Ontology:Q5499: Difference between revisions
copy or update fake Item from Q3840 |
Usage notes |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
{{HueRoster|P=instance of| -- }} <!-- en: instance of --> | {{HueRoster|P=instance of| -- }} <!-- en: instance of --> | ||
{{HueRoster|P=superset of| -- }} <!-- en: superset of --> | {{HueRoster|P=superset of| -- }} <!-- en: superset of --> | ||
</dl> | </dl> | ||
| Line 30: | Line 29: | ||
{{WaveBuildNone| (proposition?) there can never be any official concepts | poststructuralism }} <!-- en: WITH ?? PRODUCES ?? --> | {{WaveBuildNone| (proposition?) there can never be any official concepts | poststructuralism }} <!-- en: WITH ?? PRODUCES ?? --> | ||
</dl> | </dl> | ||
== Usage notes == | |||
In contrast to propositions that suggest that some kind of eternal juxtaposition or [[Ontology:Q5493|"balance" of arbitrary concepts]] is the only kind of knowledge. | |||
This is only a hair removed from the kinds of concepts in certain periods of Existentialism, namely the ones that proceed Saussure and attempt to fight against the perceived tyranny of signs and established concepts. In a sense, such approaches <em>are</em> meta-ontological; to practice meta-ontology is to look outside particular ontologies. However, there are a few fundamental differences, tracing back to the differences between Existentialism and meta-Marxism. Look to other propositions for explanations on this. | |||
[[Category:Molecular Marxism ontology]] [[Category:Meta-ontology ontology]] [[Category:'Pataphysics ontology]] | [[Category:Molecular Marxism ontology]] [[Category:Meta-ontology ontology]] [[Category:'Pataphysics ontology]] | ||
Revision as of 10:31, 4 May 2025
- pronounced [S2] Discoveries come from violating metaphysics 1-1-1
Characteristics in draft
Properties
- item type
- S2 (pronounced C) 1-1-1
- label (en)
- pronounced [S2] Discoveries come from violating metaphysics 1-1-1
- alias (en)
- Knowledge about the world comes from questioning and tearing apart arbitrary Idealist divisions of reality
- QID references [Item] 1-1-1
- Q5497 Alchemy failed because it is an offense to metaphysics
- color swatch references [Item]
- meta-ontology
- subset of
- --
- instance of
- --
- superset of
- --
Components
- model combines claims
- --
Wavebuilder combinations
- pronounced [P] pronounced Wavebuilder: forms result [Item]
- --
- along with [Item]
- (proposition?) there can never be any official concepts
Usage notes
In contrast to propositions that suggest that some kind of eternal juxtaposition or "balance" of arbitrary concepts is the only kind of knowledge.
This is only a hair removed from the kinds of concepts in certain periods of Existentialism, namely the ones that proceed Saussure and attempt to fight against the perceived tyranny of signs and established concepts. In a sense, such approaches are meta-ontological; to practice meta-ontology is to look outside particular ontologies. However, there are a few fundamental differences, tracing back to the differences between Existentialism and meta-Marxism. Look to other propositions for explanations on this.