User:RD/9k/Q17,55: Difference between revisions
copy markup from 9k/Q19,29 |
m Reversedragon moved page User:RD/9k/Q1755 to User:RD/9k/Q17,55: Moving numbered Item to TTS-pronounceable title |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{NextNineThousand|PPPA=Fifth Amendment|User=RD|E=Q17,55}} | {{NextNineThousand|PPPA=Fifth Amendment|User=RD|E=Q17,55|Contents=y}} | ||
== Main entry == | == Main entry == | ||
<noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol class="hue clean"> | <noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol class="hue clean"> | ||
{{li|I=S1/LR|dimension=S0|tradition=LR|Q=17,50|Q2=1750| h4 = United States constitutional amendment }} / Bill of Rights (United States) | |||
{{li|I=S2/LR|tradition=LR|Q=17,55|Q2=1755| h4 = Government will not seize property }} (Amendment 5) / Government will not seize property without compensation (Amendment 5 to the United States constitution) | |||
</li></ol> | </li></ol> | ||
== | == Selected cases == | ||
<ol class="hue clean"> | <ol class="hue clean"> | ||
</li></ol | |||
{{li|I=Z1/LR|tradition=LR|Q=618}}{{i|Agins v. City of Tiburon}} (1980) [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agins_v._City_of_Tiburon] | |||
{{li|I=S2/LR|tradition=LR|Q=618}}An instance of government using property can be considered "taking" in the context it does not substantially advance legitimate state interests | |||
{{li|I=Z1/LR|tradition=LR|Q=618}}{{i|Lingle v. Chevron}} (2005) [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lingle_v._Chevron_U.S.A._Inc.] -> case between lessee of local gas station in Hawaii and Chevron, far away on U.S. mainland. Hawaii passed a law to limit the amount of rent Chevron can charge.<br/> | |||
court ruled that previous test was invalid but did not really give an outcome on whether Chevron was right or not. | |||
</li></ol> | |||
== Ideology codes == | == Ideology codes == | ||
Latest revision as of 06:59, 27 February 2026
Main entry[edit]
United States constitutional amendment
/ Bill of Rights (United States)Government will not seize property
(Amendment 5) / Government will not seize property without compensation (Amendment 5 to the United States constitution)
Selected cases[edit]
- Agins v. City of Tiburon (1980) [1]
- An instance of government using property can be considered "taking" in the context it does not substantially advance legitimate state interests
- Lingle v. Chevron (2005) [2] -> case between lessee of local gas station in Hawaii and Chevron, far away on U.S. mainland. Hawaii passed a law to limit the amount of rent Chevron can charge.
court ruled that previous test was invalid but did not really give an outcome on whether Chevron was right or not.
Ideology codes[edit]
- (none)