Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q618-GovernanceOfChinaXi: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 05:21, 8 April 2026

Only when the foundational principles of socialism are abandoned our system would no longer be socialist (Xi Jinping) [2] / Departing from or abandoning Marxism, the party would lose its soul and direction ... we should not waver under any circumstances (Xi Jinping)
By absorbing the best of other countries our system will become the best in the world (Xi Jinping) [3] -> that's... worrying. it seems to be presenting all republics as made of ideas rather than material structures, full stop.
traffic must be controlled with a traffic light (Xi Jinping) -> oh my god actual evidence Wolff got his ideas from China. I thought I was making a shot in the dark on that one
The global economy is the great ocean from which you cannot escape; any attempt to channel the waters of the ocean back into isolated lakes and creeks (trade barriers, sanctions, protectionism) is simply not possible, and runs counter to the historical trend -> is. is this one orange? this is like the first time I have ever seen a genuine material attempt at a workers' state both try to build a global economy and also claim that it's socialism. ugly revisionist theory justifications aside, they have done more to construct Trotskyism than Trotsky or Grant as far as I'm concerned

primary stage of socialism (Deng Xiaoping Thought) / primary phase of socialism
Building socialism inside one country is impossible -> it is... a real achievement to claim you're doing the most practical Marxism and then accidentally paraphrase Trotsky.

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 {{li|I=S1/DX|Q=618}}traffic must be controlled with a traffic light (Xi Jinping)  ->  oh my god actual evidence Wolff got his ideas from China. I thought I was making a shot in the dark on that one
+{{li|I=S2/IV|tradition=DX onto IV|Q=618|volume=2|pp=521}}The global economy is the great ocean from which you cannot escape; any attempt to channel the waters of the ocean back into isolated lakes and creeks (trade barriers, sanctions, protectionism) is simply not possible, and runs counter to the historical trend  ->  is. is this one orange? this is like the first time I have ever seen a genuine material attempt at a workers' state both try to build a global economy and also {{em|claim}} that it's socialism. ugly revisionist theory justifications aside, they {{em|have}} done more to construct Trotskyism than Trotsky or Grant as far as I'm concerned
 </li></ol>
@@ Line 28: / Line 30: @@
 {{li|start=y|I=S1/DX|Q=36,99|Q2=3699|work=TheEastStillRed|chapter=0}}primary stage of socialism (Deng Xiaoping Thought) / primary phase of socialism
+{{li|I=S2/IV|tradition=IV|Q=618}}Building socialism inside one country is impossible  ->  it is... a real achievement to claim you're doing the most practical Marxism and then {{em|accidentally}} paraphrase Trotsky.
 </li></ol>