User:RD/9k/Q34,05: Difference between revisions
m Reversedragon moved page User:RD/9k/Q3405 to User:RD/9k/Q34,05: Moving numbered Item to TTS-pronounceable title |
m Non-greedy people are a class |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol class="hue clean"> | <noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol class="hue clean"> | ||
{{li|start=y|I=S2/MX|tradition=MX onto MX, MX onto ML, MX onto A|Q=34,05|Q2=3405|h4 = Anarchists can be a class }} (meta-Marxism) / In violet Marxism, anarchists can constitute a class, although this is only true under highly specific conditions — there can be an anarchist class if and when anarchists create repeatable social structures that are capable of joining up as a repeated pattern and overtaking the bourgeoisie as a repeated pattern; this is to imply that it is necessary for named anarchisms with specific internal structure to exist for anarchists to successfully pull off an anarchist revolution as a new class (in meta-Marxism; meta-Marxism onto Marxism) -> a thought that occurred to me while listening to Trotskyists attempting to explain the difference between early Cuba and Deng Xiaoping Thought in terms of the national bourgeoisie successfully or unsuccessfully taking up the position of defending the country | {{li|start=y|I=S2/MX|tradition=MX onto MX, MX onto ML, MX onto A|Q=34,05|Q2=3405|h4 = Anarchists can be a class }} (meta-Marxism) / In violet Marxism, anarchists can constitute a class, although this is only true under highly specific conditions — there can be an anarchist class if and when anarchists create repeatable social structures that are capable of joining up as a repeated pattern and overtaking the bourgeoisie as a repeated pattern; this is to imply that it is necessary for named anarchisms with specific internal structure to exist for anarchists to successfully pull off an anarchist revolution as a new class (in meta-Marxism; meta-Marxism onto Marxism) -> a thought that occurred to me while listening to Trotskyists attempting to explain the difference between early Cuba and Deng Xiaoping Thought in terms of the national bourgeoisie successfully or unsuccessfully taking up the position of defending the country<br/> | ||
Non-greedy people are a class + ?? = Anarchists can be a class. | |||
</li></ol> | </li></ol> | ||
| Line 10: | Line 11: | ||
<ol class="hue clean"> | <ol class="hue clean"> | ||
{{li|start=y|I=S2/A|Q=33,91|Q2=3391}}Non-greedy people are a class -> after listening to too many things containing either sincere or appropriated anarchist signifiers, I am convinced some people think this. "Greed"/"non-competitive balance" is the single most common wrong idea I have seen in every center-Liberal or anarchist or anticommunist argument; it's everywhere. it seems to be fundamental to the way most anarchists define the hypothetical capable subpopulation of people that can end capitalism. they start with the whole population and then they just start defining relatively arbitrary criteria including actual wealth or having prejudices for crossing out "the greedy ones". the big problem is that when we're at the "hierarchy"/prejudice criterion it can really come down to having the wrong definitions of words or not having the models people command you to. it becomes very paradoxical because it's based on what people believe or feel rather than on what's verifiable, and that can easily just lead to two or three groups of people shouting at each other, ordering each other around but insisting they won't listen to each other because they've effectively created circular hierarchies onto each other and they want freedom. | |||
{{li|I=S2/ML|Q=33,90|Q2=3390}}Anarchism is something to overthrow / ([[User:RD/9k/Q33,90|9k]]) | |||
</li></ol> | </li></ol> | ||
Latest revision as of 22:33, 6 March 2026
Main entry[edit]
Anarchists can be a class
(meta-Marxism) / In violet Marxism, anarchists can constitute a class, although this is only true under highly specific conditions — there can be an anarchist class if and when anarchists create repeatable social structures that are capable of joining up as a repeated pattern and overtaking the bourgeoisie as a repeated pattern; this is to imply that it is necessary for named anarchisms with specific internal structure to exist for anarchists to successfully pull off an anarchist revolution as a new class (in meta-Marxism; meta-Marxism onto Marxism) -> a thought that occurred to me while listening to Trotskyists attempting to explain the difference between early Cuba and Deng Xiaoping Thought in terms of the national bourgeoisie successfully or unsuccessfully taking up the position of defending the country
Non-greedy people are a class + ?? = Anarchists can be a class.
Related[edit]
- Non-greedy people are a class -> after listening to too many things containing either sincere or appropriated anarchist signifiers, I am convinced some people think this. "Greed"/"non-competitive balance" is the single most common wrong idea I have seen in every center-Liberal or anarchist or anticommunist argument; it's everywhere. it seems to be fundamental to the way most anarchists define the hypothetical capable subpopulation of people that can end capitalism. they start with the whole population and then they just start defining relatively arbitrary criteria including actual wealth or having prejudices for crossing out "the greedy ones". the big problem is that when we're at the "hierarchy"/prejudice criterion it can really come down to having the wrong definitions of words or not having the models people command you to. it becomes very paradoxical because it's based on what people believe or feel rather than on what's verifiable, and that can easily just lead to two or three groups of people shouting at each other, ordering each other around but insisting they won't listen to each other because they've effectively created circular hierarchies onto each other and they want freedom.
- Anarchism is something to overthrow / (9k)
Ideology codes[edit]
- (none)