Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q42,21: Difference between revisions
copy markup from Q42,21 |
m crisis of Stalinism / formatting |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Main entry == | == Main entry == | ||
{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean field_ML"> | {{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean field_ML"> | ||
{{li|start=y|I=S1/ML|Q=42,21|Q2=4221|h4= crisis of capitalism }} -> Trotskyists are always talking about these. as are most Marxists. it's a fairly good talking point. | |||
</li></ol> | </li></ol> | ||
| Line 16: | Line 15: | ||
<ol class="hue clean field_ML"> | <ol class="hue clean field_ML"> | ||
{{li|start=y|I=S1/ML|Q=42,22|Q2=4222}}crisis of Bolshevism / crisis of Stalinism ({{TTS|IV|Trotskyism}} onto {{TTS|ML|Stalin's Marxism}}, {{TTS|IV|Trotskyism}} onto {{TTS|DX|Dengism}}) -> the motif of a system within a workers' state ripping apart and not working as intended. everyone outgrowing microdistricts as populations expand could be considered one, as could ripping open the economy into a trapped capitalism. a country opening up to imports and exports isn't necessarily a crisis of Bolshevism in and of itself. in general these are more "orderly" than crises of capitalism; the central party can often see them coming and see why they happened whether they ultimately get stopped or not. | |||
{{li|I=S1/ML|Q=42,23|Q2=4223}}crisis of named Leninist movement -> system-breaking crisis that occurs in a Marxist movement which has not become a workers' state. | |||
{{li|I=S1/IV|Q=42,24|Q2=4224}}crisis of Trotskyism -> there are about two kinds: groups falling apart and everybody simply dropping out. | |||
{{li|I=S2/IV|Q=42,70|Q2=4270}}Marxism's great crisis is the crisis of revolutionary leadership (Trotsky 1938) -> this is... actually not untrue. the problem is that he contributed to the crisis. that's the only major problem with that statement. | {{li|I=S2/IV|Q=42,70|Q2=4270}}Marxism's great crisis is the crisis of revolutionary leadership (Trotsky 1938) -> this is... actually not untrue. the problem is that he contributed to the crisis. that's the only major problem with that statement. | ||
| Line 29: | Line 28: | ||
<ol class="hue clean field_ML"> | <ol class="hue clean field_ML"> | ||
{{li|start=y|I=S1/DG|Q=42,25|Q2=4225}}crisis of schizoanalysis -> when schizoanalysis tries to assert that different movements are inherently connected but the different movements just start fighting each other. | |||
</li></ol> | </li></ol> | ||
| Line 46: | Line 45: | ||
== Ideology codes == | == Ideology codes == | ||
* | * ML / Marxism | ||
* IV / Trotskyism | |||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
Revision as of 06:28, 2 June 2026
Main entry
crisis of capitalism
-> Trotskyists are always talking about these. as are most Marxists. it's a fairly good talking point.
Crises of capitalism
Crises in Marxism
- crisis of Bolshevism / crisis of Stalinism ( onto , onto ) -> the motif of a system within a workers' state ripping apart and not working as intended. everyone outgrowing microdistricts as populations expand could be considered one, as could ripping open the economy into a trapped capitalism. a country opening up to imports and exports isn't necessarily a crisis of Bolshevism in and of itself. in general these are more "orderly" than crises of capitalism; the central party can often see them coming and see why they happened whether they ultimately get stopped or not.
- crisis of named Leninist movement -> system-breaking crisis that occurs in a Marxist movement which has not become a workers' state.
- crisis of Trotskyism -> there are about two kinds: groups falling apart and everybody simply dropping out.
- Marxism's great crisis is the crisis of revolutionary leadership (Trotsky 1938) -> this is... actually not untrue. the problem is that he contributed to the crisis. that's the only major problem with that statement.
Crises in anarchism
- crisis of schizoanalysis -> when schizoanalysis tries to assert that different movements are inherently connected but the different movements just start fighting each other.
Related
Ideology codes
- ML / Marxism
- IV / Trotskyism