Jump to content

Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q44,36: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From LithoGraphica
← Older editNewer edit →
Reversedragon (talk | contribs)
Bureaucrats, Conference pass, Interface administrators, Arts-aligned editors, Crimson-aligned editors, Violet-aligned editors, Administrators
17,072 edits
m Trotsky changed his name to Sedov for citizenship reasons
Reversedragon (talk | contribs)
Bureaucrats, Conference pass, Interface administrators, Arts-aligned editors, Crimson-aligned editors, Violet-aligned editors, Administrators
17,072 edits
Stalin arrests and shoots the children of his opponents ... under false accusations [dubious]
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean  {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ML}}"><!-- inactive:  {{int:hue-ixn-classname-DFy}} -->
{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean  {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ML}}"><!-- inactive:  {{int:hue-ixn-classname-DFy}} -->


{{li|start=y||I=S2/IV|Q=44,36|Q2=4436|h4= Laws don't apply to Lev Sedov }} / No laws apply to Lev Sedov / Trotsky has exclusive privileges to kill people that nobody else has including Stalin, {{em|as long as nobody else ever finds out he did it}}; Trotsky or any other member of the 1930s Trotskyite conspiracy is {{em|radically}} innocent until proven guilty, to the point that as long as enough people subjectively think he's innocent he is entitled to dismantle entire legal systems and governments and definitions of treason and definitions of terrorism as long as nobody notices before he's finished / You are exempt from all laws and moral dictates if your name is [[E:Trotsky changed his name to Sedov for citizenship reasons|Lev Sedov]]  -><br/>
{{li|start=y|I=S2/IV|Q=44,36|Q2=4436|h4= Laws don't apply to Lev Sedov }}
{{li|I=S2/ML|Q=44,36|Q2=4436}}Laws don't apply to Lev Sedov / No laws apply to Lev Sedov / Trotsky has exclusive privileges to kill people that nobody else has including Stalin<ref group="error" name="a"/>, {{em|as long as nobody else ever finds out he did it}}; Trotsky or any other member of <del>the 1930s Trotskyite conspiracy</del><ref group="error" name="b"/> the Left Opposition and its allies is {{em|radically}} innocent until proven guilty, to the point that as long as enough people subjectively think he's innocent<ref group="error" name="c"/> he is entitled to dismantle entire legal systems and governments and definitions of treason and definitions of terrorism<ref group="error" name="a"/> as long as nobody notices before he's finished / You are exempt from all laws and moral dictates if your name is [[E:Trotsky changed his name to Sedov for citizenship reasons|Lev Sedov]]  -><br/>
it really disturbs me to what extent everything that happens in the United States is all about morality and holding every single individual to the same standards even across situations that really should be different, and yet somehow, Trotsky is the only exception to all of it, and he gets to do whatever he wants as long as most people across the world agree he never did it. that makes absolutely no logical sense in any way and the last tiny fragment of me that can comprehend Enlightenment rationalism on any level at all is furious about it.
it really disturbs me to what extent everything that happens in the United States is all about morality and holding every single individual to the same standards even across situations that really should be different, and yet somehow, Trotsky is the only exception to all of it, and he gets to do whatever he wants as long as most people across the world agree he never did it. that makes absolutely no logical sense in any way and the last tiny fragment of me that can comprehend Enlightenment rationalism on any level at all is furious about it.
{{li|I=S2/MX|Q=44,36|Q2=4436}}Laws don't apply to Lev Sedov  ->  okay let's try this again. I think I was legitimately trying to describe something but, yeah, I totally fumbled what the actual claims of Trotskyism were.
{{li|I=S2/IV|Q=44,36|Q2=4436}}Laws don't apply to Lev Sedov / If Trotsky can build a case within his group of allies that they are the real Communist party and Stalin's party is not, then a [[E:political revolution (Menshevism onto Marxism)|political revolution]] begins at him effective immediately and he has exclusive privileges to kill people that nobody else has including Stalin, which are active specifically {{em|as long as nobody else ever finds out he did it}}; Trotsky or any other member of the Left Opposition and its allies — Grigori Zinoviev, Lev Sedov, whoever may or may not be contributing — is {{em|radically}} innocent until proven guilty, to the point that as long as enough people subjectively think that Stalin's claim to being a valid Communist party with a valid state cannot be proven he is entitled to dismantle entire legal systems and governments and definitions of treason and definitions of terrorism as long as nobody notices before he's finished  -><br/>
the idea here was supposed to be that early Trotskyism is taking a huge leap in declaring itself the only valid government, and it's worth asking how they can possibly know that. this isn't to say there aren't answers to the question. as well, if he successfully lands the argument that he {{em|is}} the only valid proletarian revolution, well, as shocking as this claim might sound it's not even bad.


