Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q53,71: Difference between revisions
Appearance
This is a republic, not a democracy / I helped launch protogens, so I am not subject to the protogen rules |
m put steel rule at top |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{NextNineThousand|PPPA=statement from D'Souza or Stalin|User=RD|E= | {{NextNineThousand|PPPA=statement from D'Souza or Stalin|User=RD|E=Q53,71|Contents=y}} | ||
== Main entries == | == Main entries == | ||
{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean"> | {{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean"> | ||
{{li|start=y|I=S0/PT|Q=28,84|Q2=2884}}statement that could have been said by either D'Souza or Stalin | |||
{{li|start=y|I=S2/Zv|tradition=MX onto Zv, ES|Q=53,71|Q2=5371|h4= steel rule }} ([[EC:9k/RD/Q618-PeriodicTableOfRules|new metallic rule]]) / Stalin mirrors your actions / Do what Stalin should do (steel inverse) / Do not do what you would not want Stalin to do / Do not have rules or policies in government or socioeconomic institutions that you would not want Stalin's government to have (ethics) / The United States was justified to win the Cold war because it was nothing like Stalin's government (sense) -><br/> | |||
I was always implicitly told before about the age of 18 that the United States won the Cold War because it followed this rule. but as I got older and saw how often it was broken I realized that that statement was almost totally false. | |||
{{li|I=S0/PT|Q=28,84|Q2=2884}}statement that could have been said by either D'Souza or Stalin | |||
{{li|I=M3/MX|Q=29,22|Q2=2922}}Would this statement have a worse connotation coming out of Stalin's government? (question) / thing that would sound different coming out of Stalin's government (motif) | {{li|I=M3/MX|Q=29,22|Q2=2922}}Would this statement have a worse connotation coming out of Stalin's government? (question) / thing that would sound different coming out of Stalin's government (motif) | ||
| Line 21: | Line 25: | ||
{{li|start=y|I=S2/LR|Q=618|Q2=618|h4= This is not a democracy }} / This is a republic, this is not a democracy -> Stalin would not tell you a republic is not a democracy, because for one thing, that would imply he makes all the rules. | {{li|start=y|I=S2/LR|Q=618|Q2=618|h4= This is not a democracy }} / This is a republic, this is not a democracy -> Stalin would not tell you a republic is not a democracy, because for one thing, that would imply he makes all the rules. | ||
{{li|I=S2/ | {{li|I=S2/ES|Q=12,0,93|Q2=12093|h4= No one watches the founders }} / I helped launch protogens, so I am not subject to the protogen rules / ({{9k|RD/Q12,0,94}}) -> I helped found the Soviet Union, so I am exempt from the Communist Party rules. can you see why some people's response would be "that's not how rules work, rules apply to everybody"? ... | ||
{{li|I=S1/ES|Q=55,71|Q2=5571|h4= there's no "I" in team }} -> a proposition everyone has heard, and yet if they heard it out of Stalin or Mao they'd be terrified. even though in practice it wouldn't be any different.<br /> | |||
this + Would this have a worse connotation coming out of Stalin's government? = bad in blue or orange, good in red | |||
{{li|I=S2/ | {{li|I=S2/LR|Q=618}}Ask what you can do for your country / Ask not what your country can do for you — ask what you can do for your country (John F. Kennedy) / We shall pay any price to assure the success of liberty / ({{9k|RD/Q618-YouMustServeFreedom}}) -> this one is a little subjective. if you're a Communist this would sound {{em|better}} coming out of Stalin. for everyone else, it's horrifying.<br/> | ||
this one only gets crazier when you add in other lines from the speech, doesn't it. {{i|[Stalin's government locks up tens of thousands of Trotskyites]}} Stalin: we shall pay any price to assure the success of liberty<br/> | |||
it's almost a little contradictory. it gets at that central contradiction between Marxism having a definition of freedom, such as freeing a country from first world control, or creating a better world that doesn't waste labor ('freedom from necessity'), and then people inside the country getting upset when the government actually acts to protect its central objectives. some of them for the wrong reasons. Trotsky alone is allowed to object because he can claim to be creating Bolshevism over again, so at least he can claim to be protecting the same central objectives a different way. | |||
</li></ol> | |||
== Statements that would sound better coming out of Stalin == | |||
<ol class="hue clean"> | |||
{{li|start=y|I=S2/ML|Q=618|Q2=618|h4= Voting doesn't create rights }} / If the government were the arbiter of our rights, then it could take them away / Bourgeois representatives cannot create human rights; this is to imply that only getting rid of capitalism can create rights (sense) / ({{9k|RD/Q618-GodGivenRights}}) -> there really isn't enough space in the character limit for outward proposition labels to fully clarify why this is a "good" remark for Stalin. it's the notion that bourgeois democracy doesn't actually create any meaningful rule by the people but Marxism at least {{em|opens up the possibility}} to probe what is wrong with society and how to get rid of capitalism and create a better society. pretty amazing compared with Bishop Robert Barron's appeal to rights literally coming from God. | |||
{{li|I=S2/ML|tradition=|Q=618|h4= Ask what you can do for your country }} / Ask not what your country can do for you — ask what you can do for your country -> this is disgusting within the full context of the original speech, because it was pretty much going for a full-on 1991 event and the destruction of Third World national independence. but in context of defending the Soviet Union it's not so bad. | |||
</li></ol> | </li></ol> | ||
| Line 33: | Line 51: | ||
== Ideologies or fields == | == Ideologies or fields == | ||
