User:RD/9k/Q50,44: Difference between revisions
copy markup from 9k/Q50,44 |
It's possible to have political positions without it being a team sport |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{NextNineThousand|PPPA= | {{NextNineThousand|PPPA=Political positions part populations|User=RD|E=Q50,44|Contents=y}} | ||
== Main | == Main entry == | ||
<noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol class="hue clean"> | <noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol class="hue clean"> | ||
</li><li class="field_exstruct" data-qid="50,44" value="5044" data-dimension="S2"> | </li><li class="field_exstruct" data-tradition="LR, LR onto IV" data-qid="50,44" value="5044" data-dimension="S2">It's possible to have political positions without it being a team sport -> no. it's not. chunk competition / CCASH and Social-Philosophical Systems / SPS prohibit that. center-Liberal rationalists are so stupid. you know what the worst thing is? this was used to justify Trotsky in the same sentence. Trotsky violently attacked a republic due to his extreme views. I mean, what else do you term an assassination? anybody who doesn't realize hegemony politics currently exists (even if it's not a good thing) and treat it as if it exists is just, hanging out feeling like they owe nothing to a population continuing to exist and it's okay to let every other individual die except maybe a couple friendly businesses they buy things from if current policies benefit their own business. when you refuse to play "team sports" whole nationalities and ethnicities of people cease to be because all the people in them scatter to different capitalist cities. only a few things are more prejudiced than that. every population is based on a molecularized yet competitive process of people building populational structures through free association that at times harm each other and exist in mutual exclusion. you can't just "criticize" these without understanding their physical interaction and the fact that some of them have to be treated as correct and some as incorrect. correct structures bring down regulations on incorrect structures. this is the basis of Liberal democracy. SPS-based democulture. if one person standing by and writing a bunch of Zinovievism could change the world just because they had "good ideas" there would be no need for elections. | ||
</li><li class="field_exstruct" data-qid="50,44" value="5044" data-dimension="S2">It's possible to have political positions without it being a team sport -> you know, the really really funny thing about this is not just A) that Trotsky blatantly formed another team and cut the central party in two, but B) that they're using Bolshevism to prove something is true about Liberal-republicanism. like, today it could hypothetically be true that it's "possible to have political positions without it being a team sport" inside the CPC but not possible in the United States Congress. and the person who said this seemingly never even thought about that. | |||
</li></ol> | </li></ol> | ||
== | == meta-Marxist analyses against == | ||
<ol class="hue clean"> | <ol class="hue clean"> | ||
</ | <li class="field_mdem" data-tradition="MX onto LR" value="618" data-dimension="S2">Political positions divide populations / Whenever a body of people wishes to enforce a particular policy or transformation back onto itself, it will materially divide people into a countable team of people who are loyal to carrying it out and a countable team of people who are against it -><br/> | ||
...hang on. that's super close to being alliterated | |||
</li><li class="field_mdem" value="618" data-dimension="S2">Political positions part populations (bills; policies; divide; split; meta-Marxism) | |||
</li></ol> | |||
== Ideology codes == | == Ideology codes == | ||
| Line 19: | Line 25: | ||
</ol> | </ol> | ||
* | * LR | ||
* LR onto IV | |||
* MX onto LR | |||
Latest revision as of 03:38, 11 February 2026
Main entry[edit]
- It's possible to have political positions without it being a team sport -> no. it's not. chunk competition / CCASH and Social-Philosophical Systems / SPS prohibit that. center-Liberal rationalists are so stupid. you know what the worst thing is? this was used to justify Trotsky in the same sentence. Trotsky violently attacked a republic due to his extreme views. I mean, what else do you term an assassination? anybody who doesn't realize hegemony politics currently exists (even if it's not a good thing) and treat it as if it exists is just, hanging out feeling like they owe nothing to a population continuing to exist and it's okay to let every other individual die except maybe a couple friendly businesses they buy things from if current policies benefit their own business. when you refuse to play "team sports" whole nationalities and ethnicities of people cease to be because all the people in them scatter to different capitalist cities. only a few things are more prejudiced than that. every population is based on a molecularized yet competitive process of people building populational structures through free association that at times harm each other and exist in mutual exclusion. you can't just "criticize" these without understanding their physical interaction and the fact that some of them have to be treated as correct and some as incorrect. correct structures bring down regulations on incorrect structures. this is the basis of Liberal democracy. SPS-based democulture. if one person standing by and writing a bunch of Zinovievism could change the world just because they had "good ideas" there would be no need for elections.
- It's possible to have political positions without it being a team sport -> you know, the really really funny thing about this is not just A) that Trotsky blatantly formed another team and cut the central party in two, but B) that they're using Bolshevism to prove something is true about Liberal-republicanism. like, today it could hypothetically be true that it's "possible to have political positions without it being a team sport" inside the CPC but not possible in the United States Congress. and the person who said this seemingly never even thought about that.
meta-Marxist analyses against[edit]
- Political positions divide populations / Whenever a body of people wishes to enforce a particular policy or transformation back onto itself, it will materially divide people into a countable team of people who are loyal to carrying it out and a countable team of people who are against it ->
...hang on. that's super close to being alliterated - Political positions part populations (bills; policies; divide; split; meta-Marxism)
Ideology codes[edit]
- LR
- LR onto IV
- MX onto LR