User:RD/9k/Q42,76: Difference between revisions
m Reversedragon moved page User:RD/9k/Q4276 to User:RD/9k/Q42,76: Moving numbered Item to TTS-pronounceable title |
m Every color revolution is blue |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
"Color revolutions" are revolutions + ?? = Color revolutions can be models for resisting Toryism. | "Color revolutions" are revolutions + ?? = Color revolutions can be models for resisting Toryism. | ||
{{li|I=S2/ES|Q=42,76|Q2=4276}}Color revolutions are revolutions -> it makes more sense for the statement in the positive to be the proposition. in general having propositions that are said confidently enough that they could be clearly false is a good proposition construction because it makes it easy to decide whether propositions should be marked F2 or not | {{li|start=y|I=S2/ES|Q=42,76|Q2=4276}}Color revolutions are revolutions -> it makes more sense for the statement in the positive to be the proposition. in general having propositions that are said confidently enough that they could be clearly false is a good proposition construction because it makes it easy to decide whether propositions should be marked F2 or not | ||
{{li|I=S2/MX|Q=42,76|Q2=4276}}"Color revolutions" aren't revolutions (meta-Marxism; metaphysical statement) -> this is false when you define revolution as a regime change, and true when you accept "Revolution cannot be exported" as part of the actual definition of revolution. I'm not totally sure which one of these I subscribe to. I know color revolutions aren't good but I don't know if that means they are or aren't revolutions. | {{li|I=S2/MX|Q=42,76|Q2=4276}}"Color revolutions" aren't revolutions (meta-Marxism; metaphysical statement) -> this is false when you define revolution as a regime change, and true when you accept "Revolution cannot be exported" as part of the actual definition of revolution. I'm not totally sure which one of these I subscribe to. I know color revolutions aren't good but I don't know if that means they are or aren't revolutions. | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
</li></ol> | </li></ol> | ||
== | == Related == | ||
<ol class="hue clean"> | <ol class="hue clean"> | ||
{{li|start=y|I=S2/ES|tradition=MX onto ES, MX onto LR|Q=42,75|Q2=4275}}Every color revolution is blue / Every color revolution is aligned with the Liberal-republican tradition; this is to imply but not require that every color revolution is part of either the Liberal-republican tradition or the Existentialist-Structuralist tradition | |||
</li></ol> | </li></ol> | ||
Latest revision as of 21:25, 9 March 2026
Main entry[edit]
- "Color revolutions" are revolutions / Color revolutions are revolutions (Liberal-republicanism, Existentialism) -> metaphysical statement about the overall category of all revolutions including workers' movements. not a statement specifically about workers' movements.
"Color revolutions" are revolutions + ?? = Color revolutions can be models for resisting Toryism. - Color revolutions are revolutions -> it makes more sense for the statement in the positive to be the proposition. in general having propositions that are said confidently enough that they could be clearly false is a good proposition construction because it makes it easy to decide whether propositions should be marked F2 or not
- "Color revolutions" aren't revolutions (meta-Marxism; metaphysical statement) -> this is false when you define revolution as a regime change, and true when you accept "Revolution cannot be exported" as part of the actual definition of revolution. I'm not totally sure which one of these I subscribe to. I know color revolutions aren't good but I don't know if that means they are or aren't revolutions.
Related[edit]
- Every color revolution is blue / Every color revolution is aligned with the Liberal-republican tradition; this is to imply but not require that every color revolution is part of either the Liberal-republican tradition or the Existentialist-Structuralist tradition
Ideologies[edit]
- (none)