User:Reversedragon/FirstNineThousand/5000 - Revision history

Reversedragon: postmodern philosophy

2026-09-08T06:31:00Z

postmodern philosophy

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:31, 8 September 2026
Line 300:		Line 300:

	{{li\|I=S1/ES\|Q=51,84\|Q2=5184}}post-structuralist civilization / post-structuralist society -> the motif of a physical, material group of people which has no outer shape or form and whose only definitive structure is links between individuals constantly changing. the Existentialist-(Post)Structuralist tradition is the shovel dream of this kind of physical society, which to some extent already exists beneath Liberal-republicanism as the "shape" that capitalism has.		{{li\|I=S1/ES\|Q=51,84\|Q2=5184}}post-structuralist civilization / post-structuralist society -> the motif of a physical, material group of people which has no outer shape or form and whose only definitive structure is links between individuals constantly changing. the Existentialist-(Post)Structuralist tradition is the shovel dream of this kind of physical society, which to some extent already exists beneath Liberal-republicanism as the "shape" that capitalism has.
	{{li\|I=S1/ES~~\|tradition=~~\|Q=51,85\|Q2=5185}}postmodern philosophy / postmodernism (philosophy; not art) -> this is the entry for the actual thing, not the concept being used as a pejorative. you should have some sort of evidence that something bases itself on other things that identify themselves as postmodernism for it to qualify as this
			{{li\|I=S1/ES\|Q=51,85\|Q2=5185}}postmodern philosophy / postmodernism (philosophy; not art) {{9k\|RD\|Q5185}}

	{{li\|I=S2/MX\|tradition=MX onto ES\|Q=51,86\|Q2=5186}}Post-structuralism runs on prejudice (existential materialism) / In a post-structuralist society, where the shape of civilization is shapeless or formless and the only definitive structure is links between individuals constantly changing, it must be accepted that prejudice is natural and not something anyone can actually get rid of -> I've said this phrased many other ways (one way I've said it is "Gramscian approaches to media") but I may as well add one that specifically gets the term "post-structuralist" in there because that's more precise to who actually endorses this stuff<br/>		{{li\|I=S2/MX\|tradition=MX onto ES\|Q=51,86\|Q2=5186}}Post-structuralism runs on prejudice (existential materialism) / In a post-structuralist society, where the shape of civilization is shapeless or formless and the only definitive structure is links between individuals constantly changing, it must be accepted that prejudice is natural and not something anyone can actually get rid of -> I've said this phrased many other ways (one way I've said it is "Gramscian approaches to media") but I may as well add one that specifically gets the term "post-structuralist" in there because that's more precise to who actually endorses this stuff<br/>

Reversedragon: corporations as people-farms

2026-09-05T03:49:26Z

corporations as people-farms

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:49, 5 September 2026
Line 835:		Line 835:
	{{li\|I=S2/IV\|Q=55,73\|Q2=5573}}{{book\|Animal Farm}} is backhandedly true / Animal Farm was a good metaphor for the wrong reasons {{9k\|RD\|Q1983}}		{{li\|I=S2/IV\|Q=55,73\|Q2=5573}}{{book\|Animal Farm}} is backhandedly true / Animal Farm was a good metaphor for the wrong reasons {{9k\|RD\|Q1983}}
	{{li\|I=S2/IV\|Q=55,74\|Q2=5574}}{{book\|Animal Farm}} tells Trotsky's story {{9k\|RD\|Q1983}}		{{li\|I=S2/IV\|Q=55,74\|Q2=5574}}{{book\|Animal Farm}} tells Trotsky's story {{9k\|RD\|Q1983}}
			{{li\|I=S1/MX\|Q=55,75\|Q2=5575}}corporations as people-farms {{9k\|RD\|Q1983}}
	</~~li><li class~~=~~"field_mdem" value~~="5575~~" data-dimension="S">~~corporations as people-farms / all corporations as people farms / all corporate products as people-farm milk or people-farm eggs / soylent green is people (meta-Marxism) -> the motif of casting every case of corporate owners (Tory allies) herding people into microhierarchy to "prevent crimes" or "create order" as an act of farming people like cattle; an act of replacing violent wild packs of animals that snarl at each other for challenging the patriarchs or stick each other with their antlers with a peaceful herd of animals that is exploited and consumed by the farmer, occasionally kicked or stuffed into one cramped building, and all of the animals are human beings.<br />
	~~corporations as people-farms +~~ {{~~book~~\|~~Animal Farm}} = {{book~~\|~~Animal Farm~~}} ~~is backhandedly true.~~

	{{li\|I=Z1/LR\|Q=55,76\|Q2=5576}}Liberal-republicanism {{9k\|RD\|Q55,76}}		{{li\|I=Z1/LR\|Q=55,76\|Q2=5576}}Liberal-republicanism {{9k\|RD\|Q55,76}}