<ol class="hue clean terse field_exstruct"> | |||
{{li|start=y | |||
|I=S1/MX|Q=618|Q2=618}}{{TTS|MX|meta-}} / meta-Marxism | |||
{{li|I=Z1/PT|Q=618|Q2=618}}{{TTS|PT}} / Toryism | |||
{{li|I=S1/LR/PT|Q=618|Q2=618}}{{TTS|LR|L-R}} / right-Liberalism | |||
{{li|I=Z1/MN|Q=618|Q2=618}}{{TTS|MN|M.N.}} / Lenin | |||
{{li|I=Z1/ML|Q=618|Q2=618}}{{TTS|ML|M-L}} / Stalin's Marxism | |||
{{li|I=S1/Zv|Q=618|Q2=618}}{{TTS|Zv|Ziv}} / anti-Stalinism | |||
{{li|I=Z1/Fy|Q=618|Q2=618}}{{TTS|Fy|Fandoms}} / furry fandom | |||
</li></ol> | |||
== Full title for bookmarks (optional) == | == Full title for bookmarks (optional) == | ||
<pre>[9k] statement from D'Souza or Stalin - Q28,84 ; | <pre>[9k] statement from D'Souza or Stalin - Q28,84 ; thing that would sound different or worse coming out of Stalin's government</pre> | ||
[[Category:Next nine thousand (RD)]] <!-- page ends here. TTS-unfriendly numbers incoming | [[Category:Next nine thousand (RD)]] <!-- page ends here. TTS-unfriendly numbers incoming | ||
redirects: [[User:RD/9k/Q2884]] [[User:RD/9k/Q2922]] | redirects or titles: [[Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q53,71]] [[EC:9k/RD/Q28,84]] [[User:RD/9k/Q2884]] [[User:RD/9k/Q2922]] | ||
duplication hint: copy markup from [[Special:PermanentLink/ | duplication hint: copy markup from [[Special:PermanentLink/NNNNN|Q53,71]] --> | ||
Latest revision as of 11:36, 9 August 2026
Main entries
steel rule
(new metallic rule) / Stalin mirrors your actions / Do what Stalin should do (steel inverse) / Do not do what you would not want Stalin to do / Do not have rules or policies in government or socioeconomic institutions that you would not want Stalin's government to have (ethics) / The United States was justified to win the Cold war because it was nothing like Stalin's government (sense) ->
I was always implicitly told before about the age of 18 that the United States won the Cold War because it followed this rule. but as I got older and saw how often it was broken I realized that that statement was almost totally false.
- statement that could have been said by either D'Souza or Stalin
- Would this statement have a worse connotation coming out of Stalin's government? (question) / thing that would sound different coming out of Stalin's government (motif)
Statements literally said by both Tories and Stalin
- Wealth gets rid of poverty / to each according to his work (Toryism)
- to each according to his work (Lenin)
Statements that would sound worse coming out of Stalin
This is not a democracy
/ This is a republic, this is not a democracy -> Stalin would not tell you a republic is not a democracy, because for one thing, that would imply he makes all the rules.No one watches the founders
/ I helped launch protogens, so I am not subject to the protogen rules / (9k) -> I helped found the Soviet Union, so I am exempt from the Communist Party rules. can you see why some people's response would be "that's not how rules work, rules apply to everybody"? ...there's no "I" in team
-> a proposition everyone has heard, and yet if they heard it out of Stalin or Mao they'd be terrified. even though in practice it wouldn't be any different.
this + Would this have a worse connotation coming out of Stalin's government? = bad in blue or orange, good in red
- Ask what you can do for your country / Ask not what your country can do for you — ask what you can do for your country (John F. Kennedy) / We shall pay any price to assure the success of liberty / (9k) -> this one is a little subjective. if you're a Communist this would sound better coming out of Stalin. for everyone else, it's horrifying.
this one only gets crazier when you add in other lines from the speech, doesn't it. [Stalin's government locks up tens of thousands of Trotskyites] Stalin: we shall pay any price to assure the success of liberty
it's almost a little contradictory. it gets at that central contradiction between Marxism having a definition of freedom, such as freeing a country from first world control, or creating a better world that doesn't waste labor ('freedom from necessity'), and then people inside the country getting upset when the government actually acts to protect its central objectives. some of them for the wrong reasons. Trotsky alone is allowed to object because he can claim to be creating Bolshevism over again, so at least he can claim to be protecting the same central objectives a different way.
Statements that would sound better coming out of Stalin
Voting doesn't create rights
/ If the government were the arbiter of our rights, then it could take them away / Bourgeois representatives cannot create human rights; this is to imply that only getting rid of capitalism can create rights (sense) / (9k) -> there really isn't enough space in the character limit for outward proposition labels to fully clarify why this is a "good" remark for Stalin. it's the notion that bourgeois democracy doesn't actually create any meaningful rule by the people but Marxism at least opens up the possibility to probe what is wrong with society and how to get rid of capitalism and create a better society. pretty amazing compared with Bishop Robert Barron's appeal to rights literally coming from God.Ask what you can do for your country
/ Ask not what your country can do for you — ask what you can do for your country -> this is disgusting within the full context of the original speech, because it was pretty much going for a full-on 1991 event and the destruction of Third World national independence. but in context of defending the Soviet Union it's not so bad.
Related
Ideologies or fields
- / meta-Marxism
- PT / Toryism
- / right-Liberalism
- / Lenin
- / Stalin's Marxism
- / anti-Stalinism
- / furry fandom
Full title for bookmarks (optional)
[9k] statement from D'Souza or Stalin - Q28,84 ; thing that would sound different or worse coming out of Stalin's government