User:RD/9k/Q24,51: Difference between revisions
m Colonialism is common sense / Settler-colonialism is "better" than Bolshevism / Maliciously expelling any significantly large subpopulation from a country either through scattering that population or massacring that population ... is settler-colonialism |
m Prejudice is the most obviously-bad thing there is |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol class="hue clean"> | <noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol class="hue clean"> | ||
</li><li class="field_anarchy" data-qid="50,65" value="5065" data-dimension="F2">Prejudice is the most obviously-bad thing there is / Not doing prejudice is the most obvious thing there is / Prejudice is the most obvious sin / Prejudice is the ultimate sin (claim about obviousness or senselessness) | |||
</li><li class="field_nations" data-tradition="MX onto PT" data-qid="24,51" value="2451" data-dimension="S2">Prejudices are not obviously bad / It is not inherently obvious to everybody in an equal way through an equal path that prejudices are bad -> the claim that it is difficult to realize prejudices are bad, even if they are bad. most prejudices that center-Liberals would consider "good" are not obvious as prejudices unless you look closely, but they sure do exist.<br /> | </li><li class="field_nations" data-tradition="MX onto PT" data-qid="24,51" value="2451" data-dimension="S2">Prejudices are not obviously bad / It is not inherently obvious to everybody in an equal way through an equal path that prejudices are bad -> the claim that it is difficult to realize prejudices are bad, even if they are bad. most prejudices that center-Liberals would consider "good" are not obvious as prejudices unless you look closely, but they sure do exist.<br /> | ||
some Existentialist theories like poststructuralism and schizoanalysis appear to believe this. there are different ways to cast this proposition: MX) prejudices are not obviously bad, so it is not possible to simply convince everyone prejudices being bad is obvious and have that be the truth because it will never be obvious. you need to convince people of something that actually includes prejudices being impossible to operate on directly. W) prejudices are not obviously bad, so we all need to force each other to question prejudices and force everyone to believe prejudices are bad no matter how much effort it takes.<br /> | some Existentialist theories like poststructuralism and schizoanalysis appear to believe this. there are different ways to cast this proposition: MX) prejudices are not obviously bad, so it is not possible to simply convince everyone prejudices being bad is obvious and have that be the truth because it will never be obvious. you need to convince people of something that actually includes prejudices being impossible to operate on directly. W) prejudices are not obviously bad, so we all need to force each other to question prejudices and force everyone to believe prejudices are bad no matter how much effort it takes.<br /> | ||
you can see the shovel dreams unraveling. typical Gramscians aren't actually relying on the solid, material regeneration of any substrate of a workers' state, they're just [[E:Idealism|I-believe-that-everybodying]] people. | you can see the shovel dreams unraveling. typical Gramscians aren't actually relying on the solid, material regeneration of any substrate of a workers' state, they're just [[E:Idealism|I-believe-that-everybodying]] people. | ||
</li></ol> | </li></ol> | ||
Latest revision as of 12:10, 30 December 2025
Prototype notes
- Prejudice is the most obviously-bad thing there is / Not doing prejudice is the most obvious thing there is / Prejudice is the most obvious sin / Prejudice is the ultimate sin (claim about obviousness or senselessness)
- Prejudices are not obviously bad / It is not inherently obvious to everybody in an equal way through an equal path that prejudices are bad -> the claim that it is difficult to realize prejudices are bad, even if they are bad. most prejudices that center-Liberals would consider "good" are not obvious as prejudices unless you look closely, but they sure do exist.
some Existentialist theories like poststructuralism and schizoanalysis appear to believe this. there are different ways to cast this proposition: MX) prejudices are not obviously bad, so it is not possible to simply convince everyone prejudices being bad is obvious and have that be the truth because it will never be obvious. you need to convince people of something that actually includes prejudices being impossible to operate on directly. W) prejudices are not obviously bad, so we all need to force each other to question prejudices and force everyone to believe prejudices are bad no matter how much effort it takes.
you can see the shovel dreams unraveling. typical Gramscians aren't actually relying on the solid, material regeneration of any substrate of a workers' state, they're just I-believe-that-everybodying people.
Related[edit]
- Colonialism is common sense / To ordinary people, colonialism is the accepted and intuitive way of doing things in the same sense that Liberal "democracy" is, almost to the point that criticizing it is unreasonably extreme / (9k/Q29,83)