Ontology:P203

1. [P] (pronounced [P]) "Dirac test"

[P] (pronounced [P]) "Dirac test"

field value

test passed

"Signs" [pass]

test failed

"Signs" [fail]

Characteristics in draft

Properties

item type

P

label (en)

[P] (pronounced [P]) "Dirac test"

alias (en)

Is this description or argument unnecessarily opaque for its intended educational level?

Is this description or argument unnecessarily opaque even to educated people?

"Dirac test" (communication question 03)

QID references

P200 rating / communication rating level

color swatch references

quantum mechanics

Property data type

item

instance of

communication rating level

Prototype notes

• Is this description or argument unnecessarily opaque for its intended educational level? ("Dirac test")
  • A question for judging videos literally aimed at physics professors. It's possible for a scientific hypothesis to be aimed at a very high level and still be unintelligible to highly educated people who are new to the field.
  • Also applies to "ontological spaghetti" where someone like Žižek presents a model that is completely incomprehensible to any human being at first sight.
• Would this description or argument look unnecessarily opaque to a college-educated person? ("Bachelor test")