Jump to content

Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q14,80: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From LithoGraphica
Reversedragon (talk | contribs)
m Social darwinism and class society are a monistic process
Reversedragon (talk | contribs)
m All life is semiotic (Eduardo Kohn)
Line 9: Line 9:
<ol class="hue clean">
<ol class="hue clean">


{{li|I=S2/MX|Q=14,81|Q2=1481}}Social darwinism and class society are a monistic process / Social darwinism and class society are one continuous thing without a sharp boundary for where each of them begins and ends  ->  this is related to but not the same as the hypothesis that once societies become capitalist all classes or class territories are all just different 'windings' of a single monistic substance. that one is the 'noun', this one is the 'verb'.
{{li|start=y|I=S2/MX|Q=14,81|Q2=1481}}Social darwinism and class society are a monistic process / Social darwinism and class society are one continuous thing without a sharp boundary for where each of them begins and ends  ->  this is related to but not the same as the hypothesis that once societies become capitalist all classes or class territories are all just different 'windings' of a single monistic substance. that one is the 'noun', this one is the 'verb'.


</li></ol>
</li></ol>


== Related ==
== Related ==
<!-- <ol class="hue clean">
<ol class="hue clean">
</li></ol> -->
 
{{li|start=y|I=S1/MX|Q=14,84|Q2=1484}}chunk competition (motif; meta-Marxism) / all-directional contradiction between individuals / chunk competition across the spatial slot hierarchy / ([[EC:9k/RD/Q14,84|9k]])
 
{{li|I=S2/A|Q=618}}All life is semiotic and all semiosis is alive (Eduardo Kohn) / ([[EC:9k/RD/Q618-SecularAnimism|9k]])  ->  ... I think the first part is wrong and the second part is right.
{{li|I=S2/A|Q=618}}All life is semiotic (Eduardo Kohn) / ([[EC:9k/RD/Q618-SecularAnimism|9k]])  ->  ... this is so frustrating, because it's like the relationship between Marx and Hegel. ... they are convinced that the universe and nature evolve through language and arbitrary linguistic assignments of things to other things. when that just isn't how it works, things have physical structure that is contained in them as unique separable identifiable countable objects or repetitions of the same identifiable countable object, and the contents of that repeated pattern evolve through the interaction of two or more repeated patterns to produce one or two further repeated patterns. naïve dialectical materialism; one-step dialectical materialism; wave-machine logic.</br>
... the position of each die and the side it's currently on changes in response to the current position, velocity, and rotation of the other die about to hit it. for any given state vector of each die "x" and "y", <code>f(x,y) = z</code>. that's it. two objects, the dice or state vectors, are separate, and then you put them together, and you calculate what happens. ... it's all about countably separate objects being able to interact because they are separate. you don't even really have to make reference to the content of the objects. it's there, it interacts by default, but sometimes it doesn't produce anything interesting. ...<br/>
the Existentialist-Structuralist tradition. where causation is described by structuralist linguistics, a.k.a. the existence of two opposed words that "mean" different evolving things, and causality inside causation is described by existentialism.
 
</li></ol>


<!--
<!--

Revision as of 00:33, 21 April 2026

Main entries

  1. The class structure of the United States is monistic -> see below propositions for what this means.
  2. Social darwinism and class society are a monistic process

Monistic chunk competition

  1. Social darwinism and class society are a monistic process / Social darwinism and class society are one continuous thing without a sharp boundary for where each of them begins and ends -> this is related to but not the same as the hypothesis that once societies become capitalist all classes or class territories are all just different 'windings' of a single monistic substance. that one is the 'noun', this one is the 'verb'.

Related

  1. chunk competition (motif; meta-Marxism) / all-directional contradiction between individuals / chunk competition across the spatial slot hierarchy / (9k)
  2. All life is semiotic and all semiosis is alive (Eduardo Kohn) / (9k) -> ... I think the first part is wrong and the second part is right.
  3. All life is semiotic (Eduardo Kohn) / (9k) -> ... this is so frustrating, because it's like the relationship between Marx and Hegel. ... they are convinced that the universe and nature evolve through language and arbitrary linguistic assignments of things to other things. when that just isn't how it works, things have physical structure that is contained in them as unique separable identifiable countable objects or repetitions of the same identifiable countable object, and the contents of that repeated pattern evolve through the interaction of two or more repeated patterns to produce one or two further repeated patterns. naïve dialectical materialism; one-step dialectical materialism; wave-machine logic.
    ... the position of each die and the side it's currently on changes in response to the current position, velocity, and rotation of the other die about to hit it. for any given state vector of each die "x" and "y", f(x,y) = z. that's it. two objects, the dice or state vectors, are separate, and then you put them together, and you calculate what happens. ... it's all about countably separate objects being able to interact because they are separate. you don't even really have to make reference to the content of the objects. it's there, it interacts by default, but sometimes it doesn't produce anything interesting. ...
    the Existentialist-Structuralist tradition. where causation is described by structuralist linguistics, a.k.a. the existence of two opposed words that "mean" different evolving things, and causality inside causation is described by existentialism.

Ideologies or fields

  • (none)