Reversedragon: abolitionism (anarchism)

2026-09-04T08:21:20Z

abolitionism (anarchism)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:21, 4 September 2026
Line 1,086:		Line 1,086:
	</li><li data-qid="59,58" value="5958" class="field_fantasy" data-dimension="Z"><cite>My Little Pony: Tell Your Tale</cite>		</li><li data-qid="59,58" value="5958" class="field_fantasy" data-dimension="Z"><cite>My Little Pony: Tell Your Tale</cite>

	</li~~><li class~~=~~"number_empty" data-tradition="" data-qid~~="59,59~~" value~~="5959~~" data-dimension="S">??~~		{{li\|I=S1/A\|Q=59,59\|Q2=5959}}abolitionism (anarchism) / abolition (anarchism) {{9k\|RD\|Q4167}}

	</li><li class="field_fantasy" data-qid="59,60" value="5960" data-dimension="Z"><cite>[[Ontology:Q5960\|The Tea Dragon Society]]</cite> (all media)		</li><li class="field_fantasy" data-qid="59,60" value="5960" data-dimension="Z"><cite>[[Ontology:Q5960\|The Tea Dragon Society]]</cite> (all media)

Reversedragon: The American Revolution wasn't

2026-09-04T07:59:59Z

The American Revolution wasn't

Reversedragon: Monarchism never ended

2026-09-04T06:46:28Z

Monarchism never ended

Reversedragon: worldmaking / "anarchist" has horrendously inaccurate thesaurus page

2026-09-04T06:10:44Z

worldmaking / "anarchist" has horrendously inaccurate thesaurus page

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:10, 4 September 2026
Line 247:		Line 247:
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="5148" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="5148" data-dimension="S">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="5149" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="5149" data-dimension="S">??
			</li><li class="number_empty" value="5150" data-dimension="S">??

			{{li\|I=S1/A/BP\|Q=51,51\|Q2=5151}}worldmaking {{9k\|RD\|Q5151}}

	~~</li><li class="number_empty" value="5150" data-dimension="S">??~~
	~~</li><li class="number_empty" value="5151" data-dimension="S">??~~
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="5152" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="5152" data-dimension="S">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="5153" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="5153" data-dimension="S">??
Line 878:		Line 879:
	</li><li value="5592" class="number_empty">??		</li><li value="5592" class="number_empty">??

	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_nations" data-tradition="~~PT~~" data-qid~~="55,93~~" value~~="5593~~" data-dimension="S">~~synonyms for anarchist: terrorist ... / "anarchist" has horrendously inaccurate thesaurus page -> I was genuinely just looking for some synonyms of what anarchists would call themselves to try not to be identified and judged, and oh boy the thesaurus pages only contained terms of judgement. these are some pretty killer insults to throw at early Trotskyism though. I never knew "recreant" was a word.<br/>		{{li\|I=S1/PT\|Q=55,93\|Q2=5593}}synonyms for anarchist: terrorist ... / "anarchist" has horrendously inaccurate thesaurus page / ({{9k\|RD/Q5593}})
	~~non-peacer + ?? = synonyms for anarchist: terrorist.~~

	</li><li value="5594" class="number_empty">??		</li><li value="5594" class="number_empty">??

Reversedragon: we we us our

2026-09-02T06:14:15Z

we we us our

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:14, 2 September 2026
Line 45:		Line 45:
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="5037" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="5037" data-dimension="S">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="5038" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="5038" data-dimension="S">??
	</~~li><li class~~=~~"number_empty" value~~="5039~~" data-dimension="S">??~~
			{{li\|I=S1/ES\|Q=50,39\|Q2=5039}}we we us our {{9k\|RD/Q5039}}

	</li><li class="field_geo" data-qid="50,40" value="5040" data-dimension="S">allegory of the cave -> a metaphor for the gap between noumenon and phenomenon. probably greatly exaggerated. the more time goes on and the more science has been done the smaller the gap between "object" and "shadow" seems to get.		</li><li class="field_geo" data-qid="50,40" value="5040" data-dimension="S">allegory of the cave -> a metaphor for the gap between noumenon and phenomenon. probably greatly exaggerated. the more time goes on and the more science has been done the smaller the gap between "object" and "shadow" seems to get.

