Jump to content

Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q29,44: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From LithoGraphica
← Older edit
Reversedragon (talk | contribs)
Bureaucrats, Conference pass, Interface administrators, Arts-aligned editors, Crimson-aligned editors, Violet-aligned editors, Administrators
17,849 edits
m Reversedragon moved page Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q2944 to Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q29,44: Moving numbered Item to TTS-pronounceable title
Reversedragon (talk | contribs)
Bureaucrats, Conference pass, Interface administrators, Arts-aligned editors, Crimson-aligned editors, Violet-aligned editors, Administrators
17,849 edits
m formatting
 
Line 2: Line 2:
== Main entry ==
== Main entry ==
{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean  {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ML}}"><!-- inactive:  {{int:hue-ixn-classname-DFy}} -->
{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean  {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ML}}"><!-- inactive:  {{int:hue-ixn-classname-DFy}} -->
<!-- {{li|start=y|I=S2/MX|tradition=MX|Q=29,45|Q2=2945}}[[E:Q2945|Trotskyism is the prototypical oppressed group]] -->


<li class="field_mdem" data-qid="29,44" value="2944" data-dimension="S2">[[E:Q2944|Applying any claim to Trotsky eventually yields the correct answers]] / Applying any philosophy to Trotsky eventually gets you to the correct answers  ->  one of my very favorite jamming propositions. this one gets me through the hard times. this proposition sounds so stupid at first like it could never be true, and then you try it, and you realize there's something there. I'd give an example, but I have a problem that they're all turning into actually okay propositions that might be worth making into their own Items.
{{li|start=y|I=S2/MX|tradition=MX|Q=29,44|Q2=2944}}[[E:Q2944|Applying any claim to Trotsky eventually yields the correct answers]] / Applying any philosophy to Trotsky eventually gets you to the correct answers  ->  one of my very favorite jamming propositions. this one gets me through the hard times. this proposition sounds so stupid at first like it could never be true, and then you try it, and you realize there's something there. I'd give an example, but I have a problem that they're all turning into actually okay propositions that might be worth making into their own Items.


</li></ol>
</li></ol>

Latest revision as of 06:15, 16 September 2026

Main entry

  1. Applying any claim to Trotsky eventually yields the correct answers / Applying any philosophy to Trotsky eventually gets you to the correct answers -> one of my very favorite jamming propositions. this one gets me through the hard times. this proposition sounds so stupid at first like it could never be true, and then you try it, and you realize there's something there. I'd give an example, but I have a problem that they're all turning into actually okay propositions that might be worth making into their own Items.

Related

Ideologies or fields

  1. pronounced M.X. / meta-Marxism

Wavebuilder combinations

pronounced P: pronounced Wave-builder: forms result [Item]
--
along with [Item]
?? (pronounced proposed / ML)1-1-1
forming from [Item]
?? (pronounced proposed / ML)1-1-1
--
--

Subpages or related scraps

Retrieved from "https://research.moraleconomy.au/index.php?title=Ontology_talk:9k/RD/Q29,44&oldid=46076"