User:Reversedragon/FirstNineThousand/900 - Revision history

Reversedragon: There is no Spanishness Office

2026-06-10T06:46:50Z

There is no Spanishness Office

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:46, 10 June 2026
Line 1,059:		Line 1,059:
	Trotsky is your new hero + Che Guevara = this.		Trotsky is your new hero + Che Guevara = this.

	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_gramsci" data-qid~~="21,50~~" value~~="2150~~" data-dimension="S">~~The Spanishness Office ~~-> within this wiki, first brought up in <cite>MDem<~~/~~cite> "[[Philosophical Research:MDem~~/~~4.4r/4064 democulture\|democulture]]" entry.~~		{{li\|I=S1/W \|Q=21,50\|Q2=2150}}The Spanishness Office / ({{9k\|RD/Q21,50}})
	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_trotsky" data-remark~~=~~"vaguely resembles early, crude Marxisms" data-qid="~~21,51~~" value~~="2151~~" data-dimension="F2">~~[[E:ThereIsNoSpanishnessOffice\|There is no Spanishness Office]] ~~-> the concept that culture cannot be changed through any deliberate effort~~, even by most movements. one could believe there is no Spanishness Office because culture is defined by the borders between populations, or because culture is produced through deterministic factors that individual will can't successfully pilot without a thorough science of society, or for any other number of reasons.		{{li\|I=F2/IV\|Q=21,51\|Q2=2151}}[[E:ThereIsNoSpanishnessOffice\|There is no Spanishness Office]] / ({{9k\|RD/Q21,50}})
	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_mdem" data-qid~~="21,52~~" value~~="2152~~" data-dimension="S2">~~There are ten million Spanishness Offices ~~-> the claim that every time the motif of The Spanishness Office shows up~~, this is what it is bisimilar to: a bunch of free-floating corporations or institutions which may be conflated with the will of a particular owner, or a Tory Social-Philosophical System that has occupied a free-floating charity, each time raising the problem that the institution has its own "individual will" separate from society which is resistant to Liberal-republican "democracy" and resistant to almost everything. the problem isn't in asserting that there are Spanishness Offices, though there is a serious problem when people think controlling them is as simple as taking over just one when there are closer to ten million they might not successfully secure with perhaps some five million left over and wildly doing their own thing.		{{li\|I=S2/MX\|Q=21,52\|Q2=2152}}There are ten million Spanishness Offices / ({{9k\|RD/Q21,50}})

	</li><li class="field_ML" data-qid="21,53" value="2153" data-dimension="S2">Gramscianism is a grift -> the claim that while Gramsci had no ill intentions he created a theoretical system which by its design will mostly be used by grifters.<br />		</li><li class="field_ML" data-qid="21,53" value="2153" data-dimension="S2">Gramscianism is a grift -> the claim that while Gramsci had no ill intentions he created a theoretical system which by its design will mostly be used by grifters.<br />

Reversedragon: We have chosen poverty

2026-06-10T05:17:33Z

We have chosen poverty

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:17, 10 June 2026
Line 1,162:		Line 1,162:
	</li><li class="field_anarchy" data-tradition="MX onto DX / A" value="2210" data-dimension="S2">China is secretly a charcoal Marxism / China is secretly a charcoal workers' state -> there are certain moments where "charcoal" and "strawberry" [[:Category:Charcoal versus strawberry ontology\|become hard to tell apart from each other]] if you assume all the anarchist stupidities are taken out to where they at least make coherent sense.		</li><li class="field_anarchy" data-tradition="MX onto DX / A" value="2210" data-dimension="S2">China is secretly a charcoal Marxism / China is secretly a charcoal workers' state -> there are certain moments where "charcoal" and "strawberry" [[:Category:Charcoal versus strawberry ontology\|become hard to tell apart from each other]] if you assume all the anarchist stupidities are taken out to where they at least make coherent sense.