Reversedragon: Communism, no food! (threat)

2026-08-31T06:03:20Z

Communism, no food! (threat)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:03, 31 August 2026
Line 989:		Line 989:
	{{li\|I=S2/LR\|tradition=MX onto LR\|Q=56,91\|Q2=5691}}To increase the number of political candidates, force a country to create more wealth / ([[User:RD/9k/Q59,91\|9k]])		{{li\|I=S2/LR\|tradition=MX onto LR\|Q=56,91\|Q2=5691}}To increase the number of political candidates, force a country to create more wealth / ([[User:RD/9k/Q59,91\|9k]])

	</~~li><li value~~="5692~~" class~~=~~"number_empty">??~~		{{li\|I=S2/MX\|Q=56,92\|Q2=5692}}Cultures are culture eaters {{9k\|RD\|Q56,93}}
	</~~li><li value~~="5693~~" class="number_empty">??~~		{{li\|I=S2/Fy\|Q=56,93\|Q2=5693}}{{film\|My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic}} and postmodernism {{9k\|RD\|Q56,93}}

	</li><li value="5694" class="number_empty">??		</li><li value="5694" class="number_empty">??
	</li><li value="5695" class="number_empty">??		</li><li value="5695" class="number_empty">??
	</li><li value="5696" class="number_empty">??		</li><li value="5696" class="number_empty">??

	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_exstruct" data-tradition="LR,~~ ES~~" data-qid~~="56,97~~" value~~="5697~~" data-dimension="S2">~~Communism, no food! / Communism, No Food (edict; command; threat; imperative) / ~~Communism having nothing and failing must happen~~ (~~must be the result; is required to be the result) -> this isn't a descriptive idea, this is an external imperative<br~~/>		{{li\|I=S2/ES\|Q=56,97\|Q2=5697}}Communism, no food! / Communism, No Food (edict; command; threat; imperative) / ({{9k\|RD/Q56,93}})
	~~Communism~~, ~~No Food + China = During the Great Leap Forward the United States hit China with sanctions~~

	{{li\|I=Z1/Fy\|Q=56,98\|Q2=5698}}{{cite\|Tokidoki Unicorno}} {{9k\|RD\|Q56,99}}		{{li\|I=Z1/Fy\|Q=56,98\|Q2=5698}}{{cite\|Tokidoki Unicorno}} {{9k\|RD\|Q56,99}}

Reversedragon: My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic

2026-08-26T07:47:19Z

My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:47, 26 August 2026
Line 1,000:		Line 1,000:
	{{li\|I=Z1/Fy\|Q=56,98\|Q2=5698}}{{cite\|Tokidoki Unicorno}} {{9k\|RD\|Q56,99}}		{{li\|I=Z1/Fy\|Q=56,98\|Q2=5698}}{{cite\|Tokidoki Unicorno}} {{9k\|RD\|Q56,99}}
	{{li\|I=Z1/Fy\|Q=56,99\|Q2=5699}}{{cite\|My Little Pony}} {{9k\|RD\|Q56,99}}		{{li\|I=Z1/Fy\|Q=56,99\|Q2=5699}}{{cite\|My Little Pony}} {{9k\|RD\|Q56,99}}
	</li~~><li value~~=~~"5700" class~~=~~"field_fantasy" data-dimension~~=~~"Z"><cite>~~My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic~~</cite>~~		{{li\|I=Z1/Fy\|Q=57,00\|Q2=5700}}{{film\|My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic}} {{9k\|RD\|Q56,99}}
	</li><includeonly><!-- this section will be shown on the full list:		</li><includeonly><!-- this section will be shown on the full list:
	-->{{li\|start=y\|I=Z1/Fy\|Q=57,01\|Q2=5701}}{{film\|My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic}} episode 1		-->{{li\|start=y\|I=Z1/Fy\|Q=57,01\|Q2=5701}}{{film\|My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic}} episode 1

Reversedragon: MLP:FiM is a superstructural fantasy world

2026-08-26T07:30:35Z

MLP:FiM is a superstructural fantasy world

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:30, 26 August 2026
Line 779:		Line 779:
	</li><li value="5535" class="number_empty">??		</li><li value="5535" class="number_empty">??
	</li><li value="5536" class="number_empty">??		</li><li value="5536" class="number_empty">??
	</~~li><li value~~="5537~~" class~~=~~"number_empty">??~~
	</~~li><li value~~="5538~~" class="number_empty">?~~?		{{li\|I=S2/Fy\|Q=55,37\|Q2=5537}}{{film\|MLP:FiM}} is a superstructural fantasy world {{9k\|RD\|Q56,99}}
			{{li\|I=M3/Fy\|Q=55,38\|Q2=5538}}Where do Ponies go when they die? (MLP:FiM) {{9k\|RD\|Q56,99}}

