Jump to content

User:RD/9k/Q36,79: Difference between revisions

From Philosophical Research
m Defeat Stalin with gender identity
Gender identity is a top-down trend
Line 14: Line 14:


</li><li {{IS2/PT/class}} data-tradition="P4" data-qid="36,73" value="3673">Gender identity is not intersectional {{YouTube|b-jGNYy_XyE}}
</li><li {{IS2/PT/class}} data-tradition="P4" data-qid="36,73" value="3673">Gender identity is not intersectional {{YouTube|b-jGNYy_XyE}}
</li><li {{IS2/Zv/class}} data-tradition="PT, Zv" data-qid="36,71" value="3671">Gender identity is a top-down trend  ->  this one is... interesting. people claiming to be "Socialists" brought it up. [https://freerlives.wordpress.com/overview/] but the thing is, a lot of things done in real-world workers' states {{em|have}} been top-down in this same limited sense of being decided on by experts, and yet gotten widespread support across places like China and Vietnam. so that's a funny thing to be saying if you're in fact a Marxist — are they anti-China Marxists? what Marxism are they?<br/>
from a different angle, arguing that things are unfairly decided on by experts can be a Tory talking point. their reasons are usually different, having to do with the sheer conflict between two splitting nationalities trying to culturally control each other. but when Tories try to supposedly oppose capital they usually start converging with orange anarchists, empowering "indies" and "small and local" as supposedly creating better culture while essentially just attacking mass production and progress. it's always about culture, they're always playing the side of 'dark Gramscianism'.


</li></ol>
</li></ol>

Revision as of 13:12, 9 February 2026

Main entry

  1. Nobody is actually transgender

Related statements for

  1. Gender identity cannot be secular / Gender identity cannot possibly be secular / "You think a man magically changing into a woman is secular?" -> found in a comments section on a news story about parents opting out of LGBT+ lessons in school because they were supposedly "porn". (how would you expect them to have gotten into schools if that were true? these people have never seen fandoms and the absolutely gigantic controversies that LGBT+ people get into over a single mistagged tweet that wasn't for kids.)
  2. Gender identity is not intersectional [1]
  3. Gender identity is a top-down trend -> this one is... interesting. people claiming to be "Socialists" brought it up. [2] but the thing is, a lot of things done in real-world workers' states have been top-down in this same limited sense of being decided on by experts, and yet gotten widespread support across places like China and Vietnam. so that's a funny thing to be saying if you're in fact a Marxist — are they anti-China Marxists? what Marxism are they?
    from a different angle, arguing that things are unfairly decided on by experts can be a Tory talking point. their reasons are usually different, having to do with the sheer conflict between two splitting nationalities trying to culturally control each other. but when Tories try to supposedly oppose capital they usually start converging with orange anarchists, empowering "indies" and "small and local" as supposedly creating better culture while essentially just attacking mass production and progress. it's always about culture, they're always playing the side of 'dark Gramscianism'.

Related statements against

  1. Defeat Stalin with gender identity / Gender identity is proletarian but it's Stalin that divides people / (9k)

Ideology codes

  • PT / Toryism
  • P4 / Identitarian fascism
  • IV / Trotskyism