Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q17,64: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 00:50, 7 August 2026

Main entry

Fourteenth Amendment (United States) / A Confederate constitution is not legal (Amendment 14) / Black people will not be expelled from the United States population through federal or state law; Congress can block former Confederates from being elected -> If I'm reading this thing right, there's a serious loophole in it that it doesn't really prevent individual towns doing terrible things through force of law.

In relation to Donald Trump (2021/2024)

blocking Donald Trump from taking office using section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment [1] [2]
States can't disqualify a presidential candidate under the Fourteenth Amendment [3] -> United States case law. this is discouraging, but does make some amount of logical sense in its historical context, when the Civil War and Reconstruction were a nationwide effort and such.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-<!-- == Ontology entry ==
+{{NextNineThousand|PPPA=Fourteenth Amendment|E=Q17,64|User=RD|Contents=y}}
-{{HueNumberPreview|E=Q17,64}}
+== Main entry ==
+{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean  {{int:hue-ixn-classname-DFy}}"><!-- active: field_horror -->
--->== Prototype notes ==
+{{li|start=y|I=S2/LR|tradition=|Q=17,64|Q2=1764|serial=14}}Fourteenth Amendment (United States) / A Confederate constitution is not legal (Amendment 14) / Black people will not be expelled from the United States population through federal or state law; Congress can block former Confederates from being elected  ->  If I'm reading this thing right, there's a serious loophole in it that it doesn't really prevent {{em|individual towns}} doing terrible things through force of law.
-<noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol class="hue clean">
-</li><li class="field_exstruct" data-qid="17,64" value="1764" data-dimension="S2" data-serial="14">A Confederate constitution is not legal (Amendment 14) / Black people will not be expelled from the United States population through federal or state law; Congress can block former Confederates from being elected  ->  If I'm reading this thing right, there's a serious loophole in it that it doesn't really prevent {{em|individual towns}} doing terrible things through force of law.
 </li></ol>
 == In relation to Donald Trump (2021/2024) ==
 <ol class="hue clean">
-</li><li class="field_exstruct" data-tradition="ES" value="618" data-dimension="S">blocking Donald Trump from taking office using section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment [https://thehill.com/opinion/congress-blog/5055171-constitution-insurrection-trump-disqualification/] [https://www.politifact.com/article/2024/nov/07/congress-could-try-barring-trump-from-office-under/]
+{{li|start=y|I=S1/LR|tradition=|Q=618|Q2=618}}blocking Donald Trump from taking office using section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment [https://thehill.com/opinion/congress-blog/5055171-constitution-insurrection-trump-disqualification/] [https://www.politifact.com/article/2024/nov/07/congress-could-try-barring-trump-from-office-under/]
-</li><li class="field_exstruct" data-tradition="ES" value="618" data-dimension="S2">States can't disqualify a presidential candidate under the Fourteenth Amendment [https://www.politifact.com/article/2024/nov/07/congress-could-try-barring-trump-from-office-under/]  ->  United States case law. this is discouraging, but does make some amount of historical sense, when the Civil War and Reconstruction were a nationwide effort and such.
+{{li|I=S2/LR|tradition=|Q=618|Q2=618}}States can't disqualify a presidential candidate under the Fourteenth Amendment [https://www.politifact.com/article/2024/nov/07/congress-could-try-barring-trump-from-office-under/]  ->  United States case law. this is discouraging, but does make some amount of logical sense in its historical context, when the Civil War and Reconstruction were a nationwide effort and such.
 </li></ol>