	</li><li class="field_fantasy" value="5539" data-dimension="S2"><cite>Pokémon</cite> is an afterlife / <cite>Pokémon</cite> takes place in its universe's afterlife -> joke theory. this mainly stems from the idea that Pokémon is similar to the Garden of Eden and religious theories that it will in some senses be restored at the end of the world. evidence: A) parts of nature stay in perfect balance, unlike in real life B) healing Pokémon is no problem, as if once again, energy is literally not a zero-sum process any more C) everyone is nice and there is hardly any prejudice D) wars became less common over history rather than violence escalating and escalating across modern history as more people are born E) gods are tangible<br />		</li><li class="field_fantasy" value="5539" data-dimension="S2"><cite>Pokémon</cite> is an afterlife / <cite>Pokémon</cite> takes place in its universe's afterlife -> joke theory. this mainly stems from the idea that Pokémon is similar to the Garden of Eden and religious theories that it will in some senses be restored at the end of the world. evidence: A) parts of nature stay in perfect balance, unlike in real life B) healing Pokémon is no problem, as if once again, energy is literally not a zero-sum process any more C) everyone is nice and there is hardly any prejudice D) wars became less common over history rather than violence escalating and escalating across modern history as more people are born E) gods are tangible<br />
	the best counterargument to this is that it is stating that all fantasy books are imaginary afterlives. which is subjective in how true it is, but is much easier to believe than this model.		the best counterargument to this is that it is stating that all fantasy books are imaginary afterlives. which is subjective in how true it is, but is much easier to believe than this model.

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:31, 8 September 2026
Line 300:		Line 300:

	{{li\|I=S1/ES\|Q=51,84\|Q2=5184}}post-structuralist civilization / post-structuralist society -> the motif of a physical, material group of people which has no outer shape or form and whose only definitive structure is links between individuals constantly changing. the Existentialist-(Post)Structuralist tradition is the shovel dream of this kind of physical society, which to some extent already exists beneath Liberal-republicanism as the "shape" that capitalism has.		{{li\|I=S1/ES\|Q=51,84\|Q2=5184}}post-structuralist civilization / post-structuralist society -> the motif of a physical, material group of people which has no outer shape or form and whose only definitive structure is links between individuals constantly changing. the Existentialist-(Post)Structuralist tradition is the shovel dream of this kind of physical society, which to some extent already exists beneath Liberal-republicanism as the "shape" that capitalism has.
	{{li\|I=S1/ES~~\|tradition=~~\|Q=51,85\|Q2=5185}}postmodern philosophy / postmodernism (philosophy; not art) -> this is the entry for the actual thing, not the concept being used as a pejorative. you should have some sort of evidence that something bases itself on other things that identify themselves as postmodernism for it to qualify as this
			{{li\|I=S1/ES\|Q=51,85\|Q2=5185}}postmodern philosophy / postmodernism (philosophy; not art) {{9k\|RD\|Q5185}}

	{{li\|I=S2/MX\|tradition=MX onto ES\|Q=51,86\|Q2=5186}}Post-structuralism runs on prejudice (existential materialism) / In a post-structuralist society, where the shape of civilization is shapeless or formless and the only definitive structure is links between individuals constantly changing, it must be accepted that prejudice is natural and not something anyone can actually get rid of -> I've said this phrased many other ways (one way I've said it is "Gramscian approaches to media") but I may as well add one that specifically gets the term "post-structuralist" in there because that's more precise to who actually endorses this stuff<br/>		{{li\|I=S2/MX\|tradition=MX onto ES\|Q=51,86\|Q2=5186}}Post-structuralism runs on prejudice (existential materialism) / In a post-structuralist society, where the shape of civilization is shapeless or formless and the only definitive structure is links between individuals constantly changing, it must be accepted that prejudice is natural and not something anyone can actually get rid of -> I've said this phrased many other ways (one way I've said it is "Gramscian approaches to media") but I may as well add one that specifically gets the term "post-structuralist" in there because that's more precise to who actually endorses this stuff<br/>

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:49, 5 September 2026
Line 835:		Line 835:
	{{li\|I=S2/IV\|Q=55,73\|Q2=5573}}{{book\|Animal Farm}} is backhandedly true / Animal Farm was a good metaphor for the wrong reasons {{9k\|RD\|Q1983}}		{{li\|I=S2/IV\|Q=55,73\|Q2=5573}}{{book\|Animal Farm}} is backhandedly true / Animal Farm was a good metaphor for the wrong reasons {{9k\|RD\|Q1983}}
	{{li\|I=S2/IV\|Q=55,74\|Q2=5574}}{{book\|Animal Farm}} tells Trotsky's story {{9k\|RD\|Q1983}}		{{li\|I=S2/IV\|Q=55,74\|Q2=5574}}{{book\|Animal Farm}} tells Trotsky's story {{9k\|RD\|Q1983}}
			{{li\|I=S1/MX\|Q=55,75\|Q2=5575}}corporations as people-farms {{9k\|RD\|Q1983}}
	</~~li><li class~~=~~"field_mdem" value~~="5575~~" data-dimension="S">~~corporations as people-farms / all corporations as people farms / all corporate products as people-farm milk or people-farm eggs / soylent green is people (meta-Marxism) -> the motif of casting every case of corporate owners (Tory allies) herding people into microhierarchy to "prevent crimes" or "create order" as an act of farming people like cattle; an act of replacing violent wild packs of animals that snarl at each other for challenging the patriarchs or stick each other with their antlers with a peaceful herd of animals that is exploited and consumed by the farmer, occasionally kicked or stuffed into one cramped building, and all of the animals are human beings.<br />
	~~corporations as people-farms +~~ {{~~book~~\|~~Animal Farm}} = {{book~~\|~~Animal Farm~~}} ~~is backhandedly true.~~

