Jump to content

User:RD/9k/Q19,22: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Philosophical Research
copy markup from 9k/Q21,71
 
m Class consciousness includes identifying the overall structure of a national population
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
== Main entry ==
== Main entry ==
<noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol class="hue clean">
<noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol class="hue clean">
<!-- {{li|start=y|I=Z1/ML|dimension=Z|tradition=ML|Q=19,22|Q2=1922| h4 = ... }} -->


<!-- {{li|start=y|I=S2/A|dimension=F2|tradition=MX onto A, MX onto ML|Q=21,71|Q2=2171| h4 = Lenin said workers never become class-conscious }} -->
{{li|start=y|I=Z1/ML|Q=19,22|Q2=1922| h4 = <cite>The trade unions, the present situation, and Trotsky's mistakes</cite> }} (Lenin 1920)  ->  this is one of my favorite history texts because it just, is so illustrative of all the incorrect things Trotsky did at many different times all wrapped up in one prototypical incident. every time I learn about some <em>other</em> Trotsky incident my mind comes back to this one. did you know about the incident where he couldn't properly slam a metal door? unrelated but very funny. he was always convinced he knew everything but always making dumb mistakes that showed he didn't even know what Lenin or the workers' movements were actually doing. it's two sided. it's funny Trotsky was so arrogant but sad that he was so bad at contributing to the things he thought he believed in. it makes you ask, is there some point at which having standards becomes being mean to people and saying they <em>aren't good enough</em> to be part of a workers' state, that they simply weren't born to be the kind of people you want? workers' states are supposed to be about uniting everybody and getting everyone to stop fighting, so what is our obsession with leaving people behind?
</li><li class="field_ML" value="1922" data-dimension="Z"><cite>The trade unions, the present situation, and Trotsky's mistakes</cite> (Lenin 1920)  ->  this is one of my favorite history texts because it just, is so illustrative of all the incorrect things Trotsky did at many different times all wrapped up in one prototypical incident. every time I learn about some <em>other</em> Trotsky incident my mind comes back to this one. did you know about the incident where he couldn't properly slam a metal door? unrelated but very funny. he was always convinced he knew everything but always making dumb mistakes that showed he didn't even know what Lenin or the workers' movements were actually doing. it's two sided. it's funny Trotsky was so arrogant but sad that he was so bad at contributing to the things he thought he believed in. it makes you ask, is there some point at which having standards becomes being mean to people and saying they <em>aren't good enough</em> to be part of a workers' state, that they simply weren't born to be the kind of people you want? workers' states are supposed to be about uniting everybody and getting everyone to stop fighting, so what is our obsession with leaving people behind?


</li></ol>
</li></ol>


== Motifs and claims ==<!--
== Motifs and claims ==


<ol class="hue clean">
<ol class="hue clean">


</li></ol>-->
{{li|start=y|I=S2/ML|tradition=MX onto A, MX onto ML|Q=21,75|Q2=2175| h4 = Class consciousness includes identifying the overall structure of a national population }} (of a country; meta-Marxism) / ([[User:RD/9k/Q21,71|9k]])
 
{{li|I=S1/ML|Q=21,74|Q2=2174| h4 = complicated arrangement of pulleys }} / "an arrangement of cogwheels ... and transmission belts" / Lenin's filter (concept brought up in texts such as "[[E:The trade unions and Trotsky's mistakes|Trotsky's mistakes]]") / filtration (meta-Marxist term; concept in many Marxist texts expressed through different ontologies or metaphors)
 
</li></ol>


== Ideology codes ==
== Ideology codes ==


* asdfsdf
* ML / mainstream Marxism-Leninism
* ML / Lenin
* IV / early Trotskyism
* IV / Trotsky
* A / anarchism
* ML onto IV
* MX onto ML
* MX onto A




Latest revision as of 12:48, 16 February 2026

Main entry[edit]

  1. The trade unions, the present situation, and Trotsky's mistakes

    (Lenin 1920) -> this is one of my favorite history texts because it just, is so illustrative of all the incorrect things Trotsky did at many different times all wrapped up in one prototypical incident. every time I learn about some other Trotsky incident my mind comes back to this one. did you know about the incident where he couldn't properly slam a metal door? unrelated but very funny. he was always convinced he knew everything but always making dumb mistakes that showed he didn't even know what Lenin or the workers' movements were actually doing. it's two sided. it's funny Trotsky was so arrogant but sad that he was so bad at contributing to the things he thought he believed in. it makes you ask, is there some point at which having standards becomes being mean to people and saying they aren't good enough to be part of a workers' state, that they simply weren't born to be the kind of people you want? workers' states are supposed to be about uniting everybody and getting everyone to stop fighting, so what is our obsession with leaving people behind?

Motifs and claims[edit]

  1. Class consciousness includes identifying the overall structure of a national population

    (of a country; meta-Marxism) / (9k)

  2. complicated arrangement of pulleys

    / "an arrangement of cogwheels ... and transmission belts" / Lenin's filter (concept brought up in texts such as "Trotsky's mistakes") / filtration (meta-Marxist term; concept in many Marxist texts expressed through different ontologies or metaphors)

Ideology codes[edit]

  • ML / mainstream Marxism-Leninism
  • ML / Lenin
  • IV / early Trotskyism
  • IV / Trotsky
  • A / anarchism
  • ML onto IV
  • MX onto ML
  • MX onto A
Retrieved from "https://research.moraleconomy.au/index.php?title=User:RD/9k/Q19,22&oldid=25434"