpa Ralph who doesn't watch cartoons + ?? = spurious canonicity claim

	</li><li ~~class~~=~~"field_fantasy" value~~=~~"5601" data-remark~~=~~"5600" data-dimension~~=~~"S"><cite>The Owl House<~~/~~cite> ->~~ a ~~lot~~ of ~~people liked this show and~~ I~~'m just like... hmm no. it looks like it's a good show? but. gosh~~, ~~why does it prompt so many video essays about Existentialism that even reference early~~-existentialism ~~by name.~~ I ~~don't think this show was aimed at me.~~		{{li\|I=Z1/Fy\|Q=56,01\|Q2=5601}}{{film\|The Owl House}} / ({{9k\|RD/Q56,01}})
			{{li\|I=F2/ES\|Q=56,02\|Q2=5602}}If everyone wanted someone to choose them, no one would achieve anything / ({{9k\|RD/Q56,01}})
			{{li\|I=S2/ES\|Q=56,03\|Q2=5603}}People created monarchies because they believe in predetermination / ({{9k\|RD/Q56,01}})
			{{li\|I=S2/ES\|Q=56,04\|Q2=5604}}Making a choice is the opposite of predetermination / ({{9k\|RD/Q56,01}})
			{{li\|I=S2/ES\|Q=56,05\|Q2=5605}}Early-existentialism is the opposite of predetermination / ({{9k\|RD/Q56,01}})
			{{li\|I=S2/ES\|Q=56,06\|Q2=5606}}Choices are identical with character development (fiction) / Choices are identical with Subject formation (real-life psychology) / ({{9k\|RD/Q56,01}})
			{{li\|I=S2/ES\|Q=56,07\|Q2=5607}}Individuals express themselves through the people around them / ({{9k\|RD/Q56,01}})

	</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="5602" data-dimension="F2">If everyone wanted someone to choose them, no one would achieve anything -> nah. this isn't inspiring. when there's capitalism a great many people's life stories are about searching all over to get chosen by someone and how inspirational it is to hear about someone getting chosen. what is going to a university and getting hired for an exclusive "opportunity" as one of the brightest experts if it isn't being a chosen one? our fantasy books reflect our societies and class structures.<br />
	edit: gosh. this is false. this is actually false, because if you duplex it, capitalists are waiting for employees to choose them and employees are waiting for capitalists to choose them. everyone is. it's more like if nobody wanted somebody to pick them out as the chosen one <em>nobody</em> would achieve anything.

	</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="5603" data-dimension="S2">People created monarchies because they believe in predetermination -> whoa whoa whoa. this isn't simply the truth, this is an Existentialist statement. many versions of Christianity see the Christian god as a Subject that actually responds to the overall state of earth, so no, even the divine right of kings isn't equal to predetermination. it only equals doing the thing the smartest or most capable person ever to exist would do in people's opinion. you can begin to see where all the anti-science propositions come from: that anyone trying to exert control over anyone else OR trying to claim more expertise than anyone else is preaching predetermination. this is a dangerous proposition, because it's exactly what gets science defunded by reactionaries, and climate change scenarios rejected, and disabled people stuck in their houses when people wouldn't get COVID vaccines. all of that ties directly back to Existentialism and how the notions of choices and freedom are absorbed by reactionaries.

