Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q39,91: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

Latest revision as of 01:08, 11 August 2026

Main entry

Our task is to interpret it
/ Philosophers have tried to change the world; our job is to interpret it / Philosophers have only tried to change the world in various ways; our task is to interpret it -> my pet peeve and the absolute heart of most of the E-S tradition

practical-political socialism
/ it is, in essence, a matter of indifference whether the etatisation of all means of production is accepted or rejected as an ultimate aim ... in respect of practical-political socialism, which prefers immediate aims to the distant ones (Schultze-Gävernitz) [1] / realpolitik (generic) ->

sometimes I begin to feel like blue Gramscianism started at Menshevism and there has been an unbroken line from then to now. or even that maybe some of it pre-dates Marx.
something very interesting about this is that if you remove the word "socialism" this sentence almost makes sense as a simple description of Liberal-republicanism. it's tossing the word "socialism" in there that causes the problems. ...wait hang on. let me change this from "S1" to "F1". that is so much better.

Ideologies or fields

pronounced E-S / bourgeois philosophies

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{NextNineThousand|PPPA=Our task is to interpret it|User=RD|E=Q39,91|Contents=y}}
 == Main entry ==
-{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean  {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ES}}"><!-- inactive:  {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ML}} -->
+{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean"><!-- inactive:  {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ES}} {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ML}} -->
-{{li|start=y|I=S2/ES|Q=39,91|Q2=3991}}Our task is to interpret it / [[E:Q3991|Philosophers have tried to change the world; our job is to interpret it]] / Philosophers have only tried to change the world in various ways; our task is to interpret it  ->  my pet peeve and the absolute heart of most of the E-S tradition
+{{li|start=y|I=S2/ES|Q=39,91|Q2=3991|h4= [[E:Q39,91|Our task is to interpret it]] }} / Philosophers have tried to change the world; our job is to interpret it / Philosophers have only tried to change the world in various ways; our task is to interpret it  ->  my pet peeve and the absolute heart of most of the E-S tradition
 <!-- experimental wikitext
@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 == Related ==
-<!--
+<ol class="hue clean">
-<ol class="hue clean  {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ES}}">
-</li></ol> -->
+{{li|start=y|I=F1/LR|Q=39,90|Q2=3990|h4= practical-political socialism }} / it is, in essence, a matter of indifference whether the etatisation of all means of production is accepted or rejected as an ultimate aim ... in respect of practical-political socialism, which prefers immediate aims to the distant ones (Schultze-Gävernitz) [https://www.marxists.org/archive/plekhanov/1898/10/what.htm] / realpolitik (generic)  -><br/>
+sometimes I begin to feel like blue Gramscianism started at Menshevism and there has been an unbroken line from then to now. or even that maybe some of it pre-dates Marx.<br/>
+something very interesting about this is that if you remove the word "socialism" this sentence almost makes sense as a simple description of Liberal-republicanism. it's tossing the word "socialism" in there that causes the problems. ...wait hang on. let me change this from "S1" to "F1". that is so much better.
+</li></ol>
 <!--
 == Wavebuilder combinations ==
@@ Line 24: / Line 28: @@
 -->
 == Ideologies or fields ==
-<ol class="hue clean terse  {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ES}}">
+<ol class="hue clean terse">
 {{li|start=y
-     |I=S1/ES|Q=618|Q2=618}}{{TTS|ES|E-S}} / existentialism
+     |I=S1/ES|Q=618|Q2=618}}{{TTS|ES|E-S}} / bourgeois philosophies
 </li></ol>
 <!--