Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q32,70: Difference between revisions
copy markup from SquareOfNonAggressiveActivities |
The rights of man come not from the generosity of the state but from the hand of God |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Main entry == | == Main entry == | ||
{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean"> | {{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean"> | ||
{{li|start=y|I=F2/A|tradition=A, ES|Q=32,70|Q2=3270|h4= You are already free }} (anarchism) / Anarchism is acting as if you are already free / Freedom is using individual will to realize Anarchism -> well, here it is. a claim said by anarchists which says the thing I call [[User:RD/9k/Q73|Existentialism]] [political agorism] is one specific form of Anarchism. (found in the context of an interview with David Graeber, who was claimed to be an anarchist at some point in time.) I think this claim is inherently contradictory such that it could not possibly be true. if anarchism is acting as if you are free, some people are already anti-vaccine, anti-immigrant, anti-Islam/anti-atheist Tories before they do that, and then they can do "anarchism" on top of being a Tory. so anarchism would then be a system where half of the population transitions to fascists with a fascist state and half of the population is anarchists and the fascists kill the anarchists (potentially). I think most anarchists would not say fascism is part of any anarchism, so this is not a definition which can actually mark off where anarchism starts and ends. on the other hand, the claim that anarchism generates Liberal-republicanism is more plausible, because nothing rules out Liberal-republicanism being what anarchism looks like in reality, and it doesn't rule out the possibility that anarchism generates Liberalism and Liberalism then generates fascism. | |||
{{li|I=S2/ES|tradition=|Q=32,70|Q2=3270}}The rights of man come not from the generosity of the state but from the hand of God (John F. Kennedy) [https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/president-john-f-kennedys-inaugural-address] | |||
</li></ol> | </li></ol> | ||
Latest revision as of 13:37, 9 June 2026
Main entry
You are already free
(anarchism) / Anarchism is acting as if you are already free / Freedom is using individual will to realize Anarchism -> well, here it is. a claim said by anarchists which says the thing I call Existentialism [political agorism] is one specific form of Anarchism. (found in the context of an interview with David Graeber, who was claimed to be an anarchist at some point in time.) I think this claim is inherently contradictory such that it could not possibly be true. if anarchism is acting as if you are free, some people are already anti-vaccine, anti-immigrant, anti-Islam/anti-atheist Tories before they do that, and then they can do "anarchism" on top of being a Tory. so anarchism would then be a system where half of the population transitions to fascists with a fascist state and half of the population is anarchists and the fascists kill the anarchists (potentially). I think most anarchists would not say fascism is part of any anarchism, so this is not a definition which can actually mark off where anarchism starts and ends. on the other hand, the claim that anarchism generates Liberal-republicanism is more plausible, because nothing rules out Liberal-republicanism being what anarchism looks like in reality, and it doesn't rule out the possibility that anarchism generates Liberalism and Liberalism then generates fascism.- The rights of man come not from the generosity of the state but from the hand of God (John F. Kennedy) [1]