	</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="5604" data-dimension="S2">making a choice is the opposite of predetermination -> this one is fairer. it seems probably untrue — you've got relaterminism going on in your head retermining your actions — but is more difficult to decide as clearly true or false.
	</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="5605" data-dimension="S2">early-existentialism is the opposite of predetermination -> some people distinctly seem to treat (early-)existentialism as a single proposition rather than a field of philosophers. the funny thing is that everyone explains the contents of the proposition a little differently. thus making the single proposition back into a field of philosophy containing many propositions. in an act of pettiness, I'll label this statement false in the strict binary logic sense, purely because it can be demonstrated to be a category error.
	~~</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="5606" data-dimension="S2">Choices are identical with character development (fiction) / Choices are identical with Subject formation (real-life psychology)~~
	</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="5607" data-dimension="S2">Individuals express themselves through the people around them -> one of the sharpest things I heard in an Existentialist video. you really have to pick this apart and look at it though. at first glance it looks like an acknowledgement of [[Term:reterminism\|relaterminism]]: people don't choose everything about themselves, so finding good friends that fill in the gaps in you is important. then you look at it closer and you realize there are much worse interpretations of it. one is that our main character is determining the presence of the other characters and vice versa and they are all <em>choosing</em> to be together. that's a bit disgusting. it allows people to come together and express themselves through their connection and then be prejudiced against other groups of people because being prejudiced is their authentic self. if you think that can't be someone's authentic self at least at one particular moment in time then you have never actually met a reactionary. just like a Goth kid, they will insist that even if it's a phase bigotry is exactly who they are.
	</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="5608" data-dimension="S2">The true Big Bad of Deltarune is stereotypes {{YouTube\|JpTCVxB9CwA}} {{YouTube\|3GbJfhgCyfg}} / The true antagonist to Luz is stereotypes -> this is more of a framing statement than a factual statement; it needs other propositions behind it to be able to evaluate it as true or false.<br />		</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="5608" data-dimension="S2">The true Big Bad of Deltarune is stereotypes {{YouTube\|JpTCVxB9CwA}} {{YouTube\|3GbJfhgCyfg}} / The true antagonist to Luz is stereotypes -> this is more of a framing statement than a factual statement; it needs other propositions behind it to be able to evaluate it as true or false.<br />
	I feel like this statement really cheapens Deltarune. any other story could be about stereotypes, you know? {{book\|The Owl House}} can be about stereotypes; why not. but Deltarune is about something bigger, it's about how the individuals are related to the game world and what individuals are going to do when the game world dies. a Deltarune AU could be the stage for an allegory about the United States smashing other countries to pieces and even if they try to put themselves back together with Communism before they get smashed they can't defy the death of their national population and ethnicity and just have to come to terms with death.		I feel like this statement really cheapens Deltarune. any other story could be about stereotypes, you know? {{book\|The Owl House}} can be about stereotypes; why not. but Deltarune is about something bigger, it's about how the individuals are related to the game world and what individuals are going to do when the game world dies. a Deltarune AU could be the stage for an allegory about the United States smashing other countries to pieces and even if they try to put themselves back together with Communism before they get smashed they can't defy the death of their national population and ethnicity and just have to come to terms with death.
Line 896:		Line 893:
	</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="5610" data-dimension="S2">Fiction enables fans to learn about each other / fiction allows people to learn about each other and make them better people (sic - don't fix typo unless erasing prototype notes) -> not always false, but a rather Existentialist model of fiction. for a counterpoint, see "Grimey the neckbeard"		</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="5610" data-dimension="S2">Fiction enables fans to learn about each other / fiction allows people to learn about each other and make them better people (sic - don't fix typo unless erasing prototype notes) -> not always false, but a rather Existentialist model of fiction. for a counterpoint, see "Grimey the neckbeard"

			</li><li value="5611" class="number_empty">??
			</li><li value="5615" class="number_empty">??
			</li><li value="5617" class="number_empty">??
	</li><li value="5620" class="number_empty">??		</li><li value="5620" class="number_empty">??
			</li><li value="5625" class="number_empty">??
	</li><li value="5630" class="number_empty">??		</li><li value="5630" class="number_empty">??
			</li><li value="5635" class="number_empty">??
			</li><li value="5639" class="number_empty">??
	</li><li value="5640" class="number_empty">??		</li><li value="5640" class="number_empty">??
	</li><li value="5641" class="number_empty">??		</li><li value="5641" class="number_empty">??

