Jump to content

Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q618-HowForestsThinkKohn: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From LithoGraphica
Reversedragon (talk | contribs)
copy markup from HowForestsThinkKohn
 
Reversedragon (talk | contribs)
Jaguars understand a distinction between living minds and inanimate objects
Line 4: Line 4:


{{li|start=y|I=Z1/A|ww=Q618
{{li|start=y|I=Z1/A|ww=Q618
  |ed=|published=2013|publisher=|printed=|ISBN=  <!-- [https://isbnsearch.org/] -->
  |ed=|published=|publisher=|printed=|ISBN=  <!-- [https://isbnsearch.org/] -->
  |WQ=Q96638381|WQe=|rem-WQ=http://www.wikidata.org/entity/
  |WQ=Q96638381|WQe=|rem-WQ=http://www.wikidata.org/entity/
  |Q=618|Q2=618}}{{book|How Forests Think: Toward an Anthropology Beyond the Human}} (2013)
  |Q=618|Q2=618}}{{book|How Forests Think: Toward an Anthropology Beyond the Human}} (2013)
{{li|I=Z1/A|ww=Q618-CA
|ed=|published=2013|publisher=University of California Press|printed=|pages=about 282|ISBN=
|WQ=Q96638381|WQe=
|Q=618|Q2=618}}{{book|How Forests Think}} (2013, edition)  ->  University of California Press


</li></ol>
</li></ol>


== Motifs or claims ==
== Motifs or claims ==
<!-- <ol class="hue clean">
<ol class="hue clean field_exstruct">
 
{{li|start=y|I=S1/HAS|Q=618|Q2=618|ww=Q618-CA|pp=1}}it is hard to speak of what it was, dense and difficult / forest dense and powerful [?]  ->  apparent purpose of the text: to take the indescribable awe of South American forests and make them describable
 
{{li|I=S2/HAS|Q=618|Q2=618|ww=Q618-CA|pp=1}}Jaguars understand a distinction between living minds and inanimate objects; this is to vaguely imply that predatory animals practice respect or empathy for thinking [[E:The Subject (Existentialism)|Subjects]] of other species  ->  within the first few sentences of the book, you can see the final conclusion being carefully smuggled in behind claims that look smaller but due to their rhetorical purpose are actually bigger claims than they appear to be.


{{li|start=y|I=S1/A|Q=618|Q2=618|ww=Q618|pp=}}
{{li|I=S2/STM|Q=618|Q2=618}}Jaguars understand a distinction between living animals and dead animals  ->  most people probably wouldn't dispute this much.


</li></ol> -->
</li></ol>


== Related ==
== Related ==
<ol class="hue clean terse">
<!-- <ol class="hue clean terse">
 
{{li|start=y|I=S1/A|Q=53,19|Q2=53,19|h4= secular animism }} / ({{9k|RD/Q53,19}})
{{li|start=y|I=S1/A|Q=53,19|Q2=53,19|h4= secular animism }} / ({{9k|RD/Q53,19}})
 
</li></ol> -->
</li></ol>


<!--
<!--
Line 30: Line 37:
</dl>
</dl>
{{E:Q618/ES|--}}
{{E:Q618/ES|--}}
-->
-->
== Ideologies or fields ==
== Ideologies or fields ==
<!--
<ol class="hue clean terse">
<ol class="hue clean compound">
{{li|start=y|I=S1/A|Q=53,19|Q2=53,19}}{{TTS|A|anarchy}} / secular animism ({{9k|RD/Q53,19}})
{{HueNumber|Q3300}} -- en: A / anarchism --
</li></ol>
</ol>
-->
* A / secular animism


== Subpages or related scraps ==
== Subpages or related scraps ==

Revision as of 06:48, 9 May 2026

Main entries

  1. How Forests Think: Toward an Anthropology Beyond the Human (2013)
  2. How Forests Think (2013, edition) -> University of California Press

Motifs or claims

  1. it is hard to speak of what it was, dense and difficult / forest dense and powerful [?] -> apparent purpose of the text: to take the indescribable awe of South American forests and make them describable
  2. Jaguars understand a distinction between living minds and inanimate objects; this is to vaguely imply that predatory animals practice respect or empathy for thinking Subjects of other species -> within the first few sentences of the book, you can see the final conclusion being carefully smuggled in behind claims that look smaller but due to their rhetorical purpose are actually bigger claims than they appear to be.
  3. Jaguars understand a distinction between living animals and dead animals -> most people probably wouldn't dispute this much.

Related

Ideologies or fields

  1. pronounced anarchy / secular animism (9k)

Subpages or related scraps

Nickels