	</~~li><li class~~=~~"number_empty" value~~="2211~~">??~~		{{li\|I=S1/YR\|Q=22,11\|Q2=2211}}Idealist economics / Yaroshenkoism (generic) / ({{9k\|RD/Q618-YouMustServeFreedom}})
	</~~li><li class~~=~~"number_empty" value~~="2212~~">??~~		{{li\|I=S1/YR\|Q=22,12\|Q2=2212}}We have chosen poverty / All human individuals or all citizens each-separately-in-parallel-all-at-the-same-time have the power to spontaneously end poverty just because they can point their fingers at it / ({{9k\|RD/Q618-YouMustServeFreedom}})

	{{li\|I=S1/DX\|Q=22,13\|Q2=2213}}Yaroshenkoism / pseudo-Marxist model that relations of production (class territories or industrial structures) are contained inside productive forces instead of productive forces / ([[User:RD/9k/Q22,13\|9k]])		{{li\|I=S1/YR\|Q=22,13\|Q2=2213}}Yaroshenkoism / pseudo-Marxist model that relations of production (class territories or industrial structures) are contained inside productive forces instead of productive forces / ([[User:RD/9k/Q22,13\|9k]])

			</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="2214" data-dimension="F2">Your choices created 28 times more empty houses / Ours choices created 28 times more empty houses (hyper-plural phrasing) / We choose [all individuals in the United States choose in parallel] to allow people to be homeless when there are 28 times more empty houses {{YouTube\|aOYtS53VGZI}} -> no, we don't "choose" that, it just happens. 90% of the individuals in the United States could choose that homelessness is bad and [[E:I've been Frantz-Fanon'd\|they could all]] get [[E:Frantz Fanon conjecture\|Frantz-Fanon'd]] by other parts of society being more effective at out-surviving them and nonviolently crushing and oppressing them. every island of capital is like a wolf pack, with all the individuals connected to a specific capital like the wolves; the bigger the wolf pack is the more easily it overcomes an isolated caribou even if there were millions and millions of scattered caribou but only forty wolves. each mother or father wolf that "greedily" attacks a lone caribou instead of a herd has four other adults and a bunch of pups beside it, and it has them because they all benefit from standing together. you think there will be a hundred caribou and one wolf but the wolves always have cohesion. the bourgeoisie always come with built in cohesion because they need to form a ring of people that all sell products to each other. this is why as corporations keep existing products get more and more expensive — everyone in the ring just goes [[E:dragon process\|up and up]] and up at once, while letting all the corporations outside a particular successful ring die. so this is the game now. capitalism is a forever cold war and we only win it when the million caribou actually out-survive the forty wolves. in the brutal imagery of nature, you can imagine that each time a wolf tries to get a caribou it gets stomped, and maybe it dies, so they either learn by instinct to hunt something else or they simply die out physically. what does the metaphor actually mean? I'm not positive on that. I'll say this. Marxism survives when China merely keeps existing and nothing can destroy the most basic first steps of Marxism from the outside. Marxism also potentially survives when a relatively large area of industry emerges which is impossible to break apart, where the people don't forsake building any of it just because somebody gave them an offer to migrate somewhere better, and it fills up with workers. I said once in MDem drafts: once something becomes so big it's a whole population [[E:A revolution strives to become legal\|it decides what is legal]], the people surrounding it don't determine what's legal or okay. but I also think that doesn't happen unless the inside of that area is genuinely strong and hard to break up. a statement that "we choose to allow empty houses" doesn't by itself create a population that strong. (I marked this false purely for Idealism, not for not knowing my working model)

	~~</li><li class="number_empty" value="2214">??~~
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="2215">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="2215">??

