User:RD/9k/Q50,92: Difference between revisions
m Reversedragon moved page User:RD/9k/Q5092 to User:RD/9k/Q50,92: Moving numbered Item to TTS-pronounceable title |
m entropicism |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Ontology entry == | |||
{{HueNumberPreview|E=Q50,92}} | {{HueNumberPreview|E=Q50,92}} | ||
== Prototype notes == | |||
<noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol class="hue clean"> | <noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol class="hue clean"> | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
entropicism can be compared to nihilism in that nihilism always has a sort of "floor with a hole in it" where you sit with nihilism for a while and then you fall through the floor and land on an actual interpretation of how to apply nihilism when you have to keep physically existing anyway. entropicism is one of these possible "true floors" you could land on. {{em|technically}} it could be considered a form of nihilism but it's entirely transformed the purpose, substance, and presentation of it to where it's practically an entirely different thing; it's practically turned into "somethingism". | entropicism can be compared to nihilism in that nihilism always has a sort of "floor with a hole in it" where you sit with nihilism for a while and then you fall through the floor and land on an actual interpretation of how to apply nihilism when you have to keep physically existing anyway. entropicism is one of these possible "true floors" you could land on. {{em|technically}} it could be considered a form of nihilism but it's entirely transformed the purpose, substance, and presentation of it to where it's practically an entirely different thing; it's practically turned into "somethingism". | ||
</li></ol> | </li></ol> | ||
== | == Related == | ||
<ol class="hue clean"> | <ol class="hue clean"> | ||
< | |||
<li class="field_mdem" value="618" data-dimension="S2">Waiting for people to die is as bad as hatred -> there is this really huge contradiction in the way everyone defines prejudices in the United States. normal people believe that every bad thing comes from prejudices. it's bad to be prejudiced. but for some reason it's okay [...] to say things like "when the boomers die out", although logically that should be a prejudiced statement because you don't want them to exist or physically live. [...]<br /> | |||
it genuinely doesn't make sense to comprehend tolerance through individual freedom, because to truly tolerate someone not just where you're hiding your hatred but at the level where you could become friends is to overwrite and destroy individual identity and freedom, and the only question is whether this is a good thing. I think there's a decent argument to be made that it is, but it is nothing like [[:Category:Existentialist-Structuralist tradition ontology|Existentialism]] and the way that everybody ever tries to comprehend freedom and The Subject. this is a new philosophy I have no name for. I already named entropicism. maybe I should name this one too. this is, uh... the ego-death philosophy of tolerance and friendship, I don't know how to make that snappy. this is the philosophy where instead of Twilight Sparkle and Rainbow Dash being friends and gelling into a team because they're unique different competing individuals who each separately want freedom, Twilight Sparkle and Rainbow Dash are friends because they agree to become each other in part if never in whole and abandon the parts of them that are harmful to them being friends. [...] just imagine if there was an episode where a Pony was getting mocked and bullied in Ponyville or one of the main locations but it was because they were too much of a free individual to stay in Totally Not Eastern Europe; their own greedy individuality [[E:The Soviet diaspora was a second Trail of Tears|left them with nothing and turned them into a minority somewhere else]] constantly getting picked on by others. [...] | |||
</li></ol> | |||
Latest revision as of 01:06, 29 December 2025
Ontology entry[edit]
- entropicism (meta-Marxism)1
-1-1
Prototype notes[edit]
- entropicism -> the motif of a philosophy of meaning where individuals are not asked or obligated to look for meaning to their lives, they don't even have the task of looking for meaning, because all material processes have a limited form of inherent meaning that exists within their causes, results, and relationships to other processes. the entropicist position does not assert that particular models or outcomes that relate things to causes and effects are the most important ones, it only says that reality, history, and the search for happiness in life are generally about outward cause and effect rather than inward choices as they would be within early-existentialist philosophy. this means that two different Marxisms (and two more anarchisms) could exist all interpreting material reality to find meaning and none could be inherently the most correct meaning of existence yet all of them could be valid, in the sense that they are operational and each possible to make use of to each create societies all existing in plurality.
entropicism can be compared to nihilism in that nihilism always has a sort of "floor with a hole in it" where you sit with nihilism for a while and then you fall through the floor and land on an actual interpretation of how to apply nihilism when you have to keep physically existing anyway. entropicism is one of these possible "true floors" you could land on. technically it could be considered a form of nihilism but it's entirely transformed the purpose, substance, and presentation of it to where it's practically an entirely different thing; it's practically turned into "somethingism".
Related[edit]
- Waiting for people to die is as bad as hatred -> there is this really huge contradiction in the way everyone defines prejudices in the United States. normal people believe that every bad thing comes from prejudices. it's bad to be prejudiced. but for some reason it's okay [...] to say things like "when the boomers die out", although logically that should be a prejudiced statement because you don't want them to exist or physically live. [...]
it genuinely doesn't make sense to comprehend tolerance through individual freedom, because to truly tolerate someone not just where you're hiding your hatred but at the level where you could become friends is to overwrite and destroy individual identity and freedom, and the only question is whether this is a good thing. I think there's a decent argument to be made that it is, but it is nothing like Existentialism and the way that everybody ever tries to comprehend freedom and The Subject. this is a new philosophy I have no name for. I already named entropicism. maybe I should name this one too. this is, uh... the ego-death philosophy of tolerance and friendship, I don't know how to make that snappy. this is the philosophy where instead of Twilight Sparkle and Rainbow Dash being friends and gelling into a team because they're unique different competing individuals who each separately want freedom, Twilight Sparkle and Rainbow Dash are friends because they agree to become each other in part if never in whole and abandon the parts of them that are harmful to them being friends. [...] just imagine if there was an episode where a Pony was getting mocked and bullied in Ponyville or one of the main locations but it was because they were too much of a free individual to stay in Totally Not Eastern Europe; their own greedy individuality left them with nothing and turned them into a minority somewhere else constantly getting picked on by others. [...]