Jump to content

User:Reversedragon/Wavebuilder/2411-03 submission: Difference between revisions

From Philosophical Research
archive old form as-is
 
new, better example
Line 1: Line 1:
This is a prototype of the concept of "submitting new Wavebuilder combinations" from November 03, 2024.
This is a prototype of the concept of "submitting new Wavebuilder combinations" from November 03, 2024.


Note that this form is considered <i>outdated</i> as it has been replaced with the concept of adding combinations directly to Ontology pages through wiki edits.
Note that this form is considered <i>outdated</i> as it has been replaced with the concept of adding combinations to Ontology pages through wiki edits.


------
------
Line 19: Line 19:


== Submission example ==
== Submission example ==
(This example was a bit intentionally silly.)


<dl class="wikitable hue">
<dl class="wikitable hue">
<div class="row"><dt>First element</dt>  <dd>Vegeta</dd></div>
<div class="row"><dt>First element</dt>  <dd>poem (300:20)</dd></div>
<div class="row"><dt>Second element</dt>  <dd>AO3</dd></div>
<div class="row"><dt>Second element</dt>  <dd>melody (205:15)</dd></div>
<div class="row"><dt>Operator</dt>  <dd>Combination (default, no special operator)</dd></div>
<div class="row"><dt>Operator</dt>  <dd>Combination (default, no special operator)</dd></div>
<div class="row"><dt>(Suggested result)</dt>  <dd>Character Study</dd></div>
<div class="row"><dt>(Suggested result)</dt>  <dd>song with lyrics</dd></div>
<div class="row"><dt>(Current result)</dt>  <dd>Draco In Leather Pants</dd></div>
<div class="row"><dt>(Current result)</dt>  <dd>(none)</dd></div>
<div class="row"><dt>(Explanation)</dt>  <dd>Fans have absolutely the wrong interpretation of Vegeta because they obviously have not looked at the source material closely and they do not understand that actually the reason for this behavior on the part of Vegeta is—<br /><i>(Note that this answer intentionally overflows the text box, obscuring whatever the end of it would be)</i></dd></div>
<div class="row"><dt>(Explanation)</dt>  <dd>Songs are basically poems</dd></div>
<div class="row"><dt>Dictionary</dt>  <dd>Example dictionary (example.dict)</dd></div>
<div class="row"><dt>Dictionary</dt>  <dd>wave.dict</dd></div>
<div class="row"><dt>(Submitter if given)</dt>  <dd>(Bogus example answer)</dd></div>
<div class="row"><dt>(Submitter if given)</dt>  <dd>(Bogus example answer)</dd></div>
<div class="row"><dt>Score</dt>  <dd>(Not calculated)</dd></div>
<div class="row"><dt>Score</dt>  <dd>505:21</dd></div>
</dl>
</dl>


<dfn style="font-weight: bold; font-style: normal;">Score</dfn>: This would be the [[User:Reversedragon/Wavebuilder/2410-22 wave-score|wave score]] of the new result. I am not totally sure why it was on the form. To provide a loose sense of progression by keeping a record of how "big" new submissions were increasingly getting, I guess?
<dfn style="font-weight: bold; font-style: normal;">Score</dfn>: This would be the [[User:Reversedragon/Wavebuilder/2410-22 wave-score|wave score]] of the new result. It isn't totally clear why it was on the form. To provide a loose sense of progression by keeping a record of how "big" new submissions were increasingly getting? Something like that.
 
This example score was loosely based on [https://codeberg.org/reverseDragon/wavebuilder-unstable/src/commit/0f3eea3525f539a97099145e5e1634ae02bfe115/dict/001-crafter.dict crafter.dict], the game-guide dictionary that follows the most optimal or interesting combinations within [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinite_Craft Infinite Craft] and its LLaMA model. Large language models are not the primary purpose of Wavebuilder dictionaries. Also note that neither of the above words was actually successfully collected into crafter.dict as a valid combination — both scores are based on the element "Shakespeare", which had a wave score of <strong>351:20</strong>.




[[Category:Wavebuilder ontology]]
[[Category:Wavebuilder ontology]]

Revision as of 07:14, 28 May 2025

This is a prototype of the concept of "submitting new Wavebuilder combinations" from November 03, 2024.

Note that this form is considered outdated as it has been replaced with the concept of adding combinations to Ontology pages through wiki edits.


"Submission form"

First element
__________
Second element
__________
Operator
🔘 Combination (default, no special operator)
🔘 Other...
What does this combination currently result in?
__________
What should the correct result be?
__________
Why is the current result incorrect or this new result correct?
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Dictionary
🔘 Main dictionary (wave.dict) 📖🌌
🔘 (Other dictionary...)
What handle do you want to be credited by in the repository? (Ok to leave blank)
__________

Submission example

First element
poem (300:20)
Second element
melody (205:15)
Operator
Combination (default, no special operator)
(Suggested result)
song with lyrics
(Current result)
(none)
(Explanation)
Songs are basically poems
Dictionary
wave.dict
(Submitter if given)
(Bogus example answer)
Score
505:21

Score: This would be the wave score of the new result. It isn't totally clear why it was on the form. To provide a loose sense of progression by keeping a record of how "big" new submissions were increasingly getting? Something like that.

This example score was loosely based on crafter.dict, the game-guide dictionary that follows the most optimal or interesting combinations within Infinite Craft and its LLaMA model. Large language models are not the primary purpose of Wavebuilder dictionaries. Also note that neither of the above words was actually successfully collected into crafter.dict as a valid combination — both scores are based on the element "Shakespeare", which had a wave score of 351:20.