Jump to content

Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q618-AgainstAvakianismAjith: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From LithoGraphica
Reversedragon (talk | contribs)
copy markup from Q618-AgainstAvakianismAjith
 
Reversedragon (talk | contribs)
The resolution of social contradictions is a kind of inevitability
Line 1: Line 1:
{{NextNineThousand|PPPA=Against Avakianism|User=RD|E=Q618|Contents=y}}
{{NextNineThousand|PPPA=Against Avakianism|User=RD|E=Q618|Contents=y}}
== Main entry ==
== Main entry ==
{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean">
{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean field_ML">


{{li|start=y|I=Z1/ML|Q=618|Q2=618}}{{book|Against Avakianism}} [https://www.bannedthought.net/USA/RCP/CriticismOfRCP/Ajith-AgainstAvakianism-Utrecht-FLP-2017-3rdPrinting.pdf]
{{li|start=y|I=Z1/ML|class=field_ML field_mao|Q=618|Q2=618}}{{book|Against Avakianism}} [https://www.bannedthought.net/USA/RCP/CriticismOfRCP/Ajith-AgainstAvakianism-Utrecht-FLP-2017-3rdPrinting.pdf]


</li></ol>
</li></ol>


== Motifs or claims ==
== Motifs or claims ==
<!--
<ol class="hue clean field_ML">
<ol class="hue clean">
 
{{li|start=y|I=S2/HAS|Q=618|Q2=618}}
{{li|start=y|I=S2/MZ|class=field_ML field_mao|Q=618}}The resolution of social contradictions is a kind of inevitability; the action of necessity inside contradictions produces particular results under particular conditions unless stopped  ->  this sounds like a form of [[E:relativistic determinism (meta-Marxism)|determinism]] to me. I am not sure why this book is against determinism and thinks just bringing up 'determinism' is an insult when necessity and determinism should functionally be [[E:necessity (mathematics)|the same thing]].
</li></ol> -->
 
</li></ol>


== Subjective themes ==
== Subjective themes ==

Revision as of 04:58, 27 April 2026

Main entry

  1. Against Avakianism [1]

Motifs or claims

  1. The resolution of social contradictions is a kind of inevitability; the action of necessity inside contradictions produces particular results under particular conditions unless stopped -> this sounds like a form of determinism to me. I am not sure why this book is against determinism and thinks just bringing up 'determinism' is an insult when necessity and determinism should functionally be the same thing.

Subjective themes

Related

Ideologies or fields

  • (none)