	{{li\|I=Z1/LR\|Q=55,76\|Q2=5576}}Liberal-republicanism {{9k\|RD\|Q55,76}}		{{li\|I=Z1/LR\|Q=55,76\|Q2=5576}}Liberal-republicanism {{9k\|RD\|Q55,76}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:59, 4 September 2026
Line 755:		Line 755:
	{{li\|I=Z1/Fy\|Q=52,22\|Q2=5522}}{{book\|Get Fuzzy}}		{{li\|I=Z1/Fy\|Q=52,22\|Q2=5522}}{{book\|Get Fuzzy}}

	{{li\|I=S2/STM\|Q=52,23\|Q2=5523}}To hunt is to destroy ~~/ Predation is destruction / Predation is an act of destruction / Predation is an act of violence~~ / Speaking literally, for a given definition of violence as the destruction of a living animal, predation is an act of actively destroying a living animal; this is not to imply any particular philosophical agenda or further conclusions that should be taken from this deduction within the scope of this proposition -> this is some important philosophical foundation to set down if you're going to discuss what political themes should or shouldn't have been put in {{~~cite~~\|~~Zootopia~~}} ~~as well as what themes are currently in it.<br/>~~		{{li\|I=S2/STM\|Q=52,23\|Q2=5523}}To hunt is to destroy / Speaking literally, for a given definition of violence as the destruction of a living animal, predation is an act of actively destroying a living animal {{9k\|RD/Q5223}}
	~~how to classify this proposition.... I think when I have limited it as much as I have you can say this falls within ecology. it is a very literal material definition, without much political baggage.~~

	</li><li class="field_horror" value="5524" data-dimension="S">physically slaying one's inner child -> Giggleland ep 2, Fatum Betula. I think there's something to be said about the vague analogy between cartoon furries slaying their inner child in Giggleland and the myth of the lion turning against the lamb in Pitch haven / other works like Kimba, Beastars, and Zootopia		</li><li class="field_horror" value="5524" data-dimension="S">physically slaying one's inner child -> Giggleland ep 2, Fatum Betula. I think there's something to be said about the vague analogy between cartoon furries slaying their inner child in Giggleland and the myth of the lion turning against the lamb in Pitch haven / other works like Kimba, Beastars, and Zootopia

	</li><li value="5525~~" data-remark="6525~~" class="field_exstruct" data-dimension="S">wolf slaying lamb as Original Sin / lion slaying lamb as Original Sin / eating animals as forbidden fruit -> alternate version of book of Genesis that crops up frequently in fiction, sometimes quite literally as in Pitch haven mythos, sometimes much more figuratively in things like <cite>Zootopia</cite> or <cite>Kimba</cite>. runs narratively parallel to: Buddhist imagery of the existence of individuals being harmful		</li><li value="5525" class="field_exstruct" data-dimension="S">wolf slaying lamb as Original Sin {{9k\|RD/Q5223}}

	</li><li value="5526" class="field_horror" data-dimension="Z"><cite>Zootopia</cite> [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zootopia] / <cite>Zootropolis</cite> (UK / AU) -> animated movie about the concept of intelligent animals getting along or not. clearly wasn't originally designed to be a metaphor for humans, but somewhere in the middle of writing got "corrected" to be a bad metaphor for anti-Black racism. I prefer to ignore that when analyzing the work and pretend it's only about the concept of animals trying to live in society. I do this so it becomes easier to compare this movie to things like <cite>Kimba the White Lion</cite> or <cite>Warriors</cite>, which clearly were designed on that more literal level, and <cite>Beastars</cite>, which kind of falls in the middle between the two categories.		</li><li value="5526" class="field_horror" data-dimension="Z"><cite>Zootopia</cite> [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zootopia] / <cite>Zootropolis</cite> (UK / AU) -> animated movie about the concept of intelligent animals getting along or not. clearly wasn't originally designed to be a metaphor for humans, but somewhere in the middle of writing got "corrected" to be a bad metaphor for anti-Black racism. I prefer to ignore that when analyzing the work and pretend it's only about the concept of animals trying to live in society. I do this so it becomes easier to compare this movie to things like <cite>Kimba the White Lion</cite> or <cite>Warriors</cite>, which clearly were designed on that more literal level, and <cite>Beastars</cite>, which kind of falls in the middle between the two categories.
Line 834:		Line 833:
	this is supposedly a proposition that Marxists believe except that it isn't. and I am still trying to untangle that contradiction. some days I'm more confused by Marxism than I am by anarchism. I'm glad there aren't many of them.		this is supposedly a proposition that Marxists believe except that it isn't. and I am still trying to untangle that contradiction. some days I'm more confused by Marxism than I am by anarchism. I'm glad there aren't many of them.