Reversedragon: Time must explain politics / 1632

2026-06-08T00:03:14Z

Time must explain politics / 1632

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:03, 8 June 2026
Line 507:		Line 507:
	</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="1621" data-dimension="Z">Kimberlé Crenshaw -> one inclusive-historian off in a corner of the United States surrounded by a bizarre amount of controversy and discourse. I swear the whole PragerU video about "people segregating themselves at Black graduation" grew out of her drifting over to a different university when the group of people at the other university didn't want her there		</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="1621" data-dimension="Z">Kimberlé Crenshaw -> one inclusive-historian off in a corner of the United States surrounded by a bizarre amount of controversy and discourse. I swear the whole PragerU video about "people segregating themselves at Black graduation" grew out of her drifting over to a different university when the group of people at the other university didn't want her there

	</li><li class="number_empty" value="~~1630~~">??		{{li\|I=S2/MX\|Q=16,30\|Q2=1630}}Time must explain politics / A physics model that makes reference to time must be able to explain politics / ({{9k\|Ontology_talk:9k/RD/Q66}})
			{{li\|I=S2/MX\|Q=16,31\|Q2=1631}}??
			{{li\|I=Z1/Fy/IV\|Q=16,32\|Q2=1632}}{{book\|1632}} (Eric Flint)

			</li><li class="number_empty" value="1633">??
			</li><li class="number_empty" value="1634">??
			</li><li class="number_empty" value="1635">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="1640">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="1640">??
			</li><li class="number_empty" value="1645">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="1650">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="1650">??
			</li><li class="number_empty" value="1655">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="1660">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="1660">??
			</li><li class="number_empty" value="1665">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="1670">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="1670">??
			</li><li class="number_empty" value="1675">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="1680">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="1680">??
			</li><li class="number_empty" value="1685">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="1690">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="1690">??

Reversedragon: There are only a limited number of Marxisms fighting

2026-06-07T06:03:31Z

There are only a limited number of Marxisms fighting

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:03, 7 June 2026
Line 1,416:		Line 1,416:
	</li><li class="field_exstruct" data-qid="25,28" value="2528" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="field_exstruct" data-qid="25,28" value="2528" data-dimension="S">??
	</li><li class="field_exstruct" data-qid="25,29" value="2529" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="field_exstruct" data-qid="25,29" value="2529" data-dimension="S">??

	</li><li class="field_exstruct" data-qid="25,30" value="2530" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="field_exstruct" data-qid="25,30" value="2530" data-dimension="S">??

	</li><li class="field_exstruct" data-qid="25,31" value="2531" data-dimension="S">??		</li><li class="field_exstruct" data-qid="25,31" value="2531" data-dimension="S">??

	</li><li class="field_gramsci" data-qid="25,32" value="2532" data-remark="1532 Machiavelli" data-dimension="S2">??		</li><li class="field_gramsci" data-qid="25,32" value="2532" data-remark="1532 Machiavelli" data-dimension="S2">??

			{{li\|I=S2/MX\|Q=25,34\|Q2=2534\|rem=1925, 3 & 4}}There are only a limited number of Marxisms fighting / There are a limited number of countable Marxist tendencies fighting each other for a position in which they can create workers' states or Internationals, in contrast to anarchism, where at any given moment there is a nearly infinite number of anarchisms fighting each other

	</li><li class="number_empty" value="2535" data-dimension="S2">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="2535" data-dimension="S2">??

Reversedragon: qualified immunity (United States)

2026-05-26T23:13:10Z

qualified immunity (United States)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:13, 26 May 2026
Line 392:		Line 392:

	</li><li data-qid="13,50" value="1350" class="field_nations" data-tradition="ES onto PT, MX onto PT" data-dimension="Z">[[E:Q13,50\|structural racism]] -> material phenomenon as described by real-world evidence, and not whatever papers and books say, should that somehow be a problem		</li><li data-qid="13,50" value="1350" class="field_nations" data-tradition="ES onto PT, MX onto PT" data-dimension="Z">[[E:Q13,50\|structural racism]] -> material phenomenon as described by real-world evidence, and not whatever papers and books say, should that somehow be a problem
	~~</li><~~li ~~class~~=~~"field_nations" data-~~tradition="ES onto PT~~" data-qid~~="13,51~~" value~~="1351~~" data-dimension="Z">~~redlining		{{li\|I=Z1/PT\|tradition=ES onto PT\|Q=13,51\|Q2=1351}}redlining
	</~~li><li class~~=~~"number_empty" value~~="1352">??		{{li\|I=S1/PT\|Q=13,52\|Q2=1352}}qualified immunity (United States) [https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/LSB/PDF/LSB10492/LSB10492.4.pdf] -> you could get some absolutely wild combinations out of this.

