User:RD/9k/Q28,98: Difference between revisions
copy markup from 9k/Q28,94 |
m numbers / redirects |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{NextNineThousand|PPPA= | {{NextNineThousand|PPPA=meta-Marxism is a concept|User=RD|E=Q28,98|NoContents=y}} | ||
== Main | == Main entries == | ||
<noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol class="hue clean"> | <noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol class="hue clean"> | ||
<li class="field_mdem" data-qid="28,91" value="2891" data-remark="91: Bolshevism is over" data-dimension="S2" data-submitter="R.D.">R.D. has not done meta-Marxism correctly -> pre-emptively creating this so nobody can collapse Q28,98 into being false specifically because <em>R.D. has not allowed</em> meta-Marxism to expand to the point it can practically be more than one person. to falsify Q28,98 you have to prove something which does not pivot around R.D., like that meta-Marxism can never become a science, or can never serve the purposes of being a predictive or explanatory model that it is trying to achieve. | <li class="field_mdem" data-qid="28,98" value="2898" data-dimension="S2" data-submitter="R.D."><h4>meta-Marxism is a concept, not a person</h4> / meta-Marxism is an ontology, not a person / [[User:Reversedragon|R.D.]] is not the only one who can do meta-Marxism -> some people are going to need this reminder. meta-Marxism is a pile of hypotheses and a scientific method (in prototype, at least) by which the hypotheses can self-correct and evolve. the meta-Marxism that adjusts itself to match reality is meta-Marxism.<br/> | ||
if R.D. doesn't update meta-Marxism to be empirically accurate, then R.D. is not a top-tier meta-Marxist. meta-Marxism is an embryonic attempt to create a field of science. one could say this about the original Marxism as well. one could also claim, to varying degrees of success, that Marxism never became a science and always fell back down into the realm of philosophy. that's where meta-Marxism is right now, but if it is successful, it and Marxism will both climb out of the philosophy pit together.</li> | |||
<!-- mediawiki parser or browser bug inserts a big gap here if you don't close the tag properly --> | |||
<li class="field_mdem" data-qid="28,91" value="2891" data-tradition="MX onto MX" data-remark="91: Bolshevism is over" data-dimension="S2" data-submitter="R.D."><h4>R.D. has not done meta-Marxism correctly</h4> -> pre-emptively creating this so nobody can collapse Q28,98 into being false specifically because <em>R.D. has not allowed</em> meta-Marxism to expand to the point it can practically be more than one person. to falsify Q28,98 you have to prove something which does not pivot around R.D., like that meta-Marxism can never become a science, or can never serve the purposes of being a predictive or explanatory model that it is trying to achieve. | |||
</li><li class="field_mdem" data-qid="28,79" value="2879" data-dimension="S2">R.D. has not done meta-Marxism correctly -> move to 28,79 so [[E:Societies operates as one|another proposition]] can have the coveted "91" | |||
</li></ol> | </li></ol> | ||
== Related == | == Related ==<!-- | ||
<ol class="hue clean"> | <ol class="hue clean"> | ||
< | </ol>--> | ||
== Ideology codes == | == Ideology codes == | ||
* | * MX onto MX | ||
[[Category:Next nine thousand (RD)]] <!-- page ends here. TTS-unfriendly numbers incoming | [[Category:Next nine thousand (RD)]] <!-- page ends here. TTS-unfriendly numbers incoming | ||
redirects: [[User:RD/9k/Q2879]] | redirects: [[User:RD/9k/Q2879]] [[User:RD/9k/Q2898]] [[User:RD/9k/Q28,79]] | ||
duplication hint: copy markup from [[Special:PermanentLink/NNNN|9k/Q28, | duplication hint: copy markup from [[Special:PermanentLink/NNNN|9k/Q28,98]] --> | ||
Latest revision as of 07:42, 13 February 2026
Main entries[edit]
meta-Marxism is a concept, not a person
/ meta-Marxism is an ontology, not a person / R.D. is not the only one who can do meta-Marxism -> some people are going to need this reminder. meta-Marxism is a pile of hypotheses and a scientific method (in prototype, at least) by which the hypotheses can self-correct and evolve. the meta-Marxism that adjusts itself to match reality is meta-Marxism.
if R.D. doesn't update meta-Marxism to be empirically accurate, then R.D. is not a top-tier meta-Marxist. meta-Marxism is an embryonic attempt to create a field of science. one could say this about the original Marxism as well. one could also claim, to varying degrees of success, that Marxism never became a science and always fell back down into the realm of philosophy. that's where meta-Marxism is right now, but if it is successful, it and Marxism will both climb out of the philosophy pit together.R.D. has not done meta-Marxism correctly
-> pre-emptively creating this so nobody can collapse Q28,98 into being false specifically because R.D. has not allowed meta-Marxism to expand to the point it can practically be more than one person. to falsify Q28,98 you have to prove something which does not pivot around R.D., like that meta-Marxism can never become a science, or can never serve the purposes of being a predictive or explanatory model that it is trying to achieve.- R.D. has not done meta-Marxism correctly -> move to 28,79 so another proposition can have the coveted "91"
Related[edit]
Ideology codes[edit]
- MX onto MX