User:RD/9k/Q22,23: Difference between revisions
copy markup from 9k/Q22,23 |
m formatting |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol class="hue clean"> | <noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol class="hue clean"> | ||
{{li|I=S2/MX|Q=22,23|Q2=2223| h4 = [[Ontology:Q2223|Nature is a multiplication table]] }} / All physics equations are actually multivariable functions -> here we go. one of the most genuinely solid propositions I've come to in <cite>MDem</cite>, that unlike everything else I have very little doubt about, and high confidence in. we teach mathematics and Newtonian mechanics entirely wrong. we should be teaching every physics function from wavefunction collapse to chemical reactions to throwing a rock as multivariable functions of objects colliding in the sense of two number lines colliding in a multiplication table style function to produce a three dimensional graph. this is the beginning to how we fix all of physics. this might lead to unifying quantum mechanics, Newtonian mechanics, and gravity. this is it. it sounds absurdly simple, and ridiculous that this could be the answer, but I think this is it. | |||
</li></ol> | </li></ol> | ||
== | == Related == | ||
<ol class="hue clean"> | <ol class="hue clean"> | ||
{{li|I=S2/MX|Q=22,24|Q2=2224| h4 = Punnett squares can apply to anything }} -> the claim that Punnett squares are just one situational application of a data structure or kind of computation that can be used to model any event with multiple known outcomes | |||
{{li|I=S2/MX|Q=21,93|Q2=2193| h4 = A contradiction has the form f(x,y) {{=}} z }} / A contradiction is a process of form f(x,y) = z / A contradiction is a physical process in which two separate free-floating objects which may lack the ability to directly read or predict each other interact, with the general form f(x,y) = z -> many people claim that dialectical materialism is "arbitrary" or "mystical" just because they themselves don't understand what a contradiction is. I'm tired of this. it's possible to fix this and make all the opaque language super-precise so there are no Confusing Words to argue over any more, and if by the time it all turns into mathematics you think it's too difficult to understand, well it's your fault then, because you were the one that had trouble with Words. | |||
{{li|I=S2/MX|Q=21,93|Q2=2193}}A contradiction is a process of form f(x,y) = z / A contradiction is a physical process in which two separate free-floating objects which may lack the ability to directly read or predict each other interact, with the general form f(x,y) = z -> many people claim that dialectical materialism is "arbitrary" or "mystical" just because they themselves don't understand what a contradiction is. I'm tired of this. it's possible to fix this and make all the opaque language super-precise so there are no Confusing Words to argue over any more, and if by the time it all turns into mathematics you think it's too difficult to understand, well it's your fault then, because you were the one that had trouble with Words. | |||
</li></ol> | </li></ol> | ||
Latest revision as of 04:54, 28 February 2026
Main entry[edit]
Nature is a multiplication table
/ All physics equations are actually multivariable functions -> here we go. one of the most genuinely solid propositions I've come to in MDem, that unlike everything else I have very little doubt about, and high confidence in. we teach mathematics and Newtonian mechanics entirely wrong. we should be teaching every physics function from wavefunction collapse to chemical reactions to throwing a rock as multivariable functions of objects colliding in the sense of two number lines colliding in a multiplication table style function to produce a three dimensional graph. this is the beginning to how we fix all of physics. this might lead to unifying quantum mechanics, Newtonian mechanics, and gravity. this is it. it sounds absurdly simple, and ridiculous that this could be the answer, but I think this is it.
Related[edit]
Punnett squares can apply to anything
-> the claim that Punnett squares are just one situational application of a data structure or kind of computation that can be used to model any event with multiple known outcomesA contradiction has the form f(x,y) = z
/ A contradiction is a process of form f(x,y) = z / A contradiction is a physical process in which two separate free-floating objects which may lack the ability to directly read or predict each other interact, with the general form f(x,y) = z -> many people claim that dialectical materialism is "arbitrary" or "mystical" just because they themselves don't understand what a contradiction is. I'm tired of this. it's possible to fix this and make all the opaque language super-precise so there are no Confusing Words to argue over any more, and if by the time it all turns into mathematics you think it's too difficult to understand, well it's your fault then, because you were the one that had trouble with Words.
Ideology codes[edit]
- (none)