	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_ML" value~~="5573~~" data-dimension="S2">~~{{book\|Animal Farm}} is backhandedly true / Animal Farm was a good metaphor for the wrong reasons		{{li\|I=S2/IV\|Q=55,73\|Q2=5573}}{{book\|Animal Farm}} is backhandedly true / Animal Farm was a good metaphor for the wrong reasons {{9k\|RD\|Q1983}}
	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_mdem" data-tradition~~=~~"MX onto IV" value~~="5574~~" data-dimension="S2">~~Animal Farm tells Trotsky's story ~~/ "Trotsky was expelled from Bolshevik society" is the only accurate historical statement made by~~ {{~~book~~\|~~Animal Farm~~}}, not excluding other tiny "accuracies", but not taking away from all the inaccuracies -> even that one is on thin ice, but I have to grant it because the graphic novel version of the book was all right and through all its omissions kind of accidentally focused on the struggles of the animals more. it's funny how often people misremember the book as being positive toward the farm animals and their struggle to be free, and it seems like a little of that sneaks into every single adaptation. I might have hated this book if I only had the prose. but the more I see people "misinterpret" it and accidentally make it more historically accurate, the more I'm willing to meet it in the middle and use it as a teaching tool about how Trotsky found the Soviet Union terribly disorienting, but he didn't have the answers on how to fix it, but you can sympathize with his suffering if you want to.		{{li\|I=S2/IV\|Q=55,74\|Q2=5574}}{{book\|Animal Farm}} tells Trotsky's story {{9k\|RD\|Q1983}}

	</li><li class="field_mdem" value="5575" data-dimension="S">corporations as people-farms / all corporations as people farms / all corporate products as people-farm milk or people-farm eggs / soylent green is people (meta-Marxism) -> the motif of casting every case of corporate owners (Tory allies) herding people into microhierarchy to "prevent crimes" or "create order" as an act of farming people like cattle; an act of replacing violent wild packs of animals that snarl at each other for challenging the patriarchs or stick each other with their antlers with a peaceful herd of animals that is exploited and consumed by the farmer, occasionally kicked or stuffed into one cramped building, and all of the animals are human beings.<br />		</li><li class="field_mdem" value="5575" data-dimension="S">corporations as people-farms / all corporations as people farms / all corporate products as people-farm milk or people-farm eggs / soylent green is people (meta-Marxism) -> the motif of casting every case of corporate owners (Tory allies) herding people into microhierarchy to "prevent crimes" or "create order" as an act of farming people like cattle; an act of replacing violent wild packs of animals that snarl at each other for challenging the patriarchs or stick each other with their antlers with a peaceful herd of animals that is exploited and consumed by the farmer, occasionally kicked or stuffed into one cramped building, and all of the animals are human beings.<br />
	corporations as people-farms + {{book\|Animal Farm}} = {{book\|Animal Farm}} is backhandedly true.		corporations as people-farms + {{book\|Animal Farm}} = {{book\|Animal Farm}} is backhandedly true.

	{{li\|I=Z1/LR\|Q=55,76\|Q2=5576}}Liberal-republicanism		{{li\|I=Z1/LR\|Q=55,76\|Q2=5576}}Liberal-republicanism {{9k\|RD\|Q55,76}}

	</li><li class="field_exstruct" data-qid="55,77" value="5577" data-dimension="S">forced free choice / forcing someone to freely choose something / forcing consent -> this + misogyny = Ella Enchanted		</li><li class="field_exstruct" data-qid="55,77" value="5577" data-dimension="S">forced free choice / forcing someone to freely choose something / forcing consent -> this + misogyny = Ella Enchanted
Line 872:		Line 871:
	appears in: MDem 5.1-5.3 scrap "scenario" "zone 621". (furries are 'expelled' into their own afterlife with some kind of implied moral code, though not specifically this one)		appears in: MDem 5.1-5.3 scrap "scenario" "zone 621". (furries are 'expelled' into their own afterlife with some kind of implied moral code, though not specifically this one)

	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_exstruct" data-qid~~="55,91~~" value~~="5591~~" data-dimension="F2">{{TTS\|html=abbr\|tts=Liberal-republicanism\|Liberalism~~}} requires no revolution ~~/ Creating~~ Liberal-republicanism ~~didn't~~ require a revolution ~~(Hannah Arendt)~~ {{9k\|RD\|Q56,76}}		{{li\|I=F2/LR\|Q=55,91\|Q2=5591}}The American Revolution wasn't / The United States requires no revolution to continue to exist because creating Liberal-republicanism did not require a social revolution ... {{9k\|RD\|Q56,76}}