	</li><li class="number_empty" value="1353">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="1353">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="1354">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="1354">??

Reversedragon: Mathematics predicts reality when it is Materialism

2026-05-14T22:44:34Z

Mathematics predicts reality when it is Materialism

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:44, 14 May 2026
Line 1,502:		Line 1,502:
	</li><li class="field_mdem" value="2666" data-dimension="M3">Why isn't your theory forbidden? / If your theory can overturn all hierarchies, why hasn't it been forbidden as a threat to the existing order? -> a question Existentialists never seem to seriously ask themselves. really felt this trying to read Foucault. there are a few anarchists that pass this bar only technically and dubiously by being willing to Zinovievize society for nothing in return. not the way I would prefer that a theory fix itself, but, back to Existentialism. why does it act like it's the most radical thing ever when it never stops to ask what it is or isn't disrupting		</li><li class="field_mdem" value="2666" data-dimension="M3">Why isn't your theory forbidden? / If your theory can overturn all hierarchies, why hasn't it been forbidden as a threat to the existing order? -> a question Existentialists never seem to seriously ask themselves. really felt this trying to read Foucault. there are a few anarchists that pass this bar only technically and dubiously by being willing to Zinovievize society for nothing in return. not the way I would prefer that a theory fix itself, but, back to Existentialism. why does it act like it's the most radical thing ever when it never stops to ask what it is or isn't disrupting

			</li><li class="field_ML" value="2667" data-dimension="S2">??
			</li><li class="field_ML" value="2668" data-dimension="S2">??
			</li><li class="field_ML" value="2669" data-dimension="S2">??
	</li><li class="field_ML" value="2670" data-dimension="S2">??		</li><li class="field_ML" value="2670" data-dimension="S2">??
			</li><li class="field_ML" value="2671" data-dimension="S2">??
			</li><li class="field_ML" value="2672" data-dimension="S2">??
			</li><li class="field_ML" value="2673" data-dimension="S2">??
			</li><li class="field_ML" value="2674" data-dimension="S2">??
	</li><li class="field_ML" value="2675" data-dimension="S2">??		</li><li class="field_ML" value="2675" data-dimension="S2">??
			</li><li class="field_ML" value="2676" data-dimension="S2">??
			</li><li class="field_ML" value="2677" data-dimension="S2">??
			</li><li class="field_ML" value="2678" data-dimension="S2">??

	</li><li class="field_mdem" value="2679" data-dimension="S2">[[Ontology:Q2679\|If mathematics is purely arbitrary, Krillin can punch Chiaotzu for any answer]]		</li><li class="field_mdem" value="2679" data-dimension="S2">[[Ontology:Q2679\|If mathematics is purely arbitrary, Krillin can punch Chiaotzu for any answer]]
Line 1,509:		Line 1,519:
	</li><li class="field_mdem" value="2681" data-dimension="M3">[[Ontology:Q2681\|Does two flames plus two ice cubes equal four ice cubes?]] -> jamming question to trip up philosophers who say that "two plus two <em>must necessarily</em> equal four" rather than realizing that mathematics is true according to definitions of regular rules. mathematics is one big field of multivariable equations, such as "z = x + y", which always work the way they have been defined to work, but cease to work that way as soon as we use a different definition, which is rather frequent. if we assume one flame melts exactly one ice cube, the flames and ice cubes problem can be phrased with negative numbers, and we have changed the definition of adding objects into subtracting objects just by saying that the same integer that can contain 2 can contain -2.		</li><li class="field_mdem" value="2681" data-dimension="M3">[[Ontology:Q2681\|Does two flames plus two ice cubes equal four ice cubes?]] -> jamming question to trip up philosophers who say that "two plus two <em>must necessarily</em> equal four" rather than realizing that mathematics is true according to definitions of regular rules. mathematics is one big field of multivariable equations, such as "z = x + y", which always work the way they have been defined to work, but cease to work that way as soon as we use a different definition, which is rather frequent. if we assume one flame melts exactly one ice cube, the flames and ice cubes problem can be phrased with negative numbers, and we have changed the definition of adding objects into subtracting objects just by saying that the same integer that can contain 2 can contain -2.

