Jump to content

User:RD/9k/Q28,85: Difference between revisions

From LithoGraphica
Reversedragon (talk | contribs)
m to each according to his work (Toryism)
Reversedragon (talk | contribs)
m State and Revolution / formatting
Line 1: Line 1:
<!-- == Ontology entry ==
{{NextNineThousand|PPPA=to each according to his work|User=RD|E=Q28,85|Contents=y}}
{{HueNumberPreview|E=Q28,85}}
== Motif ==
{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean">


-->== Motif ==
{{li|start=y|I=S1/ML|Q=28,85|Q2=28,85}}to each according to his work  ->  this always stuck out at me as odd because of the way it's exactly how markets work. I don't have any moral issues with it, but I find it theoretically confusing.
<noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol class="hue clean">
{{li|I=S1/ML|Q=28,85|Q2=28,85}}in Bolshevism there is no absolute equality / absolute equalitarianism is the product of a small peasant economy; (in Bolshevism) there can be no absolute equality (Mao) [https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/volume-1/mswv1_5.htm#s4]
 
<li class="field_ML" data-qid="28,85" value="2885" data-dimension="S">to each according to his work  ->  this always stuck out at me as odd because of the way it's exactly how markets work. I don't have any moral issues with it, but I find it theoretically confusing.
<li class="field_ML" data-qid="28,85" value="2885" data-dimension="S">in Bolshevism there is no absolute equality / absolute equalitarianism is the product of a small peasant economy; (in Bolshevism) there can be no absolute equality (Mao) [https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/volume-1/mswv1_5.htm#s4]


</li></ol>
</li></ol>
Line 14: Line 12:
<ol class="hue clean">
<ol class="hue clean">


<li data-qid="19,20" value="1920" class="field_ML" data-dimension="Z"><cite>[[Ontology:Q1920|The State and Revolution]]</cite> (Lenin 1918/1920)  ->  motif appears in chapter 5. [https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1917/staterev/ch05.htm]
{{li|start=y|I=Z1/ML|Q=19,20|Q2=19,20}}<cite>[[Ontology:Q1920|The State and Revolution]]</cite> (Lenin 1918/1920) / ([[User:RD/9k/Q19,20|9k]])  ->  motif appears in chapter 5. [https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1917/staterev/ch05.htm]


</li><li data-qid="19,29" value="1929" class="field_ML" data-dimension="Z">{{book|On correcting mistaken ideas in the party}} (Mao 1929) [https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/volume-1/mswv1_5.htm#s4]
{{li|I=Z1/ML|Q=19,29|Q2=19,29}}{{book|On correcting mistaken ideas in the party}} (Mao 1929) [https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/volume-1/mswv1_5.htm#s4]


</li></ol>
</li></ol>
Line 24: Line 22:
<ol class="hue clean">
<ol class="hue clean">


</li><li class="field_nations" data-qid="28,83" value="2883" data-dimension="F2">Wealth gets rid of poverty / to each according to his work (Toryism)
{{li|start=y|I=F2/PT|Q=28,83|Q2=2883}}Wealth gets rid of poverty / to each according to his work (Toryism)


</li></ol>
</li></ol>
Line 33: Line 31:




[[Category:Next nine thousand (RD)]] {{NextNineThousand|PPPA=to each according to his work|User=RD|E=Q28,85}} <!-- page ends here.  TTS-unfriendly numbers incoming
[[Category:Next nine thousand (RD)]]  <!-- page ends here.  TTS-unfriendly numbers incoming
redirects:  [[User:RD/9k/Q2885]]
redirects:  [[User:RD/9k/Q2885]]
duplication hint:  copy markup from [[Special:PermanentLink/11770|9k/Q28,85]] -->
duplication hint:  copy markup from [[Special:PermanentLink/NNNN|9k/Q28,85]] -->

Revision as of 00:17, 19 March 2026

Motif

  1. to each according to his work -> this always stuck out at me as odd because of the way it's exactly how markets work. I don't have any moral issues with it, but I find it theoretically confusing.
  2. in Bolshevism there is no absolute equality / absolute equalitarianism is the product of a small peasant economy; (in Bolshevism) there can be no absolute equality (Mao) [1]

Appearances

  1. The State and Revolution (Lenin 1918/1920) / (9k) -> motif appears in chapter 5. [2]
  2. On correcting mistaken ideas in the party (Mao 1929) [3]

Rival statements

  1. Wealth gets rid of poverty / to each according to his work (Toryism)

Ideology codes

  • (none)