	</li><li value="5592" class="number_empty">??		</li><li value="5592" class="number_empty">??
	{{li\|I=S1/PT\|Q=55,93\|Q2=5593}}synonyms for anarchist: terrorist ... / "anarchist" has horrendously inaccurate thesaurus page ~~/ (~~{{9k\|RD/Q5593}})		{{li\|I=S1/PT\|Q=55,93\|Q2=5593}}synonyms for anarchist: terrorist ... / "anarchist" has horrendously inaccurate thesaurus page {{9k\|RD\|Q5593}}

	</li><li value="5594" class="number_empty">??		</li><li value="5594" class="number_empty">??
	</li><li value="5595" class="number_empty">??		</li><li value="5595" class="number_empty">??

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:46, 4 September 2026
Line 850:		Line 850:
	significance of this proposition: it might be used to argue that a lot of instances of [[Term:democulture\|democulture]] or "Lacanianism" are actually Toryism and not center-Existentialism.		significance of this proposition: it might be used to argue that a lot of instances of [[Term:democulture\|democulture]] or "Lacanianism" are actually Toryism and not center-Existentialism.

	</li><li class="field_exstruct" data-tradition="ES, PT, Fy" value="5882" data-dimension="S2">Monarchism never ended -> the claim that because monarchism was not actually about installing a designated ruler, and was really about unifying multiple populations into one population, Liberal-republicanism did not abolish monarchism, and only elaborated on it.<br />		</li><li class="field_exstruct" data-tradition="ES, PT, Fy" value="5882" data-dimension="S2">Monarchism never ended {{9k\|RD\|Q56,76}}
	this sounds absolutely nuts if you have not been way deep in trying to figure out the real relationship between Communism, anarchism, Liberal-republicanism, and imperialism. but this propositions has its reasons for being. it's things like... who was it, Heidegger [[E:Twentieth-Century Continental Philosophy\|I think]]? I don't remember exactly. claiming that a Communist International couldn't solve countries' problems because they were based on nationalism and "internationalism wasn't creating a better nationalism". that shouldn't matter, because the goal of "internationalism" isn't to do what nationalism already did! but now let's say that {{em\|~~was~~}} true. if Communist Internationals can only create a better nationalism, then it's logically true that Liberal-republicanism never stopped being monarchism and everything it does can only create a better monarchism. I think George Washington did think like this a little bit. he genuinely thought the United States was just one population instead of multiple populations, split at least along state lines into 50 discrete populations with material antagonisms against each other, maybe split into two politically-defined populations uniting it into a civil war.<br />
	so, this statement is weird. it's not true of material reality but it may be baked into Liberal-republicanism and some anarchisms, as operating assumptions that are true specifically of those ideologies and the social-graph-objects (Social-Philosophical-Material Systems) they create.

	</li><li value="5583" class="field_nations" data-dimension="S">microhierarchy / networkism (spatial hierarchy of potentially very small size characterized by leaders that sort people into different separate physical chunks of people; meta-Marxist term) / {{TTS\|tts=Commu-nity\|Community}} as series of tiny processes of individuals banding together in friendship and then each island of friends competing against each other, nominating leaders to protect their shared territory and shared standards and freedom, and ultimately turning into microscopic "feudal orders" or "kingdoms" that become about oppressing their people just to make sure the people of each island don't fight or kill each other or spontaneously snatch each other's stuff<br />		</li><li value="5583" class="field_nations" data-dimension="S">microhierarchy / networkism (spatial hierarchy of potentially very small size characterized by leaders that sort people into different separate physical chunks of people; meta-Marxist term) / {{TTS\|tts=Commu-nity\|Community}} as series of tiny processes of individuals banding together in friendship and then each island of friends competing against each other, nominating leaders to protect their shared territory and shared standards and freedom, and ultimately turning into microscopic "feudal orders" or "kingdoms" that become about oppressing their people just to make sure the people of each island don't fight or kill each other or spontaneously snatch each other's stuff<br />
Line 874:		Line 872:
	appears in: MDem 5.1-5.3 scrap "scenario" "zone 621". (furries are 'expelled' into their own afterlife with some kind of implied moral code, though not specifically this one)		appears in: MDem 5.1-5.3 scrap "scenario" "zone 621". (furries are 'expelled' into their own afterlife with some kind of implied moral code, though not specifically this one)