	</~~li><li class~~=~~"number_empty" value~~="2682~~">??~~		{{li\|I=S2/MX\|Q=26,82\|Q2=2682}}Math predicts through Materialism / Mathematics predicts reality if and when it amounts to a very precisely-worded Materialist philosophy; this is to loosely imply that mathematics is not fully distinguishable from language, and that language can predict the physical processes of the material world if and only if, when and only when, it is fully as precise as mathematics is / ({{9k\|RD/Q36,10}})
	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_ML" data-qid~~="26,83~~" value~~="2683~~" data-dimension="S2">~~Amazon bleeding authors is stealing / Letting Amazon bleed authors is stealing -> by itself, this isn't <em>not</em> true — I mean, the small shops are hard at work and the big mall owner is bleeding them into the ground with little benefit to them. reads like r/accidentallycommunist
	</li><li class="~~number_empty~~" value="2684">??		{{li\|I=S2/MX\|Q=26,83\|Q2=2683}}Amazon bleeding authors is stealing / Letting Amazon bleed authors is stealing -> by itself, this isn't <em>not</em> true — I mean, the small shops are hard at work and the big mall owner is bleeding them into the ground with little benefit to them. reads like r/accidentallycommunist
			</li><li class="field_ML" value="2684">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="2685">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="2685">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="2686">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="2686">??

Reversedragon: entryism

2026-05-14T21:07:40Z

entryism

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:07, 14 May 2026
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Historical events, texts, etc.<noinclude><br /> Final live version of this section: [[Philosophical Research:Items 1 to 1,000\|Items 1 to 1,000]] / [[Philosophical Research:Items 1,000 to 2,000\|Items 1,000 to 2,000]]</noinclude>		Historical events, texts, etc.<noinclude><br /> Final live version of this section: [[Philosophical Research:Items 1 to 1,000\|Items 1 to 1,000]] / [[Philosophical Research:Items 1,000 to 2,000\|Items 1,000 to 2,000]]</noinclude>
			<noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol start="900" class="hue clean"> <!-- retrieve date of crow behavior -->

	~~<noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol start="900" class="hue clean"> <!-- retrieve date of crow behavior -->~~
	<li value="901" data-remark="next to MDem reading list" class="field_ML" data-dimension="S">MAI reading list / Anti-Imperialist Movement Marxist-Leninist reading list		<li value="901" data-remark="next to MDem reading list" class="field_ML" data-dimension="S">MAI reading list / Anti-Imperialist Movement Marxist-Leninist reading list

Line 1,082:		Line 1,082:
	{{li\|I=S1/ML\|Q=21,70\|Q2=2170}}advanced worker -> I have been revisiting [[Term:advanced workers\|what this means]], for somewhat silly reasons of wondering what is the most appropriate term in other languages and what puns can be made on the word. in the process you invariably dig through some of the most essential stuff for explaining Marxism, and some of the most-high quality sources. in some ways, this is a critically important concept. so it's time to code it.		{{li\|I=S1/ML\|Q=21,70\|Q2=2170}}advanced worker -> I have been revisiting [[Term:advanced workers\|what this means]], for somewhat silly reasons of wondering what is the most appropriate term in other languages and what puns can be made on the word. in the process you invariably dig through some of the most essential stuff for explaining Marxism, and some of the most-high quality sources. in some ways, this is a critically important concept. so it's time to code it.

