User:NickelBank/YT/TransActivismVersion2: Difference between revisions
copy markup from MamdaniPropertyTaxes26 |
Comments section |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
== Motifs or claims == | == Motifs or claims == | ||
<ol class="hue clean reset"> | <ol class="hue clean reset"> | ||
{{li|I=S2/ | {{li|start=y|I=S2/A|Q=618}}Science is not compatible with anarchism -> appears in a relatively soft way. | ||
</li></ol> | </li></ol> | ||
=== Comments section === | === Comments section === | ||
<ol class="hue clean reset"> | <ol class="hue clean reset"> | ||
{{li|I=S2/LR|Q=618}} | {{li|start=y|I=S2/LR|Q=618}}The value of science to a free society (Liberal republic or {{a|E=post-structuralist civilization}}) should be judged specifically by whether it is nice people or {{a|mean people|E=science Tories}} that support science, and particularly whether it is more common for mean people or nice people to be against it; if a significant number of mean people support science then regardless of whether it is accurate to reality everyone must band together against it and get rid of it | ||
{{li|I=S2/LR|Q=618}}Rejecting science is bad purely because it causes people to form into conspiracy theory movements that want to break out of society or take it over, which in turn is bad specifically because when people are tied to hateful movements they are not within freedom and not capable of recognizing others' freedom and granting them equal freedom; rejecting science does not occur based on what is accurate to reality but is a matter of bigotry versus freedom where when people refuse to perceive reality through anti-essentialism and to baselessly assume that things are "not always bad" they go beyond a natural moderate state entering an unacceptable extreme and thus create bigotry; accepting science occurs based on practicing anti-essentialism and deciding to tolerate scientists and grant them freedom | |||
</li></ol> | </li></ol> | ||
Latest revision as of 08:59, 7 April 2026
The Problem with Transgender Activism
- channel
- --
- field, scope, or group [Item]
- video URL
Nickel usage or significance
- (fill in later)
Usage notes
- (none)
Motifs or claims
- Science is not compatible with anarchism -> appears in a relatively soft way.
Comments section
- The value of science to a free society (Liberal republic or post-structuralist civilization) should be judged specifically by whether it is nice people or mean people that support science, and particularly whether it is more common for mean people or nice people to be against it; if a significant number of mean people support science then regardless of whether it is accurate to reality everyone must band together against it and get rid of it
- Rejecting science is bad purely because it causes people to form into conspiracy theory movements that want to break out of society or take it over, which in turn is bad specifically because when people are tied to hateful movements they are not within freedom and not capable of recognizing others' freedom and granting them equal freedom; rejecting science does not occur based on what is accurate to reality but is a matter of bigotry versus freedom where when people refuse to perceive reality through anti-essentialism and to baselessly assume that things are "not always bad" they go beyond a natural moderate state entering an unacceptable extreme and thus create bigotry; accepting science occurs based on practicing anti-essentialism and deciding to tolerate scientists and grant them freedom