Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q50,45: Difference between revisions
copy markup from 9k/Q290 |
m I think, therefore I am |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{NextNineThousand|PPPA=|User=RD|E=Q50,45}} | {{NextNineThousand|PPPA=|User=RD|E=Q50,45|Contents=y}} | ||
== Main entry == | == Main entry == | ||
{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean"> | {{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean"> | ||
{{li|start=y|I=S2/ES|class=field_exstruct field_LGBT|Q=50,45|Q2=5045|h4 = I think therefore I'm trans }} / Transgender people think therefore transgender people are -> this is the crux of my problem with current theories on gender identity. this Cartesian construction was overturned for crusty old White men within their own groups' philosophers so it seems strange we should be using it for anyone else.<br/> | |||
"I think, therefore I am" + gender identity = this. | "I think, therefore I am" + gender identity = this. | ||
| Line 10: | Line 9: | ||
== Related == | == Related == | ||
<ol class="hue clean"> | <ol class="hue clean"> | ||
</li></ol | |||
<li class="field_geo" data-qid="50,42" value="5042" data-dimension="S2">I think, therefore I am / The writer cannot be the writer's hallucination / The writer cannot be a proposition inaccurate to reality -> classic, famous proposition used by Descartes as a basic axiom. one good argument against it is that by Gödel's incompleteness theorem no computer or logic book can reason about the actual computer or things outside the computer and certainly be correct. there's always a causal separation between computer, brain, or logic book and reality itself in the sense that one can say physics "is" the separation between objects. | |||
</li></ol> | |||
== Ideology codes == | == Ideology codes == | ||
Revision as of 08:38, 5 April 2026
Main entry
I think therefore I'm trans
/ Transgender people think therefore transgender people are -> this is the crux of my problem with current theories on gender identity. this Cartesian construction was overturned for crusty old White men within their own groups' philosophers so it seems strange we should be using it for anyone else.
"I think, therefore I am" + gender identity = this.
Related
- I think, therefore I am / The writer cannot be the writer's hallucination / The writer cannot be a proposition inaccurate to reality -> classic, famous proposition used by Descartes as a basic axiom. one good argument against it is that by Gödel's incompleteness theorem no computer or logic book can reason about the actual computer or things outside the computer and certainly be correct. there's always a causal separation between computer, brain, or logic book and reality itself in the sense that one can say physics "is" the separation between objects.
Ideology codes
- (none)