	{{li\|I=F2/A\|Q=21,71\|Q2=2171}}Lenin said workers never become class-conscious / Lenin said that workers in trade unions only get to trade union consciousness, therefore within the historical process of a Leninist movement and transition into the beginning of Bolshevism workers never extract themselves from rule by the bourgeoisie / ([[User:RD/9k/Q21,71\|9k]])		{{li\|I=F2/A\|Q=21,71\|Q2=2171}}Lenin said workers never become class-conscious (anarchism) / Lenin said that workers in trade unions only get to trade union consciousness, therefore within the historical process of a Leninist movement and transition into the beginning of Bolshevism workers never extract themselves from rule by the bourgeoisie / ([[User:RD/9k/Q21,71\|9k]])

	</li><li class="field_ML" data-qid="21,72" value="2172" data-dimension="Z"><cite class="article">Advanced workers and backward opportunists</cite> [https://research.moraleconomy.au/index.php?title=Term:Advanced_workers]		</li><li class="field_ML" data-qid="21,72" value="2172" data-dimension="Z"><cite class="article">Advanced workers and backward opportunists</cite> [https://research.moraleconomy.au/index.php?title=Term:Advanced_workers]
Line 1,425:		Line 1,425:
	</li><li class="field_trotsky" value="2544" data-dimension="S2">??		</li><li class="field_trotsky" value="2544" data-dimension="S2">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="2545" data-dimension="S2">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="2545" data-dimension="S2">??

	</li><li class="number_empty" value="2550" data-dimension="S2">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="2550" data-dimension="S2">??
			</li><li class="number_empty" value="2551" data-dimension="S2">??

			{{li\|I=Z0/W\|Q=25,52\|Q2=2552}}entryism / entrism / ({{9k\|RD/Q25,52}})

	</li><li class="number_empty" value="2555" data-dimension="S2">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="2555" data-dimension="S2">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="2560" data-dimension="S2">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="2560" data-dimension="S2">??
Line 1,435:		Line 1,440:
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="2585" data-dimension="S2">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="2585" data-dimension="S2">??

	</li><li class="field_nations" data-tradition="MX onto PT" data-qid="25,88" value="2588" data-dimension="S2">QAnon is democratic ~~/ Despite~~ being fundamentally anti-rational, ~~QAnon was democratic in that~~ it allowed groups of people with grievances that weren't being answered to cluster together, discuss their grievances, and find people who would represent them and force other groups of people in their national population to respond to their grievances; the structure of QAnon is not easily distinguishable from the basic principles of Liberal-republicanism that may include people nominating representatives of their choice and Kantian ethics / ([[User:RD/9k/Q25,88\|9k]])		</li><li class="field_nations" data-tradition="MX onto PT" data-qid="25,88" value="2588" data-dimension="S2">QAnon is democratic — despite being fundamentally anti-rational, it allowed groups of people with grievances that weren't being answered to cluster together, discuss their grievances, and find people who would represent them and force other groups of people in their national population to respond to their grievances; the structure of QAnon is not easily distinguishable from the basic principles of Liberal-republicanism that may include people nominating representatives of their choice and Kantian ethics / ([[User:RD/9k/Q25,88\|9k]])

	</li><li class="number_empty" value="2589" data-dimension="S2">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="2589" data-dimension="S2">??

