Jump to content

User:RD/9k/Q92: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Philosophical Research
copy markup from 9k/Q92
 
m violet Marxism
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
== Main entries ==
== Main entries ==
<noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol class="hue clean">
<noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol class="hue clean">
<!-- {{li|start=y|I=Z1/ML|dimension=Z|tradition=ML|Q=19,22|Q2=1922| h4 = ... }} -->


</li><li value="92" data-dimension="Z" class="field_mdem">[[Ontology:Q92|meta-Marxism]]
{{li|start=y|I=Z1/MX|Q=92}}[[E:Q92|meta-Marxism]] (Materialist analysis of contradicting or competing Leninisms, their component parts at various large and tiny scales, and their iterative development as interacting factions or countries; R. Bergfalk) / [[E:Q92/WA|violet Marxism]]


</li></ol>
</li></ol>
Line 12: Line 11:
<ol class="hue clean">
<ol class="hue clean">


{{li|I=S1/PT|tradition=PT onto HM|Q=618}}unpacking the meta-Marxism of the woke narrative {{YouTube|ex-bUC1wXyg}}  ->  oh my god you're telling me that critical theory secretly knows everything about modeling the historical development of different Marxisms?? and it knows exactly how to get China and Cuba to cooperate so they can both get back to Bolshevism?? I had no idea<br/>
{{li|start=y|I=S1/PT|tradition=PT onto HM|Q=618}}unpacking the meta-Marxism of the woke narrative {{YouTube|ex-bUC1wXyg}}  ->  oh my god you're telling me that critical theory secretly knows everything about modeling the historical development of different Marxisms?? and it knows exactly how to get China and Cuba to cooperate so they can both get back to Bolshevism?? I had no idea<br/>
found this when I tried to use Google to search YouTube for "meta-Marxism". it was the only result.
found this when I tried to use Google to search YouTube for "meta-Marxism". it was the only result.


{{li|I=Z1/W|tradition=UM / unknown|Q=618}}{{article|Rethinking Althusser's Meta-Marxism}} (Andreas Beck Holm 2024) [https://decalagesjournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/decalagesvol2iss1_07.pdf]  ->  so, "meta-Marxism" has rarely been used for describing Western-Marxism for some reason. rest assured, this is {{em|not}} at all what "meta-Marxism" is referring to on any other page on this site. here meta-Marxism is a particular thing called violet Marxism. if we became successful at what we were doing here you would search meta-Marxism and there would be 100 results about violet Marxism and 5 results about Western-Marxism.<br/>
{{li|I=Z1/W|tradition=UM / unknown|Q=21,29|Q2=2129}}{{article|Rethinking Althusser's Meta-Marxism}} (Andreas Beck Holm 2024) [https://decalagesjournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/decalagesvol2iss1_07.pdf] / ([[User:RD/9k/Q21,29|9k]]) ->  so, "meta-Marxism" has rarely been used for describing Western-Marxism for some reason. rest assured, this is {{em|not}} at all what "meta-Marxism" is referring to on any other page on this site. ...
but, I'm interested to see exactly what the word is supposed to mean in Althusser's context and like how arrogant he is to think that Mark Fisher's tools can actually step outside Marxism or what exactly is going on here.
 
{{li|I=S1/W|tradition=UM onto W|Q=618}}inability to maintain the division between science and ideology  ->  that is... not the problem {{em|I}} had with Althusser. for me it was that he couldn't maintain the difference between ideology and material objects. so the first thing I did was fix his account of capitalism in the article I was reading so he was describing one big material object breaking. and that actually made a lot of sense to me apart from the notion that it removes the concept of predicting and understanding revolution or the ability to steer transitions, and then I was like, but what's the point of aleatory materialism if it doesn't practically tell you anything about how to have a movement; today I'd also accuse that of being anarchism instead of Marxism, because shockingly almost everything that isn't Marxism turns out to be anarchism. psychoanalysis is provably an anarchism; critical theory is provably an anarchism; capitalist ideology itself is arguably-but-not-certainly an anarchism.


</li></ol>
</li></ol>
Line 26: Line 22:
* MX / meta-Marxism
* MX / meta-Marxism
* W / Western Marxism
* W / Western Marxism
* W / Althusser
* UM / unknown Marxism
* UM / unknown Marxism


Line 32: Line 27:
[[Category:Next nine thousand (RD)]]  <!-- page ends here.  TTS-unfriendly numbers incoming
[[Category:Next nine thousand (RD)]]  <!-- page ends here.  TTS-unfriendly numbers incoming
redirects:  (none)
redirects:  (none)
duplication hint:  copy markup from [[Special:PermanentLink/27998|9k/Q21,03]] -->
duplication hint:  copy markup from [[Special:PermanentLink/NNNN|9k/Q92]] -->

Latest revision as of 08:39, 3 March 2026

Main entries[edit]

  1. meta-Marxism (Materialist analysis of contradicting or competing Leninisms, their component parts at various large and tiny scales, and their iterative development as interacting factions or countries; R. Bergfalk) / violet Marxism

Prior usages of "meta-Marxism"[edit]

  1. unpacking the meta-Marxism of the woke narrative [1] -> oh my god you're telling me that critical theory secretly knows everything about modeling the historical development of different Marxisms?? and it knows exactly how to get China and Cuba to cooperate so they can both get back to Bolshevism?? I had no idea
    found this when I tried to use Google to search YouTube for "meta-Marxism". it was the only result.
  2. Rethinking Althusser's Meta-Marxism (Andreas Beck Holm 2024) [2] / (9k) -> so, "meta-Marxism" has rarely been used for describing Western-Marxism for some reason. rest assured, this is not at all what "meta-Marxism" is referring to on any other page on this site. ...

Ideology codes[edit]

  • MX / meta-Marxism
  • W / Western Marxism
  • UM / unknown Marxism
Retrieved from "https://research.moraleconomy.au/index.php?title=User:RD/9k/Q92&oldid=28216"