User:RD/9k/Q34,30

Main entry

3430. anarcho-Toryism -> the motif of conservatives or reactionaries saying a lot of bizarrely anarchist things right down to peace, degrowth, and not wanting industry or empire or neocolonial control of Africa if you only hand them blatant racial segregation.

Related

3428. anarcho-colonialism -> the motif of isolated elements interacting together on the molecular scale of society right between individuals (anarchically, "systemically"; the elements are mostly individuals but could be corporations as long as they can achieve things purely through basic social interactions between each other without any central government) to produce the effect of populations that link together in a dark tent of freedom poles and stretch across the area around them to fill it up and not let anyone in, possibly slowly encroaching further into the surrounding area only to repeat the same hostile "stretching across and violently guarding" behavior again (this specific behavior is the key to this motif, not the expansion of a population in number which could be normal)
      the more I learn about anarchism and motifs anarchists say the more I get slowly convinced that basically all the world's social problems can arise out of anarchism. regardless of everything anarchists say about anarchism not meaning to do that. there are like 100 different anarchisms or something and we need to stop people from claiming that "anarchy" is safe without clearly and fully separating it from things that are also anarchy by their own definitions but aren't safe.
3429. Black lion or white lion, any republic is okay if it promotes a thriving White countable culture / Black lion or white lion, any republic is okay if it promotes a thriving Protestant-specific nation (England) -> the proposition that seems to define Toryism versus Liberal-republicanism. Tories do not require democracy as long as all the individuals in the population somehow end up happy with it. Liberal-republicans require Liberal-republican democracy at the cost that somebody must rule over all the countable cultures of a national population and tell them how to be a countable culture. is this inherently colonial, and do we have to deal with the contradiction that fascism and anarchism are both postcolonial whether we like it or not? that remains to be seen.
3427. Nonviolence leads to settler-colonialism / If money, wealth, artisanal careers, and fines are the alternative to murder, the nonviolent alternative to hate crimes is paying to not share the same space with minority demographics, which is achieved by a bunch of majority people teaming up, helping each other horizontally, and existing as fast as possible producing as much as possible while exercising as much free choice as possible in order to associate with only the people they want to associate with and which they get along with, here implying no minority people; subsequently, this expanding majority would be expected to create a democratic State specific only to them (in the case the overarching population had Liberal-republicanism) which overtakes the entire area occupied by all ethnicities in question and morphs into the only government of the country
3426. A republic exists for upper-rank people to fight over land -> the claim that Mexican political parties are primarily about allegiances to specific upper-rank people who arbitrarily choose opposing parties just because they have pre-existing rivalries with each other, after which they only pretend to believe what the parties believe. [1] archive.is I find this one pretty believable. it matches general patterns of party affiliation in other countries. look at the United States going through a phase of making its parties about who is Protestant or Catholic, or who is the most or least similar to particular "successful" White people. this is the proper response to the claim that conservative parties "stabilize" republics — do you really want people pretending to believe things just to legitimize socially-linked cults around specific wealthy individuals fighting for pure territory and power?
3431. you are educated stupid and evil (Gene Ray) -> if Ray was talking about the supposed "interpellation of capitalist ideology" or "world of bureaucrats" running Liberal republics and the Soviet Union, what he's saying would be genuinely cathartic and radical. I wish he hadn't been racist, because, shit (pronounced redacted), if all these people were Communists where would we even be today
3432. An anarchist U.S. (pronounced United States) would believe time cube / If you turned everyone in the United States into anarchists, they'd basically believe time cube -> you can get everyone to believe that greed is bad and all people shouldn't be greedy and shouldn't be "colonizers", but if you succeeded you would almost precisely get Gene Ray going on about how nationalities should remain separate on their own faces of the earth trapped in Family, Village, and Culture and never expand across the earth to prevent war and exploitation
      goddamn, is Gene Ray identical to Alexander Dugin minus the Russian Empire? I'm seeing a lot of weird similarities, minus all the hatred you see in Dugin's work if you dig a little bit

Ideology codes

• (none)