Reversedragon: A mode of production contains a particular economic base

2026-05-11T10:44:36Z

A mode of production contains a particular economic base

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:44, 11 May 2026
Line 1,339:		Line 1,339:

	</li><li class="number_empty" value="2440">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="2440">??
			</li><li class="number_empty" value="2441">??
			</li><li class="number_empty" value="2442">??
			</li><li class="number_empty" value="2443">??
	</li><li value="2444" class="field_trotsky">??		</li><li value="2444" class="field_trotsky">??
			</li><li class="number_empty" value="2445">??
			</li><li class="number_empty" value="2446">??
			</li><li class="field_mdem" data-tradition="MX" data-qid="24,47" value="2447" data-dimension="S2">All human existence in industrial countries falls into the broad shape of either monarchy or settler-colonialism / ([[User:RD/9k/Q2448\|9k]])

	</li><li class="~~field_mdem" data-tradition="MX" data-qid="24,48~~" value="2448" data-dimension="S2">~~All human existence in industrial countries falls into~~ the ~~broad shape~~ of ~~either monarchy or settler-colonialism / ([[User:RD/9k/Q2448\|9k]])~~		</li><li class="field_nations" value="2448" data-dimension="S">apartheid state -> the motif of a state formed on a conflict zone over the frontier between two populations where the empire that owns the state may decide to eliminate the other population. depending on how sloppily you read that definition the United States a bit before the Civil War already was one. but that sounds about right.

	</li><li class="field_nations" data-tradition="MX onto LR, MX onto PT" data-qid="24,49" value="2449" data-dimension="S2">Settler-colonialism outperforms Bolshevism / Settler-colonialism is "better" than Bolshevism / Settler-colonialism is more successful than Bolshevism / The United States succeeded because of settler-colonialism / The United States was successful because of settler-colonialism / The United States succeeded because of a small-scale, molecularized settler-colonialism process in which it opted to toss out all its extra people instead of undergo the considerable strain of incorporating them, in contrast to the Soviet Union where molecular settler-colonialism did not win and people were to be incorporated into the overall federation simply because they were people but because people mattered more than maintaining the imperial structure the system was not robust against the outside / ([[User:RD/9k/Q29,83\|9k/Q29,83]], [[User:RD/9k/Q691\|9k/Q691]])		</li><li class="field_nations" data-tradition="MX onto LR, MX onto PT" data-qid="24,49" value="2449" data-dimension="S2">Settler-colonialism outperforms Bolshevism / Settler-colonialism is "better" than Bolshevism / Settler-colonialism is more successful than Bolshevism / The United States succeeded because of settler-colonialism / The United States was successful because of settler-colonialism / The United States succeeded because of a small-scale, molecularized settler-colonialism process in which it opted to toss out all its extra people instead of undergo the considerable strain of incorporating them, in contrast to the Soviet Union where molecular settler-colonialism did not win and people were to be incorporated into the overall federation simply because they were people but because people mattered more than maintaining the imperial structure the system was not robust against the outside / ([[User:RD/9k/Q29,83\|9k/Q29,83]], [[User:RD/9k/Q691\|9k/Q691]])
Line 1,352:		Line 1,358:
	</li><li value="2476" class="number_empty">??		</li><li value="2476" class="number_empty">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="2480">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="2480">??
			</li><li class="number_empty" value="2481">??
			</li><li class="number_empty" value="2482">??

			{{li\|I=S2/ML\|tradition=ML, MX\|Q=2483\|Q2=2483}}A mode of production contains a particular economic base / A mode of production is wholly or partially composed of a particular economic base -> setting down some clear definitions of concepts whether the concepts themselves might be a bit vague.

			</li><li class="number_empty" value="2484">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="2485">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="2485">??

Reversedragon: move trauma adventure to Q11,41 so Q11,42 ethics adventure can take its place; due to the inherent early-existentialist themes, a much more approriate use of "42"

2026-05-07T07:10:42Z

move trauma adventure to Q11,41 so Q11,42 ethics adventure can take its place; due to the inherent early-existentialist themes, a much more approriate use of "42"

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:10, 7 May 2026
Line 247:		Line 247:
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="1139">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="1139">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="1140">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="1140">??
	~~</li><li class="number_empty" value="1141">??~~

	</~~li><li data-qid~~="11,~~42" value="1142" class~~=~~"field_horror" data-dimension="S">~~[[Ontology:Q11,42\|trauma adventure]] (literary genre)		{{li\|I=S1/DFy\|Q=11,41\|Q2=1141}}[[Ontology:Q11,42\|trauma adventure]] (literary genre)
			{{li\|I=S2/Fy\|Q=11,42\|Q2=1142}}ethics adventure (literary genre)

	</li><li class="number_empty" value="1143">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="1143">??

