User:RD/9k/Q42,76: Difference between revisions
copy markup from 9k/Q19,08 |
Color revolutions are revolutions (Liberal-republicanism) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
{{li|I=S2/ES|Q=42,76|Q2=4276}}"Color revolutions" are revolutions / Color revolutions are revolutions (Liberal-republicanism, Existentialism) -> metaphysical statement about the overall category of {{em|all revolutions}} including workers' movements. not a statement specifically about workers' movements.<br/> | {{li|I=S2/ES|Q=42,76|Q2=4276}}"Color revolutions" are revolutions / Color revolutions are revolutions (Liberal-republicanism, Existentialism) -> metaphysical statement about the overall category of {{em|all revolutions}} including workers' movements. not a statement specifically about workers' movements.<br/> | ||
"Color revolutions" are revolutions + ?? = Color revolutions can be models for resisting Toryism. | "Color revolutions" are revolutions + ?? = Color revolutions can be models for resisting Toryism. | ||
{{li|I=S2/ES|Q=42,76|Q2=4276}}Color revolutions are revolutions -> it makes more sense for the statement in the positive to be the proposition. in general having propositions that are said confidently enough that they could be clearly false is a good proposition construction because it makes it easy to decide whether propositions should be marked F2 or not | |||
{{li|I=S2/MX|Q=42,76|Q2=4276}}"Color revolutions" aren't revolutions (meta-Marxism; metaphysical statement) -> this is false when you define revolution as a regime change, and true when you accept "Revolution cannot be exported" as part of the actual definition of revolution. I'm not totally sure which one of these I subscribe to. I know color revolutions aren't good but I don't know if that means they are or aren't revolutions. | {{li|I=S2/MX|Q=42,76|Q2=4276}}"Color revolutions" aren't revolutions (meta-Marxism; metaphysical statement) -> this is false when you define revolution as a regime change, and true when you accept "Revolution cannot be exported" as part of the actual definition of revolution. I'm not totally sure which one of these I subscribe to. I know color revolutions aren't good but I don't know if that means they are or aren't revolutions. | ||
Revision as of 19:54, 9 March 2026
Main entry
- "Color revolutions" are revolutions / Color revolutions are revolutions (Liberal-republicanism, Existentialism) -> metaphysical statement about the overall category of all revolutions including workers' movements. not a statement specifically about workers' movements.
"Color revolutions" are revolutions + ?? = Color revolutions can be models for resisting Toryism. - Color revolutions are revolutions -> it makes more sense for the statement in the positive to be the proposition. in general having propositions that are said confidently enough that they could be clearly false is a good proposition construction because it makes it easy to decide whether propositions should be marked F2 or not
- "Color revolutions" aren't revolutions (meta-Marxism; metaphysical statement) -> this is false when you define revolution as a regime change, and true when you accept "Revolution cannot be exported" as part of the actual definition of revolution. I'm not totally sure which one of these I subscribe to. I know color revolutions aren't good but I don't know if that means they are or aren't revolutions.
Motifs or claims
Ideologies
- (none)