Reversedragon: immersion language learning

2026-05-25T00:33:57Z

immersion language learning

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:33, 25 May 2026
Line 261:		Line 261:
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="5157" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="5157" data-dimension="S">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="5158" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="5158" data-dimension="S">??
	</li><~~li class~~=~~"number_empty" value~~="~~5159~~" ~~data-dimension~~="~~S">??~~
			{{li\|I=S1/HAS\|Q=51,59\|Q2=5159}}immersion language learning [https://ai.glossika.com/blog/language-learning-methods-worth-adding-to-your-self-study] -> I have no particular reason to code this as an Item other than I genuinely think it's cool, and it's my favorite way when nobody is grading me. videos, novels (if you're at that level), and instructions on how to do something are all wonderful ways to learn a language. or, in the rare case this is what you do, looking up phrases related to Marxism or other philosophies to see how they were used in their original context. I learned, like, more about German grammar than I should have by just looking up {{i\|lang=de\|Aufhebung}}. pretty quickly it was like, {{i\|there are words you either separate or squash into one word? so sometimes the verb goes at the end of the sentence??}} and by the end... I didn't {{em\|quite}} know how to put together a German sentence but I was so much closer than when I'd started.<br/>
			oh yeah, here's some cursed knowledge: I've found talks by Alan Woods in Spanish. there might be some in about one more non-English language. weirdest way to start learning Spanish, there you go.<br/>
			as for learning Mandarin on professor Feng's intro to Dengism, though? I actually recommend that, because the way he formats the slides is weirdly entertaining. for a bit he managed to firmly lodge the phrase "{{TTS\|lang=zh\|tts=工人阶级\|gōngrén jiējí\|title=working class}}" in my mind until for a bit I forgot it, and then I found the video again, and then I remembered. it's almost a better language course than it is a course on Marxism. 7/10, {{em\|will}} teach you the word "{{TTS\|lang=zh\|工人阶级}}". [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/工人阶级]

	</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="5160" data-dimension="M3">why do US people say "inside thoughts" in public -> there are multiple causes		</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="5160" data-dimension="M3">why do US people say "inside thoughts" in public -> there are multiple causes

Reversedragon: Sapir-Whorf hypothesis / Japanese speakers do not think about the future

2026-05-25T00:27:42Z

Sapir-Whorf hypothesis / Japanese speakers do not think about the future

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:27, 25 May 2026
Line 196:		Line 196:
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="5118" data-dimension="S">Wittgensteinian language usage -> the type of language usage that fails to separate words from ontological constructs (signifier equations) that lie inside language and that large language models trace in a superficial way. this doesn't have a precise definition yet but one thing it could mean is insisting that every term applied to things is really literal instead of a figurative way to refer to something which could practically be the same thing depending on the circumstance — that Einstein can't refer to awe as religion as a way of defanging religion and showing that it was only another name for awe.		</li><li class="field_geo" value="5118" data-dimension="S">Wittgensteinian language usage -> the type of language usage that fails to separate words from ontological constructs (signifier equations) that lie inside language and that large language models trace in a superficial way. this doesn't have a precise definition yet but one thing it could mean is insisting that every term applied to things is really literal instead of a figurative way to refer to something which could practically be the same thing depending on the circumstance — that Einstein can't refer to awe as religion as a way of defanging religion and showing that it was only another name for awe.

	</~~li><li class~~=~~"field_geo" value~~="5119~~" data~~-~~dimension="S">??~~		{{li\|I=S2/HAS\|Q=51,19\|Q2=5119}}Sapir-Whorf hypothesis [https://ai.glossika.com/blog/the-sapir-whorf-hypothesis-does-language-create-reality]

	</li><li class="field_mdem" value="5120" data-dimension="S2">Language is just a bunch of math -> sounds ridiculous at first unless you've already come to understand language is a bunch of signifier equations, and then you're like, oh, yeah, it really is just a bunch of things inside of other things that we only assign arbitrary names to, it's not too big of a leap from that to saying it's literally just math.		</li><li class="field_mdem" value="5120" data-dimension="S2">Language is just a bunch of math -> sounds ridiculous at first unless you've already come to understand language is a bunch of signifier equations, and then you're like, oh, yeah, it really is just a bunch of things inside of other things that we only assign arbitrary names to, it's not too big of a leap from that to saying it's literally just math.
Line 219:		Line 219:
	</li><li class="field_fantasy" data-qid="51,32" value="5132" data-dimension="S2">"Hogwarts" is a direction / ([[User:RD/9k/Q51,30\|9k]])		</li><li class="field_fantasy" data-qid="51,32" value="5132" data-dimension="S2">"Hogwarts" is a direction / ([[User:RD/9k/Q51,30\|9k]])

	{{li\|I=S1/Fy\|Q=51,31\|Q2=~~5131~~}}thinking Job sounds like job / Job sounds like job / pronouncing Job as job -> one of those moments where you really wonder about the claims of Christianity being relevant when people can't even pronounce the names.		{{li\|I=S1/Fy\|Q=51,33\|Q2=5133}}thinking Job sounds like job / Job sounds like job / pronouncing Job as job -> one of those moments where you really wonder about the claims of Christianity being relevant when people can't even pronounce the names.