Reversedragon: class traitor from specific field

2026-05-05T08:50:34Z

class traitor from specific field

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:50, 5 May 2026
Line 290:		Line 290:
	</li><li class="field_fantasy" data-tradition="Fy" data-qid="12,01" value="1201" data-dimension="S">alternate-timeline version of figure or character in narrative		</li><li class="field_fantasy" data-tradition="Fy" data-qid="12,01" value="1201" data-dimension="S">alternate-timeline version of figure or character in narrative
	</li><li class="field_fantasy" data-tradition="Fy" data-qid="12,02" value="1202" data-dimension="S">alternate-timeline version of real country		</li><li class="field_fantasy" data-tradition="Fy" data-qid="12,02" value="1202" data-dimension="S">alternate-timeline version of real country
	</~~li><li class~~=~~"number_empty" value~~="1203~~">??~~
	</~~li><li class~~=~~"number_empty" value~~="1204">??		{{li\|I=S0/ML\|Q=12,03\|Q2=1203}}class traitor from Law
	</~~li><li class~~=~~"number_empty" value~~="1205~~">??~~		{{li\|I=S0/ML\|Q=12,04\|Q2=1204}}class traitor from journalism -> it's a little hilarious that innumerable people will claim to be this and probably no one is.
	</~~li><li class~~=~~"number_empty" value~~="1206~~">??~~		{{li\|I=S0/ML\|Q=12,05\|Q2=1205}}class traitor from medicine
	</~~li><li class~~=~~"number_empty" value~~="1207~~">??~~		{{li\|I=S0/ML\|Q=12,06\|Q2=1206}}class traitor from religion
	</~~li><li class~~=~~"number_empty" value~~="1208">??		{{li\|I=S0/ML\|Q=12,07\|Q2=1207}}class traitor from the arts
	</~~li><li class~~=~~"number_empty" value~~="~~1209~~"~~>??~~		{{li\|I=S0/ML\|Q=12,08\|Q2=1208}}??
	</~~li><li class~~=~~"number_empty" value~~="1210~~">??~~		{{li\|I=S0/ML\|Q=12,09\|Q2=1209}}class traitor from peasantry -> that wording isn't {{em\|necessary}}, but there have been times peasants were considered "petty producers", so sometimes it fits.

			{{li\|I=S0/ML\|Q=12,10\|Q2=1210}}class traitor from specific field / class traitor from specific field who is suitable for becoming Leninist theorist or revolutionary; Mao counts, even Gramsci arguably counts, but someone like Althusser explicitly does not count

	</li><li class="number_empty" value="1211">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="1211">??
	</li><li class="field_fantasy" data-tradition="Fy" data-qid="12,12" value="1212" data-dimension="S0">variant of fictional character / alternate-universe variant of fictional character ~~-> this is your~~		</li><li class="field_fantasy" data-tradition="Fy" data-qid="12,12" value="1212" data-dimension="S0">variant of fictional character / alternate-universe variant of fictional character
	</li><li class="field_fantasy" data-tradition="Fy" data-qid="12,13" value="1213" data-dimension="S">variant of historical figure (historical fiction) -> applies to historical fiction works / simulation games like {{game\|Hearts of Iron IV}}, and historical-materialist thought experiments.		</li><li class="field_fantasy" data-tradition="Fy" data-qid="12,13" value="1213" data-dimension="S">variant of historical figure (historical fiction) -> applies to historical fiction works / simulation games like {{game\|Hearts of Iron IV}}, and historical-materialist thought experiments.
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="1214">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="1214">??