Jump to content

User:RD/9k/Q22,91: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Philosophical Research
copy markup from 9k/Q29,20
 
m Reversedragon moved page User:RD/9k/Q2291 to User:RD/9k/Q22,91: Moving numbered Item to TTS-pronounceable title
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{NextNineThousand|PPPA=Bolshevism is obviously Bad|User=RD|E=Q22,91|Contents=y}}
{{NextNineThousand|PPPA=Bolshevism is obviously Wrong|User=RD|E=Q22,91|Contents=y}}
== Main entry ==
== Main entry ==
<noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol class="hue clean">
<noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol class="hue clean">


<li class="field_exstruct" data-qid="22,91" value="2291" data-dimension="F2">Bolshevism is obviously Bad / Bolshevism is obviously Wrong / It is obvious to normal people that Bolshevism is morally wrong  ->  if the bulk of ordinary people in the Soviet Union can be normal, then this statement is false. at the very least, even if Bolshevism actually were bad, <em>it isn't obvious</em> that that's true. the concept that any moral statement is obvious may be one of the biggest errors any philosopher of ethics has ever made. before we go making any statement about what <em>is</em> right or wrong, the very first thing we must establish is that almost nothing is obvious.
<li class="field_exstruct" data-tradition="LR, ES, A, Zv" data-qid="22,91" value="2291" data-dimension="F2"><h4>Bolshevism is obviously Evil</h4> (Communism; Marxism-Leninism, Trotskyism, Maoism, Deng Xiaoping Thought; wicked; cruel; Bad; morally Wrong; ethical hypothesis) / It is obvious to normal people that Bolshevism is morally wrong  ->  if the bulk of ordinary people in the Soviet Union can be normal, then this statement is false. at the very least, even if Bolshevism actually were bad, <em>it isn't obvious</em> that that's true. the concept that any moral statement is obvious may be one of the biggest errors any philosopher of ethics has ever made. before we go making any statement about what <em>is</em> right or wrong, the very first thing we must establish is that almost nothing is obvious.


</li></ol>
</li></ol>
Line 19: Line 19:
</ol>
</ol>


* (none)
* LR / Liberal-republicanism
* ES / Existentialist-Structuralist tradition
* A / Anarchism
* Zv / "Zinovievism"




Latest revision as of 23:43, 10 February 2026

Main entry[edit]

  1. Bolshevism is obviously Evil

    (Communism; Marxism-Leninism, Trotskyism, Maoism, Deng Xiaoping Thought; wicked; cruel; Bad; morally Wrong; ethical hypothesis) / It is obvious to normal people that Bolshevism is morally wrong -> if the bulk of ordinary people in the Soviet Union can be normal, then this statement is false. at the very least, even if Bolshevism actually were bad, it isn't obvious that that's true. the concept that any moral statement is obvious may be one of the biggest errors any philosopher of ethics has ever made. before we go making any statement about what is right or wrong, the very first thing we must establish is that almost nothing is obvious.

Rationalizations[edit]

Ideology codes[edit]

  • LR / Liberal-republicanism
  • ES / Existentialist-Structuralist tradition
  • A / Anarchism
  • Zv / "Zinovievism"
Retrieved from "https://research.moraleconomy.au/index.php?title=User:RD/9k/Q22,91&oldid=23636"