	</li><li class="number_empty" value="5134" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="5134" data-dimension="S">??
	</~~li><li class~~=~~"number_empty" value~~="5135~~" data~~-~~dimension~~=~~"S"~~>??
			{{li\|I=S2/HAS\|Q=51,35\|Q2=5135}}Speakers of the Hopi language do not distinguish past and present events<br/>
			Sapir-Whorf hypothesis + Hopi people = this.<br/>
			this + Japan = Japanese speakers do not think about the future.

	{{li\|I=S1/Zv\|Q=51,36\|Q2=5136}}lying / ({{9k\|RD/Q51,36}})		{{li\|I=S1/Zv\|Q=51,36\|Q2=5136}}lying / ({{9k\|RD/Q51,36}})

	</~~li><li class~~=~~"number_empty" value~~="5137~~" data~~-~~dimension="S"~~>??		{{li\|I=F2/HAS\|Q=51,37\|Q2=5137}}Japanese speakers do not think about the future; the non-past tense means that present and future events actually happen at the same time -> this is what that study on the Hopi language sounded like to me. with the Japanese language you see that the information of when something happened is just encoded into other words in the sentence. so I'm going to take a wild guess and guess that the Hopi language in fact operates about the same.<br/>
	</~~li><li class~~=~~"number_empty" value~~="5138~~" data-dimension="S">??~~		this + ?? = Language does not put serious limitations on how people conceptualize time.

			{{li\|I=S2/MX\|Q=51,38\|Q2=5138}}Language does not put serious limitations on how people conceptualize time