</li></ol>
</li></ol>
Line 11: Line 17:
<ol class="hue clean  {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ML}}">
<ol class="hue clean  {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ML}}">


{{li|start=y|I=S2/IV|tradition=|Q=41,41|Q2=4141}}Trotsky changed his name to Sedov for citizenship reasons [https://www.reddit.com/r/AskARussian/comments/18c5gne/trotskys_son_naming/] [https://trotskyana.net/Leon_Trotsky/Genealogy/genealogy.htm]  ->  mostly just a funny little bit of trivia about the notoriously bad Russian passport system that remained notoriously bad into the time of the Soviet Union. (quite literally, the Bolsheviks took advantage of the bad passport system of the Russian Empire, and then the Trotskyite conspirators did it again.) but sometimes it comes up when pondering the weird little question of whether Trotsky and his son Lev Sedov technically have the exact same name. I just cannot get over that, that he would always act like it doesn't matter if he's arrogant if he's correct, but he and his son have the same name.
{{li|start=y|I=S2/IV|tradition=|Q=41,41|Q2=4141}}Trotsky changed his name to Sedov for citizenship reasons [https://www.reddit.com/r/AskARussian/comments/18c5gne/trotskys_son_naming/] [https://trotskyana.net/Leon_Trotsky/Genealogy/genealogy.htm]  ->  mostly just a funny little bit of trivia about the notoriously bad Russian passport system that remained notoriously bad into the time of the Soviet Union. (quite literally, the Bolsheviks took advantage of the bad passport system of the Russian Empire, and then the <del>Trotskyite conspirators</del> Trotskyist allies that came out of Germany etc. did it again.) but sometimes it comes up when pondering the weird little question of whether Trotsky and his son Lev Sedov technically have the exact same name. I just cannot get over that, that he would always act like it doesn't matter if he's arrogant if he's correct, but he and his son have the same name.


{{li|I=F2/IV|Q=436|Q2=436|h4= Trotsky was framed }} / The 1930s Trotskyite conspiracy never happened / Trotsky was framed / Lev Sedov was framed / Zinoviev was framed / Emmanuel Goldstein was framed (fiction) / Snowball was framed (fiction)  ->  this is one of those statements that's so centrally important to world history that it's fine for the main sense of the Item to be in the negative instead of the positive.<br/>
{{li|I=F2/IV|Q=436|Q2=436|h4= Trotsky was framed }} / The 1930s Trotskyite conspiracy never happened / Trotsky was framed / Lev Sedov was framed / Zinoviev was framed / Emmanuel Goldstein was framed (fiction) / Snowball was framed (fiction)  ->  this is one of those statements that's so centrally important to world history that it's fine for the main sense of the Item to be in the negative instead of the positive.<br/>
yeah, no.... this proposition is {{em|so}} important I'm putting it in the first 1,000 where usually only basic stuff like physics and mathematics went.
yeah, no.... this proposition is {{em|so}} important I'm putting it in the first 1,000 where usually only basic stuff like physics and mathematics went.
{{li|I=Z1/IV|Q=618|Q2=618}}{{article|Their Morals and Ours}} (Trotsky 1938) [https://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/1938/morals/morals.htm]  ->  a key article to look back on when discussing or explaining this proposition.
{{li|I=S2/IV|Q=436|Q2=436}}Stalin arrests and shoots the children of his opponents after these opponents have been themselves executed under false accusations [https://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/1938/morals/morals.htm]  -><br/>
Trotsky, you are not slick putting this directly after a section about how lies are a necessary weapon of war. that is like the biggest freudian slip ever.<br/>
the specific charges might be wrong, but if Stalin got them they probably did {{em|something}}. you know, as part of the underground Trotskyist operation. the potential revolution. I don't call it a conspiracy any more. but now that we're past about 1953, I do think people need to stop lying about it.


