Jump to content

Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q778: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From LithoGraphica
Newer edit →
Reversedragon (talk | contribs)
Bureaucrats, Conference pass, Interface administrators, Arts-aligned editors, Crimson-aligned editors, Violet-aligned editors, Administrators
14,904 edits
copy markup from 9k/Q697
 
Reversedragon (talk | contribs)
Bureaucrats, Conference pass, Interface administrators, Arts-aligned editors, Crimson-aligned editors, Violet-aligned editors, Administrators
14,904 edits
m formatting
Line 2: Line 2:
== Main entry ==
== Main entry ==
{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean">
{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean">
<!-- {{li|start=y|I=S1/ML|Q=697|Q2=697|h4=}} -->


</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="778" data-dimension="S">freedom (top-level category)  ->  one of the only terms worse than [[E:Q777|free will]] in terms of how many definitions it has. genuinely don't use this except to list the category on category pages
{{li|start=y|I=S1/ES|tradition=LR, IK, ES, A|Q=778|Q2=778|h4= freedom }} (top-level category)  ->  one of the only terms worse than [[E:Q777|free will]] in terms of how many definitions it has. genuinely don't use this Item except to list the category on category pages
{{li|start=y|I=S1/ES|Q=778|Q2=778}}freedom  ->  tradition: {{a|E=Liberal-republicanism}} (LR), {{a|E=Kantianism}} (IK), {{a|E=Existentialist-Structuralist tradition}} (ES), {{a|E=anarchism}} (A)<br/>
any philosophy can {{em|talk about}} this concept, obviously, but these are the main ones that popularized it or insist on it


</li></ol>
</li></ol>
Line 13: Line 14:


== Freedom and Habermasian logic ==
== Freedom and Habermasian logic ==
<ol class="hue clean">
<ol class="hue clean terse">
{{li|start=y
|I=S1/HAS/PT|Q=579|Q2=579|h4= unfitting action }} (truth value) / vicious individual action
{{li|I=S1/HM/PT|Q=575|Q2=575|h4= does not promote freedom }} (truth value)


</li><li class="field_nations"  value="579" data-dimension="S">unfitting action (truth value) / vicious individual action
{{li|I=S1/HAS|Q=580|Q2=580|h4= fitting action }} (truth value) / virtuous individual action
</li><li class="field_nations"  value="575" data-dimension="S">does not promote freedom (truth value)
{{li|I=S1/HM/A |Q=576|Q2=576|h4= promotes freedom }} (truth value)
</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="580" data-dimension="S">fitting action (truth value) / virtuous individual action
</li><li class="field_anarchy"  value="576" data-dimension="S">promotes freedom (truth value)


</li></ol>
</li></ol>

Revision as of 06:08, 8 May 2026

Main entry

  1. freedom

    (top-level category) -> one of the only terms worse than free will in terms of how many definitions it has. genuinely don't use this Item except to list the category on category pages
  2. freedom -> tradition: Liberal-republicanism (LR), Kantianism (IK), Existentialist-Structuralist tradition (ES), anarchism (A)
    any philosophy can talk about this concept, obviously, but these are the main ones that popularized it or insist on it

Definitions of freedom

Freedom and Habermasian logic

  1. unfitting action

    (truth value) / vicious individual action

  2. does not promote freedom

    (truth value)

  3. fitting action

    (truth value) / virtuous individual action

  4. promotes freedom

    (truth value)

Related

Ideology codes

  • (none)
Retrieved from "https://research.moraleconomy.au/index.php?title=Ontology_talk:9k/RD/Q778&oldid=43044"