	</li><li class="field_exstruct" data-qid="55,91" value="5591" data-dimension="F2">{{TTS\|html=abbr\|tts=Liberal-republicanism\|Liberalism}} requires no revolution / Creating Liberal-republicanism didn't require a revolution (Hannah Arendt) -> this is flat out false twice over and yet a lot of people still repeat versions of it. in the United States, there was the "American Revolution". it did have consequences. it did "mess things up for the next 200 years". it eventually birthed Andrew Jackson. in Europe, there was a really clear change between the era where there had to be a bunch of freemasons and alchemist philosophers and the era where there didn't. now people with money just do whatever "helpful" things they want to in the open. but there was a time where they absolutely couldn't do that, and they had to meet in secret so some greater authority wouldn't notice their power and start calling them a threat. there was a time where small owners, Artisan types, and Careerists were oppressed. Galileo. like, I can show why Arendt's proposition is wrong in a sentence one word long. Galileo. and there was an overall revolution that happened in however many steps to create a Europe where that particular thing wasn't an issue. this overall series of steps is a Liberal-republican revolution. in the same sense of the word.<br />		</li><li class="field_exstruct" data-qid="55,91" value="5591" data-dimension="F2">{{TTS\|html=abbr\|tts=Liberal-republicanism\|Liberalism}} requires no revolution / Creating Liberal-republicanism didn't require a revolution (Hannah Arendt) {{9k\|RD\|Q56,76}}
	there is so much thick illusion going on for people to think that isn't true. what is it? is it people trying to act like "the Galileo days" were a [[E:bad fake historical period\|bad fake historical period]] that wasn't a Real period of history, just a fake totalitarian invented fabrication made up by [[E:generalized dictator\|bad evil meanies]]? do people believe that only a certain class of people that assembles into certain physical structures {{em\|~~is actually human~~}} and all other possible Bauplans are an outright deviation from humanity. I guess that would explain why they hate Bolshevism so much. but that aside, I don't even understand why this is so scary by itself and what denying that Liberal-republicanism has a revolution actually gets you. like, maybe my brain has been corrupted by Trotsky but I don't see why someone can't believe in one kind of republic that's created by a revolution and hate another kind of republic anyway. Marxists do it all the time so why can't you. why do they lie about this? it's many times stupider than Trotskyism. it makes Trotskyism look smart

	</li><li value="5592" class="number_empty">??		</li><li value="5592" class="number_empty">??

	{{li\|I=S1/PT\|Q=55,93\|Q2=5593}}synonyms for anarchist: terrorist ... / "anarchist" has horrendously inaccurate thesaurus page / ({{9k\|RD/Q5593}})		{{li\|I=S1/PT\|Q=55,93\|Q2=5593}}synonyms for anarchist: terrorist ... / "anarchist" has horrendously inaccurate thesaurus page / ({{9k\|RD/Q5593}})

Line 955:		Line 951:
	</li><li value="5668" class="number_empty">??		</li><li value="5668" class="number_empty">??
	</li><li value="5669" class="number_empty">??		</li><li value="5669" class="number_empty">??

	</li><li value="5670" class="number_empty">??		</li><li value="5670" class="number_empty">??
	</li><li value="5671" class="number_empty">??		</li><li value="5671" class="number_empty">??
Line 961:		Line 956:
	</li><li value="5673" class="number_empty">??		</li><li value="5673" class="number_empty">??
	</li><li value="5674" class="number_empty">??		</li><li value="5674" class="number_empty">??
	~~</li><li value="5675" class="number_empty">??~~

	{{li\|I=S1/LR/ES\|Q=56,76\|Q2=5676}}liberal democracy (motif) / democratization of human life through becoming more modern and getting good modern values that cause people to build constitutions and codify long lists of human rights and throw out ideas such as the idea of attempting to rule people as a king, the idea of government acting as an organ for Catholics or Protestants to ban each other's representatives or churches or publications, and the idea of codifying chattel slavery instead of giving everyone the right to have legislators and cast a ballot for president		{{li\|I=S1/ES\|Q=56,75\|Q2=5675}}cultural imperialism (motif)
	~~/ (~~{{9k\|RD/Q56,76}}])		{{li\|I=S1/LR/ES\|Q=56,76\|Q2=5676}}liberal democracy (motif) / democratization of human life through becoming more modern and getting good modern values that cause people to build constitutions and codify long lists of human rights and throw out ideas such as the idea of attempting to rule people as a king, the idea of government acting as an organ for Catholics or Protestants to ban each other's representatives or churches or publications, and the idea of codifying chattel slavery instead of giving everyone the right to have legislators and cast a ballot for president {{9k\|RD\|Q56,76}}

	</li><li value="5677" class="number_empty">??		</li><li value="5677" class="number_empty">??
	</li><li value="5678" class="number_empty">??		</li><li value="5678" class="number_empty">??
	</li><li value="5679" class="number_empty">??		</li><li value="5679" class="number_empty">??

	</li><li value="5680" class="number_empty">??		</li><li value="5680" class="number_empty">??
	</li><li value="5681" class="number_empty">??		</li><li value="5681" class="number_empty">??