Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q41,89: Difference between revisions
copy markup from 9k/Q697 |
did not / did ; created today |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
{{li|start=y|I=S1/IV|Q=618}}monolithic Bolshevik Party [https://www.marxists.org/archive/grant/1969/lat/2.htm] -> <s>they keep saying this. I have no idea what it is.</s> | {{li|start=y|I=S1/IV|Q=618}}monolithic Bolshevik Party [https://www.marxists.org/archive/grant/1969/lat/2.htm] -> <s>they keep saying this. I have no idea what it is.</s> | ||
{{li|I=S1/IV/ML|Q=618}}monolithic Bolshevik Party [https://www.wsws.org/en/special/library/fi-20-1/05.html] -> so apparently, "the monolithic Bolshevik Party" is a model where the Bolshevik Party contained one tendency of Marxism-Leninism rather than two would-be parties of mainstream Marxism-Leninism and Trotskyism that were slowly forming the whole time since around maybe 1906. ok, I'll let them have that one, because I've actually taken that position too. it's hard to explain why exactly Trotskyism came to exist and why it picked up across multiple countries even slowly if the CPSU really was "monolithic". | {{li|I=S1/IV/ML|Q=618}}monolithic Bolshevik Party [https://www.wsws.org/en/special/library/fi-20-1/05.html] -> so apparently, "the monolithic Bolshevik Party" is a model where the Bolshevik Party contained one tendency of Marxism-Leninism rather than two would-be parties of mainstream Marxism-Leninism and Trotskyism that were slowly forming the whole time since around maybe 1906. ok, I'll let them have that one, because I've actually taken that position too. it's hard to explain why exactly Trotskyism came to exist and why it picked up across multiple countries even slowly if the CPSU really was "monolithic". | ||
</li></ol> | |||
== Did not == | |||
<ol class="hue clean"> | |||
{{li|start=y|I=S2/IV/ML|tradition=IV onto ML|Q=41,90|Q2=4190}}The Bolshevik Party {{em|did not}} contain a second tendency of Trotskyists and was primarily defined by a group of Stalin-followers / monolithic Bolshevik Party (motif) [https://www.marxists.org/archive/grant/1969/lat/2.htm] [https://www.wsws.org/en/special/library/fi-20-1/05.html] -> this is specifically the claim made by Trotskyists in their works {{em|about what "Stalinists" believe}}. | |||
{{li|I=S1/IV/ML|Q=618}}establishing Trotskyism as an alien and distinct political philosophy from Leninism / establishing Trotskyism as an alien and distinct political philosophy hostile to Leninism (Alan Woods; {{abbr|IV|tts=Trotskyism}} onto {{abbr|UM|tts=unknown Marxism}}) [https://www.marxists.org/archive/grant/1969/lat/1.htm] -> I think this is rather necessary minus the "hostile" part. is Trotskyism hostile to Leninism? no. they talk about forming Leninist parties with a limited kind of formal state power quite a bit, and they occasionally talk about supporting strawberry countries or non-Marxist 'socialist' programs in the Third World. they are not hostile to Marxist parties but they are definitely distinct from Stalin's Marxism to the point you really do almost have to separate them back at the very beginning of when they appear, circa 1906. | |||
</li></ol> | |||
== Did == | |||
<ol class="hue clean"> | |||
{{li|start=y|I=S2/IV|tradition=IV, IV onto ML, MX|Q=41,89|Q2=4189}}The Bolshevik Party contained a second tendency of Trotskyists, which was actually its first tendency and the first form of Leninism in the Soviet Union region (Trotskyism) / The Bolshevik Party contained a second tendency of Trotskyists, which was not necessarily distinguishable from Stalin's Marxism in 1900, but starting circa 1906 slowly differentiated into a second Communist party such that by 1936 the Soviet Union effectively had two Communist parties crammed into one central party-nation (meta-Marxism) -> this is the claim that would be the opposite of Q41,90, with all its connotations or subtext taken into account. | |||
</li></ol> | </li></ol> | ||
Revision as of 06:59, 14 May 2026
Main entries
- monolithic Bolshevik Party [1] ->
they keep saying this. I have no idea what it is. - monolithic Bolshevik Party [2] -> so apparently, "the monolithic Bolshevik Party" is a model where the Bolshevik Party contained one tendency of Marxism-Leninism rather than two would-be parties of mainstream Marxism-Leninism and Trotskyism that were slowly forming the whole time since around maybe 1906. ok, I'll let them have that one, because I've actually taken that position too. it's hard to explain why exactly Trotskyism came to exist and why it picked up across multiple countries even slowly if the CPSU really was "monolithic".
Did not
- The Bolshevik Party did not contain a second tendency of Trotskyists and was primarily defined by a group of Stalin-followers / monolithic Bolshevik Party (motif) [3] [4] -> this is specifically the claim made by Trotskyists in their works about what "Stalinists" believe.
- establishing Trotskyism as an alien and distinct political philosophy from Leninism / establishing Trotskyism as an alien and distinct political philosophy hostile to Leninism (Alan Woods; onto ) [5] -> I think this is rather necessary minus the "hostile" part. is Trotskyism hostile to Leninism? no. they talk about forming Leninist parties with a limited kind of formal state power quite a bit, and they occasionally talk about supporting strawberry countries or non-Marxist 'socialist' programs in the Third World. they are not hostile to Marxist parties but they are definitely distinct from Stalin's Marxism to the point you really do almost have to separate them back at the very beginning of when they appear, circa 1906.
Did
- The Bolshevik Party contained a second tendency of Trotskyists, which was actually its first tendency and the first form of Leninism in the Soviet Union region (Trotskyism) / The Bolshevik Party contained a second tendency of Trotskyists, which was not necessarily distinguishable from Stalin's Marxism in 1900, but starting circa 1906 slowly differentiated into a second Communist party such that by 1936 the Soviet Union effectively had two Communist parties crammed into one central party-nation (meta-Marxism) -> this is the claim that would be the opposite of Q41,90, with all its connotations or subtext taken into account.
Related
Ideology codes
- (none)