User:NickelBank/YT/CynicalArtKillingHope26: Difference between revisions
m Reversedragon moved page User:NickelBank/YT/SXNanAMWgE8 to User:NickelBank/YT/CynicalArtKillingHope26: Moving numbered Item to TTS-pronounceable title |
Ideology is Idealism unexamined |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
== Motifs or claims == | == Motifs or claims == | ||
<ol class="hue clean reset"> | <ol class="hue clean reset"> | ||
{{li|I=S2/ES|Q=618}}Cynical art is killing our ability to imagine hopeful futures {{YouTube|SXNanAMWgE8}} | |||
{{li|I=S1/ES|Q=618}}all I see in the news is power and domination over others {{YouTube|SXNanAMWgE8}} | |||
{{li|I=S1/ES|Q=618}}I can never be a great man of the realm because I can never live up to who greatness is supposed to belong to {{YouTube|SXNanAMWgE8}} -> there is a lot to say about this. when you read enough enough Communist texts you realize that the point of "great men", in terms of experts without equal, is to accomplish something and fade away. their purpose is to do something that will not need to be done again. if history were operating efficiently, their purpose is to abolish themselves and cease to have their position. even Stalin and Mao wanted a world where they would not be needed, while Trotsky struggling to stay relevant was a mistake. history operates in a number of steps which complete and then are done and give way to different steps unless the previous steps unravel, completed in no consistent order but always completed according to the same unordered checklist. the great lie of capitalism is to claim that great men are needed perpetually. every single one of them is operating as inefficiently as possible and accomplishing absolutely nothing. creative destruction was precisely an admission that none of the things created are actually creating anything and all of it is one big waste. so, no, you don't have to feel bad about not being the next "great man". but I am not sure you have the right reasons. | |||
{{li|I=S1/ES|Q=618}}not good enough to be a true writer of this kingdom / comparing status as director or script writer to feudal nobility {{YouTube|SXNanAMWgE8}} -> wow! this is like a practical example of Engels framing ideology as the use of distorted conceptual models unexamined. you have a recognition that writers can be a ruling class fighting over something (the kingdom, the "market"), and then a failure to realize the analogy is literal. | |||
{{li|I=S2/ES|Q=618}}Getting rid of center-Liberalism is telling a better story {{YouTube|SXNanAMWgE8}} | |||
{{li|I=S1/ES|Q=618}}anarchism and eucatastrophe | |||
</li></ol> | </li></ol> | ||
== Subjective themes == | == Subjective themes == | ||
<ol class="hue clean reset"> | <ol class="hue clean reset"> | ||
{{li|I=S2/ML|Q=618}}Ideology is Idealism unexamined / Ideology — a distorted model of reality usually for the benefit of a particular class — comes out of conceptual models of the world ("concept-material", ontologies) specifically when considered in isolation from the world, according to processes not obvious to the people creating ideology (Engels) [https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1886/ludwig-feuerbach/ch04.htm] | |||
</li></ol> | </li></ol> | ||
Revision as of 09:05, 27 April 2026
Cynical Art Is Killing Our Ability to Imagine Hopeful Futures
- channel
-
⧼hue-ins-domain-spacer/⧽Jessie Gender
(purported philosophical field)1-1-1 - author pronoun
- she/her
- field, scope, or group [Item]
Links
- Original video: [1]
Nickel usage or significance
- (add later)
Usage notes
- (none)
Motifs or claims
- Cynical art is killing our ability to imagine hopeful futures [2]
- all I see in the news is power and domination over others [3]
- I can never be a great man of the realm because I can never live up to who greatness is supposed to belong to [4] -> there is a lot to say about this. when you read enough enough Communist texts you realize that the point of "great men", in terms of experts without equal, is to accomplish something and fade away. their purpose is to do something that will not need to be done again. if history were operating efficiently, their purpose is to abolish themselves and cease to have their position. even Stalin and Mao wanted a world where they would not be needed, while Trotsky struggling to stay relevant was a mistake. history operates in a number of steps which complete and then are done and give way to different steps unless the previous steps unravel, completed in no consistent order but always completed according to the same unordered checklist. the great lie of capitalism is to claim that great men are needed perpetually. every single one of them is operating as inefficiently as possible and accomplishing absolutely nothing. creative destruction was precisely an admission that none of the things created are actually creating anything and all of it is one big waste. so, no, you don't have to feel bad about not being the next "great man". but I am not sure you have the right reasons.
- not good enough to be a true writer of this kingdom / comparing status as director or script writer to feudal nobility [5] -> wow! this is like a practical example of Engels framing ideology as the use of distorted conceptual models unexamined. you have a recognition that writers can be a ruling class fighting over something (the kingdom, the "market"), and then a failure to realize the analogy is literal.
- Getting rid of center-Liberalism is telling a better story [6]
- anarchism and eucatastrophe
Subjective themes
- Ideology is Idealism unexamined / Ideology — a distorted model of reality usually for the benefit of a particular class — comes out of conceptual models of the world ("concept-material", ontologies) specifically when considered in isolation from the world, according to processes not obvious to the people creating ideology (Engels) [7]