	</li><li class="field_exstruct" data-tradition="MX onto poststructuralism (ES)" data-qid="51,39" value="5139" data-dimension="S2">Anti-racism education is an oxymoron / The concepts of "anti-racism" and "education" are in contradiction because the purpose of education is to teach ontologies and methods for testing ontologies but every ontology potentially contains errors relative to the real world and thus any attempt to educate people on anything can potentially be taken as a malicious prejudice if it is not specifically educating people as unique human individuals in how to socially connect and make friends with particular real people that exist and learn particular real people's exact Lived Experiences that exist independent of history books and cannot be taught through any history book or classroom -> the shocking but entirely logical conclusion you reach if you try to believe poststructuralism instead of calling it stupid, and try to believe that poststructuralism is compatible with the general concept of anti-racism. I have to say. I can't hate this when I simply look at how unbelievably coherent it is, but at the same time it's a headache because if it was true, how the {{censor\|hell}} would you actually fix education besides abolishing education for anything but immediately useful skills, and general Existentialist principles for being nice to people? I can't help but feel like poststructuralism is anti-education. and that hurts my non-neurotypical brain because making snap decisions correctly in a small period of time, like you have to if you're going to apply Existentialist Principles Of Being Nice To Everybody, is one of the things I'm almost totally incapable of doing. I constantly forget every action I did less than 5 minutes ago unless I deliberately think about it many times over the course of several hours. I have no idea where I put my keys unless I can see them on the table and suddenly remember why I put them there. I have to check the empty washing machine "for safety" just to know I didn't leave my clothes in there. (typing that made me panic and check the washing machine.) I function a lot better if I can actually read up on countries or populations as material objects and try to get a genuine understanding of what bigger processes are going on. the notion that everything can be solved by calling out supposedly correct and incorrect behaviors of individuals against individuals, in a world where there are often multiple contradictory pressures on individuals to regard the "right" thing to do as both totally mandatory and totally unacceptable, is alien to me. is anybody going to care about intuitively, empathetically understanding the Lived Experience of {{em\|my}} {{censor\|shit}} brain that can't guess the right decisions for {{censor\|shit}}? no.		</li><li class="field_exstruct" data-tradition="MX onto poststructuralism (ES)" data-qid="51,39" value="5139" data-dimension="S2">Anti-racism education is an oxymoron / The concepts of "anti-racism" and "education" are in contradiction because the purpose of education is to teach ontologies and methods for testing ontologies but every ontology potentially contains errors relative to the real world and thus any attempt to educate people on anything can potentially be taken as a malicious prejudice if it is not specifically educating people as unique human individuals in how to socially connect and make friends with particular real people that exist and learn particular real people's exact Lived Experiences that exist independent of history books and cannot be taught through any history book or classroom -> the shocking but entirely logical conclusion you reach if you try to believe poststructuralism instead of calling it stupid, and try to believe that poststructuralism is compatible with the general concept of anti-racism. I have to say. I can't hate this when I simply look at how unbelievably coherent it is, but at the same time it's a headache because if it was true, how the {{censor\|hell}} would you actually fix education besides abolishing education for anything but immediately useful skills, and general Existentialist principles for being nice to people? I can't help but feel like poststructuralism is anti-education. and that hurts my non-neurotypical brain because making snap decisions correctly in a small period of time, like you have to if you're going to apply Existentialist Principles Of Being Nice To Everybody, is one of the things I'm almost totally incapable of doing. I constantly forget every action I did less than 5 minutes ago unless I deliberately think about it many times over the course of several hours. I have no idea where I put my keys unless I can see them on the table and suddenly remember why I put them there. I have to check the empty washing machine "for safety" just to know I didn't leave my clothes in there. (typing that made me panic and check the washing machine.) I function a lot better if I can actually read up on countries or populations as material objects and try to get a genuine understanding of what bigger processes are going on. the notion that everything can be solved by calling out supposedly correct and incorrect behaviors of individuals against individuals, in a world where there are often multiple contradictory pressures on individuals to regard the "right" thing to do as both totally mandatory and totally unacceptable, is alien to me. is anybody going to care about intuitively, empathetically understanding the Lived Experience of {{em\|my}} {{censor\|shit}} brain that can't guess the right decisions for {{censor\|shit}}? no.
Line 299:		Line 304:

	{{li\|I=S2/MX\|tradition=MX onto ES, MX onto PT\|Q=51,87\|Q2=5187}}Post-structuralist anarchy is indistinguishable from Toryism / Because she is willing to adapt to new situations and coast through science academia and critical theory getting defunded, Sabine Hossenfelder is not just a Tory but a post-structuralist anarchist -> this is one of those things you only arrive at after thinking about a whole lot of things to derive an ontology of different Bauplans; if the proposition is confusing to you, you just haven't been following along with meta-Marxism. anyway. recently I was revisiting the video where Sabine Hossenfelder talks about how defunding academia and letting it fall to a bunch of private organizations is basically just the same thing as having government programs and it doesn't matter to her; having a philosophy where she literally just adapts to anything, she was fine with the idea of taking a flawed structure, smashing it to pieces, and letting a diffuse cloud of individuals including academics and capitalists just sort of stochastically assemble through their individual motions and individualized judgement back into something functional. by some people's rubrics, she is an average Tory, not a [[:Category:Existentialist-Structuralist tradition ontology\|blue anarchist]] or anything. but as far as I can tell, the way she goes about her day is indistinguishable from "poststructuralist anarchy". [https://www.reddit.com/r/Anarchy101/comments/13n1te1/regarding_postmodernism_and_post_structuralist/] the whole thing seems to leave a giant loophole for Toryism to fester wildly and spawn nazisms. I can see how it isn't identical with individualist anarchism because it has that sort of "pseudo MDem" character of localized countable objects (individuals) interacting and assembling into larger countable objects. but even so it seems like garbage. no matter how much [[E:chaos magic\|chaos magic]] you invoke, every "changeable structure in flux" will be made of eating, space-occupying organisms which can kill each other, and due to that, the more things are open and in flux the more killing can happen.		{{li\|I=S2/MX\|tradition=MX onto ES, MX onto PT\|Q=51,87\|Q2=5187}}Post-structuralist anarchy is indistinguishable from Toryism / Because she is willing to adapt to new situations and coast through science academia and critical theory getting defunded, Sabine Hossenfelder is not just a Tory but a post-structuralist anarchist -> this is one of those things you only arrive at after thinking about a whole lot of things to derive an ontology of different Bauplans; if the proposition is confusing to you, you just haven't been following along with meta-Marxism. anyway. recently I was revisiting the video where Sabine Hossenfelder talks about how defunding academia and letting it fall to a bunch of private organizations is basically just the same thing as having government programs and it doesn't matter to her; having a philosophy where she literally just adapts to anything, she was fine with the idea of taking a flawed structure, smashing it to pieces, and letting a diffuse cloud of individuals including academics and capitalists just sort of stochastically assemble through their individual motions and individualized judgement back into something functional. by some people's rubrics, she is an average Tory, not a [[:Category:Existentialist-Structuralist tradition ontology\|blue anarchist]] or anything. but as far as I can tell, the way she goes about her day is indistinguishable from "poststructuralist anarchy". [https://www.reddit.com/r/Anarchy101/comments/13n1te1/regarding_postmodernism_and_post_structuralist/] the whole thing seems to leave a giant loophole for Toryism to fester wildly and spawn nazisms. I can see how it isn't identical with individualist anarchism because it has that sort of "pseudo MDem" character of localized countable objects (individuals) interacting and assembling into larger countable objects. but even so it seems like garbage. no matter how much [[E:chaos magic\|chaos magic]] you invoke, every "changeable structure in flux" will be made of eating, space-occupying organisms which can kill each other, and due to that, the more things are open and in flux the more killing can happen.


