Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q618-ManifestDestinyArgument

Main entry

618. Q618/Q618 manifest destiny argument (general) -> the motif of any argument that a large empire conquering smaller kingdoms or nations is so inevitable you should have supported it at the time, to limit the amount of suffering involved, or for any other stated reason.
     it seems that a huge wedge of United States culture and discourse revolves around these, either supporting them or attempting to oppose them. usually badly attempting to oppose them because nobody actually understands what history, Materialism, or determinism really are. you'll see why below.

Related

618. Q618/Q618 Fukuyama made a manifest destiny argument -> let's lay out the facts from a Materialist point of view. in the period of westward expansion, a manifest destiny argument was that the U.S. empire would surely reach the other side no matter what other civilizations were in the middle; the topic of the original manifest destiny argument was the emerging United States empire as a whole. starting in the 1960s, the United States began to assume that it could crush Cuba and expand United States Liberal-republicanism over it starting by filling it back up with foreign businesses. the argument is rather transparent. by the United States' own arguments, the distinctive things about the United States lie inside free-floating businesses, and Cuba will surely fill up with freedom not due to a constitution or anything but because all the United States' freedom comes from a sea of businesess washing over both the United States and Cuba. the statement that the United States will overcome Cuba is a statement about the overall United States empire, defined in terms of the United States' small-scale elements that extend over several countries. but it's a statement about a named empire; the United States never says "it would be great if France overcame Cuba and then destroyed the United States". so in practice, saying the United States will collapse Dengism in Cuba is a statement that the United States empire in particular will surely expand over Cuba, and it doesn't actually matter if anybody puts that statement euphemistically and starts talking about abstract Ideals or a few specific businesses, because the euphemisms are just to make the concrete struggle for the United States to conquer Cuba more palatable. when Fukuyama describes "the end of history", he condones this entire thing, and doesn't separate himself from it. this is the new Manifest Destiny. there's also Palestine, but that's just a less sophisticated version where Israel-United-States says Palestinians are 'criminals' just like the founders of Cuba supposedly are and there goes the manifest destiny argument for Israel.

Wavebuilder combinations

[P] (pronounced P:) Wavebuilder (pronounced Wave-builder): forms result [Item]

Fukuyama made a manifest destiny argument (📥 (pronounced proposed) / MX)1:-1:-1

along with [Item]

S–618 (pronounced 618. (S))[LR] [S] (pronounced (L.R.) (S):) LR ⧼hue-ins-domain-spacer/⧽manifest destiny argument (📥 (pronounced proposed) / LR)1:-1:-1

forming from [Item]

S–618 (pronounced 618. (S))[LR] [S] (pronounced (L.R.) (S):) LR ⧼hue-ins-domain-spacer/⧽manifest destiny argument (📥 (pronounced proposed) / LR)1:-1:-1

S–618 (pronounced 618. (S))[LR] [S] (pronounced (L.R.) (S):) LR ⧼hue-ins-domain-spacer/⧽The end of history and the last man (📥 (pronounced proposed) / LR)1:-1:-1

Fukuyama made a manifest destiny argument (📥 (pronounced proposed) / MX)1:-1:-1

Ideologies or fields

618. Q618/Q618 LR (pronounced L-R) / Liberal-republicanism