Jump to content

Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q618-UnitedStatesAndMonarchy: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From LithoGraphica
Reversedragon (talk | contribs)
Bureaucrats, Conference pass, Interface administrators, Arts-aligned editors, Crimson-aligned editors, Violet-aligned editors, Administrators
17,964 edits
copy markup from Q56,94
 
Reversedragon (talk | contribs)
Bureaucrats, Conference pass, Interface administrators, Arts-aligned editors, Crimson-aligned editors, Violet-aligned editors, Administrators
17,964 edits
monarchists as treacherous and pretended friends of United States
 
Line 3: Line 3:
{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean  {{int:hue-ixn-classname-DFy}}"><!-- inactive: {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ML}} -->
{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean  {{int:hue-ixn-classname-DFy}}"><!-- inactive: {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ML}} -->


{{li|start=y|I=S2/HAS|Q=618|Q2=618}}United States and monarchy
{{li|start=y|I=S2/HAS|Q=618|Q2=618}}United States and monarchy (1780)
 
{{li|I=S2/HAS|Q=618|Q2=618}}United States and capital-monarchy (2026)
 
</li></ol>
</li></ol>


== Related ==
== Related ==
<!--
<ol class="hue clean  {{int:hue-ixn-classname-DFy}}">
<ol class="hue clean  {{int:hue-ixn-classname-DFy}}">
</li></ol> -->
 
{{li|start=y|I=S1/HAS/PT|Q=618|Q2=618}}Roman dictators [https://csac.history.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/281/2024/04/DC1-02-01-03_Introduction-Monarchical-Tendencies-in-America.pdf]
 
{{li|I=S2/PT|Q=618|Q2=618}}Only absolute monarchy or a military state can rescue the United States (James M. Varnum 1782) [https://csac.history.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/281/2024/04/DC1-02-01-03_Introduction-Monarchical-Tendencies-in-America.pdf]  -> that's really funny. by now, a lot of people think the 1780s was the time when the United States was {{em|functional}}.<br/>
Washington didn't like this, even as that handful of army men wanted to crown him king.
 
{{li|I=S1/LR|Q=618|Q2=618}}monarchists as treacherous and pretended friends of United States (Civis, c.1782) [https://csac.history.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/281/2024/04/DC1-02-01-03_Introduction-Monarchical-Tendencies-in-America.pdf]  ->  that's getting very close to the concept of Tories trying to "steal back" England and getting their name, although it's not precisely the same because it doesn't make reference to parliament.
 
</li></ol>


== {{int:hue-prototype-trads-topics-or-genres}} ==
== {{int:hue-prototype-trads-topics-or-genres}} ==

Latest revision as of 10:28, 20 September 2026

Main entry

  1. United States and monarchy (1780)
  2. United States and capital-monarchy (2026)

Related

  1. Roman dictators [1]
  2. Only absolute monarchy or a military state can rescue the United States (James M. Varnum 1782) [2] -> that's really funny. by now, a lot of people think the 1780s was the time when the United States was functional.
    Washington didn't like this, even as that handful of army men wanted to crown him king.
  3. monarchists as treacherous and pretended friends of United States (Civis, c.1782) [3] -> that's getting very close to the concept of Tories trying to "steal back" England and getting their name, although it's not precisely the same because it doesn't make reference to parliament.

Ideologies, topics, or genres

  1. pronounced Hass / historical monarchies
  2. pronounced Hass / Roman Empire

Wavebuilder combinations

pronounced P: pronounced Wave-builder: forms result [Item]
--
along with [Item]
?? (pronounced proposed / Fy)1-1-1
forming from [Item]
?? (pronounced proposed / Fy)1-1-1
--
--

Subpages or related scraps

Retrieved from "https://research.moraleconomy.au/index.php?title=Ontology_talk:9k/RD/Q618-UnitedStatesAndMonarchy&oldid=46223"