	</li><li class="field_exstruct field_LGBT" data-qid="51,88" value="5188" data-dimension="S">Billy Herrington condoning Japanese war crimes {{YouTube\|Doc4cbqB-_s}} -> an incident which I think reveals a lot about normal human psychology. people want to believe that "society" or "humanity" is separable from populational boundaries, wars, and politics, and that they can simply form a connection to something <s>(yes, in this case edits of a gay porn tape.)</s> and that people who always seem nice are nice, while in reality that isn't necessarily true.		</li><li class="field_exstruct field_LGBT" data-qid="51,88" value="5188" data-dimension="S">Billy Herrington condoning Japanese war crimes {{YouTube\|Doc4cbqB-_s}} -> an incident which I think reveals a lot about normal human psychology. people want to believe that "society" or "humanity" is separable from populational boundaries, wars, and politics, and that they can simply form a connection to something <s>(yes, in this case edits of a gay porn tape.)</s> and that people who always seem nice are nice, while in reality that isn't necessarily true.

Reversedragon: thinking Job sounds like job

2026-05-25T00:03:34Z

thinking Job sounds like job

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:03, 25 May 2026
Line 219:		Line 219:
	</li><li class="field_fantasy" data-qid="51,32" value="5132" data-dimension="S2">"Hogwarts" is a direction / ([[User:RD/9k/Q51,30\|9k]])		</li><li class="field_fantasy" data-qid="51,32" value="5132" data-dimension="S2">"Hogwarts" is a direction / ([[User:RD/9k/Q51,30\|9k]])

	</~~li><li class~~=~~"number_empty" value~~=~~"5133" data~~-~~dimension="S"~~>??		{{li\|I=S1/Fy\|Q=51,31\|Q2=5131}}thinking Job sounds like job / Job sounds like job / pronouncing Job as job -> one of those moments where you really wonder about the claims of Christianity being relevant when people can't even pronounce the names.

	</li><li class="number_empty" value="5134" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="5134" data-dimension="S">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="5135" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="5135" data-dimension="S">??

Reversedragon: lying

2026-05-24T05:16:58Z

lying

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:16, 24 May 2026
Line 222:		Line 222:
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="5134" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="5134" data-dimension="S">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="5135" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="5135" data-dimension="S">??
	</~~li><li class~~=~~"number_empty" value~~="5136~~" data-dimension="S">??~~
			{{li\|I=S1/Zv\|Q=51,36\|Q2=5136}}lying / ({{9k\|RD/Q51,36}})

	</li><li class="number_empty" value="5137" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="5137" data-dimension="S">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="5138" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="5138" data-dimension="S">??

