Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q4699: Difference between revisions
copy markup from Q46,99 |
Statements in theoretical texts distill objective laws and patterns of historical development |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean"><!-- inactive: {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ML}} {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ES}} --> | {{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean"><!-- inactive: {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ML}} {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ES}} --> | ||
{{li|start=y|I=Z1/LLM/IV|Q=46,99|Q2=4699}}Socialism AI / ({{9k|RD/Q46,99}}) | {{li|start=y|I=Z1/LLM/IV|Q=46,99|Q2=4699}}Socialism AI [https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2025/12/12/gpid-d12.html] [https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2025/12/21/bzhq-d21.html] [https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2026/05/13/nmgz-m13.html] [https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2026/05/22/zqyb-m22.html] <!-- / ({{9k|RD/Q46,99}}) --> | ||
</li></ol> | </li></ol> | ||
== Related == | == Related == | ||
<ol class="hue clean"> | <ol class="hue clean"> | ||
{{li|start=y|I=S2/ES|Q=618|Q2=618}}The best case scenario is that Socialism AI is randomly interpolating between articles on the WSWS [https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2025/12/19/thbn-d19.html] -> technically true, but also, its interpolation abilities are _really_ sophisticated. it was able to answer some mad complex questions I put in and almost all the time it put out something coherent; only a very small portion of the time would it put out nonsense, and I could tell every time because of how incredibly logical the sensical parts were. | |||
{{li|I=S2/ES|Q=618|Q2=618}}There is no reason that the structural properties of the WSWS corpus as text lines up with structural properties of politics or history [https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2025/12/19/thbn-d19.html] -> that is false. that is to say that linguistic statements are purely Idealist and saying Materialist sentences isn't possible. which isn't true. | |||
article goes on to point out that the "criticism" applies to every Marxist text. I'm laughing. it totally would. | |||
{{li|I=S2/MX/IV|Q=618|Q2=618}}Statements in theoretical texts distill objective laws and patterns of historical development [https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2025/12/19/thbn-d19.html] -> this statement is totally compatible with violet Marxism but was said by an orange Marxist, so it's orange. | |||
</li></ol> | </li></ol> | ||
| Line 14: | Line 21: | ||
<ol class="hue clean terse"> | <ol class="hue clean terse"> | ||
{{li|start=y | {{li|start=y | ||
|I= | |I=Z1/IV|Q=41,04|Q2=4104}}{{TTS|IV|Fourth}} / Trotskyism | ||
<!-- {{IXN/FieldTagSimple02|icon-trad=MX}} --> | |||
</li></ol> | </li></ol> | ||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
Revision as of 11:58, 15 August 2026
Main entries
Related
- The best case scenario is that Socialism AI is randomly interpolating between articles on the WSWS [5] -> technically true, but also, its interpolation abilities are _really_ sophisticated. it was able to answer some mad complex questions I put in and almost all the time it put out something coherent; only a very small portion of the time would it put out nonsense, and I could tell every time because of how incredibly logical the sensical parts were.
- There is no reason that the structural properties of the WSWS corpus as text lines up with structural properties of politics or history [6] -> that is false. that is to say that linguistic statements are purely Idealist and saying Materialist sentences isn't possible. which isn't true. article goes on to point out that the "criticism" applies to every Marxist text. I'm laughing. it totally would.
- Statements in theoretical texts distill objective laws and patterns of historical development [7] -> this statement is totally compatible with violet Marxism but was said by an orange Marxist, so it's orange.
Ideologies or fields
- / Trotskyism