Jump to content

Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q19,77: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From LithoGraphica
← Older edit
Reversedragon (talk | contribs)
Bureaucrats, Conference pass, Interface administrators, Arts-aligned editors, Crimson-aligned editors, Violet-aligned editors, Administrators
16,007 edits
Israeli houses are guilty / senses
Reversedragon (talk | contribs)
Bureaucrats, Conference pass, Interface administrators, Arts-aligned editors, Crimson-aligned editors, Violet-aligned editors, Administrators
16,007 edits
Zionism ; created two days ago
 
Line 33: Line 33:
{{li|I=S2/MX/JC|tradition=MX onto JC|Q=618|Q2=618}}Israeli houses are guilty / If Israel exploded, then good / If North Korea blew up all the {{em|buildings}} in Israel but somehow didn't kill a single human being, it would be a good decision that {{em|either}} improves life on earth or is ethical  ->  everything I hear about geopolitics is severely confusing to me on every level and I am constantly baffled as to why any of it matters. it all sounds like word salad. I feel like investigating this proposition is the closest I can come to ever understanding any of it.<br/>
{{li|I=S2/MX/JC|tradition=MX onto JC|Q=618|Q2=618}}Israeli houses are guilty / If Israel exploded, then good / If North Korea blew up all the {{em|buildings}} in Israel but somehow didn't kill a single human being, it would be a good decision that {{em|either}} improves life on earth or is ethical  ->  everything I hear about geopolitics is severely confusing to me on every level and I am constantly baffled as to why any of it matters. it all sounds like word salad. I feel like investigating this proposition is the closest I can come to ever understanding any of it.<br/>
like, if this was true, why would it be true? I don't understand any of the whys of anything that happens now. it all feels completely senseless and in some ways "unimportant". I can't explain the disconnect I feel between the prospect of Israelis wiping out Palestinians being horrible and the feeling I get every time anybody talks about the Palestine conflict that it's a totally unimportant discourse that doesn't matter and it's equivalent to Tories sweeping all issues off the table and making the only US political issue trans rights so people only debate trans people in bathrooms for the rest of human existence.
like, if this was true, why would it be true? I don't understand any of the whys of anything that happens now. it all feels completely senseless and in some ways "unimportant". I can't explain the disconnect I feel between the prospect of Israelis wiping out Palestinians being horrible and the feeling I get every time anybody talks about the Palestine conflict that it's a totally unimportant discourse that doesn't matter and it's equivalent to Tories sweeping all issues off the table and making the only US political issue trans rights so people only debate trans people in bathrooms for the rest of human existence.
{{li|I=S2/PT|tradition=|Q=618|Q2=618}}Zionism is the most effective progressive ideology / Because progressive ideologies are about people respecting each other as people and not violating each other's stated rights and freedoms nor taking the land of a group of people that inherently belongs to them (because taking a people's land is bad in and of itself), Zionism is the most effective progressive ideology because when a group of people simply assembles an army and blows up a lot of buildings everyone has to respect their rights and there can be no failure of anybody to be courteous and respectful to the shared human spirit  ->  you really don't want this to be true. but these days almost every definition of progressivism accidentally leads here because none of them are armored against it. want to declare genocide to be inherently bad? too bad, because unless you can change reality so that a population of people assembling an army and blowing up buildings isn't the single best way to prevent genocide, you're back at Zionism all over again as the best way to defend people's "inherent" human rights and what is "inherently" owed to people.<br/>
you can really only get out of this by abandoning morality and the concept morality is pegged to individual or small-scale actions as some kind of guide on whether they will happen. in lieu of morality, it becomes possible to build an amoral consequentialism which is simply {{em|the study of consequences}}. of course, this naturally generates statism, and that will make some people unhappy. the whole 'materialism = Communism = Stalin' thing is {{em|slightly}} true. it's not entirely true especially looking at all the connotations and baggage, but it is just true enough to make anarchists really upset.


