Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q5151: Difference between revisions
copy markup from Q29,65 |
worldmaking |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ML}}"><!-- inactive: {{int:hue-ixn-classname-DFy}} --> | {{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ML}}"><!-- inactive: {{int:hue-ixn-classname-DFy}} --> | ||
{{li|start=y|I=S1/ES|Q=618|Q2=618|h4- | {{li|start=y|I=S1/ES|Q=618|Q2=618|h4= worldmaking }} -> what the hell is this. I've seen it like five times looking up weird political-agorist garbage. I'm not giving it its own Item number until I know what it is.<br/> | ||
world: ????<br/> | |||
make: ???? | |||
{{li|I=S1/ES|Q=618|Q2=618}}worldmaking / concepts related to worldmaking (sense) [https://www.dukeupress.edu/worldmaking] / studying race (generic) / psychoanalysis and racial identity (Kondo 2018; generic) / theater and media representation (generic) / race and economic forces (generic) / race and institutional hiring practices (generic) / ideologies of artistic transcendence (generic) / race and aesthetic form (generic) | |||
</li></ol> | |||
== Worldmaking (blog) == | |||
<ol class="hue clean {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ML}}"> | |||
{{li|start=y|I=Z1/ES|Q=618|Q2=618}}{{book|Worldmaking}} [https://worldmakingproject.substack.com/p/worldmaking] -> forgive me for adding this as an Item in an act of pettiness, when I gave the guideline that living people and their video channels shouldn't be coded unless they're prominent figures, but the claims of this blog are gigantic. you make a 'magazine' like this one, and it's actually begging for scrutiny. | |||
{{li|I=S2/ES|Q=618|Q2=618}}Worlds organize behavior before people make conscious choices (Damjan Jovanovic) / We live inside worlds we did not choose (generic) -> so, the problem with any idea like this is, how will you ever get anyone to understand worldmaking beyond about 5 people if worlds are always modifying their choices before they can choose to adopt worldmaker theory? how did {{em|you}} ever discover worldmaker theory if you too were born absorbed into a particular world? | |||
{{li|I=S2/ES|Q=618|Q2=618}}Cities, nations (populations? states?), and technological infrastructures (?) are worlds (Damjan Jovanovic) | |||
{{li|I=S2/ES|Q=618|Q2=618}}For much of human history worlds were inherited but now they are designed (Damjan Jovanovic) -> that seems doubtful. I think if there's such a thing they're still inherited a whole lot of the time. | |||
{{li|I=S1/ES|Q=618|Q2=618}}planetary imaginaries -> they defined a word I didn't understand with another new word. | |||
{{li|I=S1/ES|Q=618|Q2=618}}alternative worlds / alternative worlds, historical and emerging / failures of existing worlds (generic) -> so, like, is the Soviet Union considered an alternative world? or do these people just arbitrarily draw the line of what's an alternate world and what's a mainstream world wherever they feel like it? | |||
{{li|I=S1/ES|Q=618|Q2=618}}myth and narrative as technologies / games and simulations as worldmaking systems (generic) / artificial intelligence as a perceptual and cosmological apparatus (generic) / utopias as working hypotheses (generic) -> this is one of the most coherent things I have heard these people say. yes, narratives and representational art in general are technologies that fulfill a purpose. | |||
{{li|I=S2/MX|Q=618|Q2=618}}Worlds are narratives / Worlds in "worldmaker theory" and narratives in postmodernism are the same thing | |||
</li></ol> | </li></ol> | ||
Revision as of 07:18, 2 September 2026
Main entry
worldmaking
-> what the hell is this. I've seen it like five times looking up weird political-agorist garbage. I'm not giving it its own Item number until I know what it is.
world: ????
make: ????- worldmaking / concepts related to worldmaking (sense) [1] / studying race (generic) / psychoanalysis and racial identity (Kondo 2018; generic) / theater and media representation (generic) / race and economic forces (generic) / race and institutional hiring practices (generic) / ideologies of artistic transcendence (generic) / race and aesthetic form (generic)
Worldmaking (blog)
- Worldmaking [2] -> forgive me for adding this as an Item in an act of pettiness, when I gave the guideline that living people and their video channels shouldn't be coded unless they're prominent figures, but the claims of this blog are gigantic. you make a 'magazine' like this one, and it's actually begging for scrutiny.
- Worlds organize behavior before people make conscious choices (Damjan Jovanovic) / We live inside worlds we did not choose (generic) -> so, the problem with any idea like this is, how will you ever get anyone to understand worldmaking beyond about 5 people if worlds are always modifying their choices before they can choose to adopt worldmaker theory? how did you ever discover worldmaker theory if you too were born absorbed into a particular world?
- Cities, nations (populations? states?), and technological infrastructures (?) are worlds (Damjan Jovanovic)
- For much of human history worlds were inherited but now they are designed (Damjan Jovanovic) -> that seems doubtful. I think if there's such a thing they're still inherited a whole lot of the time.
- planetary imaginaries -> they defined a word I didn't understand with another new word.
- alternative worlds / alternative worlds, historical and emerging / failures of existing worlds (generic) -> so, like, is the Soviet Union considered an alternative world? or do these people just arbitrarily draw the line of what's an alternate world and what's a mainstream world wherever they feel like it?
- myth and narrative as technologies / games and simulations as worldmaking systems (generic) / artificial intelligence as a perceptual and cosmological apparatus (generic) / utopias as working hypotheses (generic) -> this is one of the most coherent things I have heard these people say. yes, narratives and representational art in general are technologies that fulfill a purpose.
- Worlds are narratives / Worlds in "worldmaker theory" and narratives in postmodernism are the same thing