</li></ol>
</li></ol>
Line 21: Line 33:
<ol class="hue clean terse  {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ML}}">
<ol class="hue clean terse  {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ML}}">
{{li|start=y
{{li|start=y
     |I=Z1/IV|Q=41,04|Q2=4104}}{{TTS|IV|Fourth}} / Trotskyism
     |I=Z1/IV |Q=41,04|Q2=4104}}{{TTS|IV|Fourth}} / Trotskyism
{{li|I=Z1/ML |Q=40,01 |Q2=4001}}{{TTS|ML|M-L}} / [[EC:9k/RD/Q4000|Stalinism]] (Soviet Union)
{{li|I=Z1/ML |Q=40,01|Q2=4001}}{{TTS|ML|M-L}} / [[EC:9k/RD/Q4000|Stalinism]] (Soviet Union)
{{li|I=Z1/ML |Q=41,03 |Q2=4103}}{{TTS|ML|M-L}} / Stalin's Marxism (2020s)
{{li|I=Z1/ML |Q=41,03|Q2=4103}}{{TTS|ML|M-L}} / Stalin's Marxism (2020s)
</li></ol>
</li></ol>
<!--
<!--
Line 38: Line 50:
* {{nickel/silent}} [[Research talk:5c/|]]
* {{nickel/silent}} [[Research talk:5c/|]]
-->
-->
== Errors ==
<references group="error">
<ref name="a">Note: in the situation that it can be proved that Trotskyists are leading a coherent revolution against older forms of society this goes from being an "error in Trotskyism" to just an interesting observation and a casual description of what revolution is.</ref>
<ref name="b">"Trotskyite conspiracy" implies that the Left Opposition had no unique new political content. In actuality, it had the theory of permanent revolution.</ref>
<ref name="c">Trotsky was relatively unpopular in the Soviet Union. This, ironically, actually stands against the model that he was leading a popular movement of non-proletarians who didn't understand Marxism, and leaves open the possibility that he was unpopular because he defended correct models that nobody understood.</ref>
</references><!--
<ref group="error" name="a"/> -->




