Jump to content

Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q42,44: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Philosophical Research
Reversedragon (talk | contribs)
copy markup from 9k/Q47,78
 
Reversedragon (talk | contribs)
m formatting
Line 2: Line 2:
== Main entry ==
== Main entry ==
{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean">
{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean">
<!-- {{li|I=S2/IV|tradition=MX onto IV|Q=4778|Q2=4778|h4 = Trotskyism is like cold fusion }} -->


</li><li class="field_trotsky" value="42,44" value="4244" data-dimension="S2">Is Trotskyism real Leninism? / Is Trotskyism accurate to what Lenin actually said? / hyper Trotskyist question  ->  you know why I love questions like this? if you went through this with nothing but approved Trotskyist criteria but actual intellectual honesty the answer would be "no".
{{li|start=y|I=M3/MX|tradition=MX onto IV|Q=42,44|Q2=4244|h4 = Is Trotskyism real Leninism? }} / Is Trotskyism accurate to what Lenin actually said? / hyper Trotskyist question  ->  you know why I love questions like this? if you went through this with nothing but approved Trotskyist criteria but actual intellectual honesty the answer would be "no".


</li></ol>
</li></ol>


== Related ==
== Related ==
<!--
<ol class="hue clean terse">
<ol class="hue clean">
 
</li></ol> -->
{{li|start=y|I=M3/MX|tradition=MX onto ES|Q=42,42|Q2=4242}}Is there a point to believing in existentialism? / Is it possible for individuals to assert existentialism is meaningful? / Is believing in early-existentialism meaningless?  ->  the hyper-existentialist question. does the premise of existentialism apply to existentialism? entropicism would argue that ultimately this is not true, or at the very least, this is not a thing people can say trivially and it's a really difficult question.
 
{{li|I=M3/MX|tradition=MX onto ES|Q=42,45|Q2=4245|h4 = Is ethics ethical? }} / Is morality moral? / Is ethics moral? / Is morality ethical? / hyper morality question
 
</li></ol>


== Ideology codes ==
== Ideology codes ==


* (none)
* MX / meta-Marxism
* IV / Trotskyism
* ES / Existentialist-Structuralist tradition
* MX onto IV
* MX onto ES


<!--
<!--
== Full title for bookmarks (optional) ==
== Full title for bookmarks (optional) ==
<pre>[9k] Existentialist-Structuralist tradition - Q47,78 - 9k, next nine thousand ; Trotskyism is like cold fusion ; world where Trotskyists surpass North Korea </pre>
<pre>[9k] Is Trotskyism real Leninism? - Q42,44 - next nine thousand</pre>
-->
-->
[[Category:Next nine thousand (RD)]]  <!-- page ends here.  TTS-unfriendly numbers incoming
[[Category:Next nine thousand (RD)]]  <!-- page ends here.  TTS-unfriendly numbers incoming
redirects:  [[Ontology_talk:9k/RD/Q4778]]
redirects:  [[Ontology_talk:9k/RD/Q4778]]
duplication hint:  copy markup from [[Special:PermanentLink/NNNN|9k/Q47,78]] -->
duplication hint:  copy markup from [[Special:PermanentLink/NNNN|9k/Q47,78]] -->

Revision as of 23:58, 30 March 2026

Main entry

  1. Is Trotskyism real Leninism?

    / Is Trotskyism accurate to what Lenin actually said? / hyper Trotskyist question -> you know why I love questions like this? if you went through this with nothing but approved Trotskyist criteria but actual intellectual honesty the answer would be "no".

Related

  1. Is there a point to believing in existentialism? / Is it possible for individuals to assert existentialism is meaningful? / Is believing in early-existentialism meaningless? -> the hyper-existentialist question. does the premise of existentialism apply to existentialism? entropicism would argue that ultimately this is not true, or at the very least, this is not a thing people can say trivially and it's a really difficult question.
  2. Is ethics ethical?

    / Is morality moral? / Is ethics moral? / Is morality ethical? / hyper morality question

Ideology codes

  • MX / meta-Marxism
  • IV / Trotskyism
  • ES / Existentialist-Structuralist tradition
  • MX onto IV
  • MX onto ES