</li></ol>
</li></ol>

Latest revision as of 13:23, 25 June 2026

Main entry

  1. Palestine conflict (1917-; history) -> so, people sometimes get a little upset when you mention Israel as a part of the Palestine conflict because they say it goes too far toward legitimizing Israel. I'm tired. I'm not here to argue about what's the correct way to say it. I have no real objections on dropping 'Israel' from this entry, given how this site isn't a social platform based on a capitalist owning an agora and I'm not going to get "demonetized and shadowbanned" just for saying the word Palestine instead of hiding it behind the word Israel. why not do it the other way? at least this way, it will be especially easy to visually distinguish the blue and khaki senses of this Item.
  2. Israel-Palestine conflict (1917-; global empire) [1]

Timeline

  1. Balfour declaration of 1917 [2] -> declaration which proposed Israel. Britain actually tried to be all 'tent of freedom poles' about it and claim there was a way to protect Palestinians at the same time as creating Israel. although we can see how that went.
  2. U.N. vote for two-state solution (Palestine; 1947) [3]
  3. Founding of Israel (1948)
  4. Arab-Israeli war of 1948 [4] / Israel independence war / Nakba
  5. expulsion of Jews to Israel (1949-1967) [5] [6]

Related

  1. Palestine is not complicated / (9k)
  2. metanarrative (philosophy) [7] -> this keeps getting brought up in Palestine discussions, because apparently people judge their entire conception of what history is by countries that have been involved in United States wars and other countries that don't serve the purpose of drawing a frame around the United States aren't important.
  3. Israeli houses are guilty / If Israel exploded, then good / If North Korea blew up all the buildings in Israel but somehow didn't kill a single human being, it would be a good decision that either improves life on earth or is ethical -> everything I hear about geopolitics is severely confusing to me on every level and I am constantly baffled as to why any of it matters. it all sounds like word salad. I feel like investigating this proposition is the closest I can come to ever understanding any of it.
    like, if this was true, why would it be true? I don't understand any of the whys of anything that happens now. it all feels completely senseless and in some ways "unimportant". I can't explain the disconnect I feel between the prospect of Israelis wiping out Palestinians being horrible and the feeling I get every time anybody talks about the Palestine conflict that it's a totally unimportant discourse that doesn't matter and it's equivalent to Tories sweeping all issues off the table and making the only US political issue trans rights so people only debate trans people in bathrooms for the rest of human existence.
  4. Zionism is the most effective progressive ideology / Because progressive ideologies are about people respecting each other as people and not violating each other's stated rights and freedoms nor taking the land of a group of people that inherently belongs to them (because taking a people's land is bad in and of itself), Zionism is the most effective progressive ideology because when a group of people simply assembles an army and blows up a lot of buildings everyone has to respect their rights and there can be no failure of anybody to be courteous and respectful to the shared human spirit -> you really don't want this to be true. but these days almost every definition of progressivism accidentally leads here because none of them are armored against it. want to declare genocide to be inherently bad? too bad, because unless you can change reality so that a population of people assembling an army and blowing up buildings isn't the single best way to prevent genocide, you're back at Zionism all over again as the best way to defend people's "inherent" human rights and what is "inherently" owed to people.
    you can really only get out of this by abandoning morality and the concept morality is pegged to individual or small-scale actions as some kind of guide on whether they will happen. in lieu of morality, it becomes possible to build an amoral consequentialism which is simply the study of consequences. of course, this naturally generates statism, and that will make some people unhappy. the whole 'materialism = Communism = Stalin' thing is slightly true. it's not entirely true especially looking at all the connotations and baggage, but it is just true enough to make anarchists really upset.

Wavebuilder combinations

pronounced P: pronounced Wave-builder: forms result [Item]
Immutable justice cannot exist if the borders of Palestine or Israel and the living conditions of the people inside can change
along with [Item]
Israel-Palestine conflict (pronounced proposed / PT)1-1-1
forming from [Item]
Israel-Palestine conflict (pronounced proposed / PT)1-1-1
immutable justice (pronounced proposed / A)1-1-1
Immutable justice cannot exist if the borders of Palestine or Israel and the living conditions of the people inside can change
pronounced P: pronounced Wave-builder: forms result [Item]
pronounced Israel (robot) (pronounced proposed / DFy)1-1-1
along with [Item]
Israel-Palestine conflict (pronounced proposed / PT)1-1-1
forming from [Item]
Israel-Palestine conflict (pronounced proposed / PT)1-1-1
Drawn Together (pronounced proposed / DFy)1-1-1
pronounced Israel (robot) (pronounced proposed / DFy)1-1-1

Ideologies or fields

  1. PT / global empire
  2. P4 / Zionism
  3. pronounced Hass / Israel
Retrieved from "https://research.moraleconomy.au/index.php?title=Ontology_talk:9k/RD/Q19,77&oldid=44267"