Ontology:Q2100

1. countable area of capitalism1:-1:-1

Characteristics in draft

Properties

item type

Z01:-1:-1

label (en)

countable area of capitalism1:-1:-1

alias (en)

countable area of business territories

countable area of bourgeois subpopulations comprising capitalist population

QID (pronounced Q.I.D.) references [Item]1:-1:-1

S2–617 (pronounced 617. (S2))[ML] [S2] (pronounced (Template:TradTTS) (S2):) ML (pronounced Template:TradTTS) ⧼hue-ins-domain-spacer/⧽Political economy remains a science until the proletariat bursts out1:-1:-1

color swatch references [Item]

right-Liberalism

subset of

--

instance of

--

superset of

--

consists of components [Item]

--

Wavebuilder combinations

[P] (pronounced P:) Wavebuilder (pronounced Wave-builder): forms result [Item]

S2–617 (pronounced 617. (S2))[ML] [S2] (pronounced (Template:TradTTS) (S2):) ML (pronounced Template:TradTTS) ⧼hue-ins-domain-spacer/⧽Political economy remains a science until the proletariat bursts out1:-1:-1

along with [Item]

false consciousness

Usage notes

Capitalism as a countable object. This may take the form of a country full of capitalism, some subdivision of a country, or perhaps an international structure spanning multiple countries. In real life, it may be a non-trivial task to try to pin down where one physical area of capitalism ends and another one begins, or even a nearly impossible task. Don't worry about this too deeply. This entry is meant to be something of an abstract pattern used to define specific instances of things that are areas of capitalism as part of what they are, or to define more complex concepts which can describe things more accurately.

Is capitalism a population? Is the United States truly "an instance of capitalism" contained in a population, or is capitalism the act of tying together multiple countries? Look to proposition and question entries to deliver on this question properly.