User:RD/9k/Q37,77

Democulture definition

3777. Democracy is government of the person by the people / Democracy is government of the person, by the people and for the people / culturocracy proposition / democulture proposition (not explaining the component of "democratic" control of culture)
3778. Democracy is government of the culture by the people / Democracy is the people overcoming the Spanishness Office / democulturocracy proposition / democulture proposition (more proper one) / anarculture proposition (one of them) -> culturocracy is a "real" meta-Marxist term, but "democulturocracy proposition" is to be taken as a proper name, not an actual term; even I think that word is too silly.

Kantian ethics and its consequences

618. Everyone makes their own meaning (existentialism)
3666. Individual choices immediately shape the health of society / Individual choices immediately contribute to the health of society -> the nexus point where we see Existentialism being born inside the context of ancient religions; what is in my opinion the core of defining "sin", as well as the Buddhist concept of "unhelpful mental factors" that impede meditation and also society.
3667. Nothing should be done unless everybody considers it wonderful / "they had such good reasons for doing what they did that the ends justify the means" -> I am so sick of this phrase and its use in analyzing both fiction and reality. there are so many wrong assumptions in it that are difficult to dig up at first, but whenever anyone uses this concept it always totally distorts their view of how reality really works. you get so many crazy propositions out of this like that it's absolutely not allowed to investigate how reality works without obeying metaphysics, etc.
3664. Culture is nothing more than the set of signs many individuals spontaneously make up -> this is ultimately why people think there's a "Spanishness Office". Existentialism. they think that if they tell one person, who is perfectly equivalent to the whole population, to change their way of thinking that everybody will spontaneously change, unanimously flipping over the policies of the Spanishness Office. but there are several wrong assumptions in there. one, knowledge doesn't travel faster than light to everybody at once. two, individuals have different content, and whenever they hear the same message, this sorts them into different factions and different opposing courses of action. imagine any two individuals, Stalin and Trotsky, Goku and Vegeta. you tell them the exact same statement, and they take it to mean totally different things, and any allies they have take it to mean the same thing. "Freeza is descending on Planet Vegeta". (if you live on earth, is it a good thing for Saiyans to cease to exist?) "The Soviet Union will fall apart if people don't properly participate". (Trotsky, Zinoviev: that's fantastic!) "Inclusive history education will give marginalized people more power." (Floridians: then let's destroy it, we can't have that.) you have to plan any attempt to "inform everyone" around this inherent separation into ideological subpopulations.
3665. No one should make their own meaning unless others consider it wonderful / People shouldn't spontaneously make up culture and signs unless it's wonderful -> Q3667 + Q?? everyone creates their own meaning = this. anarculture proposition / democulture proposition. I think this one is anarculture but it turns into democulture practically speaking with another proposition
3784. The United States already is democulture / The United States already has democulturocracy -> the claim that the United States actually operates on a system of forcing every single individual to perform a certain list of cultural values at gunpoint, and "democracy" (republican structures) serves only to spread out that basic process of culturocracy over the whole population or at least a selected ruling population of representatives derived from the population.
      the corollary, not directly included in this proposition, is that mainstream Marxism-Leninism really is demo-ocracy: government of the physical population of people by the people. a Marxist state truly only wishes to "control" people's bodies while Liberal-republicanism seeks to completely control people's minds and exert authoritarian control over countable cultures and ethnicities that are more closely connected with themselves than with it. in some senses it will always spawn anarchism in response to its strange, incomprehensible methods, because countable cultures fundamentally don't like being culturally controlled like that, White or non-White.

Ideology codes

• A / anarculture
• IK / Kantian ethics
• MX onto LR
• MX onto ES