Reversedragon: The Opposer

2026-05-20T21:40:10Z

The Opposer

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:40, 20 May 2026
Line 918:		Line 918:
	</li><li data-qid="56,63" value="5663" class="field_fantasy" data-dimension="S">The King -> the motif of a great worldwide or international emperor in religion or fiction. equally applies to Aslan or the god of a real-world religion		</li><li data-qid="56,63" value="5663" class="field_fantasy" data-dimension="S">The King -> the motif of a great worldwide or international emperor in religion or fiction. equally applies to Aslan or the god of a real-world religion
	</li><li value="5664" class="number_empty">??		</li><li value="5664" class="number_empty">??
	</~~li><li data-qid~~="56,65~~" value~~="5665~~" class="field_horror" data-dimension="S">~~The Opposers, plural ~~-> the motif of an Opposer which simply consists of a group of opposing individuals without any particular god-level leader. the Dark Forest in <cite>Warriors<~~/~~cite> is an example~~
	</~~li><li data-qid~~="56,66~~" value~~="5666~~" class="field_trotsky" data-dimension="S">~~The Opposer / The Satan (archetype or motif) -> the motif of a great worldwide enemy in religion or fiction. "satan" originally simply meant "the opposer". Manichaeism, Zoroastrianism, Christianity all have some counterpart to this. The Opposer + ??? = Mx. Satan.		{{li\|I=S1/DFy\|Q=56,65\|Q2=5665}}The Opposers, plural / ({{9k\|RD/Q5666}})
			{{li\|I=S1/DFy/Zv\|Q=56,66\|Q2=5666}}The Opposer / The Satan (archetype or motif) / ({{9k\|RD/Q5666}})

	</li><li class="field_exstruct field_LGBT" data-qid="56,67" value="5667" data-dimension="S2">gnosticism in LGBT+ media / LGBT+ and gnosticism (use of mythical imagery by queer creators; not conspiracy theories about the origins of LGBT+ identities) / LGBT+ media and belief in any higher power as scary (as horror; literary analysis) / belief in higher power as horror (LGBT+ fiction) -> not to be confused with conspiracy theories that Gnosticism-proper "created" gay and transgender movements. this is the motif of media which are predominately about "queer experiences" having narratives that the concept of gods is scary ({{game\|Adastra}}), or that fictional characters in a metanarrative could only have a demiurge as a god and that's scary ({{game\|Deltarune}}), etc.		</li><li class="field_exstruct field_LGBT" data-qid="56,67" value="5667" data-dimension="S2">gnosticism in LGBT+ media / LGBT+ and gnosticism (use of mythical imagery by queer creators; not conspiracy theories about the origins of LGBT+ identities) / LGBT+ media and belief in any higher power as scary (as horror; literary analysis) / belief in higher power as horror (LGBT+ fiction) -> not to be confused with conspiracy theories that Gnosticism-proper "created" gay and transgender movements. this is the motif of media which are predominately about "queer experiences" having narratives that the concept of gods is scary ({{game\|Adastra}}), or that fictional characters in a metanarrative could only have a demiurge as a god and that's scary ({{game\|Deltarune}}), etc.

Reversedragon: consumerism in Pokémon / subtextual capitalism in fiction

2026-05-11T10:52:17Z

consumerism in Pokémon / subtextual capitalism in fiction

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:52, 11 May 2026
Line 638:		Line 638:
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="5465" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="5465" data-dimension="S">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="5469" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="5469" data-dimension="S">??
	</~~li><li class~~=~~"number_empty" value~~="5470~~" data~~-~~dimension="S"~~>??
	</~~li><li class~~=~~"number_empty" value~~="5471~~" data-dimension="S">??~~		{{li\|I=S1/Fy\|Q=54,70\|Q2=5470}}subtextual capitalism in fiction / capitalist subtext in fiction -> the motif of capitalism as a material process that grows, develops, and reproduces being vaguely represented on some not-entirely-literal level in fiction.
			{{li\|I=S1/Fy\|Q=54,71\|Q2=5471}}consumerism in {{game\|Pokémon}} / consumerist metaphors or paradigms inside the fictional context of {{game\|Pokémon}} / ({{9k\|RD/Q5471}})

	</li><li class="number_empty" value="5472" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="5472" data-dimension="S">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="5473" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="5473" data-dimension="S">??