Revision as of 05:00, 20 August 2026

Main entry

  1. Laws don't apply to Lev Sedov

  2. Laws don't apply to Lev Sedov / No laws apply to Lev Sedov / Trotsky has exclusive privileges to kill people that nobody else has including Stalin[error 1], as long as nobody else ever finds out he did it; Trotsky or any other member of the 1930s Trotskyite conspiracy[error 2] the Left Opposition and its allies is radically innocent until proven guilty, to the point that as long as enough people subjectively think he's innocent[error 3] he is entitled to dismantle entire legal systems and governments and definitions of treason and definitions of terrorism[error 1] as long as nobody notices before he's finished / You are exempt from all laws and moral dictates if your name is Lev Sedov ->
    it really disturbs me to what extent everything that happens in the United States is all about morality and holding every single individual to the same standards even across situations that really should be different, and yet somehow, Trotsky is the only exception to all of it, and he gets to do whatever he wants as long as most people across the world agree he never did it. that makes absolutely no logical sense in any way and the last tiny fragment of me that can comprehend Enlightenment rationalism on any level at all is furious about it.
  3. Laws don't apply to Lev Sedov -> okay let's try this again. I think I was legitimately trying to describe something but, yeah, I totally fumbled what the actual claims of Trotskyism were.
  4. Laws don't apply to Lev Sedov / If Trotsky can build a case within his group of allies that they are the real Communist party and Stalin's party is not, then a political revolution begins at him effective immediately and he has exclusive privileges to kill people that nobody else has including Stalin, which are active specifically as long as nobody else ever finds out he did it; Trotsky or any other member of the Left Opposition and its allies — Grigori Zinoviev, Lev Sedov, whoever may or may not be contributing — is radically innocent until proven guilty, to the point that as long as enough people subjectively think that Stalin's claim to being a valid Communist party with a valid state cannot be proven he is entitled to dismantle entire legal systems and governments and definitions of treason and definitions of terrorism as long as nobody notices before he's finished ->
    the idea here was supposed to be that early Trotskyism is taking a huge leap in declaring itself the only valid government, and it's worth asking how they can possibly know that. this isn't to say there aren't answers to the question. as well, if he successfully lands the argument that he is the only valid proletarian revolution, well, as shocking as this claim might sound it's not even bad.

Related

  1. Trotsky changed his name to Sedov for citizenship reasons [1] [2] -> mostly just a funny little bit of trivia about the notoriously bad Russian passport system that remained notoriously bad into the time of the Soviet Union. (quite literally, the Bolsheviks took advantage of the bad passport system of the Russian Empire, and then the Trotskyite conspirators Trotskyist allies that came out of Germany etc. did it again.) but sometimes it comes up when pondering the weird little question of whether Trotsky and his son Lev Sedov technically have the exact same name. I just cannot get over that, that he would always act like it doesn't matter if he's arrogant if he's correct, but he and his son have the same name.

  2. Trotsky was framed

    / The 1930s Trotskyite conspiracy never happened / Trotsky was framed / Lev Sedov was framed / Zinoviev was framed / Emmanuel Goldstein was framed (fiction) / Snowball was framed (fiction) -> this is one of those statements that's so centrally important to world history that it's fine for the main sense of the Item to be in the negative instead of the positive.

    yeah, no.... this proposition is so important I'm putting it in the first 1,000 where usually only basic stuff like physics and mathematics went.

  3. Their Morals and Ours (Trotsky 1938) [3] -> a key article to look back on when discussing or explaining this proposition.
  4. Stalin arrests and shoots the children of his opponents after these opponents have been themselves executed under false accusations [4] ->
    Trotsky, you are not slick putting this directly after a section about how lies are a necessary weapon of war. that is like the biggest freudian slip ever.
    the specific charges might be wrong, but if Stalin got them they probably did something. you know, as part of the underground Trotskyist operation. the potential revolution. I don't call it a conspiracy any more. but now that we're past about 1953, I do think people need to stop lying about it.

Ideologies or fields

  1. pronounced Fourth / Trotskyism
  2. pronounced M-L / Stalinism (Soviet Union)
  3. pronounced M-L / Stalin's Marxism (2020s)

Subpages or related scraps

Errors

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 Note: in the situation that it can be proved that Trotskyists are leading a coherent revolution against older forms of society this goes from being an "error in Trotskyism" to just an interesting observation and a casual description of what revolution is.
  2. ↑ "Trotskyite conspiracy" implies that the Left Opposition had no unique new political content. In actuality, it had the theory of permanent revolution.
  3. ↑ Trotsky was relatively unpopular in the Soviet Union. This, ironically, actually stands against the model that he was leading a popular movement of non-proletarians who didn't understand Marxism, and leaves open the possibility that he was unpopular because he defended correct models that nobody understood.
Retrieved from "https://research.moraleconomy.au/index.php?title=Ontology_talk:9k/RD/Q44,36&oldid=45328"