Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q49,97: Difference between revisions
copy markup from Q4861 |
m Reversedragon moved page Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q4997 to Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q49,97: Moving numbered Item to TTS-pronounceable title |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Main entry == | == Main entry == | ||
{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ML}}"><!-- inactive: {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ES}} --> | {{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ML}}"><!-- inactive: {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ES}} --> | ||
{{li|start=y|I=F2/MX|tradition=|Q=49,97|Q2=4997|h4= No Marxism is actually over }} / For any given [[E:named Marxism (meta-Marxism)|apparent form of Marxism]], including crimson tendencies, orange tendencies, and possibly strawberry tendencies, none of these tendencies has outright been shown to be more or less capable of creating socialist transition than others, and whether any given form of Marxism will vanish from the world largely still remains to be seen; this is to imply that Western-Marxism may be "over" in that it is more like an appropriation of Marxism than an honest attempt to reach the [[E:Material System of Bolshevism (meta-Marxism)|Material System of Bolshevism]], but Stalinism, Trotskyism, and possibly Dengism are not over -><br/> | |||
{{book|MDem}}'s basic working model of Marxisms. if you want to prevent all future Trotskyite conspiracies<ref group="error" name="a"/>, you have to talk to Trotskyists as human beings and not immediately scare them off. you have to recognize the existence of different Social-Philosophical Systems around different Marxist models and discuss every model as if it's vaguely possible in order to guide people into forming an agreement for all the different divergent Marxisms and so-called "leftisms" you more commonly find everywhere to live in the same world and not fight each other. this is not a trivial thing given that people unify based on the outcome they believe in rather than whether they are currently oppressed. | |||
{{li|I=S2/MX/IV|tradition=|Q=49,97|Q2=4997}}No Marxism is actually over -> truth value: most likely false. Stalinism has physically died and there is hardly ever an attempt to create Stalin's Marxism in the First World that is actually effective. Khruschevism-Dengism-Juche has been strangely resilient and Maoism is still a contender in Third World countries inasmuch as it doesn't pretend to avoid turning into Dengism, but it isn't really fair to say that Dengism "succeeded" because it was Marxism as much as because it is capitalism or because it is the successful realization of Menshevism. Dengism isn't "really" a Marxism. Stalinism is over. Trotskyism is not over. this is apparently false as written. | |||
</li></ol> | </li></ol> | ||
| Line 25: | Line 27: | ||
{{li|I=Z1/IV|Q=41,04|Q2=4104}}{{TTS|IV|Fourth}} / Trotskyism | {{li|I=Z1/IV|Q=41,04|Q2=4104}}{{TTS|IV|Fourth}} / Trotskyism | ||
</li></ol> | </li></ol> | ||
== Errors == | |||
<references group="error"> | |||
<ref name="a">The Left Opposition or early Trotskyism was not a conspiracy. At worst, it was a civil war between two [[E:named Marxism (meta-Marxism)|apparent forms of Marxism]]. It may be possible to prevent such a thing but this sentence suggests the wrong methods.</ref> | |||
</references> | |||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
Latest revision as of 03:26, 18 August 2026
Main entry
No Marxism is actually over
/ For any given apparent form of Marxism, including crimson tendencies, orange tendencies, and possibly strawberry tendencies, none of these tendencies has outright been shown to be more or less capable of creating socialist transition than others, and whether any given form of Marxism will vanish from the world largely still remains to be seen; this is to imply that Western-Marxism may be "over" in that it is more like an appropriation of Marxism than an honest attempt to reach the Material System of Bolshevism, but Stalinism, Trotskyism, and possibly Dengism are not over ->
MDem's basic working model of Marxisms. if you want to prevent all future Trotskyite conspiracies[error 1], you have to talk to Trotskyists as human beings and not immediately scare them off. you have to recognize the existence of different Social-Philosophical Systems around different Marxist models and discuss every model as if it's vaguely possible in order to guide people into forming an agreement for all the different divergent Marxisms and so-called "leftisms" you more commonly find everywhere to live in the same world and not fight each other. this is not a trivial thing given that people unify based on the outcome they believe in rather than whether they are currently oppressed.
- No Marxism is actually over -> truth value: most likely false. Stalinism has physically died and there is hardly ever an attempt to create Stalin's Marxism in the First World that is actually effective. Khruschevism-Dengism-Juche has been strangely resilient and Maoism is still a contender in Third World countries inasmuch as it doesn't pretend to avoid turning into Dengism, but it isn't really fair to say that Dengism "succeeded" because it was Marxism as much as because it is capitalism or because it is the successful realization of Menshevism. Dengism isn't "really" a Marxism. Stalinism is over. Trotskyism is not over. this is apparently false as written.
Related
Ideologies or fields
- MXmeta-Marxism / meta-Marxism
- / Trotskyism
Errors
- ↑ The Left Opposition or early Trotskyism was not a conspiracy. At worst, it was a civil war between two apparent forms of Marxism. It may be possible to prevent such a thing but this sentence suggests the wrong methods.