Jump to content

Category:Non-binary truth values ontology: Difference between revisions

From Philosophical Research
description
 
move proposed statement types here from prototype
Line 1: Line 1:
This is a Category for various possible responses to the question "is this statement true?" which define themselves according to the range of possible ways statements actually apply to the real world or some specific defined reality that can be probed and investigated. In concept, the range of possibilities that could go in here may be infinite, or at least very large; the number of possible correspondences between statements and reality is proportional to the relationship between any particular imagined model and real things.
This is a Category for various possible responses to the question "is this statement true?" which define themselves according to the range of possible ways statements actually apply to the real world or some specific defined reality that can be probed and investigated. In concept, the range of possibilities that could go in here may be infinite, or at least very large; the number of possible correspondences between statements and reality is proportional to the relationship between any particular imagined model and real things.


[[Category:Philosophy or field ontologies]]
== Indeterminate statements ==
 
== Truthy statements ==
 
== Falsy statements ==
 
<ol class="hue clean compound">
{{HueNumber|Q280}}
{{HueNumber|Q288}}
</ol>
 
== Proposed Items ==
 
{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean"><!-- from [[User:Reversedragon/FirstNineThousand|prototype]] -->
 
</li><li class="field_geo" value="618" data-dimension="S0">backhandedly-true statement / backhandedly correct statement  ->  a statement which says one particular thing on the surface, and has a particular reasoning for why that's true, but where the surface statement turns out to be true for another different reason that likely <em>really</em> goes against the intention behind the original reasoning for the statement. named in reference to "backhanded compliments", which are statements that sound like compliments but end up complimenting something unflattering.
 
</li><li class="field_geo" value="618" data-dimension="S0">statement with logical contradictions
</li><li class="field_geo" value="618" data-dimension="S0">statement which is logical but not sound  ->  a lot of the [[Ontology:Q1501|brown]] propositions and some of the [[:Category:Existentialist-Structuralist tradition ontology|blue]] ones are literally just this.
</li><li class="field_geo" value="618" data-dimension="S0">statement which is technically true in some contexts
</li><li class="field_geo" value="618" data-dimension="S0">statement which is technically true in most contexts
 
</ol>
 
[[Category:Epistemology ontology]] [[Category:Non-binary logic ontology]]

Revision as of 05:23, 20 July 2025

This is a Category for various possible responses to the question "is this statement true?" which define themselves according to the range of possible ways statements actually apply to the real world or some specific defined reality that can be probed and investigated. In concept, the range of possibilities that could go in here may be infinite, or at least very large; the number of possible correspondences between statements and reality is proportional to the relationship between any particular imagined model and real things.

Indeterminate statements

Truthy statements

Falsy statements

  1. statement with no possible backing claims 1-1-1
  2. [PT] misinformation or disinformation 1-1-1

Proposed Items

  1. backhandedly-true statement / backhandedly correct statement -> a statement which says one particular thing on the surface, and has a particular reasoning for why that's true, but where the surface statement turns out to be true for another different reason that likely really goes against the intention behind the original reasoning for the statement. named in reference to "backhanded compliments", which are statements that sound like compliments but end up complimenting something unflattering.
  2. statement with logical contradictions
  3. statement which is logical but not sound -> a lot of the brown propositions and some of the blue ones are literally just this.
  4. statement which is technically true in some contexts
  5. statement which is technically true in most contexts

Pages in category "Non-binary truth values ontology"

The following 7 pages are in this category, out of 7 total.