Reversedragon: secular animism

2026-05-08T12:42:54Z

secular animism

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:42, 8 May 2026
Line 452:		Line 452:
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="5317" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="5317" data-dimension="S">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="5318" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="5318" data-dimension="S">??
	~~</li><li class="number_empty" value="5319" data-dimension="S">??~~

	</li~~><li class~~=~~"number_empty" value~~="5320~~" data~~-~~dimension~~=~~"S">??~~		{{li\|I=S2/A\|Q=53,19\|Q2=53,19}}secular animism / ({{9k\|RD/Q618-SecularAnimism}})
	</~~li><li class~~=~~"number_empty" value~~="5321~~" data~~-~~dimension~~=~~"S">??~~		{{li\|I=S2/Aqr/HAS\|Q=53,20\|Q2=5320}}animism / ({{9k\|RD/Q618-SecularAnimism}})
	</~~li><li class~~=~~"number_empty" value~~="5322~~" data~~-~~dimension="S">??~~		{{li\|I=S2/Aqr/HAS\|Q=53,21\|Q2=5321}}local god as external force / god (animating power) / local god (generic) / tutelary deity (generic) / spirit (local god; generic) / ({{9k\|RD/Q618-SecularAnimism}})
			{{li\|I=S2/Aqr/HAS\|Q=53,22\|Q2=5322}}local god as personification / god (personification) / local god (generic) / tutelary deity (generic) / spirit (local god; generic) / ({{9k\|RD/Q618-SecularAnimism}})

	</li><li class="number_empty" value="5323" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="5323" data-dimension="S">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="5324" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="5324" data-dimension="S">??

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:45, 1 June 2026
Line 525:		Line 525:
	</li><li class="field_nations" data-qid="53,70" value="5370" data-dimension="F2">Speedrunning is for cheaters / ([[User:RD/9k/Q53,73\|9k]])		</li><li class="field_nations" data-qid="53,70" value="5370" data-dimension="F2">Speedrunning is for cheaters / ([[User:RD/9k/Q53,73\|9k]])

	{{li\|I=S1/Aa~~\|tradition=~~\|Q=53,71\|Q2=5371}}why would I go to the effort to become good at something over a long period of time when I already have access to a product that was made by someone else? / why would I go to the effort to become good at something over a long period of time when I already have access to a simulation such as ChatGPT or a game or a recorded broadcast? {{YouTube\|DwauNBnF-8A}} -> because if you do the same thing as other people capitalism punishes you and calls you Evil for taking away other people's "right" to section up society and administer every action and behavior that happens in that section. it's not about "simulations" whatsoever. it's about actual security guys with clubs or guns and copyright lawyers and bourgeois republics (~~sometimes including Deng Xiaoping states~~) telling you the government is fine and nobody is allowed to build another republic over the top of them. it's about all the people that called the security forces getting together and saying they have formed the only possible form of modern society.		{{li\|I=S1/Aa\|Q=53,71\|Q2=5371}}why would I go to the effort to become good at something over a long period of time when I already have access to a product that was made by someone else? / why would I go to the effort to become good at something over a long period of time when I already have access to a simulation such as ChatGPT or a game or a recorded broadcast? {{YouTube\|DwauNBnF-8A}} / ({{9k\|RD/Q53,73}})

	</li><li class="field_ML" data-tradition="MX onto ML, MX onto Aa" data-qid="53,72" value="5372" data-dimension="S2">Difficulty is the lack of being able to pay for something to be done by someone else (outsourcing; "farming" people; meta-Marxism) / ([[User:RD/9k/Q53,73\|9k]])		</li><li class="field_ML" data-tradition="MX onto ML, MX onto Aa" data-qid="53,72" value="5372" data-dimension="S2">Difficulty is the lack of being able to pay for something to be done by someone else (outsourcing; "farming" people; meta-Marxism) / ([[User:RD/9k/Q53,73\|9k]])