Jump to content

Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q51,19: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From LithoGraphica
Reversedragon (talk | contribs)
Bureaucrats, Conference pass, Interface administrators, Arts-aligned editors, Crimson-aligned editors, Violet-aligned editors, Administrators
16,694 edits
copy markup from Q51,08
 
Reversedragon (talk | contribs)
Bureaucrats, Conference pass, Interface administrators, Arts-aligned editors, Crimson-aligned editors, Violet-aligned editors, Administrators
16,694 edits
m Reversedragon moved page Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q5119 to Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q51,19: Moving numbered Item to TTS-pronounceable title
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 11:38, 9 August 2026

Main entry

  1. Sapir-Whorf hypothesis [1]

Related

  1. Speakers of the Hopi language do not distinguish past and present events
    Sapir-Whorf hypothesis + Hopi people = this.
    this + Japan = Japanese speakers do not think about the future.
  2. Japanese speakers do not think about the future; the non-past tense means that present and future events actually happen at the same time -> this is what that study on the Hopi language sounded like to me. with the Japanese language you see that the information of when something happened is just encoded into other words in the sentence. so I'm going to take a wild guess and guess that the Hopi language in fact operates about the same.
    this + ?? = Language does not put serious limitations on how people conceptualize time.
  3. Language does not put serious limitations on how people conceptualize time

Ideologies or fields

  1. pronounced Hass / linguistics
Retrieved from "https://research.moraleconomy.au/index.php?title=Ontology_talk:9k/RD/Q51,19&oldid=44926"